Mr Anonymous
Footballguy
Bucks still undefeated this season when Giannis, Middleton, and Holiday all play
Damnnnnnn. That was wild.
Can ya blame him. Stewart was playing physical all game and LeFlop overreacted as usual. That's why I've said for yrs teams need to play Lebron Physical. Thibs knew this in CHI and had a good team that could be physical with Lebronand not back down. Too many teams just back down from physicality these days.
You're not getting a flagrant at the rim? Am I missing something?Also If I'm coaching against Lebron I'm calling a no easy layups rule. Hard would them legally at the rim where you aren't getting a flagrant. You gonna foul make it worth it and make sure they can't get the lay up. Lebron has always been frustrated by these sorts of plays and why I've always questioned if he could've played under Jordan Rules given how adamant he gets with such small physical stuff in a game.
Idon't think it was emotional at all. Typiically, the guy in second position will battle the guyu in first position for the rebound. Stewart caught him off guard and was driving him out with an arm bar. A normal response to an arm bar, or handcheck, is to chop it. Because Stewart was getting low and driving him out, the alignment on the chop was well beyond vertical and the contact with face was an unfortunate result.Typical Lebron. Gets emotional, throws elbow, then goes to apologize to avoid getting his ### kicked. Then backpedaled out of the camera view.
Emotional. Fragile. Dumb.
It's a shame RUN TMC didn't get more traction. They would've been a problem in today's NBA.
More like an intentional result.Idon't think it was emotional at all. Typiically, the guy in second position will battle the guyu in first position for the rebound. Stewart caught him off guard and was driving him out with an arm bar. A normal response to an arm bar, or handcheck, is to chop it. Because Stewart was getting low and driving him out, the alignment on the chop was well beyond vertical and the contact with face was an unfortunate result.
That’s probably exactly with the refs saw when they gave him a technical two and kicked him out of the game.Idon't think it was emotional at all. Typiically, the guy in second position will battle the guyu in first position for the rebound. Stewart caught him off guard and was driving him out with an arm bar. A normal response to an arm bar, or handcheck, is to chop it. Because Stewart was getting low and driving him out, the alignment on the chop was well beyond vertical and the contact with face was an unfortunate result.
I dunno if the ejections provide much to evaluate the way the game is officiated currently. In todays game—even accidental contact to the head often gets qualified as a flagrant 1. With that said—in my opinion—what Lebron did was clearly dirty. I also think that Stewart reacted to a dirty play in an even dirtier fashion. To me it’s just like the Morris and Jokic situation a few weeks back. Both guys could have and should have been better.That’s probably exactly with the refs saw when they gave him a technical two and kicked him out of the game.
It saddens me to say this is the first time I think I’ve ever disagreed with you but this time I do on all counts.I dunno if the ejections provide much to evaluate the way the game is officiated currently. In todays game—even accidental contact to the head often gets qualified as a flagrant 1. With that said—in my opinion—what Lebron did was clearly dirty. I also think that Stewart reacted to a dirty play in an even dirtier fashion. To me it’s just like the Morris and Jokic situation a few weeks back. Both guys could have and should have been better.
Basketball is a physical contact sport. I played basketball at a competitive level for 20 years—from about when i was 15-35. I was working 35 hours a week while in high school—so while I didnt play on the high school team—I would work out and scrimmage with the team when I could. After that—I played intramural at UC Irvine and after that I’d play in competitive leagues that feature college and ex-NBA players. Anytime I played—I knew that I could get hit—and when that happened—I knew that I could hit back— but within the course/parameters of the game. I’m not saying that Stewart didn’t have the right to be mad—or even face up Lebron. He DID NOT need to charge the court several times and to instigate what could have been a second malice in the palace. I said it before—Lebrons play was dirty. Stewarts reaction was also dirty.It saddens me to say this is the first time I think I’ve ever disagreed with you but this time I do on all counts.
You put your hands on me and I’m putting mine on you.
