They just said he made 136 feet of putts in the last 7 holes.I haven’t looked at any stats - but in the blind I bet Spain just set the USO record for feet of putts made by a champion in a final round.
Agree. Tricked it up too much and introduced too much randomness.One of the reasons I disliked this course is because they made it artificially hard. It's already a tough course in its own right. I think any course could grow the rough out to 5" and shave the greens down to marble.
It would have been the same for me if he needed the putt to win. Knowing he just needed a 2-putt, I put his chances at around 80% to get it done. Would have been less if he hadn't just seen the same putt right before he took his.Agree. Tricked it up too much and introduced too much randomness.One of the reasons I disliked this course is because they made it artificially hard. It's already a tough course in its own right. I think any course could grow the rough out to 5" and shave the greens down to marble.
Spaun's heroics salvaged the tournament, for me at least.
I had written Spaun off after the 5th. Actually, I had probably written him off before the round started. He was - I think - 6 shots back after the 5th hole?5 over thru 6, 3 under over last 12 in just ridiculous conditions. What a ballsy/gutsy round. The drive on 17 and putt on 18 go straight into the legends file.
Maybe he doesn't win anyway, but man it seems like Burns got a REALLY bad break with that ruling on the standing water. It seemed pretty clear with every practice swing (and then the actual shot) that that area was absolutely soaked.
And then someone posted a video walking around where he allegedly hit from and there was tons of visible water coming up with each step.
Always thought the whole "water has to come up around your feet" made no sense. Someone who weighs more is going to displace more water (and then be more likely to get a free drop), right?
Maybe the ruling was right at the time. I don think they ever gave us a close up of anyone's feet when they were deciding. But it certainly looked wrong based on the way water flew up on the shot.
That being said, he let one "Bad" (maybe) ruling cost him like 4 shots over the next 3 holes. Gotta get over it and keep your cool if you're gonna win the big one.
Seems like a decent fella, just like JJ does.I play golf with JJ's dad once a week in AZ during the winter months. His handi is about a 5. Very nice guy.
Starting at about the 3:12 mark is a good interview with John Spaun.
- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.www.youtube.com
I play golf with JJ's dad once a week in AZ during the winter months. His handi is about a 5. Very nice guy.
Starting at about the 3:12 mark is a good interview with John Spaun.
- YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.www.youtube.com
That's a crazy number inside of 10 foot, much less 20Spaun holed 18-of-19 putts inside 20 feet yesterday
The rule they were citing said there needed to be water coming up around your feet when you take a stance, but that's only half of the standing water ruling. If the ball is sitting in visible water then it can also be called a standing water rule. I could see how wet it was where his ball was sitting on tv. To say that wasn't visible standing water? OK, we're gonna have to disagree because my stance won't change on that.Maybe he doesn't win anyway, but man it seems like Burns got a REALLY bad break with that ruling on the standing water. It seemed pretty clear with every practice swing (and then the actual shot) that that area was absolutely soaked.
And then someone posted a video walking around where he allegedly hit from and there was tons of visible water coming up with each step.
Always thought the whole "water has to come up around your feet" made no sense. Someone who weighs more is going to displace more water (and then be more likely to get a free drop), right?
Maybe the ruling was right at the time. I don think they ever gave us a close up of anyone's feet when they were deciding. But it certainly looked wrong based on the way water flew up on the shot.
That being said, he let one "Bad" (maybe) ruling cost him like 4 shots over the next 3 holes. Gotta get over it and keep your cool if you're gonna win the big one.
There needs to be visible water. Two officials both agreed that wasn't satisfied. Get it is a tough break with the lie but if both officials agree and they both know the rules much better then I do then think it was right ruling.
No idea when that video was taken but it continued to rain so not sure if that is representative.
Once 1 golfer tees off while playing it ‘down’, you can’t flip to lift, clean, and place. That happens quite a bit at all levels.the tourney made the wrong call by not giving everyone lift, clean, and place on balls in the fairway after that downpour anyway.Maybe he doesn't win anyway, but man it seems like Burns got a REALLY bad break with that ruling on the standing water. It seemed pretty clear with every practice swing (and then the actual shot) that that area was absolutely soaked.
And then someone posted a video walking around where he allegedly hit from and there was tons of visible water coming up with each step.
Always thought the whole "water has to come up around your feet" made no sense. Someone who weighs more is going to displace more water (and then be more likely to get a free drop), right?
