What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*2014-15 EPL Fantasy - 15-16 league rules wars & signup open (1 Viewer)

User error imo.
your face is a user error imo
You started Stuart Downing. Case closed.
It was Paul Dummett that I started ahead of Costa - Downing was starting regardlessIt still boggles the mind that we don't want the best teams on the field. Just mind numbingly stupid.

#Idratherbeluckythangood
He was expected to play as of yesterday and was in every paper's expected line-up.

Just pay attention.

 
User error imo.
your face is a user error imo
You started Stuart Downing. Case closed.
It was Paul Dummett that I started ahead of Costa - Downing was starting regardlessIt still boggles the mind that we don't want the best teams on the field. Just mind numbingly stupid.

#Idratherbeluckythangood
He was expected to play as of yesterday and was in every paper's expected line-up.Just pay attention.
Boom, roasted

 
User error imo.
your face is a user error imo
You started Stuart Downing. Case closed.
It was Paul Dummett that I started ahead of Costa - Downing was starting regardlessIt still boggles the mind that we don't want the best teams on the field. Just mind numbingly stupid.

#Idratherbeluckythangood
He was expected to play as of yesterday and was in every paper's expected line-up.

Just pay attention.
Are you ####### kidding me?

 
User error imo.
your face is a user error imo
You started Stuart Downing. Case closed.
It was Paul Dummett that I started ahead of Costa - Downing was starting regardlessIt still boggles the mind that we don't want the best teams on the field. Just mind numbingly stupid.

#Idratherbeluckythangood
He was expected to play as of yesterday and was in every paper's expected line-up.

Just pay attention.
Are you ####### kidding me?
I saw that he trained without incident on Twitter yesterday. I'm not sure I would have taken the chance, but that's the risk.

 
The fact that this type of thing has happened to every team just convinces me that the policy is fair. Next year, maybe the East Coasters can have their own league.
The policy is fair - in that it treats everyone the same, but that does not make it a good rule.

We could make a rule that all goals counted for -2 points, it would be fair, but not a good rule.

I am willing to do the work to ensure everyone has an opportunity to make line-up changes prior to the start of the game - just send me a list of subs based on situation the night before, and give me commish access, and I will go in and adjust based on your lineups accordingly.

We should not be playing guessing games over who is starting, when we don't have to.

 
The fact that this type of thing has happened to every team just convinces me that the policy is fair. Next year, maybe the East Coasters can have their own league.
The policy is fair - in that it treats everyone the same, but that does not make it a good rule.

We could make a rule that all goals counted for -2 points, it would be fair, but not a good rule.

I am willing to do the work to ensure everyone has an opportunity to make line-up changes prior to the start of the game - just send me a list of subs based on situation the night before, and give me commish access, and I will go in and adjust based on your lineups accordingly.

We should not be playing guessing games over who is starting, when we don't have to.
It's not going to change. Throwing a tantrum every week isn't going to change that. Passive aggressive hashtags are fine, but if you want your own rules, start your own league.

 
User error imo.
your face is a user error imo
You started Stuart Downing. Case closed.
It was Paul Dummett that I started ahead of Costa - Downing was starting regardlessIt still boggles the mind that we don't want the best teams on the field. Just mind numbingly stupid.

#Idratherbeluckythangood
He was expected to play as of yesterday and was in every paper's expected line-up.

Just pay attention.
Are you ####### kidding me?
I saw that he trained without incident on Twitter yesterday. I'm not sure I would have taken the chance, but that's the risk.
There is no question, that under the rules it was a risk, and I made the decision based on the rules. I can live with that. I am probably also going to win this week regardless, but if I lose, #### happens.

The larger point remains we should be putting out line-ups with best information available. This is not a case where we cannot allow for substituting players based on game-time decisions. The game allows for it, the other two games I am playing allow for substitutes if a player does not play - which shifts the risk to play the normal line-up, and you have a backup ready just in case.

We do not have that luxury - but not because we can't do it with fantrax, but because we somehow think its better to make ill-informed decisions.

