What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2025 Cleveland Browns - OTAs (6 Viewers)

What is step-1 for Cleveland?
They retained their head coach after going 3-14? Stefanski has two 11-win seasons out of 5 for Cleveland, considering it's the Browns I can understand why they retained him

-What is happening at Quarterback? I don't think anyone on these boards truly knows what the plan is. Can Watson even return in 2025? I heard he tore the achilles again somehow while he was recovering from the 1st achilles tear, that would seem like a career crippler. Is it possible he never throws an NFL pass again? Whatever the outcome it seems like Cleveland would be wise to draft another QB and either Sanders or Cam Ward seem like an easy selection. I think Cam Ward is pretty wild and a little too sure of himself after watching all of his football games this year. He is easily the best QB to ever put on a Hurricanes Jersey since Vinny Testaverde won the Heisman in '86. He's definitely that good but is he as good as other recent Top 5-10 QB picks over the last 3 years? There is a reason he decided to come back and transfer to Miami.

What is the situation with the OL and DL? That's where you win football games. Do they need to go in a new direction at RB? The Draft has a lot of names
The Draft has some quality QBs IMHO in the 2nd-3rd-4th round range, any chance the Browns would want to do something else at No 2 instead of Sanders/Ward, what about Hunter?
Then go get a QB in the 2nd or early 3rd, that's what Pete Carroll's plan will likely be for LVR, just saying there are other ways to approach this off season
With Garrett, the defense is ready to compete, but it'd be a whole not nicer if JOK is able to recover.

The O is a different story. There's enough there if an alpha QB were available. There are cracks throughout the foundation that could crush someone not ready to come in and be the guy.

Njoku is great, but it'd be nice to have someone along side of him. Jeudy and Tillman are a good start to a wr room, but more is needed. Ford / Chubb could be a formidable rb duo, but not something to bet on now. The starting OL might be ok or better, especially going back to the original scheme and with competent coaching. That said, Bitonio is old, Jones can't be trusted yet, and Pocic is a JAG.

The reason why I'm not doom and gloom is despite how horrific last season was, the locker room never broke. That tells me this team has strong leadership they trust. I just can't look at this team from a pragmatic perspective and honestly say they are just a couple pieces away from competing. That appears to be the direction they're taking though.
they made that decision when they didn't flush the HC/GM.

honestly, a LOT of things need to go right for them to be competitive, but we've seen what this team is capable of when they have a competent QB.
Agreed with the most likely direction forward and why, but I don't think 'A LOT' needs to go right for them to competitive. It's all on one position. It's 'just' the most important / difficult position in sports that needs filled and the list of options this year leaves a lot to be desired. I hate being a defeatest, but I guess after all these years, that's where I am. I hope they get it right, but don't expect them to.
 
What is step-1 for Cleveland?
They retained their head coach after going 3-14? Stefanski has two 11-win seasons out of 5 for Cleveland, considering it's the Browns I can understand why they retained him

-What is happening at Quarterback? I don't think anyone on these boards truly knows what the plan is. Can Watson even return in 2025? I heard he tore the achilles again somehow while he was recovering from the 1st achilles tear, that would seem like a career crippler. Is it possible he never throws an NFL pass again? Whatever the outcome it seems like Cleveland would be wise to draft another QB and either Sanders or Cam Ward seem like an easy selection. I think Cam Ward is pretty wild and a little too sure of himself after watching all of his football games this year. He is easily the best QB to ever put on a Hurricanes Jersey since Vinny Testaverde won the Heisman in '86. He's definitely that good but is he as good as other recent Top 5-10 QB picks over the last 3 years? There is a reason he decided to come back and transfer to Miami.

What is the situation with the OL and DL? That's where you win football games. Do they need to go in a new direction at RB? The Draft has a lot of names
The Draft has some quality QBs IMHO in the 2nd-3rd-4th round range, any chance the Browns would want to do something else at No 2 instead of Sanders/Ward, what about Hunter?
Then go get a QB in the 2nd or early 3rd, that's what Pete Carroll's plan will likely be for LVR, just saying there are other ways to approach this off season
With Garrett, the defense is ready to compete, but it'd be a whole not nicer if JOK is able to recover.

