What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2023 Rock and Roll Hall of Fame Nominees (1 Viewer)

bigbottom

Footballguy
This year’s nominees are:

  • Kate Bush
  • Sheryl Crow
  • Missy Elliott
  • Iron Maiden
  • Joy Division/New Order
  • Cyndi Lauper
  • George Michael
  • Willie Nelson
  • Rage Against the Machine
  • Soundgarden
  • The Spinners
  • A Tribe Called Quest
  • The White Stripes
  • Warren Zevon
 
The whole thing is a sham and frankly I don't care who they let in. Missy Elliot, rock and roll :ROFLMAO:
I think they’re simply realizing that with the current state of rock, they’re going to run out of acts if theu don’t expand who they let in.
The current state of rock n roll is pretty damn rocking
There may be some great groups out there and some great music, but the reality is that rock just isn’t that popular anymore overall. There are very few rock radio stations left. All of the charts are dominated by pop and hip hop. Rock is not even a blip on the radar at the Grammys. It has almost zero effect on culture.

The Rock & Roll HOF has made it clear that they have no interest in being the curator of an increasingly niche part of culture. They want to be a part of culture, to be part of conversation, to even spark controversy and conversation with who they nominate and don’t nominate.

I think it’s dumb, but if their goal is to be culturally relevant, then it was inevitable that they’d have to expand beyond rock.
 
The whole nomination and selection process for the Rock Hall is just silly. The only objective criteria for an artist is the 25 year time stamp after releasing their first album. Other than that it is all just subjective opinion on whether they have been influential or not, whatever that means. Might as well just let everybody in...
 
The whole nomination and selection process for the Rock Hall is just silly. The only objective criteria for an artist is the 25 year time stamp after releasing their first album. Other than that it is all just subjective opinion on whether they have been influential or not, whatever that means. Might as well just let everybody in...

They kind of are letting everybody in.
 
Willie Nelson.
Willie intersects with rock in a number of different ways. He should have been in decades ago.
Sounds like we’re headed towards the same conversation we’ve had for years. The range of “rock and roll” spans so many sub-genres that have been conveniently categorized by record execs, producers, DJs, etc. When in reality, the influence in “rock” comes from multiple levers.

This is one thing that the RRHOF, in my view, has gotten right.
 
Willie Nelson.
Willie intersects with rock in a number of different ways. He should have been in decades ago.
Sounds like we’re headed towards the same conversation we’ve had for years. The range of “rock and roll” spans so many sub-genres that have been conveniently categorized by record execs, producers, DJs, etc. When in reality, the influence in “rock” comes from multiple levers.

This is one thing that the RRHOF, in my view, has gotten right.
Yeah, we've danced around this tree a few times here over the decades, haven't we? :lol:

Agree with all you've said. Those who limit R&R to "white guys with guitars" conveniently forget that there are more exceptions than there are rules in their views on the subject.
 
The whole thing is a sham and frankly I don't care who they let in. Missy Elliot, rock and roll :ROFLMAO:
I think they’re simply realizing that with the current state of rock, they’re going to run out of acts if theu don’t expand who they let in.
I understand that but if you let non-RnR acts in then rename the darn thing. The whole thing is absurd.
 
The whole thing is a sham and frankly I don't care who they let in. Missy Elliot, rock and roll :ROFLMAO:
I think they’re simply realizing that with the current state of rock, they’re going to run out of acts if theu don’t expand who they let in.
I understand that but if you let non-RnR acts in then rename the darn thing. The whole thing is absurd.
Or…you know…just accept that it’s been the “music” hall of fame for a while now and don’t get hung up on labels. It’s in the museum’s best interest to have a broad swarth of music covered. I’ve always had a broad definition of rock. Tim docked me points for taking “Live From Folsom Prison” in the best live rock album category in one of his mega-drafts years ago. I argued then that Johnny Cash was more rock than some of the other acts chosen.
 
Last edited:
The whole thing is a sham and frankly I don't care who they let in. Missy Elliot, rock and roll :ROFLMAO:
I think they’re simply realizing that with the current state of rock, they’re going to run out of acts if theu don’t expand who they let in.
I understand that but if you let non-RnR acts in then rename the darn thing. The whole thing is absurd.
Or…you know…just accept that it’s been the “music” hall of fame for a while now and don’t get hung up on labels. It’s in the museum’s best interest to have a broad swarth of music covered. I’ve always had a broad definition of rock. Tim docked me points for taking “Live From Folsom Prison” in the best live rock album category in one of his mega-drafts years ago. I argued then that Johnny Cash was more rock than some of the other acts chosen. I guess it’s just one more thing that people get “upset” about that’s not really worth their time.
Not upset at all, just think it is idiotic. If they were worried about breadth of music they would be more willing to consider other artists on the fringe. Hell, Beethoven had as much or more influence then some of the prior inductees.

And if they were concerned with Rock and Roll there are dozens of deserving bands and artists of the 60s, 70s, and 80s that would be better nominees than the non-RnR acts they are letting in.

