I just listened to the latest Simmons podcast and I've read about the Magic-Thunder trade from various places, why do people think that trade was so heavily in the Thunders favor?
People are acting like Oladipo is a star in the making. To me he seems like a high end 6th man. He shot 31.3% on jumpers last year (up from 27.7 and 29 the previous two years). For all of Simmons' talking about him getting more open looks in OKC, almost all of his threes were open looks in Orlando (about 10% of his 3s came with somebody within 4 feet of him). I don't really see how Oladipo and Westbrook can coexist as starters with both players being so ball dominant without the ability to shoot jumpers. I think they are a worse team for this trade. The good news is that they won't throw a ####load of money at Waiters now.
Typically, the team that gets the best player, wins the trade, and Ibaka is certainly the best player of the four involved in the trade. With Gordon and Vucevic, he's not an ideal fit either, but Gordon might be able to play just enough SF to make it work for 10-12 minutes a game. If they can resign Ibaka, they win this trade, IMO. If they don't resign Ibaka, they basically spent the 11th pick in a mediocre draft to keep themselves from paying Oladipo $25m/yr next year. Really, its a win/win IMO.