What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*2014-15 Hot Stove Thread: The Padres won it I guess (1 Viewer)

Who cares about NFBC ADP in a keeper decision? Should keep the player YOU think is best for YOUR team. By April 15th all of that ADP talk will be long forgotten.
If you have a tough decision on two guys, you probably keep the guy who's typically going higher in drafts, since it could mean you can get the other guy back using a lower pick.

 
For all the slamming we do of MLB in this thread, I'd like to throw heap some praise their way.

The MLB At-Bat is just fantastic. Not only can you get television, radio, and gametracker functionality on demand, but the Spring Training coverage has been top notch. Every afternoon there is fresh content for each team with stories, videos, etc. Just a really nice app that is done right.

 
Who cares about NFBC ADP in a keeper decision? Should keep the player YOU think is best for YOUR team. By April 15th all of that ADP talk will be long forgotten.
I'm assuming its keeping for this year only. He didn't mention otherwise.

He also mentioned ADP's being close, which is why I responded with that haha. Read slower.

And yes Cobb coming off 2 stellar years vs the guy coming off his 1st good year in 5 seasons and a career 4.5 era, I don't think its really close. That's 'me' I guess.
You're a peach. Never change.

To imply that Cobb has been "stellar" is to imply that he has turned in even one season of 30 starts in his MLB career. He's been pretty good when he has pitched, but he's still a mid-tier No. 2 at best for fantasy purposes.

FWIW, I think both of the guys in question are being overvalued in redrafts.
He has a career 3.21 ERA/ 1.19 whip thru 500 IP. Those are stellar/elite #'s. You can diminish that all you like I suppose, but the list of guys who have those type of ratios over their 1st 500 IP is pretty small I'd imagine. Kershaw couldn't even match those #'s to start his career. EDIT (He matched Cobb in ERA 3.17, WHIP 1.27)

The only concern with Cobb was his workload, as u referenced, still hasn't pitched 200+ IP. The skills/stuff is not questioned at all. Or shouldn't be.

And thanks, you stay peachy also.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So - in high school - any rostered player not currently in the game, or who has not previously been in the game, may be used as a courtesy runner for the pitcher or the catcher. The same courtesy runner cannot be used for both positions in the same inning. Also, the player(s) used as a courtesy runner(s), cannot be entered into the game defensively in the next half inning. If a player has already been in the game and removed, they cannot be used as a courtesy runner for pitcher or catcher - if they are used to run it falls under re-entry rules.

I am not adverse to this being used as a means to speed up the game at college and pro levels - but as a purist, would prefer no courtesy runner and no DH.

Odd fact I did not know - in high school, the designated hitter does not necessarily have to be for the pitcher. If this was the case in MLB - I could have seen La Russa hitting for the SS and allowing the Pitcher to hit with as wacky as he was.

 
For all the slamming we do of MLB in this thread, I'd like to throw heap some praise their way.

The MLB At-Bat is just fantastic. Not only can you get television, radio, and gametracker functionality on demand, but the Spring Training coverage has been top notch. Every afternoon there is fresh content for each team with stories, videos, etc. Just a really nice app that is done right.
Rob Manfred says "umm" too much

 
Who cares about NFBC ADP in a keeper decision? Should keep the player YOU think is best for YOUR team. By April 15th all of that ADP talk will be long forgotten.
I'm assuming its keeping for this year only. He didn't mention otherwise.

He also mentioned ADP's being close, which is why I responded with that haha. Read slower.

And yes Cobb coming off 2 stellar years vs the guy coming off his 1st good year in 5 seasons and a career 4.5 era, I don't think its really close. That's 'me' I guess.
You're a peach. Never change.

To imply that Cobb has been "stellar" is to imply that he has turned in even one season of 30 starts in his MLB career. He's been pretty good when he has pitched, but he's still a mid-tier No. 2 at best for fantasy purposes.

FWIW, I think both of the guys in question are being overvalued in redrafts.
He has a career 3.21 ERA/ 1.19 whip thru 500 IP. Those are stellar/elite #'s. You can diminish that all you like I suppose, but the list of guys who have those type of ratios over their 1st 500 IP is pretty small I'd imagine. Kershaw couldn't even match those #'s to start his career. EDIT (He matched Cobb in ERA 3.17, WHIP 1.27)

The only concern with Cobb was his workload, as u referenced, still hasn't pitched 200+ IP. The skills/stuff is not questioned at all. Or shouldn't be.

