Toby2ElectricBugaloo
Footballguy
If Curry wins another title and Finals MVP, does he move ahead of Lebron all-time?
By my count Curry would still be one title and three Finals MVPs behind LeBron in those categories if he wins those things.
YWIA
If Curry wins another title and Finals MVP, does he move ahead of Lebron all-time?
Wouldn't they both have 4 titles? And Lebron's last one was in the bubble . . . .By my count Curry would still be one title and three Finals MVPs behind LeBron in those categories if he wins those things.
YWIA
Wouldn't they both have 4 titles? And Lebron's last one was in the bubble . . . .
Hellllll noIf Curry wins another title and Finals MVP, does he move ahead of Lebron all-time?
You keep bringing this up but I hate to inform you the bubble title counts. I don’t even know why you think it wouldn’t, everybody played by the same rules, I thought only trolls on Twitter were trying that. No respectable basketball person bothers.Wouldn't they both have 4 titles? And Lebron's last one was in the bubble . . . .
So he'd tie him in titles(which is team-based), and be way behind him in everything else. Would love to hear an argument for this.If Curry wins another title and Finals MVP, does he move ahead of Lebron all-time?
There is literally no argument for it besides “I don’t like Lebron James”So he'd tie him in titles(which is team-based), and be way behind him in everything else. Would love to hear an argument for this.
Yeah, not even close.Hellllll no
There is literally no argument for it besides “I don’t like Lebron James”
If Curry wins another title and Finals MVP, does he move ahead of Lebron all-time?
These stats really lend themselves to variance when you consider MIA going 5-37 on open 3's in Game 5.Looking at the opponents they faced that playoff 3 point shooting differential is impressive:
Brooklyn 36.1 (10th)
Milwaukee 36.6 (5th)
Miami 37.9 (1st)
Granted Bucks and Heat were missing their top 3 point shooters, but still.
Warriors have played:
Denver 35.3 (16th)
Memphis 35.3 (17th)
Dallas 35.0 (19th)
The Celtics shot 35.6 (14th) from 3 in the regular season.
So the 3 point contest is closer than I thought.
Going to be a great series! Thanks for adding to my anxiety again.
Yea I think Lebron is #2 but I think there is an argument for Kareem and Magic as well. I wouldn’t agree with it but I could get it.I like Lebron perfectly fine. Never in trouble. Genius level basketball mind. Gives to the community. Good dad. All time great.
I don't think he is #1 of all-time. Maybe not even #2. I have come around more on Kobe as well. But Lebron's personality really seems to have taken a turn for the worse since moving to LA for some reason.
I think it was Brian Windhorst of ESPN that answered this best. There was a discussion on whether Curry would be equal to LeBron with another title (and whether he could somehow surpass James in the pantheon of all time players). Windhorst answered that Curry would be in contention for the next best player in the LeBron James era of basketball.No way. If Curry retired right now he is top 15ish all time. If he wins this title and wins finals MVP he is top 10ish. He would have to go off the next 3 to 5 years to crack the top 5.
Lebron is arguably the goat. Even if you only polled the biggest Lebron haters ever he is still a lock for top 5 no matter what he does from here on out.
I think it was Brian Windhorst of ESPN that answered this best. There was a discussion on whether Curry would be equal to LeBron with another title (and whether he could somehow surpass James in the pantheon of all time players). Windhorst answered that Curry would be in contention for the next best player in the LeBron James era of basketball.
I also hate to agree with Nick Wright on anything, but he suggested people should have to name names in their Top 5 or Top 10 lists when they suggest PLAYER X is in that group. Bottom line, there are a lot of great players near the top of the basketball heap. Michael, LeBron, Kareem, Russell, Magic, Wilt, Bird, Kobe, Duncan, Shaq, Robertson, Durant, Malone, and multiple other guys could be in the Top 10-15. Which players DON'T make the Top 10 if Curry is considered a Top 10 player of all time?
Obviously, we don't know what we don't know. Curry could go on to win 5 more titles and 3 more MVPs. We can't fully judge anyone until that player's career is completely over. (Similarly, we don't know what other players will do. KD could win 3 more titles and multiple MVPs.)Let's assume that Curry has no major injuries and they win this title he is finals MVP and he adds 4 more all NBA selections the rest of his career all while being the Warriors best player and they are one of handful of teams to be in the mix for the next 4 to 6 years. Not saying this will happen, just a what if.
On your list I think he clearly passes Malone, Robertson and Durant and is on par with Kobe, Shaq and Duncan.
