tommyGunZ
Footballguy
Count me in the camp of hoping the Lakers stick to the original plan to sign LeBron and PG13 to play with the really good young core they already have. With Ball, Kuz, Ingram, & Hart, the roster is strong 6 deep, with some other intriguing prospects (1st round pick Wagner, 2017 2nd rounder Thomas Bryant), and a couple of vets who sign for the minimum.Gr00vus said:I wasn't intimating James would let them know what he'd do next year if he stayed in Cleveland. I was just thinking, from his perspective, does he really want to force the team he's going to to shed a bunch of useful players to fit Leonard in a year early, whereas the overall roster would be much better if they simply waited a year to fit Leonard in. James just lived through what happens when you have no flexibility left on your roster - does he really want to force creation of that same environment in his next spot? I don't think so.
If the Lakers don't get LeBron, they still see if they can sign George, maybe bring Randle back and see what happens next year. I'm fine with that as a fan. I'm fine with it as a fan if they just sign a bunch of 1 year big money deals as placeholders and see what's on the market next year.
That roster could be scary good if Ball, Kuz, and Ingram progress as expected.