And thanks, you stay peachy also.
Alex Cobb is 6 months older than Clayton Kershaw. Comparing their development or career arc seems a little unfair to both of them.

 
Who cares about NFBC ADP in a keeper decision? Should keep the player YOU think is best for YOUR team. By April 15th all of that ADP talk will be long forgotten.
I'm assuming its keeping for this year only. He didn't mention otherwise.

He also mentioned ADP's being close, which is why I responded with that haha. Read slower.

And yes Cobb coming off 2 stellar years vs the guy coming off his 1st good year in 5 seasons and a career 4.5 era, I don't think its really close. That's 'me' I guess.
You're a peach. Never change.

To imply that Cobb has been "stellar" is to imply that he has turned in even one season of 30 starts in his MLB career. He's been pretty good when he has pitched, but he's still a mid-tier No. 2 at best for fantasy purposes.

FWIW, I think both of the guys in question are being overvalued in redrafts.
He has a career 3.21 ERA/ 1.19 whip thru 500 IP. Those are stellar/elite #'s. You can diminish that all you like I suppose, but the list of guys who have those type of ratios over their 1st 500 IP is pretty small I'd imagine. Kershaw couldn't even match those #'s to start his career. EDIT (He matched Cobb in ERA 3.17, WHIP 1.27)

The only concern with Cobb was his workload, as u referenced, still hasn't pitched 200+ IP. The skills/stuff is not questioned at all. Or shouldn't be.

And thanks, you stay peachy also.
Alex Cobb is 6 months older than Clayton Kershaw. Comparing their development or career arc seems a little unfair to both of them.
Ok then find me the # of SP's of any age/development who matched that production over their 1st 500 IP. Let me know what you find.

You seem to want to diminish Cobb for whatever reason. I guess workload is the only thing you can point to. I prefer to focus on talent/skill. Overvalued as #2? Thats just crazy talk. He's been 1 of the best pitchers in baseball over the last 2 seasons.

 
For all the slamming we do of MLB in this thread, I'd like to throw heap some praise their way.

The MLB At-Bat is just fantastic. Not only can you get television, radio, and gametracker functionality on demand, but the Spring Training coverage has been top notch. Every afternoon there is fresh content for each team with stories, videos, etc. Just a really nice app that is done right.
For a game pigeonholed as being 'uncool' or 'old' or whatever nonsense term people are throwing out these days for the tweens and such, MLB's advancements in technology has blown away that of the NFL and NBA. Easily one of the best decisions they've made in the last decade was embracing the streaming game and loading up on the technology to do it. It's become insanely profitable for them too. They now contract out use of their MLBAM streaming services/servers to places like CBS and HBO. Just raking in the dough and making a great experience for the fans at the same time.

 
Who cares about NFBC ADP in a keeper decision? Should keep the player YOU think is best for YOUR team. By April 15th all of that ADP talk will be long forgotten.
I'm assuming its keeping for this year only. He didn't mention otherwise.

He also mentioned ADP's being close, which is why I responded with that haha. Read slower.

And yes Cobb coming off 2 stellar years vs the guy coming off his 1st good year in 5 seasons and a career 4.5 era, I don't think its really close. That's 'me' I guess.
You're a peach. Never change.

To imply that Cobb has been "stellar" is to imply that he has turned in even one season of 30 starts in his MLB career. He's been pretty good when he has pitched, but he's still a mid-tier No. 2 at best for fantasy purposes.

FWIW, I think both of the guys in question are being overvalued in redrafts.
He has a career 3.21 ERA/ 1.19 whip thru 500 IP. Those are stellar/elite #'s. You can diminish that all you like I suppose, but the list of guys who have those type of ratios over their 1st 500 IP is pretty small I'd imagine. Kershaw couldn't even match those #'s to start his career. EDIT (He matched Cobb in ERA 3.17, WHIP 1.27)

The only concern with Cobb was his workload, as u referenced, still hasn't pitched 200+ IP. The skills/stuff is not questioned at all. Or shouldn't be.

