He's definitely played well with Sacramento but he played equally as terrible in NO. I suppose I should hold off burying him until next season.Hield is actually decent. I wouldn't be surprised if he becomes a league average starter at the 2, maybe a plus bench guy. Doesn't belong in that group.
. If I was a Heat fan I'd be pretty pissed.
What? Cavs just rested Lebron, Kyrie, Thompson against them. (Heat barely eeked out an OT win at home) Now Wizards resting their whole team. They couldn't be gifted a chance any more.Even using his season long totals, he's shooting 39% from deep on 4.6 attempts per game. He's a bad but not horrific defender. His handle needs some work. But there's nothing that suggests to me that he's a total bust.He's definitely played well with Sacramento but he played equally as terrible in NO. I suppose I should hold off burying him until next season.
I suppose that part of it is true, I hadn't considered the gift of that Cavs game. But they would have been favored at home against an unmotivated Wiz team anyway. The part that sucks for them is that those teams are resting for cause, but the Nets are resting for no reason at all as far as I can tell and that impacts the Heat negatively.What? Cavs just rested Lebron, Kyrie, Thompson against them. (Heat barely eeked out an OT win at home) Now Wizards resting their whole team. They couldn't be gifted a chance any more.
If want to be pissed about something, be pissed about an 11-30 start.
I suppose that part of it is true, I hadn't considered the gift of that Cavs game. But they would have been favored at home against an unmotivated Wiz team anyway. The part that sucks for them is that those teams are resting for cause, but the Nets are resting for no reason at all as far as I can tell and that impacts the Heat negatively.
Also like the article said I'd just rather see them in the playoffs than the listless teams they're chasing.
He was really bad in NO. I haven't watched him in Sacramento, but statistically, he is a completely different player than he was before the trade. So I guess I'm just tainted from his play for the first 2/3 of the season. That player was a total bust. The Sacramento version is already a viable starter.Even using his season long totals, he's shooting 39% from deep on 4.6 attempts per game. He's a bad but not horrific defender. His handle needs some work. But there's nothing that suggests to me that he's a total bust.
Lin, Lopez, and Booker resting against Bulls
Wall and company likely to rest agianst Heat
Hawks likely to rest against Pacers
What a ####show
I like it here. I vote we stay.Keep this as the playoffs thread? Didn't we do that last year?
The Heat has a 1.8% chance of getting a top 3 pick and a 0.5% of getting the top pick. During the streak, they beat full-strength Rockets (twice), GS and Cleveland. They would've given Boston a good series.Sorry about the first round exit brochacho.
The Heat has a 1.8% chance of getting a top 3 pick and a 0.5% of getting the top pick. During the streak, they beat full-strength Rockets (twice), GS and Cleveland. They would've given Boston a good series.
I'm obviously a homer but Draymond is...I like these across the board except maybe with Gobert. Jazz are only one spot behind the Warriors in defensive efficiency (3rd and 2nd), so I don't see how team performance can separate the two. But I don't watch nearly enough of either team to make an informed decision. All I know if I haven't seen someone change the game like Gobert does every time he's on the floor. I'd be curious to see on/off defensive numbers for each guy.
Did you cut and paste these from somewhere or are they yours?
Zero chanceAny chance the NBA would ever consider 6 playoff teams per conference, with each of the top 2 seeds getting a first round bye (maybe with putting a couple back-to-backs in the first round)? I know there's a near zero chance they give up 4 playoff series' a season, but if they really care about the mass DNP-CD's, it seems like it may help with relatively little lost. The series' that you give up to do this are typically short and with nobody watching anyway.
I think many top teams (and that's all we really care about) would choose to go for 10 days off to start the Playoffs, and auto 2nd round berth with a potentially worn out 2nd round opponent over sitting a bunch of games in the regular season.
It would make the regular season and Playoffs both much more interesting. I think it could have an even bigger impact than even shortening the season (which wouldn't happen of course).