Maybe the ruling was right at the time. I don think they ever gave us a close up of anyone's feet when they were deciding. But it certainly looked wrong based on the way water flew up on the shot.
That being said, he let one "Bad" (maybe) ruling cost him like 4 shots over the next 3 holes. Gotta get over it and keep your cool if you're gonna win the big one.
There needs to be visible water. Two officials both agreed that wasn't satisfied. Get it is a tough break with the lie but if both officials agree and they both know the rules much better then I do then think it was right ruling.
No idea when that video was taken but it continued to rain so not sure if that is representative.
I get that. It sucks. Really weird that those officials were being such hard asses at that point. Faxon called it a mistake on air. Adam Scott said afterwards it was the wrong call. Obviously we know what Burns thought.Once 1 golfer tees off while playing it ‘down’, you can’t flip to lift, clean, and place. That happens quite a bit at all levels.the tourney made the wrong call by not giving everyone lift, clean, and place on balls in the fairway after that downpour anyway.Maybe he doesn't win anyway, but man it seems like Burns got a REALLY bad break with that ruling on the standing water. It seemed pretty clear with every practice swing (and then the actual shot) that that area was absolutely soaked.
And then someone posted a video walking around where he allegedly hit from and there was tons of visible water coming up with each step.
Always thought the whole "water has to come up around your feet" made no sense. Someone who weighs more is going to displace more water (and then be more likely to get a free drop), right?
Maybe the ruling was right at the time. I don think they ever gave us a close up of anyone's feet when they were deciding. But it certainly looked wrong based on the way water flew up on the shot.
That being said, he let one "Bad" (maybe) ruling cost him like 4 shots over the next 3 holes. Gotta get over it and keep your cool if you're gonna win the big one.
There needs to be visible water. Two officials both agreed that wasn't satisfied. Get it is a tough break with the lie but if both officials agree and they both know the rules much better then I do then think it was right ruling.
No idea when that video was taken but it continued to rain so not sure if that is representative.
But typically everyone is very liberal with standing water drops at that point too.
I just finished Tom Doaks book, and there's a lot of interesting points he makes on playing as it lies being the original spirit of golf and how American fairways have come to be so manicured, with the other expectation of a perfect lie because you hit the fairway...vs the original courses where theres so much undulation and the fairways was really just grass that was a bit easier but still had challenges of its own.I get that. It sucks. Really weird that those officials were being such hard asses at that point. Faxon called it a mistake on air. Adam Scott said afterwards it was the wrong call. Obviously we know what Burns thought.Once 1 golfer tees off while playing it ‘down’, you can’t flip to lift, clean, and place. That happens quite a bit at all levels.the tourney made the wrong call by not giving everyone lift, clean, and place on balls in the fairway after that downpour anyway.Maybe he doesn't win anyway, but man it seems like Burns got a REALLY bad break with that ruling on the standing water. It seemed pretty clear with every practice swing (and then the actual shot) that that area was absolutely soaked.
And then someone posted a video walking around where he allegedly hit from and there was tons of visible water coming up with each step.
Always thought the whole "water has to come up around your feet" made no sense. Someone who weighs more is going to displace more water (and then be more likely to get a free drop), right?
Maybe the ruling was right at the time. I don think they ever gave us a close up of anyone's feet when they were deciding. But it certainly looked wrong based on the way water flew up on the shot.
That being said, he let one "Bad" (maybe) ruling cost him like 4 shots over the next 3 holes. Gotta get over it and keep your cool if you're gonna win the big one.
There needs to be visible water. Two officials both agreed that wasn't satisfied. Get it is a tough break with the lie but if both officials agree and they both know the rules much better then I do then think it was right ruling.
No idea when that video was taken but it continued to rain so not sure if that is representative.
But typically everyone is very liberal with standing water drops at that point too.
I still fall back on the tours should move to preferred lies in the fairway. Even on the greatest of days, you can get a mud ball in the fairway. That's BS. You can still end up in a divot. You can end up in an area with little grass coverage due to poor upkeep.(Not as likely on tour) That's BS. Golf is about hitting great shots. The more great shots you hit, then greater chance you have to win. The fact that you can hit a great shot(in the fairway) and still be punished for it is a terrible concept IMO.
Golf has made rule changes like this before. The embedded golf ball rule was changed in 2019 to include any general area outside of penalty or bunker areas. Before 2019 players only got relief from the fairways on embedded balls. The tour finally realized it was a stupid rule that went against the concept of fair play and changed it. They should do the same for preferred lies in the fairway IMO.