 
The fact that this type of thing has happened to every team just convinces me that the policy is fair. Next year, maybe the East Coasters can have their own league.
The policy is fair - in that it treats everyone the same, but that does not make it a good rule.

We could make a rule that all goals counted for -2 points, it would be fair, but not a good rule.

I am willing to do the work to ensure everyone has an opportunity to make line-up changes prior to the start of the game - just send me a list of subs based on situation the night before, and give me commish access, and I will go in and adjust based on your lineups accordingly.

We should not be playing guessing games over who is starting, when we don't have to.
It's not going to change. Throwing a tantrum every week isn't going to change that. Passive aggressive hashtags are fine, but if you want your own rules, start your own league.
#SinnOut

 
Even though there are no games this week, waivers will run on Thursday. I think unclaimed players will remain free agents until the next EPL game week.

 
Just curious, how does waiver order go when multiple teams have claims processed? For example, we were #1, a few other teams also went, and now currently sitting last. I doubt it will really end up mattering, but is there a way that's done?

 
It looks like you processed two claims so it makes sense you would be last.
No, the 2nd one was actually a FCFS after waivers went through. That shouldn't affect the order.

ETA--And part of the reason I ask is that you're up to 9th after you were 2nd. So is it now based on standings as a tiebreaker? There were 6 teams that had processed claims, it seems. That's not insignificant.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It looks like you processed two claims so it makes sense you would be last.
No, the 2nd one was actually a FCFS after waivers went through. That shouldn't affect the order.

ETA--And part of the reason I ask is that you're up to 9th after you were 2nd. So is it now based on standings as a tiebreaker? There were 6 teams that had processed claims, it seems. That's not insignificant.
:shrug: The two teams that processed a second claim are at the bottom.

I was the first person to process one claim so I'm on top of those that processed behind me.

That all makes sense to me. Neither Fazio nor Hernandez were Free Agents so they had to go through as waivers.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The draft is over and teams have been entered. Go in and check your squad when you get a chance. I didn't enter placeholders this year because Fantrax didn't populate a the database as widely this year. Let me know when your guys get added in and I'll place them on your team.

Counting Jonessed round #17 skip, 23 speculative picks were made

PK TEAM PLAYER POS TEAM

14 . 05 8ebok24 --- Paul Pogba --- MID Juventus

17 . xx 8ebok24 --- Marquinhos --- DEF Paris St. Germain

16 . 14 Bonzai --- Facundo Ferreyra --- FWD NEW ADDED

17 . xx Bonzai --- Angel di Maria --- MID Real Madrid ADDED

14 . 12 Charvik --- Xherdan Shaqiri --- MID Bayern

16 . 12 Charvik --- Mario Balotelli --- FWD Milan DROPPED!!!! :excited:

17 . xx Charvik --- Karim Benzema --- FWD Real Madrid DROPPED

14 . 08 Christo --- Sami Khedira --- MID Real Madrid

15 . 07 Christo --- Mats Hummels --- DEF Dortmund

8 . 09 Eephus --- Eliaquim Mangala --- DEF Porto ADDED

16 . 09 Eephus --- Mauricio Isla --- DEF Juventus ADDED

16 . 11 Gator --- Yevhen Konoplyanka --- MID Dnipro

17 . xx Gator --- Arda Turan --- MID Atletico Madrid

17 . xx Gator --- Joshua Guilavogui --- MID Atletico Madrid DROPPED

17 . xx Jonessed --- --- ADDED

9 . 13 Native --- Edinson Cavani --- FWD Paris St. Germain

17 . xx Native --- Juan Cuadrado --- FWD Fiorentina

9 . 08 Sebow/GPJ --- Mathieu Valbuena --- MID Marseille

10 . 04 Shader --- Ezequiel Lavezzi --- FWD Paris St. Germain DROPPED

15 . 11 Shader --- Alberto Moreno --- DEF Sevilla ADDED

17 . xx Shader --- Douglas Costa --- FWD Shakhtar Donetsk DROPPED

12 . 06 Sinn Fein --- Marco Reus --- MID Dortmund DROPPED

14 . 06 Sinn Fein --- Juan Fernando Quintero --- MID Porto DROPPED

16 . 06 Sinn Fein --- Mateo Musacchio --- DEF Villarreal DROPPED

10 . 01 gian/RHE --- Arturo Vidal --- MID Juventus

13 . 07 gian/RHE --- William Carvalho --- MID Sporting Lisbon
Can we update this with who has been dropped by their owners at this point? Is the above correct?
:shrug:

 
It looks like you processed two claims so it makes sense you would be last.
No, the 2nd one was actually a FCFS after waivers went through. That shouldn't affect the order.