The O is a different story. There's enough there if an alpha QB were available. There are cracks throughout the foundation that could crush someone not ready to come in and be the guy.

Njoku is great, but it'd be nice to have someone along side of him. Jeudy and Tillman are a good start to a wr room, but more is needed. Ford / Chubb could be a formidable rb duo, but not something to bet on now. The starting OL might be ok or better, especially going back to the original scheme and with competent coaching. That said, Bitonio is old, Jones can't be trusted yet, and Pocic is a JAG.

The reason why I'm not doom and gloom is despite how horrific last season was, the locker room never broke. That tells me this team has strong leadership they trust. I just can't look at this team from a pragmatic perspective and honestly say they are just a couple pieces away from competing. That appears to be the direction they're taking though.
they made that decision when they didn't flush the HC/GM.

honestly, a LOT of things need to go right for them to be competitive, but we've seen what this team is capable of when they have a competent QB.
Agreed with the most likely direction forward and why, but I don't think 'A LOT' needs to go right for them to competitive. It's all on one position. It's 'just' the most important / difficult position in sports that needs filled and the list of options this year leaves a lot to be desired. I hate being a defeatest, but I guess after all these years, that's where I am. I hope they get it right, but don't expect them to.
I think there’s a lot of players that need to come back healthy and play well for them to have a chance. I’m not saying it’s a long shot, but there is quite a list.

you mentioned several of them in your post. JOK, Jones, etc. if they don’t play well, they don’t have the depth to overcome that.

also, they need to have a great draft. Another mediocre draft won’t cut it.

without a lot of things going their way, they will be average at best.
 
They are already not so great a team, and have one heck of a competitive disadvantage with the Watson contract.
Trade some guys, do WHATEVER has to happen to get Watsons contract off the books as fast as possible, stockpile future picks, and move on.

It sucks, but it's reality if they want a chance at winning anytime in the next 5 years.
 
The way the team is right now.... I only see two more wins unless Stefanski coaches up another miracle but this isn't just an easy QB fix IMHO.
Didn't realize I called the exact win total in September. When many didn't understand the situation and fired off at the hip that it was either Stefanski or Watson... Come on. It began before the season started with:
  • O-Line DEVASTATION.
Both starting OTs out, key backup OT out, All-Pro LG out, add injuries to the other two O-Linemen over the first few games before factoring in loss of greatest offensive line coach in the league.
In 2023 we had the best O-Line in the league along with Callahan.
Now? Bitonio came back and played great the last 5 games. Conklin returned to form; Teller came back but didn't play great. Pocic has made the Pro Bowl and played eh. Losing Dawand to IR for the second consecutive year is an issue. Third string fill-in OT did ok. We drafted a OG but he didn't look NFL ready/strong enough and played poorly but can't be written off yet.
Need? Extremely high to draft an OT who can play as a rookie. That isn't negotiable. Not top pick, target 2nd round.
We replaced the OC and O-Line coach. No joke, we already have pieces in place so this can turn around quickly if we draft a rookie OT who 'can' play and eventually start at LT. Tall order for a rook but doable. We could use depth but IMHO really need a young starting caliber OT.
  • RB and run game
See above because the O-Line caused teams to stack the box, stop the run, get us in 3rd and long, then dare Watson to pass. Oh yeah, All-Pro RB Nick Chubb was out and we replaced the OC and entire offense to pass happy attack.
Now? Nick will have had time to fully make a comeback, and we will have a better plan and 'likely' will draft for the future. Run game will be fine IF we can land a 'capable' starting QB/pass game.
  • Receivers
Amari didn't get his extension, lead the league in drops, and piss-poor attitude = gone. Judy has been great. Ced gets injured. Njoku's back acts up. We had issues but are close.
Man, if AB can pull another stellar trade. That is asking too much but we're close with receivers.
  • QB
The entire QB room from last year is gone. We start from scratch without cap room, so we need a miracle, basically a starting caliber rookie QB. When it comes to the NFL draft, I don't believe in miracles. I'd get a 'capable' NFL vet FA and acquire draft assets for next year. I don't force drafting a rookie QB out of need. I kick the can down the road to the point that I'm entirely sold or can afford to gamble. Since we have too many holes and no cap, we are operating without a net. We can't afford to gamble.