That may be what golf was, but it sure isn't what it is now.I just finished Tom Doaks book, and there's a lot of interesting points he makes on playboy as it lies being the original spirit of golf and how American fairways have come to be so manicured, with the other expectation of a perfect lie because you hit the fairway...vs the original courses where theres so much undulation and the fairways was really just grass that was a bit easier but still had challenges of its own.I get that. It sucks. Really weird that those officials were being such hard asses at that point. Faxon called it a mistake on air. Adam Scott said afterwards it was the wrong call. Obviously we know what Burns thought.Once 1 golfer tees off while playing it ‘down’, you can’t flip to lift, clean, and place. That happens quite a bit at all levels.the tourney made the wrong call by not giving everyone lift, clean, and place on balls in the fairway after that downpour anyway.Maybe he doesn't win anyway, but man it seems like Burns got a REALLY bad break with that ruling on the standing water. It seemed pretty clear with every practice swing (and then the actual shot) that that area was absolutely soaked.
And then someone posted a video walking around where he allegedly hit from and there was tons of visible water coming up with each step.
Always thought the whole "water has to come up around your feet" made no sense. Someone who weighs more is going to displace more water (and then be more likely to get a free drop), right?
Maybe the ruling was right at the time. I don think they ever gave us a close up of anyone's feet when they were deciding. But it certainly looked wrong based on the way water flew up on the shot.
That being said, he let one "Bad" (maybe) ruling cost him like 4 shots over the next 3 holes. Gotta get over it and keep your cool if you're gonna win the big one.
There needs to be visible water. Two officials both agreed that wasn't satisfied. Get it is a tough break with the lie but if both officials agree and they both know the rules much better then I do then think it was right ruling.
No idea when that video was taken but it continued to rain so not sure if that is representative.
But typically everyone is very liberal with standing water drops at that point too.
I still fall back on the tours should move to preferred lies in the fairway. Even on the greatest of days, you can get a mud ball in the fairway. That's BS. You can still end up in a divot. You can end up in an area with little grass coverage due to poor upkeep.(Not as likely on tour) That's BS. Golf is about hitting great shots. The more great shots you hit, then greater chance you have to win. The fact that you can hit a great shot(in the fairway) and still be punished for it is a terrible concept IMO.
Golf has made rule changes like this before. The embedded golf ball rule was changed in 2019 to include any general area outside of penalty or bunker areas. Before 2019 players only got relief from the fairways on embedded balls. The tour finally realized it was a stupid rule that went against the concept of fair play and changed it. They should do the same for preferred lies in the fairway IMO.
It has shifted my mentality to one of "you can only have great shots following tough spots really" and rolling with stuff.
Agree. That is the essence of golf. You play it where it lies.This is a big topic in high-level Jr Golf (and I agree that mudballs and divots could be viewed separately)....but learning to play out of a variety of lies and conditions is considered an important part of learning the game. It's foundational and won't drastically change ever, IMO. How does the ball react, how do different clubs and swings then affect the ball, how do I need to attack the ball, what's the 'smart' play...etc.
Euros clearly learn how to play in a variety of conditions and blue collar courses. For Seve, etc it was a difference maker. But also Tiger...Earl surely grinded him through every lie imaginable on their SD 'muni'. Even Country Clubs brats like Speith and JT have elevated themselves with their creativity. Great hands are a part of it, but also teaching and practice.
Just to clarify - that may be true In the U.S.That may be what golf was, but it sure isn't what it is now.I just finished Tom Doaks book, and there's a lot of interesting points he makes on playboy as it lies being the original spirit of golf and how American fairways have come to be so manicured, with the other expectation of a perfect lie because you hit the fairway...vs the original courses where theres so much undulation and the fairways was really just grass that was a bit easier but still had challenges of its own.I get that. It sucks. Really weird that those officials were being such hard asses at that point. Faxon called it a mistake on air. Adam Scott said afterwards it was the wrong call. Obviously we know what Burns thought.Once 1 golfer tees off while playing it ‘down’, you can’t flip to lift, clean, and place. That happens quite a bit at all levels.the tourney made the wrong call by not giving everyone lift, clean, and place on balls in the fairway after that downpour anyway.Maybe he doesn't win anyway, but man it seems like Burns got a REALLY bad break with that ruling on the standing water. It seemed pretty clear with every practice swing (and then the actual shot) that that area was absolutely soaked.