Subpar in bubble. Makes me want to go back and see what I observed because my memory is that it was some of the highest level seen in some time, with players have basically zero distractions.I was being facetious. However, I do think Curry should be higher on all-time lists than some may have him. His play-style has changed the game -- and he has the hardware and records to go with it.
Regarding the bubble -- I watched almost every game that was televised. And I am extremely grateful that the NBA did the whole thing. But the play was subpar down there for the most part, and it just seemed that some teams/players had advantages that others did not and it mattered. That season feels lost to me.
Top 12 for me:
1. Jordan
2. Lebron
3. Magic
4. Kareem
5. Russell
6. Wilt
7. Bird
8. Duncan
9. Shaq
10. Hakeem
11. Robertson
12. Kobe
I find it difficult without the passage of time to reasonably assess where current players like Curry, Giannis, and Durant should be ranked. But I can say that I wouldn't see any of them passing Kobe yet, which means none of them are top 12 for me.
I disagree. The regular season and the playoffs are not the same. In the regular season, these 15 players combined to attempt 661 3-pointers for the Celtics:The Celtics as a team shot 35% from 3 point during the season. Are they better in the playoffs? Sure, but that only means a regression to the mean is more likely.
Nesmith, Kornet, Fitts, & Stauskus could get a 1-2 3's up in a blowout. Hauser has had some shoulder injury, so I don't think he'll even play then.I disagree. The regular season and the playoffs are not the same. In the regular season, these 15 players combined to attempt 661 3-pointers for the Celtics:
That was ~22% of the 3-pointers attempted by the Celtics in the regular season. Those guys aren't shooting in the postseason.
- Dennis Schroder
- Josh Richardson
- Aaron Nesmith
- Romeo Langord
- Sam Hauser
- Juancho Hernangomez
- Jabari Parker
- Brodric Thomas
- Malik Fitts
- Nik Stauskas
- Enes Freedom
- Matt Ryan
- Luke Kornet
- Burno Fernando
- Kelan Martin
Since you brought up MVP's . . . (If a player was a unanimous MVP, he would earn 1 Award Share. If a player got half the votes, he would get 0.5 of an Award Share (even if that player was named MVP).That is with about 5 minutes of thought. I could be persuaded to move a guy 1 or 2 spots in the bottom 9, but that top 12 is pretty locked in for me. I could see Giannis, KD or Curry moving over Robertson, but that Moses Malone tier is a tough nut to crack. Dude is the most underrated player in history because his game wasn't sexy, but 3 MVP's don't lie.
- MJ
- Lebron
- Kareem
- Wilt
- Russell
- Bird
- Magic
- Duncan
- Shaq
- Kobe
- Hakeem
- Moses
- Robertson
- Giannis
- Garnett
- KD
- Curry
- Dirk
- Dr. J
- Barkley
- Malone
This just made me realized I totally forgot about the Admiral. I'd put him at #18 (below KD & Curry) and bump Dirk, Dr. J, Barkley & Malone each down one spot.Since you brought up MVP's . . . (If a player was a unanimous MVP, he would earn 1 Award Share. If a player got half the votes, he would get 0.5 of an Award Share (even if that player was named MVP).
01 - LeBron James - 8.815
02 - Michael Jordan - 8.115
03 - Kareem Abdul-Jabbar - 6.105
04 - Larry Bird - 5.612
05 - Magic Johnson - 5.104
06 - Bill Russell - 4.748
07 - Shaquille O'Neal - 4.380
08 - Karl Malone - 4.296
09 - Tim Duncan - 4.278
10 - Kobe Bryant - 4.202
11 - Wilt Chamberlain - 4.152
12 - James Harden - 3.656
13 - Julius Erving - 3.551
14 - Kevin Durant - 3.210
15 - David Robinson - 3.123
16 - Giannis Antetokounmpo - 2.905
17 - Moses Malone - 2.854
18 - Mel Daniels - 2.795
19 - Kevin Garnett - 2.753
20 - Bob Pettit - 2.671
21 - Stephen Curry - 2.659
22 - Hakeem Olajuwon - 2.610
23 - Oscar Robertson - 2.482
24 - Charles Barkley - 2.437
25 - Steve Nash - 2.429
26 - Nikola Jokić - 2.064
27 - Jerry West - 2.0212
28 - Rick Barry - 1.821
29 - Connie Hawkins - 1.819
30 - Dirk Nowitzki - 1.810
This clearly includes ABA MVP's as well, since Mel only played one year in the NBA and Hawkins won an ABA MVP.Since you brought up MVP's . . . (If a player was a unanimous MVP, he would earn 1 Award Share. If a player got half the votes, he would get 0.5 of an Award Share (even if that player was named MVP).