ETA--And part of the reason I ask is that you're up to 9th after you were 2nd. So is it now based on standings as a tiebreaker? There were 6 teams that had processed claims, it seems. That's not insignificant.
:shrug: The two teams that processed a second claim are at the bottom.

I was the first person to process one claim so I'm on top of those that processed behind me.

That all makes sense to me. Neither Fazio nor Hernandez were Free Agents so they had to go through as waivers.
I'm saying we didn't process a 2nd claim during waivers. We only had 1 player put in for waivers (Balotelli). I manually added Blind after waivers processed. If you look, there were 2 moves that happened after the pickup of Blind (at 6:02, btw, after the 6:00 waiver run). Eephus picked up Vargas at 6:05 and SF picked up Ben Arfa at 6:16 after I grabbed Blind at 6:02 yet neither of those were moved below us since we're still sitting at 14. That confirms it's the FCFS period and teams shouldn't move at that point.

In fact, it looks like SF actually did process 2 waivers during the run (Fazio and Hernandez). If that's the case, I would think he at least would be behind us since he's the only team that processed 2 claims.

I'm asking because, anytime I've been in a league when waivers go in a rotating order, waivers are run by priority. #1 happens first. Then that team goes to the end. Then #2 happens and then moves behind the 1st team, who moves up to 2nd to last, and so on and so forth. If it were only a couple teams, then it's not a big deal. When almost half the league has processed waivers, it's a big difference if we should be at #9 vs. #14. And it's strange that the #1 priority (us) is sitting at #14 and the #2 priority (you) is sitting at #9. There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason how it ended up.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't see how Blind could have been a Free Agent. He was just added recently.

Were Ben Arfa and Vargas Free Agents? They would have been in the system earlier.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 6:00PM Sir Papa Pepe Claim (WW) Blind, Daley M - MUN

it says 6:00 and that it was through waivers, not a fa.

Maybe it's because he's new to the system? I'm confused too

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 6:00PM Sir Papa Pepe Claim (WW) Blind, Daley M - MUN

it says 6:00 and that it was through waivers, not a fa.

Maybe it's because he's new to the system? I'm confused too
It makes sense. The automated waivers were all processed. The FA pickups post automated waivers didn't affect waiver order, but the WW pick-ups after the automated waivers did affect order and bumped those teams to the bottom.Blind could not have been a FA. He was simply processed as a waiver after the automatic waivers.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 6:00PM Sir Papa Pepe Claim (WW) Blind, Daley M - MUN

it says 6:00 and that it was through waivers, not a fa.

Maybe it's because he's new to the system? I'm confused too
It makes sense. The waivers were all processed properly, the FA pickups didn't affect waivers, the WW pick-ups after the initial waivers bumped those teams to the bottom.Blind could not have been a FA. He was simply processed as a waiver after the automatic waivers.
Just going by what papa pepe said, that he added him after the 6:00 run.

If it was his second ww claim, then yeah, makes sense.

I sense a rhe defined ww add

 
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 6:00PM Sir Papa Pepe Claim (WW) Blind, Daley M - MUN

it says 6:00 and that it was through waivers, not a fa.

Maybe it's because he's new to the system? I'm confused too
It makes sense. The automated waivers were all processed. The FA pickups post automated waivers didn't affect waiver order, but the WW pick-ups after the automated waivers did affect order and bumped those teams to the bottom.Blind could not have been a FA. He was simply processed as a waiver after the automatic waivers.
That's strange, then. First of all, on my Fantrax page, it's not showing at 6:00. Here is the copy and paste:

Processed on Sep 04, 2014 6:02 PM EDT
Claim: Daley Blind M - MUN
playerNewsSmall.gif
- Sir Papa Pepe
I don't get why another waiver would have processed but if it moves us back, so be it.

