This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Cobb. Not close
Yet many disagree considering I seen 10 startup FFPC drafts and Ryan Williams went ahead of Cobb in 8 of them 10 and some of them by 20-30 picks.
He offered it or not makes no difference. That's a horrible trade. A joke reallyHad this trade offered to me and obviously wasted no time accepting:I gave:Matt Flynn2012 draft pick 1.9I received:Larry FitzgeraldJake LockerI had offered this guy a few other deals for Fitz, with the most recent being Britt, Meachem, Wayne, and 1.9 for Fitz. I would have added Flynn to that deal had he asked. Instead, he rejected that deal and countered with the offer above.
You robbed the guy and should be ashamed.Non-pprTraded: Jonathan Stewart, David Wilson, Jon Baldwin, Ryan Broyles, future 1stReceived: Lesean McCoy and Dion LewisI think it was alot to give up, but now have a lineup ofeyton Manning (Matt Ryan backup)Chris JohnsonRyan MathewsLesean McCoyCalvin JohnsonBrandon MarshallBrandon Lloyd Jermichael Finley
It's not that bad.You robbed the guy and should be ashamed.Non-pprTraded: Jonathan Stewart, David Wilson, Jon Baldwin, Ryan Broyles, future 1stReceived: Lesean McCoy and Dion LewisI think it was alot to give up, but now have a lineup of
I agree, that's a lot of potential...It's not that bad.You robbed the guy and should be ashamed.Non-pprTraded: Jonathan Stewart, David Wilson, Jon Baldwin, Ryan Broyles, future 1stReceived: Lesean McCoy and Dion LewisI think it was alot to give up, but now have a lineup of
I agree with you on both Stewart and Baldwin. Also really like Wilson. Mainly just tired of waiting on Stewart and wanted to make a stud-lined lineup by completing this deal. I gave up alot, but it was worth it to me. Hopefully Baldwin does break out and Stewart finally shines like we all think he will and both ends of this trade works out.'EBF said:
I like the way you think!That is one hell of a line-up you have now.
I gladly take Julio Jones and AJ Green.My offers of Nicks for either of those have been rejected constantly.
That really surprises me. In my experience, Cobb has much more trade value in my leagues.'Dez said:
This is just stupid'Just Win Baby said:Had this trade offered to me and obviously wasted no time accepting:I gave:Matt Flynn2012 draft pick 1.9I received:Larry FitzgeraldJake LockerI had offered this guy a few other deals for Fitz, with the most recent being Britt, Meachem, Wayne, and 1.9 for Fitz. I would have added Flynn to that deal had he asked. Instead, he rejected that deal and countered with the offer above.
Considering it's pretty much four studs (or soon to be), it's down to what RBs the Green/Jones side has and what RB/WR2 the Mathews/Nicks side has.Given it's pretty balanced RB/WR starting volume wise, would probably prefer Mathews/Nicks, esp without PPR.
Awful. That's why that team is rebuilding. Nicks is one of the guys you build around for the rest of the decade, not trade away for a pile of complete unknowns.
What if he doesn't plan to play FF for the rest of the decade?
Then he definately should keep Nicks.
:?:Isn't that kind of the entire point of "rebuilding" or of dynasty FF in general?
A lot of studs involved, but give me Calvin's side. Even if they weren't giving their 1st, would still prefer what Team B got.
Obviously McFadden wins. Nice job of jettisoning 2nd/3rd tier guys for an elite talent.
Some one in your league just made a tremendous mistake.
Matthew/Nicks best RB is CJJulio/AJ best RB is Bradshaw
Floyd and Baldwin could be as good as Nicks in two years. I doubt I would make that trade, but the upside is there. If you're going to give up a star for prospects, you could do a lot worse than getting three first round talents.
there is 0 chance I would do either of those deals in the league I own both Lloyd and Wallace'DynastyLord said:
I can't believe my league just vetoed the deal.....Then he definately should keep Nicks.
That's lame, no way should it be vetoed.I can't believe my league just vetoed the deal.....Then he definately should keep Nicks.
I would leave that league immediately.I can't believe my league just vetoed the deal.....Then he definately should keep Nicks.
Leagues that allow vetoing or voting on trades are an absolute joke. The commissioner, if at all competent, should be able to sniff out collusion. If he suspects it, THEN you put it up for vote. Allowing other owners to manage the rest of the teams in the league blows my mind. Those votes are always selfish. I'd venture to guess that most that vote for a veto are doing so for the benefit of their own team, not the benefit of the league.I would leave that league immediately.I can't believe my league just vetoed the deal.....Then he definately should keep Nicks.
You win easily.