And then someone posted a video walking around where he allegedly hit from and there was tons of visible water coming up with each step.
Always thought the whole "water has to come up around your feet" made no sense. Someone who weighs more is going to displace more water (and then be more likely to get a free drop), right?
Maybe the ruling was right at the time. I don think they ever gave us a close up of anyone's feet when they were deciding. But it certainly looked wrong based on the way water flew up on the shot.
That being said, he let one "Bad" (maybe) ruling cost him like 4 shots over the next 3 holes. Gotta get over it and keep your cool if you're gonna win the big one.
There needs to be visible water. Two officials both agreed that wasn't satisfied. Get it is a tough break with the lie but if both officials agree and they both know the rules much better then I do then think it was right ruling.
No idea when that video was taken but it continued to rain so not sure if that is representative.
But typically everyone is very liberal with standing water drops at that point too.
I still fall back on the tours should move to preferred lies in the fairway. Even on the greatest of days, you can get a mud ball in the fairway. That's BS. You can still end up in a divot. You can end up in an area with little grass coverage due to poor upkeep.(Not as likely on tour) That's BS. Golf is about hitting great shots. The more great shots you hit, then greater chance you have to win. The fact that you can hit a great shot(in the fairway) and still be punished for it is a terrible concept IMO.
Golf has made rule changes like this before. The embedded golf ball rule was changed in 2019 to include any general area outside of penalty or bunker areas. Before 2019 players only got relief from the fairways on embedded balls. The tour finally realized it was a stupid rule that went against the concept of fair play and changed it. They should do the same for preferred lies in the fairway IMO.
It has shifted my mentality to one of "you can only have great shots following tough spots really" and rolling with stuff.
American Football is nearly unrecognizable from the sport it was invented to be. Heck, baseball changed rules to make things more fair(strike zone reveiw etc.) They're much more aggressive about protecting the spirit of the game than golf has ever been.
Who knows what golf would've been 200 years ago if they'd had modern turf equipment and knowledge? This could very well be exactly what the first golfers dreamed it would be.
Maybe I am old school but agree with this. I have played out of a lot of divots or mud on my ball in the fairway. Just because you are in fairway doesn’t mean you are required to have a perfect lie.Agree. That is the essence of golf. You play it where it lies.This is a big topic in high-level Jr Golf (and I agree that mudballs and divots could be viewed separately)....but learning to play out of a variety of lies and conditions is considered an important part of learning the game. It's foundational and won't drastically change ever, IMO. How does the ball react, how do different clubs and swings then affect the ball, how do I need to attack the ball, what's the 'smart' play...etc.
Euros clearly learn how to play in a variety of conditions and blue collar courses. For Seve, etc it was a difference maker. But also Tiger...Earl surely grinded him through every lie imaginable on their SD 'muni'. Even Country Clubs brats like Speith and JT have elevated themselves with their creativity. Great hands are a part of it, but also teaching and practice.
Anyone that fluffs up their ball or moves it out of a divot has a score that is not really indicative of their skill level.
So when I play with a foursome or whatever and a guy tells me he shot an 84 but half his shots he moved the ball for a better lie? That score is BS.
First a perfect lie doesn't mean flat and level, it means grass under your ball and no mud on it. Spaun didn't get screwed on 2, he got unlucky by hitting the flag which happens all the time. What shouldn't happen is that after a long rain delay you go back onto a course with sub par conditions just because the tour doesn't want to miss their TV window on a Sunday.Maybe I am old school but agree with this. I have played out of a lot of divots or mud on my ball in the fairway. Just because you are in fairway doesn’t mean you are required to have a perfect lie.Agree. That is the essence of golf. You play it where it lies.This is a big topic in high-level Jr Golf (and I agree that mudballs and divots could be viewed separately)....but learning to play out of a variety of lies and conditions is considered an important part of learning the game. It's foundational and won't drastically change ever, IMO. How does the ball react, how do different clubs and swings then affect the ball, how do I need to attack the ball, what's the 'smart' play...etc.
Euros clearly learn how to play in a variety of conditions and blue collar courses. For Seve, etc it was a difference maker. But also Tiger...Earl surely grinded him through every lie imaginable on their SD 'muni'. Even Country Clubs brats like Speith and JT have elevated themselves with their creativity. Great hands are a part of it, but also teaching and practice.