 
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 6:00PM Sir Papa Pepe Claim (WW) Blind, Daley M - MUN

it says 6:00 and that it was through waivers, not a fa.

Maybe it's because he's new to the system? I'm confused too
It makes sense. The automated waivers were all processed. The FA pickups post automated waivers didn't affect waiver order, but the WW pick-ups after the automated waivers did affect order and bumped those teams to the bottom.Blind could not have been a FA. He was simply processed as a waiver after the automatic waivers.
That's strange, then. First of all, on my Fantrax page, it's not showing at 6:00. Here is the copy and paste:

Processed on Sep 04, 2014 6:02 PM EDT
Claim: Daley Blind M - MUN
playerNewsSmall.gif
- Sir Papa Pepe
I don't get why another waiver would have processed but if it moves us back, so be it.
#suckit

You should get your waiver priority back though - the punishment is having Blind on your roster...

 
Vargas and Ben Arfa were the only FA pickups. The others were all WW.

The Fantrax option is to process claims in rounds. So teams who made two WW pickups are at the end of the queue now. The only oddity is why the Blind pickup seems to have handled separately. I suspect he was a late add and was classified as a waivers claim rather than a free agent claim.

As far as I can tell, the only impact is to #13 & #14 positions on the waiver wire. This isn't going to be a game changer since neither is likely to cycle near the top this season.

 
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 6:00PM Sir Papa Pepe Claim (WW) Blind, Daley M - MUN

it says 6:00 and that it was through waivers, not a fa.

Maybe it's because he's new to the system? I'm confused too
It makes sense. The automated waivers were all processed. The FA pickups post automated waivers didn't affect waiver order, but the WW pick-ups after the automated waivers did affect order and bumped those teams to the bottom.Blind could not have been a FA. He was simply processed as a waiver after the automatic waivers.
That's strange, then. First of all, on my Fantrax page, it's not showing at 6:00. Here is the copy and paste:

Processed on Sep 04, 2014 6:02 PM EDT

Claim: Daley Blind M - MUN - Sir Papa Pepe

I don't get why another waiver would have processed but if it moves us back, so be it.
According to the transaction history page, both processed at 6:00 EST

Thu Sep 4, 2014, 6:00PM

Sir Papa Pepe

Claim (WW)

Blind, Daley M - MUN

Executed

4

Thu Sep 4, 2014, 6:00PM

Some People Call Me Mauricio

Claim (WW)

Hernández, Abel F - HUL

Executed

4

 
Thu Sep 4, 2014, 6:00PM Sir Papa Pepe Claim (WW) Blind, Daley M - MUN

it says 6:00 and that it was through waivers, not a fa.

Maybe it's because he's new to the system? I'm confused too
It makes sense. The automated waivers were all processed. The FA pickups post automated waivers didn't affect waiver order, but the WW pick-ups after the automated waivers did affect order and bumped those teams to the bottom.Blind could not have been a FA. He was simply processed as a waiver after the automatic waivers.
That's strange, then. First of all, on my Fantrax page, it's not showing at 6:00. Here is the copy and paste:

Processed on Sep 04, 2014 6:02 PM EDT
Claim: Daley Blind M - MUN
playerNewsSmall.gif
- Sir Papa Pepe
I don't get why another waiver would have processed but if it moves us back, so be it.
#suckit

You should get your waiver priority back though - the punishment is having Blind on your roster...
:lmao:

 
I had a claim out on Blind. I guess I didn't prioritize so I got Robert Green in the first round and then didn't get him in the second. You couldn't have added him as an FA after waivers. Fantrax just bumps everyone that had the same number of executed claims up one spot. No going to the back of the line when your claim is made stuff. It's why I'm still behind everyone else who used one pick-up even though they picked ahead of me. I don't know how other sites do it but it wouldn't surprise me if Fantrax is different.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top