And thanks, you stay peachy also.
Alex Cobb is 6 months older than Clayton Kershaw. Comparing their development or career arc seems a little unfair to both of them.
Ok then find me the # of SP's of any age/development who matched that production over their 1st 500 IP. Let me know what you find.

You seem to want to diminish Cobb for whatever reason. I guess workload is the only thing you can point to. I prefer to focus on talent/skill. Overvalued as #2? Thats just crazy talk. He's been 1 of the best pitchers in baseball over the last 2 seasons.
What an arbitrary line to draw for production. One, I might add, that is tailored to your pro-Cobb argument because of his staggered start to his MLB career. He wasn't taking his lumps at 22 or 23 like most of the elite pitchers were. But I'm not doing your NFBC homework for you.

I bet you were a big Rich Harden fan, weren't you?

 
FWIW, I think Cobb is a fine pitcher at the right spot in the draft. I just acknowledge it likely won't be me taking him. If I'm using a Top 100 pick on a pitcher, it is a guy with a combination of health, talent, and opportunity that nets me a reasonable expectation of 200+ quality IP to build my ratios. He doesn't really fit that profile at this point.

 
FWIW, I think Cobb is a fine pitcher at the right spot in the draft. I just acknowledge it likely won't be me taking him. If I'm using a Top 100 pick on a pitcher, it is a guy with a combination of health, talent, and opportunity that nets me a reasonable expectation of 200+ quality IP to build my ratios. He doesn't really fit that profile at this point.
Cobb threw his 1st major league pitch at the senior age of 24. How many Clayton Kerhsaws/Felix Hernandez types are out there (in terms of age)? The majority of SP's follow Cobb's progression actually, not the minority. So that argument is perfectly fair and reasonable. You not taking the plunge on elite level production in the top 100 because he hasn't thrown 200 IP just shows me you're to conservative. I'm sure you wanted no part of Kershaw in 2010. I don't mind taking that gamble in rd 7/8.

If you don't feel up to it, just ask your NFBC partner to do that homework for you.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm not even sure what you're talking about anymore re: NFBC partner. But please do share when/where you are drafting as I'd be glad to follow your season.

I have my rankings in front of me. With the exception of Corey Kluber and Matt Harvey, every pitcher I have ranked above Cobb was a far more established pitcher by Age 28 season and most logged multiple seasons with significant MLB innings by their 25th birthday.

You can call me too conservative if you wish, but I'm pretty sure most of the top tier NFBC players you seem to be worried about would tell you that the first ten rounds are about building a base of highly reliable production. Not to say you shouldn't speculate on upside, but it is far more important to limit downside. I think the rosters of the 11 main event winners would back that up.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are really people taking issue with Cobb's pre-injury value? He was right where he belonged, in that group of players that have displayed the ability to be an ace but cannot be trusted as one, yet, for a variety of reasons. If you don't pick an ace then pick two from that tier and hope one hits and the other doesn't kill you. If so then you're likely in a better position than the guy who picked an ace, but...risk.

 
I'm not even sure what you're talking about anymore re: NFBC partner. But please do share when/where you are drafting as I'd be glad to follow your season.

I have my rankings in front of me. With the exception of Corey Kluber and Matt Harvey, every pitcher I have ranked above Cobb was a far more established pitcher by Age 28 season and most logged multiple seasons with significant MLB innings by their 25th birthday.

You can call me too conservative if you wish, but I'm pretty sure most of the top tier NFBC players you seem to be worried about would tell you that the first ten rounds are about building a base of highly reliable production. Not to say you shouldn't speculate on upside, but it is far more important to limit downside. I think the rosters of the 11 main event winners would back that up.
Please post this list, im curious to see it. I'd like to see those names u have in front of him. Cobb is also 27, doesn't turn 28 until October.

You also said previously Cobb is a mid-tier SP2 at best. That puts him at SP18 in 12 team format. Where do you think you're getting a mid-range SP2 in the NFBC? Top-18 SP's don't fall past the top 100 picks....ever.

Ok maybe ever is strong, but 95% of the time, they're all gone.