When I was in Nashville I went to the Country Music Hall of Fame and surprisingly did not see the Beatles, Rolling Stones, Whitney Houston or Public Enemy there.
 
The whole thing is a sham and frankly I don't care who they let in. Missy Elliot, rock and roll :ROFLMAO:
I think they’re simply realizing that with the current state of rock, they’re going to run out of acts if theu don’t expand who they let in.
I understand that but if you let non-RnR acts in then rename the darn thing. The whole thing is absurd.
Or…you know…just accept that it’s been the “music” hall of fame for a while now and don’t get hung up on labels. It’s in the museum’s best interest to have a broad swarth of music covered. I’ve always had a broad definition of rock. Tim docked me points for taking “Live From Folsom Prison” in the best live rock album category in one of his mega-drafts years ago. I argued then that Johnny Cash was more rock than some of the other acts chosen. I guess it’s just one more thing that people get “upset” about that’s not really worth their time.

Yeah, years ago I even wondered why some of these artists would want to be in the RnR HOF - other than the obvious. They aren't rock acts and have never portrayed themselves as such. But once it started then it made sense. My suggestion would be to rebrand the whole think Music HoF and then have different wings like other HoFs do it.
 
If someone is using the Country Music Industry as their guideline for how things should be, then Godspeed.
Nope not using it as a model of how a HoF should be. Just pointing out that it is pretty much restricted to one genre.

As I said I don't really care, I'm just commenting on why I pretty much ignore the RnR HoF except when I see the annual FBGs thread
 
Willie Nelson.
Willie intersects with rock in a number of different ways. He should have been in decades ago.
I might agree if he didn't sing in a complete monotone. He's terrible.

Wow, I couldn’t disagree more. His voice has incredible character and expression. The furthest thing from monotone. Now his vocal tone does have a nasal quality to it - maybe that’s what you’re getting at.
 
Willie Nelson.
Willie intersects with rock in a number of different ways. He should have been in decades ago.
I might agree if he didn't sing in a complete monotone. He's terrible.

Wow, I couldn’t disagree more. His voice has incredible character and expression. The furthest thing from monotone. Now his vocal tone does have a nasal quality to it - maybe that’s what you’re getting at.
You must have listened to some songs of his that I haven't heard. His voice is unique, I'll give him that, but no range at all in the ones that I have heard (which isn't that many as I can't stand his singing).
 
Last edited:
The one that may be the biggest lock IMO is one that I have a big problem with - The White Stripes. I do like them, but I don’t really find them groundbreaking or unique. jack White is probably the most beloved by the media this side of Dave Grohl.

there, I said it.
 
Willie Nelson.
Willie intersects with rock in a number of different ways. He should have been in decades ago.
I might agree if he didn't sing in a complete monotone. He's terrible.

Wow, I couldn’t disagree more. His voice has incredible character and expression. The furthest thing from monotone. Now his vocal tone does have a nasal quality to it - maybe that’s what you’re getting at.
You must have listened to some songs of his that I haven't heard. His voice is unique, I'll give him that, but no range at all in the ones that I have heard (which isn't that many as I can't stand his singing).
Well, he's like 85 years old now so I wouldn't expect Whitney Houston vocal fireworks from him these days :lol: Truth is, he was never that kind of singer, but I agree with biggie that he was wonderful in his prime expressing nuance.

However, that's not why he belongs in the RNRHOF. It's everything else.
 
Willie Nelson.
Willie intersects with rock in a number of different ways. He should have been in decades ago.
I might agree if he didn't sing in a complete monotone. He's terrible.

Wow, I couldn’t disagree more. His voice has incredible character and expression. The furthest thing from monotone. Now his vocal tone does have a nasal quality to it - maybe that’s what you’re getting at.
You must have listened to some songs of his that I haven't heard. His voice is unique, I'll give him that, but no range at all in the ones that I have heard (which isn't that many as I can't stand his singing).

:shrug:

3.33 Octave Vocal Range

Pretty darn impressive. By comparison, Freddy Mercury has a four octave range.
 
All the nominees created music of enduring quality. I have zero issues with any of them gaining induction, enjoying some late-career recognition with their friends and families and getting a plaque in a museum that I'll probably never visit.
 
Willie Nelson.
Willie intersects with rock in a number of different ways. He should have been in decades ago.
I might agree if he didn't sing in a complete monotone. He's terrible.

Wow, I couldn’t disagree more. His voice has incredible character and expression. The furthest thing from monotone. Now his vocal tone does have a nasal quality to it - maybe that’s what you’re getting at.
You must have listened to some songs of his that I haven't heard. His voice is unique, I'll give him that, but no range at all in the ones that I have heard (which isn't that many as I can't stand his singing).

:shrug:

3.33 Octave Vocal Range

Pretty darn impressive. By comparison, Freddy Mercury has a four octave range.

Great story Sheryl Crow told at the Johnny Cash tribute when she was going to sing a duet with Willie. She asked Kris Kristofferson for some tips. He said that Willie sings behind the beat. So don’t try to sing with him. Just sing louder. Lol
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top