We have enough holes on offense that need addressing before mentioning the defense, but the D is fine if we keep Myles. Not perfect but we're good with Myles.
It boils down to keeping Myles and finding a 'capable' vet QB. The rest is doable.
The plan is.
We finally have high draft picks, don't waste them by reaching for a rookie QB, take BPA with top pick, address OT in 2nd round, and ride out the Watson contract while keeping Myles.
We are NOT that far away because we are NOT in the same situation as we were last year. The O-Line is much better, we have Chubb and plan at RB, Amari is gone, and JJ is here, we got rid of Dorsey and the O-Line coach. This is completely different.
All the panic is tied to last year's over-inflated expectations that the media cluelessly propped up because THEY cast a blind eye to the gaping maw on the O-Line and then laid the failure at the feet of Watson and Stefanski looking for stupid scapegoats to pin it on because THEY failed to see the obvious that I saw in September. A 3-win season. Took them another month and they still don't have a clue if they think getting rid of Myles does anything other than push us 4 years backwards because that would be the cost. The dumbest thing this organization can do is get rid of Myles.
 
I think there’s a lot of players that need to come back healthy and play well for them to have a chance. I’m not saying it’s a long shot, but there is quite a list.

you mentioned several of them in your post. JOK, Jones, etc. if they don’t play well, they don’t have the depth to overcome that.

also, they need to have a great draft. Another mediocre draft won’t cut it.

without a lot of things going their way, they will be average at best.
I'm gonna push back on the drafting criticism. With what they've had to work with I think they've generally done a good job. Too early to say about last year, but they did use picks to acquire Jeudy. The year before net Tillman, Jones, McGuire, and Mitchell. 2022- Emerson, Wright, Ford, and Cooper. 2021- Newsome and JOK. And oh what coulda been had we not been sniped on Nico Collins. Those appear like mediocre hauls because of the Watson trade. The draft capital we're working with this year is something that's not been seen since 2020. Reasonable to think we should get more from it because of that and there are ample reasons to expect it to happen.

Last year went sideways because of decisions made at this time with AVP then as a result Callahan. Watson can't play, AVP said as much, as a result was shown the door, then a different offensive identity / blocking scheme was brought in that aligned with what Watson wanted, not Stefanski. Stuff happened that made the inevitable early season struggles worse, but this was a car always destined to going over the cliff. The people that led last year's offense are now gone and a return to 2023 and prior is in the works. Is there someone available that's good enough to run it though? :shrug:
 

What did we see of the winning team in the Super Bowl, what one specific thing tipped the scales?

"... The Eagles turned in a remarkable defensive effort in Super Bowl LIX, pressuring Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes all game without ever blitzing.
The Eagles did not blitz on a single one of Mahomes’ dropbacks, ...
So how did the Eagles generate so much pressure? Because their defensive line dominated the Chiefs’ offensive line...
...Those six sacks were the most Mahomes has ever taken in any game in his NFL career, regular season or postseason
.
"
 

What did we see of the winning team in the Super Bowl, what one specific thing tipped the scales?

"... The Eagles turned in a remarkable defensive effort in Super Bowl LIX, pressuring Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes all game without ever blitzing.
The Eagles did not blitz on a single one of Mahomes’ dropbacks, ...
So how did the Eagles generate so much pressure? Because their defensive line dominated the Chiefs’ offensive line...
...Those six sacks were the most Mahomes has ever taken in any game in his NFL career, regular season or postseason
.
"
While true they also scored 27 points on offense before KC got 1.
 

What did we see of the winning team in the Super Bowl, what one specific thing tipped the scales?

