TobiasFunke
Footballguy
I don't hate Durant for doing this- I hate that it happened because I think it takes a lot of the fun out of the league, but that's a different thing.
However, comparing it to what LeBron did is absurd. LeBron joined a 47 win Miami team. He then recruited another elite free agent to join him, but the team then had to get rid of like three of its existing top 6 players to make room for the two new acquisitions, and they also struggled to assemble a bench with salary limitations resulting from having three max guys. They then had to install a system from scratch with a then-unknown coach to accommodate the two additions.
He then went to a 33 win team. He recruited another elite player to come with him, but in order to get him the Cavs had to give up a #1 overall pick in a deal that many questioned at the time and many would continue to question forever if Game 7 last season had gone slightly differently. Again they had to install a new system from scratch, and went through two new coaches before finding the right combination.
Durant joined a 73 win team. To make room for him they only had to part with their fifth and sixth best player, the former of whom played a role that Durant could easily replicate and improve upon and the latter of whom was injured half the time anyway and was easily replaced by the Warriors' pick of veteran ring-chasers. They also already had a universally respect coach and stable organizational culture already in place. That's not his fault and it doesn't make him a bad person, but it's a totally different thing than what LeBron did in his two moves. It's ridiculous to compare the two.
However, comparing it to what LeBron did is absurd. LeBron joined a 47 win Miami team. He then recruited another elite free agent to join him, but the team then had to get rid of like three of its existing top 6 players to make room for the two new acquisitions, and they also struggled to assemble a bench with salary limitations resulting from having three max guys. They then had to install a system from scratch with a then-unknown coach to accommodate the two additions.
He then went to a 33 win team. He recruited another elite player to come with him, but in order to get him the Cavs had to give up a #1 overall pick in a deal that many questioned at the time and many would continue to question forever if Game 7 last season had gone slightly differently. Again they had to install a new system from scratch, and went through two new coaches before finding the right combination.
Durant joined a 73 win team. To make room for him they only had to part with their fifth and sixth best player, the former of whom played a role that Durant could easily replicate and improve upon and the latter of whom was injured half the time anyway and was easily replaced by the Warriors' pick of veteran ring-chasers. They also already had a universally respect coach and stable organizational culture already in place. That's not his fault and it doesn't make him a bad person, but it's a totally different thing than what LeBron did in his two moves. It's ridiculous to compare the two.
Last edited by a moderator:
better than the alternative