No.Any chance the NBA would ever consider 6 playoff teams per conference, with each of the top 2 seeds getting a first round bye (maybe with putting a couple back-to-backs in the first round)? I know there's a near zero chance they give up 4 playoff series' a season, but if they really care about the mass DNP-CD's, it seems like it may help with relatively little lost. The series' that you give up to do this are typically short and with nobody watching anyway.
I think many top teams (and that's all we really care about) would choose to go for 10 days off to start the Playoffs, and auto 2nd round berth with a potentially worn out 2nd round opponent over sitting a bunch of games in the regular season.
It would make the regular season and Playoffs both much more interesting. I think it could have an even bigger impact than even shortening the season (which wouldn't happen of course).
cliffy we will see although the raptors have had our number for about the last four years it is pretty bad but hey this is a different team finally with middleton back and jablownknee out so we will see ps fear the deer take that to the bank my fine dinosaur northern brohanSorry about the first round exit brochacho.
For him it might be though. At best he's slotted in at 10-11. Besides for Porter Jr and Doncic (who might wait another year anyway), the '18 class isn't that great with top-tier talent (though it is deepish). He could move up to 3-5 fairly easily (especially since he's more of a stretch 4 and the Bamba's/ Ayton's of the world are more pure 4s/5s which are becoming a dime a dozen in the NBA) which is about the delta you want to make it worthwhile to go back.Miles Bridges is probably going to return to school. He was almost a certain lottery pick and possible top 10 pick. That is rarely a good choice.
As a Celtics fan I have a feeling the 1 v. 8 could be interesting this year. I love the Celts but I'm just not convinced they're they type of team that will shine in the playoffs (I don't think Chicago is that great either so the Celts should win but it would be a smaller upset than 7 over 2 or 6 over 3 IMO). If I had to rank my top 3 East teams right now it would be Cleveland, Toronto and then Boston. Good news for the Celts is they avoid Cleveland/Toronto until the eastern finals if they make it that far. Pretty fun though who would have guessed #1 seed and best odds for the #1 pick in the same season.Any chance the NBA would ever consider 6 playoff teams per conference, with each of the top 2 seeds getting a first round bye (maybe with putting a couple back-to-backs in the first round)? I know there's a near zero chance they give up 4 playoff series' a season, but if they really care about the mass DNP-CD's, it seems like it may help with relatively little lost. The series' that you give up to do this are typically short and with nobody watching anyway.
I think many top teams (and that's all we really care about) would choose to go for 10 days off to start the Playoffs, and auto 2nd round berth with a potentially worn out 2nd round opponent over sitting a bunch of games in the regular season.
It would make the regular season and Playoffs both much more interesting. I think it could have an even bigger impact than even shortening the season (which wouldn't happen of course).
i think i would rather go to a 10 or 11 and be on a good team with a chance to shine and make bank than taking a risk of getting hurt or having a stink bomb of a year to go in the top couple of spots and play on the craptacular teams that will be there take that to the thoughts swc thinks bank brohansFor him it might be though. At best he's slotted in at 10-11. Besides for Porter Jr and Doncic (who might wait another year anyway), the '18 class isn't that great with top-tier talent (though it is deepish). He could move up to 3-5 fairly easily (especially since he's more of a stretch 4 and the Bamba's/ Ayton's of the world are more pure 4s/5s which are becoming a dime a dozen in the NBA) which is about the delta you want to make it worthwhile to go back.