A technical two?That’s probably exactly with the refs saw when they gave him a technical two and kicked him out of the game.
I don't really want to "big time" you here, but what you described is nowhere near "a competitive level". Without a coach controlling your team and practices every day, without nationally organized leagues and nationally organized officials you are talking apples and oranges. The standards and rules of conduct are not the same. I've played small college and I've played in those pro-am type competitive leagues and they are almost two different sports.Basketball is a physical contact sport. I played basketball at a competitive level for 20 years—from about when i was 15-35. I was working 35 hours a week while in high school—so while I didnt play on the high school team—I would work out and scrimmage with the team when I could. After that—I played intramural at UC Irvine and after that I’d play in competitive leagues that feature college and ex-NBA players. Anytime I played—I knew that I could get hit—and when that happened—I knew that I could hit back— but within the course/parameters of the game. I’m not saying that Stewart didn’t have the right to be mad—or even face up Lebron. He DID NOT need to charge the court several times and to instigate what could have been a second malice in the palace. I said it before—Lebrons play was dirty. Stewarts reaction was also dirty.
That's when the Kings knew the Luke Walton Era in Sacramento had come to an end.No jokes about the drunk Kings fan puking on the court on Saturday night?
I know semantics are huge with you. You know damn well I meant flagrant two.A technical two?
It saddens me to say this is the first time I think I’ve ever disagreed with you but this time I do on all counts.
You put your hands on me and I’m putting mine on you.
Why? it's a physical sport. The instigator should be the only one punished in these IMO. And I mean instigator by who made the non-basketball play. Lebron punched the guy for boxing him out. Morris went overboard on the intentional foul., though that one is less obvious who to blame. But if someone wants to defend themselves, I'm all for it. That's not the way the NBA or most sports see it, but it's my opinion. Do something to me not within the context of the game and I'm coming for you. Maybe that's years of being a white kid growing up at hood basketball courts. Gotta fight back or you're just gonna be picked on more.I dunno if the ejections provide much to evaluate the way the game is officiated currently. In todays game—even accidental contact to the head often gets qualified as a flagrant 1. With that said—in my opinion—what Lebron did was clearly dirty. I also think that Stewart reacted to a dirty play in an even dirtier fashion. To me it’s just like the Morris and Jokic situation a few weeks back. Both guys could have and should have been better.
Agreed. The player that initiates the dirty play should receive the worse punishment. In football, if a player grabs someone's facemask and pulls them to the ground they shouldn't get an offsetting penalty when the other guy gets off the ground and pushes him back. Ditto with the fines received.Why? it's a physical sport. The instigator should be the only one punished in these IMO. And I mean instigator by who made the non-basketball play. Lebron punched the guy for boxing him out. Morris went overboard on the intentional foul., though that one is less obvious who to blame. But if someone wants to defend themselves, I'm all for it. That's not the way the NBA or most sports see it, but it's my opinion. Do something to me not within the context of the game and I'm coming for you. Maybe that's years of being a white kid growing up at hood basketball courts. Gotta fight back or you're just gonna be picked on more.
Not sure if it was something LeBron said - more likely it was Stewart seeing how much he was bleeding and getting more pissed off about it.Curious what was said that really set him off. Seemed like he was just going to take it until Lebron said something slick.
I dunno if the ejections provide much to evaluate the way the game is officiated currently. In todays game—even accidental contact to the head often gets qualified as a flagrant 1. With that said—in my opinion—what Lebron did was clearly dirty. I also think that Stewart reacted to a dirty play in an even dirtier fashion. To me it’s just like the Morris and Jokic situation a few weeks back. Both guys could have and should have been better.
Not sure if it was something LeBron said - more likely it was Stewart seeing how much he was bleeding and getting more pissed off about it.