01 - LeBron James - 8.815
02 - Michael Jordan - 8.115
03 - Kareem Abdul-Jabbar - 6.105
04 - Larry Bird - 5.612
05 - Magic Johnson - 5.104
06 - Bill Russell - 4.748
07 - Shaquille O'Neal - 4.380
08 - Karl Malone - 4.296
09 - Tim Duncan - 4.278
10 - Kobe Bryant - 4.202
11 - Wilt Chamberlain - 4.152
12 - James Harden - 3.656
13 - Julius Erving - 3.551
14 - Kevin Durant - 3.210
15 - David Robinson - 3.123
16 - Giannis Antetokounmpo - 2.905
17 - Moses Malone - 2.854
18 - Mel Daniels - 2.795
19 - Kevin Garnett - 2.753
20 - Bob Pettit - 2.671
21 - Stephen Curry - 2.659
22 - Hakeem Olajuwon - 2.610
23 - Oscar Robertson - 2.482
24 - Charles Barkley - 2.437
25 - Steve Nash - 2.429
26 - Nikola Jokić - 2.064
27 - Jerry West - 2.0212
28 - Rick Barry - 1.821
29 - Connie Hawkins - 1.819
30 - Dirk Nowitzki - 1.810
Feels like most have him top 15-20 now, which seems about right. I think he is undoubtedly the 2nd best of his generation, way behind LeBron, but ahead of Durant for sure. Giannis could catch him, but not sure the Bucks can keep winning titles without a great number 2.I was being facetious. However, I do think Curry should be higher on all-time lists than some may have him. His play-style has changed the game -- and he has the hardware and records to go with it.
I think we were just happy they were playing. Some guys did better than others.Subpar in bubble. Makes me want to go back and see what I observed because my memory is that it was some of the highest level seen in some time, with players have basically zero distractions.
Had the same thought, but seeming him fairly accurately rated here. I think he's clearly in the top 20, and above guys like Barkley/Malone, but I have a really hard time putting him above, say, Oscar or Shaq or Kobe or other guys around the 12-15 range.Since we are talking all time greats, I feel obligated to mention that Dirk is usually grossly underrated in these conversations.
I will give you Middleton. But the Heats top 3 pt shooter was Robinson who is unplayable and Herro who was 1/14 in the three games he played.Looking at the opponents they faced that playoff 3 point shooting differential is impressive:
Brooklyn 36.1 (10th)
Milwaukee 36.6 (5th)
Miami 37.9 (1st)
Granted Bucks and Heat were missing their top 3 point shooters, but still.
I will give you Middleton. But the Heats top 3 pt shooter was Robinson who is unplayable and Herro who was 1/14 in the three games he played.
Miami's offensive success was based on fast breaks, Adebayo abusing anyone besides Rob Williams and Butler attacking the midrange and shooting FT's. I don't know how much of that Golden State can replicate.Charlie Harper said:I was thinking Herro and Lowry since Robinson has fallen out of the rotation in the playoffs. Even the games Lowry played he clearly wasn't healthy.
The series against a banged up Heat is what gives me hope as a Dubs fan that the Celtics defense can be beaten.
Reallllllly good list imoTop 12 for me:
1. Jordan
2. Lebron
3. Magic
4. Kareem
5. Russell
6. Wilt
7. Bird
8. Duncan
9. Shaq
10. Hakeem
11. Robertson
12. Kobe
I find it difficult without the passage of time to reasonably assess where current players like Curry, Giannis, and Durant should be ranked. But I can say that I wouldn't see any of them passing Kobe yet, which means none of them are top 12 for me.
A lot of players have said they respect that title more than any other one due to the difficulty of being in the bubble. I can’t think of one advantage anybody had over another, they played on the same exact courts and had the same exact access to everything. Trying to discredit that title is odd to me.Regarding the bubble -- I watched almost every game that was televised. And I am extremely grateful that the NBA did the whole thing. But the play was subpar down there for the most part, and it just seemed that some teams/players had advantages that others did not and it mattered. That season feels lost to me.
Dirk is clearly above Barkley/Malone? Not in my book. Can you justify this?Had the same thought, but seeming him fairly accurately rated here. I think he's clearly in the top 20, and above guys like Barkley/Malone, but I have a really hard time putting him above, say, Oscar or Shaq or Kobe or other guys around the 12-15 range.
I do think I'd have him over the Admiral and Garnett. There's something to be said for being top 10 all time in points and w/r/t Garnett specifically it always felt like Dirk owned him. Not sure if that feeling matches reality.
