Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Klobuchar said she will make a decision shortly whether to make a 2020 bid. She's would a strong moderate candidate. She outperformed Hillary by 22 points in Minnesota, which is an indicator of likeability.
I liked how she handled herself during the Kavanaugh hearings but don't know much about her. Thx.
There isn't a single one that isn't a spender...not one. They are all going to spend money. The only question remains is do you approve of what they are choosing to spend the money on.
I am inclined to NOT approve of grandiose spending plans unless believable actuarial information is also provided. I'd rather just roll forward doing what we are doing now with tweaks where appropriate.
The posters who populate my ignore list will waste no time in trying to make this an issue. It's a false equivalency issue that today's Trump supporters simply won't be able to resist.
I'm not sure I agree on the "false equivalency" part, but obviously you're right that Trump supporters aren't in any position to criticize any other candidate for lapses in their personal life.
What's truly amazing is how easy it is for them to do so though with no real awareness. It goes back to what I said in the thread about Mitch - there's a good number of people on the right today that just think they know what's best for everyone - any no amount of reasoning, logic, science, explanation or facts is going to change their mind.
Yeah, that's probably all we're measuring this far out. But he's still had a double-digit lead in every poll I've seen for the last couple months.
I am still not sure Bernie will run, but his appeal has less to do with him and more to do with policies for people that been neglected.
Do you think there are different levels of how pro-wealthy different candidates (from any party) may be?
On a scale of most pro-wealthy (100) to least pro-wealthy (0), how would you rate some of the prominent Democratic candidates and how would you rate Trump?
See, this seems WAY off to me, but it explains a lot if Cav feels similar to you. Personally if Sanders and Warren are at 5 and 10, I would put Biden and Harris closer to 20 or 30 and put Trump at like 95.
Based on this logic, Trump is pro- ... what? Who exactly would you argue his actions are helping?
This seems rash. I imagine you are basing it on current polling but it just doesn't seem meaningful yet. Biden is well known and generally liked but he's run for President on multiple occasions and gotten little traction.
I admitted the bolded in my post.
Good article. I'm still holding out hope that Klobuchar's mistreatment of her staff isn't as bad as it sounds, but the author raises some really good points.
Yeah. This goes beyond what I interpreted the earlier reports to mean. There's a real issue here from the sound of things.
This is a ridiculously slanted piece. I am really disappointed in the Atlantic. Her cruelty was astonishing, really? Throwing a binder is astonishing cruelty?