Maybe he did a Ric Flair on his own forehead for added drama.I'll have to watch it again but IIRC he got cut after the repeated melees
They are not paying him right now. Their position is show up and play and use best efforts, per contract, or waste up to 4-years of prime and wealth.I don't remember seeing anything in here about the Sixers list of 30 players that they would be willing to trade Ben for. Essentially, they won't move Simmons unless they get a Top 30 player back (and potentially more). It's expected that the list only has multi-time All Stars and All NBA players on it. And apparently they are willing to wait it out, even if it takes up to 4 years to facilitate a trade. Mind you, it's pretty likely the players on their list are not available (and won't be). It's like they want $1.25 on a dollar IF Ben were still playing and a peak performer. Is he even worth 0.50 on the dollar these days? PHI refuses to consider that Simmons is not considered a plus asset right now (and most teams are concerned he's toxic). Do they actually think that his value is going to go up with him not playing? How long will they be willing pay him not to play (or fine him for not playing and the PA gets involved)?
Which is why I said at some point he will file a grievance and the player's association will step in. He will get his own doctor to say he mentally can't play while the Sixers will get the team doctor to say that he can. The unpaid total and fines could add up quickly and make things even more tense and problematic. Then they'll probably discuss some sort of settlement in order to get a deal done.They are not paying him right now. Their position is show up and play and use best efforts, per contract, or waste up to 4-years of prime and wealth.
Which is why I said at some point he will file a grievance and the player's association will step in. He will get his own doctor to say he mentally can't play while the Sixers will get the team doctor to say that he can. The unpaid total and fines could add up quickly and make things even more tense and problematic. Then they'll probably discuss some sort of settlement in order to get a deal done.
It still doesn't change that the Sixers get no production from him when he doesn't play (while Simmons currently gets no money to stay away). And it also doesn't change that Simmons value is not going to go up any if he is not playing or practicing. In the meantime, their record is pretty meh without him (or assets to replace him).
While basketball is a physical sport—basketball at organized levels (especially at the NBA level) is also a professional sport. This is not MMA. NBA basketball does not condone vigilante justice. As a man—-if somebody cheap shots me on the street—they are inviting me to hit back them back—but nowhere within the framework of the NBA is that justified. The refs saw the foul—blew the whistle—and they rightfully kicked out Lebron for a dirty play. This is not street ball—there are kids watching that game—and they didn’t need to see . Stewart become totally unhinged—have to get restrained by refs/trainers/his teammates—and he still tried to bust through. One of the trainers got knocked down in an attempt to restrain him—which is not on Lebron. I’ve played in leagues before where any aggressive action is grounds for ejection and entire teams being banned and forfeited regardless of who starts the aggression. I’ve been on a team that got kicked out of a tournament because of my teammates shoved a dude after the dude purposely bridged him while he was going up for a layup. Benches cleared and both teams were forfeited from the tournament.Why? it's a physical sport. The instigator should be the only one punished in these IMO. And I mean instigator by who made the non-basketball play. Lebron punched the guy for boxing him out. Morris went overboard on the intentional foul., though that one is less obvious who to blame. But if someone wants to defend themselves, I'm all for it. That's not the way the NBA or most sports see it, but it's my opinion. Do something to me not within the context of the game and I'm coming for you. Maybe that's years of being a white kid growing up at hood basketball courts. Gotta fight back or you're just gonna be picked on more.
The conduct and standards for NBA players is higher than that of pro-am and small college players. Show me where in the NBA rule book it says that a player can participate in vigilante justice in regards to a cheap shot? NBA players get paid millions of dollars to be professional. Stewart rushing back on the court to attack James several times after his team, trainers/officials were restraining him is just as wrong/dirty as Lebrons play. The refs ejected Lebron—they had it right—Stewart forced the refs to eject him by his actions. I understand why Stewart was mad—but he went about it in a very unprofessional fashion.I don't really want to "big time" you here, but what you described is nowhere near "a competitive level". Without a coach controlling your team and practices every day, without nationally organized leagues and nationally organized officials you are talking apples and oranges. The standards and rules of conduct are not the same. I've played small college and I've played in those pro-am type competitive leagues and they are almost two different sports.