Problem with that is he was pencilled into a potential Hornets/Sacramento. Neither of those teams are "good". Monetarily it's a 6-7 million dollar difference over the first 3 years. The jump from 10-12 to 3-5 is about where it makes sense to go back. One of the reasons we haven't seen kids do it recently is none of the 10-12 kids one year would project to be 3-5 the following year. This year's different though since the '17 class is much deeper at the top than the '18 class after Doncic/Porter and he's also playing the continued move to stretch 4s. It's a gamble, but probably not an insane one.i think i would rather go to a 10 or 11 and be on a good team with a chance to shine and make bank than taking a risk of getting hurt or having a stink bomb of a year to go in the top couple of spots and play on the craptacular teams that will be there take that to the thoughts swc thinks bank brohans
FWIW, I think DraftExpress has him at 6 in their 2018 mock. If we use the salary of last year's 11th pick over the first four years ($11.2 million) vs the first three years of the 6th pick of the draft ($11.0 million) it's pretty much a wash, maybe he makes a little extra with whatever the raise would be from one year to the next with the same draft slot. But in what would be year 5 if he was drafted this year could be a massive disparity, possibly over $20 million in that year alone, plus he would could be behind in every raise for the rest of his career.For him it might be though. At best he's slotted in at 10-11. Besides for Porter Jr and Doncic (who might wait another year anyway), the '18 class isn't that great with top-tier talent (though it is deepish). He could move up to 3-5 fairly easily (especially since he's more of a stretch 4 and the Bamba's/ Ayton's of the world are more pure 4s/5s which are becoming a dime a dozen in the NBA) which is about the delta you want to make it worthwhile to go back.
I won't be surprised if he goes before Ayton and Williams (Bamba might be a different story though since he projects to be a freakish rim protector) though with the way the NBA is going. If he gets in the top 5 that changes the math especially if he knew for instance that the Kings were very interested in him.FWIW, I think DraftExpress has him at 6 in their 2018 mock. If we use the salary of last year's 11th pick over the first four years ($11.2 million) vs the first three years of the 6th pick of the draft ($11.0 million) it's pretty much a wash, maybe he makes a little extra with whatever the raise would be from one year to the next with the same draft slot. But in what would be year 5 if he was drafted this year could be a massive disparity, possibly over $20 million in that year alone, plus he would could be behind in every raise for the rest of his career.
i agree that sactown is sort of a crapola show but i think hornets have some potential but yeah that is a lot of dough i agree i hope it works out for him for the best honestly i hate to see a kid right on the precipice and then lose it but if he does fall i hope the bucks get him take that to the bank bromigoProblem with that is he was pencilled into a potential Hornets/Sacramento. Neither of those teams are "good". Monetarily it's a 6-7 million dollar difference over the first 3 years. The jump from 10-12 to 3-5 is about where it makes sense to go back. One of the reasons we haven't seen kids do it recently is none of the 10-12 kids one year would project to be 3-5 the following year. This year's different though since the '17 class is much deeper at the top than the '18 class after Doncic/Porter and he's also playing the continued move to stretch 4s. It's a gamble, but probably not an insane one.
great title cappy made me laugh out loud this morning you the brohan take that to the bank
Can't believe all the doctors and trainers and front office staffers might be right and the idiots on sports talk radio yelling about players skipping games might be wrong.Jeff Stotts @RotowireATC 5m5 minutes ago
The total number of NBA regular season games lost to injury or illness has decreased for 4 consecutive seasons.
seems impossible, imoCan't believe all the doctors and trainers and front office staffers might be right and the idiots on sports talk radio yelling about players skipping games might be wrong.
Correlation does not equal causation.Can't believe all the doctors and trainers and front office staffers might be right and the idiots on sports talk radio yelling about players skipping games might be wrong.
Sure, good point. But it's a four year trend that almost perfectly coincides with when teams started using DNP-Rest regularly- you can pretty much pinpoint the start of the trend to the 2012-13 season, when Stern fined the Spurs after they did it for a national game but then he retired the next season and everyone started doing it because Silver took a different approach. And I assume the data isn't a steady downward trend over decades, which would mean we can't just attribute this to general improvements in technology or travel or whatever.Correlation does not equal causation.
That seems like a big assumption to me, but I would agree that knowing the longer term trend is key to getting a better idea of the full picture.Sure, good point. But it's a four year trend that almost perfectly coincides with when teams started using DNP-Rest regularly- you can pretty much pinpoint the start of the trend to the 2012-13 season, when Stern fined the Spurs after they did it for a national game but then he retired the next season and everyone started doing it because Silver took a different approach. And I assume the data isn't a steady downward trend over decades, which would mean we can't just attribute this to general improvements in technology or travel or whatever.
I'm open to any other theory, but at first glance this seems like more than a coincidence.