"... The Eagles turned in a remarkable defensive effort in Super Bowl LIX, pressuring Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes all game without ever blitzing.
The Eagles did not blitz on a single one of Mahomes’ dropbacks, ...
So how did the Eagles generate so much pressure? Because their defensive line dominated the Chiefs’ offensive line...
...Those six sacks were the most Mahomes has ever taken in any game in his NFL career, regular season or postseason
.
"
If we have to credit one specific thing, I'd say the overall talent on that team. Highest praise to the GM!
 
Yeah, pretty much. There's a lot of teams out there with arguably a better front office that the Browns, and they are unquestionably light years ahead at the QB position.
Plus they don't have an albatross contract killing them.

They have a huge head start. The only way I see us catching up is waiting till the next race.
 
I think there’s a lot of players that need to come back healthy and play well for them to have a chance. I’m not saying it’s a long shot, but there is quite a list.

you mentioned several of them in your post. JOK, Jones, etc. if they don’t play well, they don’t have the depth to overcome that.

also, they need to have a great draft. Another mediocre draft won’t cut it.

without a lot of things going their way, they will be average at best.
I'm gonna push back on the drafting criticism. With what they've had to work with I think they've generally done a good job. Too early to say about last year, but they did use picks to acquire Jeudy. The year before net Tillman, Jones, McGuire, and Mitchell. 2022- Emerson, Wright, Ford, and Cooper. 2021- Newsome and JOK. And oh what coulda been had we not been sniped on Nico Collins. Those appear like mediocre hauls because of the Watson trade. The draft capital we're working with this year is something that's not been seen since 2020. Reasonable to think we should get more from it because of that and there are ample reasons to expect it to happen.

Last year went sideways because of decisions made at this time with AVP then as a result Callahan. Watson can't play, AVP said as much, as a result was shown the door, then a different offensive identity / blocking scheme was brought in that aligned with what Watson wanted, not Stefanski. Stuff happened that made the inevitable early season struggles worse, but this was a car always destined to going over the cliff. The people that led last year's offense are now gone and a return to 2023 and prior is in the works. Is there someone available that's good enough to run it though? :shrug:
Berry has made some good FA and trade moves, but his drafts have been subpar, just look at the D linemen he's taken.

i agree the season was derailed before it began, and i wonder if that's why Stefanski and Berry got the contract extensions they got prior to the season.
 
Berry has made some good FA and trade moves, but his drafts have been subpar, just look at the D linemen he's taken.
He's 2 outta 6 on mid round DL, which is at least on par with expectations, if not exceeding. These aren't top 40-50 guys in which it's fair to expect a hit. Michael Hall was the first pick he's used inside rd 3 since the trade and it was just 54. 2 of his 4 top 2 rd picks have been given 2nd contracts and while Newsome may not get one here, he's going to get one somewhere.
 
These aren't top 40-50 guys in which it's fair to expect a hit.
We have to base a draft hit on actual numbers of the NFL draft.
I don't know how people here base hit rates, but I listen to a lot of local sport talk radio and many media-types base GM abilities on their own arbitrary made-up criteria. Some in the media judge hit rates by the number of Pro Bowl players selected and/or on post season wins.
That is not how to judge hit rates of an NFL GM. They should be judged on how they stack up with other NFL GMs so use the actual draft numbers since all NFL general managers participate in the draft. Here are the raw numbers of hit rates of 1st round picks over 20 years of data.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2024 NFL Draft preview: What is the hit rate on positions selected in first round?
... Here are the hit rates for every position in the NFL over the last twenty years based on various measurements of success.
Jeremy Fowler
@JFowlerESPN
Always crucial pre-draft work from ESPN content producer @PaulHembo, who calculated hit rates on first-round picks from 2000-19 based upon whether the players signed second contracts with the team that drafted them. Here are the results by position.
LINK to graph
-------------------
The above graph only shows hit rates of 1st round picks. We all know it goes down by descending rounds. Lots of NFL draft studies, many show nearly a 20% decrease for second round picks. Continuing to drop over 30% lower for third round picks and even greater to the fourth round. Goes up 'slightly' in the fifth round but don't forget compensatory picks. A handful of teams lose top free agents and gain extra picks beginning in the third round, in the fourth round they increase, and so on so total picks increase by round due to compensatory selections.
Bottom line.
Use historical NFL draft numbers when evaluating hit rates and don't overestimate the value of draft picks over proven players like Myles Garrett who is the top player at his position, still in his prime, and he doesn't miss games due to injury. Trade a proven commodity like that AND take a cap hit of over $30 million for late first-round draft picks?
 