The conduct and standards for NBA players is higher than that of pro-am and small college players. Show me where in the NBA rule book it says that a player can participate in vigilante justice in regards to a cheap shot? NBA players get paid millions of dollars to be professional. Stewart rushing back on the court to attack James several times after his team, trainers/officials were restraining him is just as wrong/dirty as Lebrons play. The refs ejected Lebron—they had it right—Stewart forced the refs to eject him by his actions. I understand why Stewart was mad—but he went about it in a very unprofessional fashion.
And. Ron artist was lying on a bench when a fan threw something at him and all hell broke out and it set back the Pacers franchise and the NBA for years. According to your logic—anytime a fan or a player insults/makes contact with a player—then that player has full reign to fight back. While that might happen in the street—it’s generally not tolerated in a world where the player is representing more than himself—he is representing the team he plays for, and the league he plays for. I’m not saying that Stewart had no right to be mad. Maybe he shoves lebron right back and then walks away—but if you are condoning him pushing his own teammates aside, pushing and knocking down his own training and coaching staff after several attempts to get back on the court—we can just agree to disagree. The league not only ejected Lebron—they also suspended him for a game. What Stewart did was stupid and dumb. If he finishes out that game—there’s a great chance the Pistons beat the Lakers. He put himself ahead of the team and the league—which is wrong.JJ Stokes was drafted as the heir apparent to Jerry Rice during the end of the classic 49ers dynasty. SF spent two first round picks to move up twenty spots to take Stokes right after they toasted the Chargers for a ring. He was touted and examined and lauded and celebrated even before he took his first snap.
When the 49ers played the Broncos in 1997, ( lots of legacy between the two teams at that point, Shanahan was the offensive coordinator for that 94 championship team and he took Ed McCaffrey with him) Bill Romanowski, who had won rings as a Niners linebacker, spit in the face of JJ Stokes.
Stokes just walked away. Didn't fight at all. In the press he said he wouldn't be that kind of player. Romo, known for being out of control most of the time, was fined 7500 dollars. Stokes had his owner, his head coach, his teammates, his position coach and all the rest of the NFL and announcers defend him and say he did the right thing in public.
In private, they knew he was a punk #####. If Vern Schillinger was a long snapper somewhere in the NFL, everyone privately would believe JJ Stokes would be first in line to be his prag. Move over Beecher, it's time to stoke that new fire for Vern.
Everyone smiled in the 49ers front office, already disappointed in Stokes and understood what success he had was due to being surrounded by basically an All Star team of players, sought immediately to replace him as Terrell Owens emerged. They hung onto him a little longer than they wanted when Jerry Rice got injured.
You can label a fighter as "too passionate" but a punk ### ##### is just going to get treated like just another prag inside of Oz.
I don't know where you were taught functional sports dynamics in terms of competition and the internal culture of a locker room, but if someone wants to fight you and puts their hands on you, you need to put them down. For yourself, your team, your franchise and your dignity. Or you can hold Schillinger's pocket in the yard.
I don't remember seeing anything in here about the Sixers list of 30 players that they would be willing to trade Ben for. Essentially, they won't move Simmons unless they get a Top 30 player back (and potentially more). It's expected that the list only has multi-time All Stars and All NBA players on it. And apparently they are willing to wait it out, even if it takes up to 4 years to facilitate a trade.
Compiling a list doesn't change much of anything. The Sixers were asking for the sun and the moon when they tried piecing together a direct trade. It doesn't sound like they have budged in that regard. IMO, even with multiple teams involved, the Sixers will have to load up the trade with THEIR OWN ASSETS and draft capital to GET RID of Simmons. Some team is going to end up with Ben and owe him most of $145 million. No one knows if he will play the role of good soldier or if he will flake out again and wig out. How much is it worth it to PHI to wipe their hands of Simmons? TBH, I don't see how they end up with a Top 30 player back without shipping off other decent players and picks . . .ie, they are in damage control mode.The purpose of that list is so teams who want Simmons can start the process to negotiate 3-4 team type trade scenarios with non 76ers teams and then present a package offer to Morey. It cuts out a lot of the work.