The only 2 SP's in the top 18 that fell past pick 100 thus far according to ADP: Wainwright (103) which is comical and Darvish (499)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, I'm not posting my rankings for you. Save the NFBC lectures for somewhere else, or at minimum save it for PM to me because I don't think the rest of the folks in the thread care. Still waiting on a date/location for your draft to follow along.

 
Yeah, I'm not posting my rankings for you. Save the NFBC lectures for somewhere else, or at minimum save it for PM to me because I don't think the rest of the folks in the thread care. Still waiting on a date/location for your draft to follow along.
I drafted 3 teams already haha.

All 3 are strong.

Likely doing ME as well. PM me that list then.

 
Yeah, I'm not posting my rankings for you. Save the NFBC lectures for somewhere else, or at minimum save it for PM to me because I don't think the rest of the folks in the thread care. Still waiting on a date/location for your draft to follow along.
I drafted 3 teams already haha.

All 3 are strong.

Likely doing ME as well. PM me that list then.
Why would I send my list to a competitor? :nerd:

 
Yeah, I'm not posting my rankings for you. Save the NFBC lectures for somewhere else, or at minimum save it for PM to me because I don't think the rest of the folks in the thread care. Still waiting on a date/location for your draft to follow along.
I drafted 3 teams already haha.

All 3 are strong.

Likely doing ME as well. PM me that list then.
Why would I send my list to a competitor? :nerd:
Didn't u just ask for my draft date to follow along?

:wall:

 
Back in the real world: Matt Wieters shut down with elbow tendinitis.

Has to put his status for opening day in question.

 
This partner stuff is flying right over my head. Is it supposed to be an insult? Am I supposed to have a partner? Should I be measuring my fantasy baseball street cred by the status of said partner?

 
I'm glad Arrieta and Ryu were still there because I'd have picked Cobb had either of them been picked ahead of me.

Eta, never mind, Shields was still there. He'd have been next.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Still love Cobb.
But at an appropriate level. You passed on him eight times in Cake (while taking three pitchers), where he was selected as the 116th player overall.
116th? --- :fishy:
The sharks play in Pie. He was taken 108th overall there.
Think the term 'sharks' there is being used loosely no? LOL.

Some of those picks are downright comical.

Another thing that's funny, you're not comfortable taking Cobb as your #2 because of health concerns/workload, but you're more then comfortable taking Wacha as your SP2 at 138. Also don't wait so dam long on pitching, otherwise you end up with a staff that looks like yours.

Sigh.

 
One set of projections I use has the following for batter strikeouts this season (-.5 in my points league):

Javier Baez 297 :lmao:

Chris Davis 270

Jon Singleton 211

Jay Bruce 204

George Springer 202

Will Middlebrooks 200

Steven Souza 199

Mike Zunino 198

Ian Desmond 197

Considering 200 Ks has been hit only six times -- three by Mark Reynolds -- this seems a little extreme.

 
And passing on Iwakuma @ pick 110 for David Wright , when u already have Zimmerman in the fold...Oh boy. We need to talk RnR.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh, good. We have some analysis. Take it to the Pie thread. I'm sure the guys will be glad to hear from an expert such as yourself.

 
One set of projections I use has the following for batter strikeouts this season (-.5 in my points league):

Javier Baez 297 :lmao:

Chris Davis 270

Jon Singleton 211

Jay Bruce 204

George Springer 202

Will Middlebrooks 200

Steven Souza 199

Mike Zunino 198

Ian Desmond 197

Considering 200 Ks has been hit only six times -- three by Mark Reynolds -- this seems a little extreme.
Seems conservative on Baez, IMO.

 
One set of projections I use has the following for batter strikeouts this season (-.5 in my points league):

Javier Baez 297 :lmao:

Chris Davis 270

Jon Singleton 211

Jay Bruce 204

George Springer 202

Will Middlebrooks 200

Steven Souza 199

Mike Zunino 198

Ian Desmond 197

Considering 200 Ks has been hit only six times -- three by Mark Reynolds -- this seems a little extreme.
Baez struck out in 41.5% of his 2014 PAs. He'd have to have make 715 PAs this year at the same rate in order to rack up 297 SOs.

That's pretty much impossible. If Baez strikes out more than 40% of the time, he won't play. Even Reynolds only topped 35% once in his career.

