So that one was low enough (40,000 feet) to potentially impact air traffic, unlike the one that traversed the US at 60,000 feet.
I'd wait until it crossed into Antarctica. WTF have penguins ever done for us?Now the complaint will be why didn’t we shoot it down over the Pacific![]()
The first prize is usually very small. Need to keep playing and winning to upgrade to larger prizes.Stolen:
Pop two more balloons and we win a stuffed animal which, ironically, is also made in China.
![]()
Now another high altitude object shot down over Alaskan waters...
IT'S IN THE NEWS IT'S GOT TO BE TRUENow another high altitude object shot down over Alaskan waters...
Huh. *knits brow, squints eyes*
They sure about this?
IT'S IN THE NEWS IT'S GOT TO BE TRUE
ABC News Chief Global Affairs Correspondent Martha Raddatz first reported that when fighters were scrambled, the pilots did visuals, got images and said there was no sign the object had propulsion. It was described as "cylindrical and silver-ish gray" and seemed to be floating, a U.S. official said.
ABC News Chief Global Affairs Correspondent Martha Raddatz first reported that when fighters were scrambled, the pilots did visuals, got images and said there was no sign the object had propulsion. It was described as "cylindrical and silver-ish gray" and seemed to be floating, a U.S. official said.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-shoots-high-altitude-object-alaska-white-house/story?id=97040022
I was just wondering today what the bag limits would be. I mean, states usually set the limits for each species but states don't own the sky so the feds would have to set bag limits for balloons so they don't become extinct. Size limits and restrictions during spawing seasons would also be important.From the Twitters;
There are so many Chinese balloons hovering over the US - they’ll soon have their own hunting season
Well according to CNN TV this evening the unidentified craft "shattered on impact", so I don't think it was a balloon.ABC News Chief Global Affairs Correspondent Martha Raddatz first reported that when fighters were scrambled, the pilots did visuals, got images and said there was no sign the object had propulsion. It was described as "cylindrical and silver-ish gray" and seemed to be floating, a U.S. official said.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-shoots-high-altitude-object-alaska-white-house/story?id=97040022![]()
Oh great...NOW who's going to talk to the whales?ABC News Chief Global Affairs Correspondent Martha Raddatz first reported that when fighters were scrambled, the pilots did visuals, got images and said there was no sign the object had propulsion. It was described as "cylindrical and silver-ish gray" and seemed to be floating, a U.S. official said.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-shoots-high-altitude-object-alaska-white-house/story?id=97040022
NORAD spokesman, Maj. Olivier Gallant, said the military had determined what it was but would not reveal detailsCNN link, but few details.Something else shot down over Canada today? Wtf?
Time for another vote.I am curious how nervous people are after this incident.
1-10 scale: 1 being like "balloon...what balloon?"...10 being you ordered an extra Ham radio set off the dark web.
I'll go with 2.
Nobody knows for sure and if they do they aren’t telling.Any realItic idea on what this all is?
Any realItic idea on what this all is?
Any realItic idea on what this all is?
Trying to find an article about this. Is this in mainstream news outlets yet?... and now China saying they have a object near a port city they are bringing down.
LinkTrying to find an article about this. Is this in mainstream news outlets yet?... and now China saying they have a object near a port city they are bringing down.
Hopefully Biden and the Joint Chiefs of Staff aren’t actively posting in here.Any realItic idea on what this all is?
A well-armed nuclear power deciding they want to, at the very least, invade two giant nations' airspace and **** with their militaries and officials.
Really, no big deal. Better to joke about it.
Or worse even. There were reports about this object over Montana (that now supposedly doesn't exist) that pilots flying by couldn't figure out how it was being propelled.Any realItic idea on what this all is?
A well-armed nuclear power deciding they want to, at the very least, invade two giant nations' airspace and **** with their militaries and officials.
Really, no big deal. Better to joke about it.
F-35 fighter jets were sent up to investigate after the object was first detected on Thursday, according to a US official. Kirby told reporters that the first fly-by of US fighter aircraft happened Thursday night, and the second happened Friday morning. Both brought back “limited” information about the object.
But the pilots later gave differing reports of what they observed, the source briefed on the intelligence said. Some pilots said the object “interfered with their sensors” on the planes, but not all pilots reported experiencing that. Some pilots also claimed to have seen no identifiable propulsion on the object, and could not explain how it was staying in the air, despite the object cruising at an altitude of 40,000 feet.