We are taking a cap hit of nearly $6million for this year.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Browns Release 2-Time Super Bowl Winner to Take $5,684,000 in Cap Hit for Next Season
... the franchise is moving on from safety Juan Thornhill to make some cap room.
... Thornhill still has one year left on his contract with the Browns. As per reports, he will be designated a post-June 1 release with a $5.68 million cap hit for the franchise in 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmnn.
Not sure how to read this move.
 
We are taking a cap hit of nearly $6million for this year.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Browns Release 2-Time Super Bowl Winner to Take $5,684,000 in Cap Hit for Next Season
... the franchise is moving on from safety Juan Thornhill to make some cap room.
... Thornhill still has one year left on his contract with the Browns. As per reports, he will be designated a post-June 1 release with a $5.68 million cap hit for the franchise in 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hmnn.
Not sure how to read this move.
**MY READ**

we have one less worthless bum in the locker room
 
we have one less worthless bum in the locker room
Juan? Buh bye.
The cap hit is what I'm puzzling over in terms of what the FO is going to do this season. Is this an expected one-off or a strategy to dump cap and take a hard-hit this year?
By keeping a worthless bum around that can only result in negative outcomes in the locker room.

They're gonna keep THAT guy around despite what he's done, er rather not done, the last 2 years? What are we doing here.

Occam's razor- take a bath for the good of the team.
 
So, Hunter or Abdul Carter?
I would think Abdul Carter if available, especially if they decide to move Garrett. I think they would be smart to move Myles if they can get a decent offer as this team is not in a position to win a Super Bowl this year or next imo.
It probably would be smart to move Garrett but there is a chance they don't because of stubbornness or whatever. On a related note, his staying in Cleveland is now the favorite of where he will be playing next year. A few days ago it was Washington that was favored.
 
They're gonna keep THAT guy around
Uh, no. He was gone last year when he gave up on a play.
My question is:
The cap hit is what I'm puzzling over in terms of what the FO is going to do this season. Is this an expected one-off or a strategy to dump cap and take a hard-hit this year?
Are they going to keep dumping guys and take a hard cap hit this year because this move was expected. No surprise. I can never read the big picture of the FO. I was against changing OC's and moving on from Flacco last year.
Things I want.
I Want them to keep Myles and not reach for a rookie QB.
Have no clue how they deal with the cap situation.
They are going to HAVE to do 'something' to deal with the cap so is this a one-off expected move or will are they planning on more moves. I thought pushing Watson's cap hit out meant that wasn't the plan.
 
I guess it’s cool for Browns fans you get to keep a first ballot hall of famer but also surprised the team didn’t want to pull the cord and rebuild. You won’t draft a better player than Garrett but could get multiple very good ones and then have cap space to rebuild.
 
I guess it’s cool for Browns fans you get to keep a first ballot hall of famer but also surprised the team didn’t want to pull the cord and rebuild. You won’t draft a better player than Garrett but could get multiple very good ones and then have cap space to rebuild.
The team doesn't have a cap space problem, they're going to get ~$45m in insurance relief from Watson alone next year.
 
Its hard to say extending Garrett is a bad move.......but I'll say it anyway, it's a bad move. This team is going nowhere fast, and now we are going nowhere even slower, which is worse.
 
I guess it’s cool for Browns fans you get to keep a first ballot hall of famer but also surprised the team didn’t want to pull the cord and rebuild. You won’t draft a better player than Garrett but could get multiple very good ones and then have cap space to rebuild.
The team doesn't have a cap space problem, they're going to get ~$45m in insurance relief from Watson alone next year.
Ok, but what happens with Watsons contract after that (assuming they do get that relief)?
 
