Jonathan Givoney was right on his Simmons right up. This dude has zero desire for completion. Just amazes me how many people defended this guy for yrs. Maybe it was tunnel vision of wanting the next superstar, maybe it was because he was on their team, favorite player they grew attracted too what have you. I'd have paid good money to watch what the likes of Bird/Magic/MJ etc and even Kobe would've done to this clown during their primes.
Ben gets a ton of blame but I think the 76ers do to for not saying no and coddling the kid for yrs because the team was worried if he did become the player they thought he could be, then he'd leave them and they'd be screwed, This is a good reminder why Organizations run the the team and players play. Same with the Lakers/Lebron situation. Allow your guys input but final say comes from the big suits upstairs.
Overall the warning signs and big red flags about this guy were there for yrs. I got destroyed by a lot of people for saying this dude was a fraud too.
Really looking forward to Bucks/Celtics. Has the makings of a great series, especially if Middleton is back.
Really like this Minnesota Memphis series a lot. A lot of young talent.
Those Bucks teams are my first basketball memories. I would've been 10 years old or so. Good times.Not to look ahead or anything, but I'm looking ahead to this one. If Middleton and Robert Williams are both reasonably healthy (a big if), it could bring back memories of the late 80's - Bird, Parish, Ainge and DJ against Moncrief, Pressey, Cummings and Sikma.
Not to mention the mental exhaustion from dealing with the nonstop drama from Kyrie, Harden, and now Simmons.Watching KD in this series, it becomes evident that he is no longer a young man. A major achilles injury, the amount of deep playoff runs, a recent Olympic run and the minutes/years have once again proven that Father Time is undefeated.
What the Celtics are doing is wearing him down throughout the games and throughout the series. His points and even shot attempts have gone down with each game as he just doesn't have the energy and will to fight through all of the hits he takes on each offensive posession.
As a player I HATED the guy that was just going to work hard to keep you from getting to where you wanted to go. Even if you had a physical advantage (like KD does against everyone in the world but Giannis), the amount of effort it takes to utilize that advantage is unsustainable over multiple possessions. Even though for one possession KD is ultimately unstoppable, over the course of multiple games you can make it so hard he doesn't even want to try. In the 2nd half of game 3, that is what it looked like. As long as the Celtics come out with energy to finish the job I don't see KD putting in the effort it would take to extend the series.
Not to mention the mental exhaustion from dealing with the nonstop drama from Kyrie, Harden, and now Simmons.
Those Bucks teams are my first basketball memories. I would've been 10 years old or so. Good times.
That’s part of what made Jordan so unreal. He pushed himself so hard and was so competitive that it never mattered how much other teams banged on him he simply kept out working them. And of course it’s one reason why he added more muscle mass was because the Pistons and Knicks were beating him up so much that he knew he had to get bigger and stronger to keep winning.Watching KD in this series, it becomes evident that he is no longer a young man. A major achilles injury, the amount of deep playoff runs, a recent Olympic run and the minutes/years have once again proven that Father Time is undefeated.
What the Celtics are doing is wearing him down throughout the games and throughout the series. His points and even shot attempts have gone down with each game as he just doesn't have the energy and will to fight through all of the hits he takes on each offensive posession.
As a player I HATED the guy that was just going to work hard to keep you from getting to where you wanted to go. Even if you had a physical advantage (like KD does against everyone in the world but Giannis), the amount of effort it takes to utilize that advantage is unsustainable over multiple possessions. Even though for one possession KD is ultimately unstoppable, over the course of multiple games you can make it so hard he doesn't even want to try. In the 2nd half of game 3, that is what it looked like. As long as the Celtics come out with energy to finish the job I don't see KD putting in the effort it would take to extend the series.
