Still the defense "wasn't that bad" is only in comparison to how awful their box score was. They were still really bad.Right, the Jets caught a lot of big breaks at really opportune times. Tough to stop a team like that without your best player.
I wouldn't say they were really bad, but again, I seem to be in the minority. That said, do you think a better DC would have made a difference? I think they were just a little outmatched.Still the defense "wasn't that bad" is only in comparison to how awful their box score was. They were still really bad.
Totally agree. I've become so ashamed to tell folks who I follow lately. Fortunately I live in Lions territory, so nobody can really throw stones.I'm starting to suspect that being known as a Bills fan is starting to undermine my colleague's assessment of my own professional competence. I think that for them, it's kind of like finding out that your boss is a flat-earther or believes in alien abductions or something.
Roman wasn't good in SF either. Their team success just masked it.Yep. Rob and Rex get 38 dropped on them and you fire the OC. Based off of the WRs and QB Roman has, he probably wasn't the problem.
The "better DC" question is strange because I think Rex runs HIS defense regardless of his players skill sets. This will of course cause problems. That and arrogance are Rex's problems. I can't pick apart his play by play calls. He studies teams and is way better than me personally (obviously) but I do think there is better DCs out there. It's not just a matter of in game play calls. **Rex might actually be really good at this.** This isn't a scrub defense so they shouldn't look like they are. That's usually a sign of a coach misusing his players. His scheme and his game plan in general might be the problem.I wouldn't say they were really bad, but again, I seem to be in the minority. That said, do you think a better DC would have made a difference? I think they were just a little outmatched.
However, on the offensive side. I think it's 75% on the OC, and 25% on Tyrod. You simply can't have one of the best WRs in the game and only target him a few times. And the run game hasn't been called any better. It's been just as terrible. Let's run McCoy up the middle from the shotgut every single play...
Correct, this is new OC.Schefter reporting the new OC will actually be Anthony Lynn.
Thank god it is NOT him. Palmer was once the OC when #1 QB pick Tim Couch busted. He then went on to be the OC for Houston when another #1 QB pick, David Carr, was sacked a record number of times and is still in the fetal position to this day.Isn't Chris Palmer a one-time HC of the Browns?
If so, then yes, that sound you hear is me choking on my own disgust.
I was actually trying to do the multi-quote thing, and couldn't cancel the post, so I tried just deleting the content and surprisingly it let me post that.
Oh believe me, I'm not saying he shouldn't be fired. I'm just saying that when Greg Salas is your guy (Sammy I believe to be not 100% but 100% game planned for) and Tyrod is your QB and you still put up 31, maybe other heads need to roll first.Roman wasn't good in SF either. Their team success just masked it.
LolThank god it is NOT him. Palmer was once the OC when #1 QB pick Tim Couch busted. He then went on to be the OC for Houston when another #1 QB pick, David Carr, was sacked a record number of times and is still in the fetal position to this day.
This total scapegoat moveOh believe me, I'm not saying he shouldn't be fired. I'm just saying that when Greg Salas is your guy (Sammy I believe to be not 100% but 100% game planned for) and Tyrod is your QB and you still put up 31, maybe other heads need to roll first.
That actually wouldn't surprise me at all if he ends up being the next HC.The Bills should hire Matt Patricia as their new HC.
Not only that but give him complete control BB style.
His buddy that he brought with him from the Jets.WHO?Schefter reporting the new OC will actually be Anthony Lynn.
Yes! Actually probably not but yes! I'm excited. The Pats allowed him to interview for the Browns HC job during their playoff bye week.That actually wouldn't surprise me at all if he ends up being the next HC.
I wonder if they could do it before week 4...
To add to the above, the other thing to keep in mind is that the defense was on the field all game. Time of possession was almost 2:1. That D got gassed early.Right, the Jets caught a lot of big breaks at really opportune times. Tough to stop a team like that without your best player.
Hiring Rex Ryan was the worst thing they've done since handing Fitz that massive contract.Rex Ryan - DT - Bills
The Sporting News' Alex Marvez reports the Bills' front office forced coach Rex Ryan to fire OC Greg Roman as a "sacrificial lamb" following Thursday night's embarrassing home loss to the Jets.
Per Marvez, the front office "leaned on" Rex to make a "significant change" in hopes of "appeasing a disgruntled fan base." Ryan couldn't fire himself -- and certainly wouldn't fire his brother Rob -- so he fired Roman, who took the Bills' offense from No. 26 in offensive DVOA in 2014 to No. 9 in 2015, and scored 24 points Thursday night against a tough Jets defense. Meanwhile, Rex's defense finished No. 24 in DVOA in 2015 after ranking No. 2 under Jim Schwartz in 2014, and coughed up 37 points at home to the Jets. Marvez also confirms Rex himself "is feeling the heat" following an 0-2 start. The Bills are set up to start 0-4 with the Cardinals and Patriots next on the schedule.
