oddsbodkins
Footballguy
Ditto save I dropped Carolina. Next week looks good for Oakland tooI dropped Buffalo for Oak, good luck.
Ditto save I dropped Carolina. Next week looks good for Oakland tooI dropped Buffalo for Oak, good luck.
Wow yeah that is nice.Take a look at the entire season schedule for jax. Yummy.
and you forgot to add a pedestrian RB1 and a stubborn coach who refuses to integrate a rookie RB who is infinitely better than the RB1.BENGALS
Houston has zero legit TEs, one legit WR, and a rookie QB.
I went with Jax, dropped Steelers for them. I said a day ago I'd go Oakland, but I love Jacksville schedule and Bloom called the Jax defense "elite" twice in the same article. That tipped the scales for me.Take a look at the entire season schedule for jax. Yummy.
Yeah i drafted the cardinals but grabbed cle for the next few weeks to stream then will drop around week 7. I normally don't hold two def need but the cards have such a nice back end of the schedule this pretty much locks up that position all year and can drop the browns once the bye weeks really start coming into play.gradin123 said:I didn't watch the Clev/Pitts game but the Browns D seemed to hold up well.
Are the Browns a multiple week streamer with their upcoming schedule?
Sun, Sep 17@Ravens
Sun, Sep 24@Colts
Sun, Oct 1 vs Bengals
Sun, Oct 8 vs Jets
Sun, Oct 15 @Texans
You don't like them as a streaming D for this week?lot of common recommendations of OAK
No, I absolutely do. Unfortunately they were already drafted or picked up in all my leagues already. I assume that's likely the case for a number of others as well. so, going a rung down the ladder, i was thinking Jax as they're likely more availableYou don't like them as a streaming D for this week?
Have same choice and going Cinci. Don't think Cinci D is that great, but short week, rookie QB, rookie QB with banged up ankle...tough to turn down.Currently have Steelers but thinking Cincy this week. Really want to pick up Jax for following two weeks but struggling to fit two Ds onto roster. Partially tempted to just take them now and risk it against Tennessee this week
Which begs the question; are the Rams a legit D as well or was week 1 more a product of Indy being awful?Really don't like the idea of holding 2 defenses, but they do score a lot in this league. (Last week Rams scored 44, Jags 38)
Came away with 7 points, wasn't a horrible gamble. Should've had more, missed a couple of picks ...Bengals -While I don't think the Hou OL will be as horrible as it was against Jax, they aren't good and I figure that Watson will run into a few sacks.
In fairly standard defensive scoring, Carolina scored 11 and Oakland scored 10.Overthinking 101: Dropped Panthers for Raiders, cost me the game
Something I always seem to forget: A bad defense is still bad, even in a great match up.
Thanks that makes me a feel a little better lol, in my league Oakland scored 12 and Panthers 19.I'm fairly standard defensive scoring, Carolina scored 11 and Oakland scored 10.
I wouldn't call that overthinking. Unfortunate maybe if you lost by a tiny margin. But I wouldn't say it was a bad choice.
Running with Miami this week, and likely holding them through Week 7 to pair with HOU. Miami faces the Jets on the road this week (a much better option than HOU @ NE, and they play the Jets again at home during HOU's bye week.Oakland got 17 in my league. Quite happy with that. Next on the Jet train is Miami. I also see Pitt on the WW. I'll see if any one grabs them. If I can't get Pitt, then I'll go Miami this week.
I rolled with the Bills + Raiders the first two weeks, and was all set to pickup the Fins. But after MNF, I couldn't resist the Eagles at home versus the G-men.Oakland got 17 in my league. Quite happy with that. Next on the Jet train is Miami. I also see Pitt on the WW. I'll see if any one grabs them. If I can't get Pitt, then I'll go Miami this week.
Not surprised. Miami is the #1 ranked Defense this week on numerous sites.Someone actually claimed the Dolphins this week. But Steelers were left alone. Grabbed them for free.
I don't know if I would consider the Bucs O a good matchup for a D. Maybe if Winston makes mistakes.I may try to roll with the Lions and Rams the rest of the way. Pretty good schedule alignment. The Lions matchup during weeks 14-15-16 (playoffs) looks good with the Bucs - Bears - Bengals.
That is a fair point. I was looking at the stats and they were last in total yards. Completely forgot they did not play week 1.I don't know if I would consider the Bucs O a good matchup for a D. Maybe if Winston makes mistakes.
Agree. Just waiting for some more news on BradfordBucs D was where I went this week. Everything coming out about Bradford is bad and Keenum was bad bad bad. Bucs will eat him alive like they did Glennon
Miami only played one game this year.Balt and NE are two of the highest scoring D's this year. Nice you all are able to find them on the FA list.
Miami has scored 3 points total in two games, Cleveland has 11 total...hard to know what to roll with here. Detroit, Jax, Tampa, Dallas, GB, SF, Oak (waivers) all available too.
Good call, Skoo....and I realize now that Tampa did too.Miami only played one game this year.
NE has a total of 3 points for 2 games.....They are bottom 30 right now. Makes perfect sense why they are on waivers.Balt and NE are two of the highest scoring D's this year. Nice you all are able to find them on the FA list.
Miami has scored 3 points total in two games, Cleveland has 11 total...hard to know what to roll with here. Detroit, Jax, Tampa, Dallas, GB, SF, Oak (waivers) all available too.
I confused NE Def with someone else...it would certainly makes sense if they were on the WW. My bad...brain is tired I think.NE has a total of 3 points for 2 games.....They are bottom 30 right now. Makes perfect sense why they are on waivers.