Anyone that fluffs up their ball or moves it out of a divot has a score that is not really indicative of their skill level.
So when I play with a foursome or whatever and a guy tells me he shot an 84 but half his shots he moved the ball for a better lie? That score is BS.
Look I am not a rules expert but there were two on the course with same ruling. Hell Spaun got screwed on 2 and while different facts he hit a near perfect shot and he ends up 50 yards away. Golf is about dealing with stuff like that.
Either one of those are bad luck. How you deal with it is part of golf.First a perfect lie doesn't mean flat and level, it means grass under your ball and no mud on it. Spaun didn't get screwed on 2, he got unlucky by hitting the flag which happens all the time. What shouldn't happen is that after a long rain delay you go back onto a course with sub par conditions just because the tour doesn't want to miss their TV window on a Sunday.Maybe I am old school but agree with this. I have played out of a lot of divots or mud on my ball in the fairway. Just because you are in fairway doesn’t mean you are required to have a perfect lie.Agree. That is the essence of golf. You play it where it lies.This is a big topic in high-level Jr Golf (and I agree that mudballs and divots could be viewed separately)....but learning to play out of a variety of lies and conditions is considered an important part of learning the game. It's foundational and won't drastically change ever, IMO. How does the ball react, how do different clubs and swings then affect the ball, how do I need to attack the ball, what's the 'smart' play...etc.
Euros clearly learn how to play in a variety of conditions and blue collar courses. For Seve, etc it was a difference maker. But also Tiger...Earl surely grinded him through every lie imaginable on their SD 'muni'. Even Country Clubs brats like Speith and JT have elevated themselves with their creativity. Great hands are a part of it, but also teaching and practice.
Anyone that fluffs up their ball or moves it out of a divot has a score that is not really indicative of their skill level.
So when I play with a foursome or whatever and a guy tells me he shot an 84 but half his shots he moved the ball for a better lie? That score is BS.
Look I am not a rules expert but there were two on the course with same ruling. Hell Spaun got screwed on 2 and while different facts he hit a near perfect shot and he ends up 50 yards away. Golf is about dealing with stuff like that.
Honestly even if Burns gets a par on 15 he shots a 76 on final round (instead of 78) and ends up three shots back of Spaun. That ruling doesn’t take away his double bogey on 11 or other poor play. He collapsed just like he did last year at British open.
Maybe I am old school but agree with this. I have played out of a lot of divots or mud on my ball in the fairway. Just because you are in fairway doesn’t mean you are required to have a perfect lie.Agree. That is the essence of golf. You play it where it lies.This is a big topic in high-level Jr Golf (and I agree that mudballs and divots could be viewed separately)....but learning to play out of a variety of lies and conditions is considered an important part of learning the game. It's foundational and won't drastically change ever, IMO. How does the ball react, how do different clubs and swings then affect the ball, how do I need to attack the ball, what's the 'smart' play...etc.
Euros clearly learn how to play in a variety of conditions and blue collar courses. For Seve, etc it was a difference maker. But also Tiger...Earl surely grinded him through every lie imaginable on their SD 'muni'. Even Country Clubs brats like Speith and JT have elevated themselves with their creativity. Great hands are a part of it, but also teaching and practice.
Anyone that fluffs up their ball or moves it out of a divot has a score that is not really indicative of their skill level.
So when I play with a foursome or whatever and a guy tells me he shot an 84 but half his shots he moved the ball for a better lie? That score is BS.
Look I am not a rules expert but there were two on the course with same ruling. Hell Spaun got screwed on 2 and while different facts he hit a near perfect shot and he ends up 50 yards away. Golf is about dealing with stuff like that.
Maybe I am old school but agree with this. I have played out of a lot of divots or mud on my ball in the fairway. Just because you are in fairway doesn’t mean you are required to have a perfect lie.Agree. That is the essence of golf. You play it where it lies.This is a big topic in high-level Jr Golf (and I agree that mudballs and divots could be viewed separately)....but learning to play out of a variety of lies and conditions is considered an important part of learning the game. It's foundational and won't drastically change ever, IMO. How does the ball react, how do different clubs and swings then affect the ball, how do I need to attack the ball, what's the 'smart' play...etc.
Euros clearly learn how to play in a variety of conditions and blue collar courses. For Seve, etc it was a difference maker. But also Tiger...Earl surely grinded him through every lie imaginable on their SD 'muni'. Even Country Clubs brats like Speith and JT have elevated themselves with their creativity. Great hands are a part of it, but also teaching and practice.