ZiPS projects Baez for 212 SO in 650 PAs. Steamer is much more conservative with 143 in 467. The latter seems more reasonable to me.

 
I don't think there's a chance he comes near 200K's, unless he's on pace to hit 40+ hr's, if he's k'ing that much, they will send him down for at least a month.....or 2.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
One set of projections I use has the following for batter strikeouts this season (-.5 in my points league):

Javier Baez 297 :lmao:

Chris Davis 270

Jon Singleton 211

Jay Bruce 204

George Springer 202

Will Middlebrooks 200

Steven Souza 199

Mike Zunino 198

Ian Desmond 197

Considering 200 Ks has been hit only six times -- three by Mark Reynolds -- this seems a little extreme.
Good time to burn these projections. :shrug:

;)

 
One set of projections I use has the following for batter strikeouts this season (-.5 in my points league):

Javier Baez 297 :lmao:

Chris Davis 270

Jon Singleton 211

Jay Bruce 204

George Springer 202

Will Middlebrooks 200

Steven Souza 199

Mike Zunino 198

Ian Desmond 197

Considering 200 Ks has been hit only six times -- three by Mark Reynolds -- this seems a little extreme.
Good time to burn these projections. :shrug:

;)
All kidding aside, that is pretty bad. Mind sharing the source?

 
One set of projections I use has the following for batter strikeouts this season (-.5 in my points league):

Javier Baez 297 :lmao:

Chris Davis 270

Jon Singleton 211

Jay Bruce 204

George Springer 202

Will Middlebrooks 200

Steven Souza 199

Mike Zunino 198

Ian Desmond 197

Considering 200 Ks has been hit only six times -- three by Mark Reynolds -- this seems a little extreme.
Good time to burn these projections. :shrug:

;)
All kidding aside, that is pretty bad. Mind sharing the source?
Insider Baseball.

 
One set of projections I use has the following for batter strikeouts this season (-.5 in my points league):

Javier Baez 297 :lmao:

Chris Davis 270

Jon Singleton 211

Jay Bruce 204

George Springer 202

Will Middlebrooks 200

Steven Souza 199

Mike Zunino 198

Ian Desmond 197

Considering 200 Ks has been hit only six times -- three by Mark Reynolds -- this seems a little extreme.
Good time to burn these projections. :shrug:

;)
All kidding aside, that is pretty bad. Mind sharing the source?
Insider Baseball.
How many plate appearances are they projecting? Is it possible this is an error?

 
One set of projections I use has the following for batter strikeouts this season (-.5 in my points league):

Javier Baez 297 :lmao:

Chris Davis 270

Jon Singleton 211

Jay Bruce 204

George Springer 202

Will Middlebrooks 200

Steven Souza 199

Mike Zunino 198

Ian Desmond 197

Considering 200 Ks has been hit only six times -- three by Mark Reynolds -- this seems a little extreme.
Good time to burn these projections. :shrug:

;)
All kidding aside, that is pretty bad. Mind sharing the source?
Insider Baseball.
How many plate appearances are they projecting? Is it possible this is an error?
522 AB, plus 42 BB. They project him for 125 hits and 26 HR, so essentially they're projecting a BABIP of about .500.

For Davis, it's 270 K / 540 AB (or ~ 640 AB).

 
One set of projections I use has the following for batter strikeouts this season (-.5 in my points league):

Javier Baez 297 :lmao:

Chris Davis 270

Jon Singleton 211

Jay Bruce 204

George Springer 202

Will Middlebrooks 200

Steven Souza 199

Mike Zunino 198

Ian Desmond 197

Considering 200 Ks has been hit only six times -- three by Mark Reynolds -- this seems a little extreme.
Good time to burn these projections. :shrug:

;)
All kidding aside, that is pretty bad. Mind sharing the source?
Insider Baseball.
How many plate appearances are they projecting? Is it possible this is an error?
522 AB, plus 42 BB. They project him for 125 hits and 26 HR, so essentially they're projecting a BABIP of about .500.

For Davis, it's 270 K / 540 AB (or ~ 640 AB).
That's 52.6% SO. It would challenge Blind Papa Johnson's record from the 1937 Pittsburgh Crawfords.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top