Which is why the Celts won't be able to simply "outphysical" Giannis into submission the way they are with KD.That’s part of what made Jordan so unreal. He pushed himself so hard and was so competitive that it never mattered how much other teams banged on him he simply kept out working them. And of course it’s one reason why he added more muscle mass was because the Pistons and Knicks were beating him up so much that he knew he had to get bigger and stronger to keep winning.
but they can use similar tactics - the same 1ondaball, 1ondabod, 1indeearea - to that by which they bottled-up KD to interrupt Anteaternintendo's stride. Stevens experimented with this in the past, which is why i was surprised he didnt grab Ojeleye (who the Bucks signed this yr entirely off his D on Giannis) when the Clips dropped him late in the season - you can let the man-on circle back after his first step so that another is at his 2nd step and be there to pick him up again for the Euro step and frustrate his action to the hoop. that's the trunk of his move-tree and the key to minimizing his damageWhich is why the Celts won't be able to simply "outphysical" Giannis into submission the way they are with KD.
Yeah, but but he's grown by leaps and bounds as a facilitator. If he can consistently make the right pass, this strategy will result in tons of open looks for Jrue/Wes/Bobby/Grayson/Pat and hopefully Khris. The Nets don't have shooters like that.but they can use similar tactics - the same 1ondaball, 1ondabod, 1indeearea - to that by which they bottled-up KD to interrupt Anteaternintendo's stride. Stevens experimented with this in the past, which is why i was surprised he didnt grab Ojeleye (who the Bucks signed this yr entirely off his D on Giannis) when the Clips dropped him late in the season - you can let the man-on circle back after his first step so that another is at his 2nd step and be there to pick him up again for the Euro step and frustrate his action to the hoop. that's the trunk of his move-tree and the key to minimizing his damage
there's a reason theyre the champs. you almost had me til you said "Wes"...Yeah, but but he's grown by leaps and bounds as a facilitator. If he can consistently make the right pass, this strategy will result in tons of open looks for Jrue/Wes/Bobby/Grayson/Pat and hopefully Khris. The Nets don't have shooters like that.
Also, if guaranteed contracts are gone after the next CBA, there's exactly one person to blame...
He's 8/17 from three (47%) so far against the Bulls.there's a reason theyre the champs. you almost had me til you said "Wes"...
Boston in a half court set can slow down pretty much anybody. They won't be able to do much against Giannis in transition, as he is a freight train. But he may not be able to get the ball and do much with it (either shooting or facilitating) when the defense is set in half court. That's been part of the problem with the Nets and KD. He hasn't been able to get the ball inside the three-point line. Boston has been smothering him and he can't even get open to receive a pass. When Brooklyn has him bring the ball up, he gets swarmed as soon as he crosses mid court. Sure, Giannis is stronger and probably won't wilt or tire out, but he still has to be able to receive the ball and have time and space to maneuver.Yeah, but but he's grown by leaps and bounds as a facilitator. If he can consistently make the right pass, this strategy will result in tons of open looks for Jrue/Wes/Bobby/Grayson/Pat and hopefully Khris. The Nets don't have shooters like that.
Because there is 100's of years of data across all sports that show how difficult it is to repeat.I've said it before, and I'll say it again. I love how the defending champs are being cast pretty much universally as underdogs.
if one could actually distinguish the Bulls defense from a shootaround, that would be impressive...He's 8/17 from three (47%) so far against the Bulls.![]()
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. I love how the defending champs are being cast pretty much universally as underdogs.
I picked them to win the East and lose in 7 games to the Suns.Sure, but that’s because winning every series necessary to win a title even if you are favorites is really difficult. But that doesn’t mean that a team shouldn’t be the favorite in every series.Because there is 100's of years of data across all sports that show how difficult it is to repeat.
Putting aside the everyone hates Simmons take -I just looked on Spotrac to see what Simmons is making. You've got to be ####### kidding me.
With the 64 win Suns on the verge of losing their series with the Pellies, without looking any guesses what team holds the distinction currently for the most regular season wins to lose in Round 1?
(I thought it was obvious but guessed wrong)
I Love This Game.
My guess as well but incorrect.I have 3 guesses, but will only guess one. The Sonics to the Nuggets with Mutumbo.