I guess it’s cool for Browns fans you get to keep a first ballot hall of famer but also surprised the team didn’t want to pull the cord and rebuild. You won’t draft a better player than Garrett but could get multiple very good ones and then have cap space to rebuild.
The team doesn't have a cap space problem, they're going to get ~$45m in insurance relief from Watson alone next year.
Ok, but what happens with Watsons contract after that (assuming they do get that relief)?
He'll be a post June 1 cut - cap hit is the same for '26 whether his contract remains unchanged (which won't happen) or if they give him this designation.
 
I guess it’s cool for Browns fans you get to keep a first ballot hall of famer but also surprised the team didn’t want to pull the cord and rebuild. You won’t draft a better player than Garrett but could get multiple very good ones and then have cap space to rebuild.
The team doesn't have a cap space problem, they're going to get ~$45m in insurance relief from Watson alone next year.
That’s certain?
 
I guess it’s cool for Browns fans you get to keep a first ballot hall of famer but also surprised the team didn’t want to pull the cord and rebuild. You won’t draft a better player than Garrett but could get multiple very good ones and then have cap space to rebuild.
The team doesn't have a cap space problem, they're going to get ~$45m in insurance relief from Watson alone next year.
Ok, but what happens with Watsons contract after that (assuming they do get that relief)?
He'll be a post June 1 cut - cap hit is the same for '26 whether his contract remains unchanged (which won't happen) or if they give him this designation.
So you're saying after this year, none of Watsons contract will affect the cap moving forward in 2026 and beyond??
 
I guess it’s cool for Browns fans you get to keep a first ballot hall of famer but also surprised the team didn’t want to pull the cord and rebuild. You won’t draft a better player than Garrett but could get multiple very good ones and then have cap space to rebuild.
The team doesn't have a cap space problem, they're going to get ~$45m in insurance relief from Watson alone next year.
That’s certain?
No, but I'm confident in assuming it since both sides only have reasons to milk it all season. When they do, this happens
 
I guess it’s cool for Browns fans you get to keep a first ballot hall of famer but also surprised the team didn’t want to pull the cord and rebuild. You won’t draft a better player than Garrett but could get multiple very good ones and then have cap space to rebuild.
The team doesn't have a cap space problem, they're going to get ~$45m in insurance relief from Watson alone next year.
Ok, but what happens with Watsons contract after that (assuming they do get that relief)?
He'll be a post June 1 cut - cap hit is the same for '26 whether his contract remains unchanged (which won't happen) or if they give him this designation.
So you're saying after this year, none of Watsons contract will affect the cap moving forward in 2026 and beyond??
This is a great tool to understand how the cap works
 
Are they going to keep dumping guys and take a hard cap hit this year
No.
Bitonio is back, the OC and O-Line coaches are gone, Amari is gone, we have Jeudy, we will revamp the entire QB room, we not only have a 1st round pick since Greg Newsome in 2021 we have a HIGH first round pick and most importantly of all we kept Myles.
We are not going to dump salaries the plan is to compete this year.
clearly he cares more about $ than winning
He has no leverage,...
He had leverage >>> Browns Reveal Financial Plan for New $2.4 Billion Stadium in Brook Park
...The other $1.2 billion is split up of expected contributions from the state of Ohio ($600 million), Cuyahoga County ($178 million) and the city of Brook Park ($422 million).
They HAVE to field competitive teams till they get this done. Myles was under contract for the next two years and the club had two more years of franchise tags available which would mean no leverage to try and pull this off... Unless his team understood Garrett's team only won 3 games last year and that the 3-time Super Bowl champion KC citizens just declined funding of a new stadium. People have had enough and aren't going to bend over and take it for a 3-win team.
The Haslam's stood to lose $1.2 billion in public funding.
He was never going to get traded, no teams called because they knew. I mean, no. The Browns would never deal. He was going to continue his scorched earth campaign knowing he wasn't going to get traded. He wanted to finish his career and retire here to ensure his HOF bust but he wanted to get paid. You don't get the sort of leverage or perfect timing he had fall in his lap every day.
I absolutely LOVE :tebow:MYLES and have to hand it to him. He played his hand perfectly. :bowtie:
 
Kenny flippin Pickett??? I hope they don't view this guy as a contender for the starting gig. :kicksrock:
I'm not seeing starting caliber numbers. He has one game where he's thrown more than 2 TDs and one game where he's thrown for over 300 yards in his entire NFL career.
Don't worry about it, he's not the starter.
 