If Morey solicits trades, he is acknowledging he has little to no leverage in some ways and the price goes down. If Morey waits and others approach him, the price moves to the perception of what other teams think other interested teams are going to offer.
For example, if the Knicks want Simmons, a straight across trade won't likely work. I have a hard time seeing Morey wanting Julius Randle or Evan Fournier as salary matching type contracts in return. But if the Knicks know Bradley Beal is on that list, maybe they can try to mix in a trade negotiation with Washington to see if they and Philly can offer something together for Beal while Simmons goes to NY and something solid goes back to the Wizards.
The more teams involved in a mega trade, the better chance Morey has to get a better haul in terms of quantity.
Morey wants to pick from the best 3-4 team large trade offer he's presented instead of hunting for trades himself where he has to politic with not just multiple GMs, but also owners. This kind of large trade and with the kind of pieces being discussed are ownership level trades. I.E. Morey doesn't need to check in with his owner to trade off former UDFA Aaron Henry. However moving someone like Tobias Harris and taking back a different contract needs to be discussed.
This is not going to take four years. Everyone wants to avoid invoking the Chris Bosh Rule here because that opens up all kinds of other legal pitfalls and risks. However it looks like Rich Paul will keep up his idiot ways and there will be no choice left.
And. Ron artist was lying on a bench when a fan threw something at him and all hell broke out and it set back the Pacers franchise and the NBA for years. According to your logic—anytime a fan or a player insults/makes contact with a player—then that player has full reign to fight back. While that might happen in the street—it’s generally not tolerated in a world where the player is representing more than himself—he is representing the team he plays for, and the league he plays for. I’m not saying that Stewart had no right to be mad. Maybe he shoves lebron right back and then walks away—but if you are condoning him pushing his own teammates aside, pushing and knocking down his own training and coaching staff after several attempts to get back on the court—we can just agree to disagree. The league not only ejected Lebron—they also suspended him for a game. What Stewart did was stupid and dumb. If he finishes out that game—there’s a great chance the Pistons beat the Lakers. He put himself ahead of the team and the league—which is wrong.
Compiling a list doesn't change much of anything. The Sixers were asking for the sun and the moon when they tried piecing together a direct trade. It doesn't sound like they have budged in that regard. IMO, even with multiple teams involved, the Sixers will have to load up the trade with THEIR OWN ASSETS and draft capital to GET RID of Simmons. Some team is going to end up with Ben and owe him most of $145 million. No one knows if he will play the role of good soldier or if he will flake out again and wig out. How much is it worth it to PHI to wipe their hands of Simmons? TBH, I don't see how they end up with a Top 30 player back without shipping off other decent players and picks . . .ie, they are in damage control mode.
gruecd said:No jokes about the drunk Kings fan puking on the court on Saturday night?
Anarchy99 said:I don't remember seeing anything in here about the Sixers list of 30 players that they would be willing to trade Ben for. Essentially, they won't move Simmons unless they get a Top 30 player back (and potentially more). It's expected that the list only has multi-time All Stars and All NBA players on it. And apparently they are willing to wait it out, even if it takes up to 4 years to facilitate a trade. Mind you, it's pretty likely the players on their list are not available (and won't be). It's like they want $1.25 on a dollar IF Ben were still playing and a peak performer. Is he even worth 0.50 on the dollar these days? PHI refuses to consider that Simmons is not considered a plus asset right now (and most teams are concerned he's toxic). Do they actually think that his value is going to go up with him not playing? How long will they be willing pay him not to play (or fine him for not playing and the PA gets involved)?
Anarchy99 said:And it also doesn't change that Simmons value is not going to go up any if he is not playing or practicing. In the meantime, their record is pretty meh without him (or assets to replace him).