Anyone that fluffs up their ball or moves it out of a divot has a score that is not really indicative of their skill level.
So when I play with a foursome or whatever and a guy tells me he shot an 84 but half his shots he moved the ball for a better lie? That score is BS.
Look I am not a rules expert but there were two on the course with same ruling. Hell Spaun got screwed on 2 and while different facts he hit a near perfect shot and he ends up 50 yards away. Golf is about dealing with stuff like that.
100%.
I've noticed that the pros complaining about getting a bad lie in the fairway and saying you shouldn't get punished for a good shot don't throw their ball back in the woods when it bounces off a tree and into the fairway, and they get rewarded for a bad shot.
Exactly - thats what I mean when I say "luck evens out in the long run anyway."Maybe I am old school but agree with this. I have played out of a lot of divots or mud on my ball in the fairway. Just because you are in fairway doesn’t mean you are required to have a perfect lie.Agree. That is the essence of golf. You play it where it lies.This is a big topic in high-level Jr Golf (and I agree that mudballs and divots could be viewed separately)....but learning to play out of a variety of lies and conditions is considered an important part of learning the game. It's foundational and won't drastically change ever, IMO. How does the ball react, how do different clubs and swings then affect the ball, how do I need to attack the ball, what's the 'smart' play...etc.
Euros clearly learn how to play in a variety of conditions and blue collar courses. For Seve, etc it was a difference maker. But also Tiger...Earl surely grinded him through every lie imaginable on their SD 'muni'. Even Country Clubs brats like Speith and JT have elevated themselves with their creativity. Great hands are a part of it, but also teaching and practice.
Anyone that fluffs up their ball or moves it out of a divot has a score that is not really indicative of their skill level.
So when I play with a foursome or whatever and a guy tells me he shot an 84 but half his shots he moved the ball for a better lie? That score is BS.
Look I am not a rules expert but there were two on the course with same ruling. Hell Spaun got screwed on 2 and while different facts he hit a near perfect shot and he ends up 50 yards away. Golf is about dealing with stuff like that.
100%.
I've noticed that the pros complaining about getting a bad lie in the fairway and saying you shouldn't get punished for a good shot don't throw their ball back in the woods when it bounces off a tree and into the fairway, and they get rewarded for a bad shot.
This is very fair.
Of course it changes the course. If you had asked Burns, Scott, and Hovland early Sunday morning would they have rather have teed off at 7:30 a.m. (when the weather was forecast to be fairly benign) or at 2:30 p.m. (when there was a forecast of nastier weather), what do you think they would have chosen? Those teeing off early had no shot of winning. I'd take my chances with the weather if I knew I had a chance to win.If I were to complain about anything from this tourney specifically, it is that the weather creating very different conditions depending on when you teed off seems less like luck and more impactful somehow. I can't quite put my finger on why, except that if the conditions themselves literally become different, it feels like it changes the course itself.
I've always had an issue with that rule as well. A spot that's a little bald whatever I'm not entitled to a perfect lie just because my shot was straight. But if I'm in the middle of the fairway and in a 1/2" deep divot that seems palpably unfair, to borrow a term from a different sport.Being forced to hit out of a fairway divot is total BS.
I've always had an issue with that rule as well. A spot that's a little bald whatever I'm not entitled to a perfect lie just because my shot was straight. But if I'm in the middle of the fairway and in a 1/2" deep divot that seems palpably unfair, to borrow a term from a different sport.Being forced to hit out of a fairway divot is total BS.
I agree with Chief's earlier point though that the people who are always improving their lies are posting a score that is substantially better than their ability. My chipping ability goes from mediocre to pretty darn good if I can fluff the ball up every time and I think people that move the ball regularly vastly underestimate how many strokes they are shaving versus playing it down.
Like when you hit it stiff, only for the ball to ricochet off the pin and roll 60 yards backwards.Honestly even if Burns gets a par on 15 he shots a 76 on final round (instead of 78) and ends up three shots back of Spaun. That ruling doesn’t take away his double bogey on 11 or other poor play. He collapsed just like he did last year at British open.
In terms of numbers sure. But I think it was more the mental impact of the "bad" ruling (which then caused one bad shot...which compounded into several).
But to the point....if you want to be a champ...gotta get over it and hit the next shot.