Kenny flippin Pickett??? I hope they don't view this guy as a contender for the starting gig. :kicksrock:
I'm not seeing starting caliber numbers. He has one game where he's thrown more than 2 TDs and one game where he's thrown for over 300 yards in his entire NFL career.
Don't worry about it, he's not the starter.
He will sure make it easy to go to the rookie week 1 (if we take one at 2)
 
Potentially... Pickett starter until rookie or Watson is ready.
I think Pickett was a shrewd move. He's still young, has starting experience, and was pretty cheap, which was necessary because of Watson's deal. I think its a solid backup plan if Cam Ward doesn't make it to them.
 
We lost Hudson.
New York Giants Sign Free Agent OT James Hudson III
The New York Giants have signed former Cleveland Brown offensive tackle James Hudson III to a two-year deal worth $12M, with up to another $4M in incentives....
--------------------------
We signed Cornelius Lucas to a two-year, $10 million contract.
Browns Agree to Sign Towering Offensive Lineman to $10 Million Deal
...he is absolutely huge.
The 33-year-old stands 6-foot-8 and weighs 327 pounds, definitely make him a towering presence along Cleveland's offensive line.
Lucas played in 14 games and made seven starts for the Commanders in 2024 and was very effective, registering a 74.1 overall grade at Pro Football Focus. He also posted a 79.1 pass-blocking grade...

--------------------------
At least $2 million in cap savings. Not a starter but fills Hudson's role as a swing backup tackle.
Jed 'appears' gone and we can't depend on Dwand's health so the need of a rookie 'starting caliber' offensive tackle remains high.
 
Jed 'appears' gone and we can't depend on Dwand's health so the need of a rookie 'starting caliber' offensive tackle remains high.
I write this without doing any recon on this OT class, but unless we're trading down (with who?) from 2 or up from 34, it'd be unfair to expect a rookie tackle to be starting caliber. Dawand's the starter, Cornelius is the backup, and I expect developmental pieces to be added in April at both G and T for life after Bitonio and Conklin.
 
it'd be unfair to expect a rookie tackle to be starting caliber
True. Back in 2016 Joe Thomas got injured. In 2017 we replaced him with Spencer Drango. Coincidentally we finished 0-16 in 2017 with Spencer Drago as our left tackle. In 2018 and 2019 we had Greg Robinson before drafting Jed. If we go with Dwand we've seen him on IR for the majority of the past two seasons which means we'd 'likely' have Cornelius as the starter. Not ideal especially if peeps think we're going with a rookie QB.
Some stuff to chew on:
---------------------------------
NFL Offensive Line Success: Why building through the NFL draft is the key ...OL rookie success vs. draft position
...it’s not enough to just draft offensive line year to year, it’s crucial to invest premium picks there because the success rate in the later rounds is considerably lower than at other positions, especially early in their careers.
If we break it down by position, we see there is a higher success rate in drafting OTs vs interior OL in their rookie year: ...one thing is clear – top offensive line talent is difficult to acquire in comparison to other positions because teams simply aren’t letting those guys walk out the door as often, so they better be able to draft them well.
Where was the average NFL offensive starter drafted, by position?
Where a player was drafted matters...

  • QB is the big outlier, but OT is another one with an unusual concentration of 1st round picks starting.
  • Breaking OT Down by Left and Right Tackle

The results are dramatic. LT is a premium position, even approaching that of QB, with more than 51% of starters being 1st rounders.
----------------------------------------
I think drafting a rookie QB and expecting him to start with a 33 yr. old OLT Spencer Drago eske JAG is criminally unfair especially since we'd 'likely' be getting the second 'best' QB from this weak QB class.
If we WERE to trade-down, we'd get extra draft capital to target a long-term QB prospect next year. If we don't and simply take BPA and land one of the top non-QB prospects, then we progress in terms of overall team talent.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top