Source: Sporting News
Sep 16 - 3:58 PM
That's certainly partly on the offense, but the first Jets drive was like 8.5 minutes long thanks in large part to the terrible play of Gilmore. It's not like they were playing great and then got tired and fell apart. They sucked from the very beginning.To add to the above, the other thing to keep in mind is that the defense was on the field all game. Time of possession was almost 2:1. That D got gassed early.
Gilmore got his ### whooped all game. I was there last night and you could see the WRs pointing at Gilmore when they lined up on him so Fitz was aware of the matchup. They targeted him all night and he kept getting beat. He was late turning his head numerous times and other times just got flat out beat. On the first drive alone he gave up 3 first downs. Darby was beat a few times as well, but Gilmore is looking for that big contract for being a lockdown corner. All guys have bad games, but I don't remember the last time a "lock down" corner in his prime had a game this bad.That's certainly partly on the offense, but the first Jets drive was like 8.5 minutes long thanks in large part to the terrible play of Gilmore. It's not like they were playing great and then got tired and fell apart. They sucked from the very beginning.
In Rex's defense, the Bills lost Ragland, Lawson and Dareus before the season even started. That's a huge kick in the balls to lose that much talent and almost 50% of your front 7 like that.
But I agree with the sentiment that Rex forces his scheme and refuses to adjust to his personnel. That's the hallmark of a mediocre coach at best.
I don't think Whaley is going anywhere, unless bringing Rex in was 100% on him, and Pegula was against it, or he and Pegula really don't get along....so I can see Whaley gone next.
The Pegulas were directly involved in hiring Rex. Whaley didn't make that decision on his own... It's not even clear whether he had much of a choice. This was also around the time they were looking at bringing in another personnel guy (i.e., Bill Polian) to work above Whaley.Grigs Allmoon said:I don't think Whaley is going anywhere, unless bringing Rex in was 100% on him, and Pegula was against it, or he and Pegula really don't get along.
This team has more talent than any team we've seen in Buffalo in a long time.
Come on now. The Bills got their collective asses handed to them. Breaks went both ways. What if Robey-Coleman doesn't return that fumble for six?Right, the Jets caught a lot of big breaks at really opportune times. Tough to stop a team like that without your best player.
Doesn't seem likely:It's hard to put a "grade" on Whaley, mostly because the organization is a mess and it's unclear who makes what decisions, but I think they need to clean house. Not necessarily right now, there is no saving this season anyway, but take their time and identify who they want to put their faith in to lead them in the future. Let's be honest, Buffalo isn't on the top of anyone's list, so they're going to have to do a good job selling it. I think the fact that they finally have stable ownership, and at least a decent amount of talent on the field, makes them less unattractive than they've been in a long time, but they're still probably going to have to take a leap of faith on a college coach or someone in the lower ranks on an NFL team. Identify who they want, take time making sure it's a good fit, give them full control and let them do their thing. I'm not sure if the Pegula's are willing to do that, but that's what needs to happen IMO.
I have absolutely no problem with it in this scenario. Should it become a trend, which I doubt it will, then yes it would be a problem.ConnSKINS26 said:It's not a good thing because it shows that the decision-making/FO structure is absolutely ####ed from the very top. Trust me, as a Skins fan who dealt with these type of "Snyder meeting with players" stories all the way up until this current regime got things back on track.
Now maybe Rex is basically a lame duck and this isn't indicative of bigger organizational problems...but its still not good (other than maybe for short-term fantasy production) and it sets a really, really bad precedent with your star offensive players and the locker room in general.
GM's don't do the hiring/firing of assistant coaches.It doesn't seem to me like Whaley has the control GMs need.
I have never believed that hiring Rex was his call. And if it wasn't, there is also little he can do to get Roman fired for mishandling the offense.
Other than go to the owner and get them to do it.
In the off season they need to give one person control and hold them accountable, whether that is Whaley or someone else.
Why not, because you agree with the decision? It's a terrible precedent to set IMO.I have absolutely no problem with it in this scenario. Should it become a trend, which I doubt it will, then yes it would be a problem.
Neither do the owners (normally).GM's don't do the hiring/firing of assistant coaches.
You should have a huge problem with this. Owners and players should not be meeting behind a HC's back and making decisions on any level.I have absolutely no problem with it in this scenario. Should it become a trend, which I doubt it will, then yes it would be a problem.