Right or wrong, the one thing he has over both of those guys is a ring and Finals MVP. And it was an impressive championship at that, over LeBron's Heat and he was the clear cut alpha on that team.Dirk is clearly above Barkley/Malone? Not in my book. Can you justify this?
Lol at Karl Malone and Harden.Since you brought up MVP's . . . (If a player was a unanimous MVP, he would earn 1 Award Share. If a player got half the votes, he would get 0.5 of an Award Share (even if that player was named MVP).
01 - LeBron James - 8.815
02 - Michael Jordan - 8.115
03 - Kareem Abdul-Jabbar - 6.105
04 - Larry Bird - 5.612
05 - Magic Johnson - 5.104
06 - Bill Russell - 4.748
07 - Shaquille O'Neal - 4.380
08 - Karl Malone - 4.296
09 - Tim Duncan - 4.278
10 - Kobe Bryant - 4.202
11 - Wilt Chamberlain - 4.152
12 - James Harden - 3.656
13 - Julius Erving - 3.551
14 - Kevin Durant - 3.210
15 - David Robinson - 3.123
16 - Giannis Antetokounmpo - 2.905
17 - Moses Malone - 2.854
18 - Mel Daniels - 2.795
19 - Kevin Garnett - 2.753
20 - Bob Pettit - 2.671
21 - Stephen Curry - 2.659
22 - Hakeem Olajuwon - 2.610
23 - Oscar Robertson - 2.482
24 - Charles Barkley - 2.437
25 - Steve Nash - 2.429
26 - Nikola Jokić - 2.064
27 - Jerry West - 2.0212
28 - Rick Barry - 1.821
29 - Connie Hawkins - 1.819
30 - Dirk Nowitzki - 1.810
I don't think the case over Barkley is clear cut. Maybe I am in the minority.Right or wrong, the one thing he has over both of those guys is a ring and Finals MVP. And it was an impressive championship at that, over LeBron's Heat and he was the clear cut alpha on that team.
Honestly, I forget that Malone won 2 MVPs, though. I think the case over Barkley is clear cut, but Malone is probably the guy who gets underrated a bit. Then again, I take into account the boost guys get from their teammates and Malone benefitted from Stockton a great deal. Dirk played with Nash before his prime and Kidd after.
@Charlie Harper PM me some things you typically like and a mailing address and I’ll find some cool stuff and get it out to you!
Will be pulling for the Warriors in the finals. Absolutely love Steph. One of the kindest players I’ve ever played with and literally always seems to be having fun.
As a massive KG dork I would have him below Dirk.Had the same thought, but seeming him fairly accurately rated here. I think he's clearly in the top 20, and above guys like Barkley/Malone, but I have a really hard time putting him above, say, Oscar or Shaq or Kobe or other guys around the 12-15 range.
I do think I'd have him over the Admiral and Garnett. There's something to be said for being top 10 all time in points and w/r/t Garnett specifically it always felt like Dirk owned him. Not sure if that feeling matches reality.
This is interesting.I don't think the case over Barkley is clear cut. Maybe I am in the minority.
- Yes, Dirk has a ring and Barkley doesn't. The one time Barkley made the Finals, he played better than Dirk did in either of his two trips. Unfortunately for Barkley, he faced Jordan's Bulls. Dirk had it easier.
- Barkley's advanced stats are generally better (PER, TS%, WS/48, BPM). Dirk has an advantage in some counting stats, but he also played a lot more games.
- Barkley made 1st team All NBA 5 times to Dirk's 4.
Not much - just when I was in grad school one of my good friends was his friend from the sweet 16 run, so he'd pop down for pickup a couple times a year.Details please.
A lot of players have said they respect that title more than any other one due to the difficulty of being in the bubble. I can’t think of one advantage anybody had over another, they played on the same exact courts and had the same exact access to everything. Trying to discredit that title is odd to me.
I said the opposite. Bubble = high level play, no distractions for anyone.Trying to claim there were teams / players with advantages, in a bubble no less, is a reach.
Was that Instinctive that said that? The OU guy?
I said the opposite. Bubble = high level play, no distractions for anyone.
Quote the post itself. I did not say that.This was your quote:
"But the play was subpar down there for the most part, and it just seemed that some teams/players had advantages that others did not and it mattered. That season feels lost to me."
Subpar in bubble. Makes me want to go back and see what I observed because my memory is that it was some of the highest level seen in some time, with players have basically zero distractions.
This was your quote:
"But the play was subpar down there for the most part, and it just seemed that some teams/players had advantages that others did not and it mattered. That season feels lost to me."
Here you go. Weird gaslighting here.Quote the post itself. I did not say that.