With the 64 win Suns on the verge of losing their series with the Pellies, without looking any guesses what team holds the distinction currently for the most regular season wins to lose in Round 1?
(I thought it was obvious but guessed wrong)
I Love This Game.
I have 3 guesses, but will only guess one. The Sonics to the Nuggets with Mutumbo.
If not, feels like it would have to be a team from pre-90s.I'm assuming, unfortunately, the 67-win 2007 Mavericks hold this distinction. If not, maybe the Spurs had 67 wins in like 2011 when they lost to the Grizzlies? Thought they were only like 61 though so Mavs would hold over them.
I'm assuming, unfortunately, the 67-win 2007 Mavericks hold this distinction. If not, maybe the Spurs had 67 wins in like 2011 when they lost to the Grizzlies? Thought they were only like 61 though so Mavs would hold over them.
I bet you could blindly name more of the GSW players from 2007 than the Mavs. #### I can only name like 4 Mavs from that season and I am not only a big fan, but someone who has followed basketball extremely well for the last ~20 years.
Figured you'd be the one to get it. I don't even remember that Golden State team that beat the Mavs that year![]()
I couldn't.....only reason I could name Baron Davis/Stephen Jackson is because I read an article. I'd have probably said Steph (who wasn't even in the league yet). TBH Dirks the only one I'd probably be able to name (maybe Josh Howard if really thinking about it....but saw his name in the article I read).I bet you could blindly name more of the GSW players from 2007 than the Mavs. #### I can only name like 4 Mavs from that season and I am not only a big fan, but someone who has followed basketball extremely well for the last ~20 years.
Let's see, 2007 warriors guesses:
Baron Davis
Mickael Pietrus
Jason Richardson
Kelenna Azubuike
Matt Barnes
Stephen Jackson
Monta Ellis
Al Harrington
Andres Biedrins
I'm sure I'm missing a big guy and chemistry man, but I think that's probably the full rotation for that series. And anyone looking at it today would think it was better than the Mavs roster. Dirk was unreal that year.
I think Dampier, surely Josh Howard is right, Jason Terry was there. I didn't think Barea yet? He feels like a 2008-2020 kind of guy. But he could have been a rookie. I'd be extremely surprised to learn he got minutes in that series.I couldn't.....only reason I could name Baron Davis/Stephen Jackson is because I read an article. I'd have probably said Steph (who wasn't even in the league yet). TBH Dirks the only one I'd probably be able to name (maybe Josh Howard if really thinking about it....but saw his name in the article I read).
I'm clueless about that time frame for either team. I'd be guessing like JJ Barea/maybe Finley returned? I can remember a lot more 90s stuff than 2000s
I'm assuming, unfortunately, the 67-win 2007 Mavericks hold this distinction. If not, maybe the Spurs had 67 wins in like 2011 when they lost to the Grizzlies? Thought they were only like 61 though so Mavs would hold over them.
Figured you'd be the one to get it. I don't even remember that Golden State team that beat the Mavs that year
I only remember Dikembe clutching the basketball crying on the ground I think and was my guess. That Sonic team had 63 wins.
Yes but only one that flaunts it in the face of the league. Guys can not live up to a contract or get hurt. Most guys don't just fake being injured and be fine with collecting a paycheck while embarrassing his team.Too much hyperbole here. There are literally dozens of contracts that were/are just as bad.
With what assets? I don’t think the Lakers have a first until like 2028.Read something that Ben/LeGM/Clutch might be angling for a trade to the Lakers in the off-season.
it is crazy how Ime didn't get more love for Coach of the year, this current iteration of Boston vs. the one from the 1st half of the season couldn't be more different. he did something to get through to the entire team. i think there is still a talent gap between them and the top 2-3 teams, but they will be in every seriesBoston is so good. I'm glad they have to play Milwaukee next round. That'll be wild.
Read something that Ben/LeGM/Clutch might be angling for a trade to the Lakers in the off-season.