The conflicting eyewitness accounts are partly why the Pentagon has been unable to fully explain what the object is, the source briefed on the matter said.
I saw this on Drudge who grabs pretty much anything (they also had that linked that story that I guess was not real with the video of the balloon being shot down over Montana last week) but it looks like this report is from Bloomberg whereas that Montana story was from a more tabloidish outlet.Trying to find an article about this. Is this in mainstream news outlets yet?... and now China saying they have a object near a port city they are bringing down.
EDIT: Found something from Bloomberg via Yahoo News. South China Morning Post has it, too. American network news, CNN, NYT, WSJ, WaPo, etc. not touching this yet.
That report about not knowing how is was propelled was about the 2nd object, the one shot down north of Alaska.Or worse even. There were reports about this object over Montana (that now supposedly doesn't exist) that pilots flying by couldn't figure out how it was being propelled.
“I ordered the take down of an unidentified object that violated Canadian airspace. @NORADCommand shot down the object over the Yukon. Canadian and U.S. aircraft were scrambled, and a U.S. F-22 successfully fired at the object,” Trudeau said on Twitter. The object was “cylindrical” and smaller than the suspected Chinese balloon shot down last weekend, Canadian Defense Minister Anita Anand said on Saturday evening.
From another board -- not particularly enlightening with specifics, but a good take overall:Nobody knows for sure and if they do they aren’t telling.Any realItic idea on what this all is?
Poster1: Anything our government shares with us in public also tells the enemy how much we know.
Poster 2: Government officials have been making statements to let us know how much they know — without telling it to us. That’s what [Royal Canadian Air Force] Major [Olivier] Gallant was doing. Here is more of that from the Washington Post:
“All of the objects are similar in certain ways and then dramatically different in certain ways. What we don’t yet understand is what sorts of technology are in there,” the official said. “Really capable technology can be very small and portable. So the size doesn’t tell us a whole lot.”
The official said the current U.S. assessment is the objects are not military threats.
A short time later, North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) released the following statement regarding the airspace closure over Havre:
NORAD detected a radar anomaly and sent fighter aircraft to investigate. Those aircraft did not identify any object to correlate to the radar hits. NORAD will continue to monitor the situation.
The false alarm and response comes on the same day that an "unidentified object" was shot down over western Canada.
Even if it's just a naked CCP release ... it's newsworthy that they're going to put on a show of "shooting something down".I saw this on Drudge who grabs pretty much anything (they also had that linked that story that I guess was not a real with the video of the balloon being shot down over Montana last week) but it looks like this report is from Bloomberg whereas that Montana story was from a more tabloidish outlet.Trying to find an article about this. Is this in mainstream news outlets yet?... and now China saying they have a object near a port city they are bringing down.
EDIT: Found something from Bloomberg via Yahoo News. South China Morning Post has it, too. American network news, CNN, NYT, WSJ, WaPo, etc. not touching this yet.
This story is really light on details so hopefully it’s more of the same false reports or outlets being tricked. China shooting down stuff is obviously an unwelcomed addition to all this.
Bloomberg I expect to be a bit better about posting stuff but we will see.
Yep. Am hoping it is completely fabricated.Even if it's just a naked CCP release ... it's newsworthy that they're going to put on a show of "shooting something down".I saw this on Drudge who grabs pretty much anything (they also had that linked that story that I guess was not a real with the video of the balloon being shot down over Montana last week) but it looks like this report is from Bloomberg whereas that Montana story was from a more tabloidish outlet.Trying to find an article about this. Is this in mainstream news outlets yet?... and now China saying they have a object near a port city they are bringing down.
EDIT: Found something from Bloomberg via Yahoo News. South China Morning Post has it, too. American network news, CNN, NYT, WSJ, WaPo, etc. not touching this yet.
This story is really light on details so hopefully it’s more of the same false reports or outlets being tricked. China shooting down stuff is obviously an unwelcomed addition to all this.
Bloomberg I expect to be a bit better about posting stuff but we will see.
Yes but China today said they had something in their airspace.Any realItic idea on what this all is?
A well-armed nuclear power deciding they want to, at the very least, invade two giant nations' airspace and **** with their militaries and officials.
Really, no big deal. Better to joke about it.
Probably a Russian balloon intended for Ukraine.Yes but China today said they had something in their airspace.Any realItic idea on what this all is?
A well-armed nuclear power deciding they want to, at the very least, invade two giant nations' airspace and **** with their militaries and officials.
Really, no big deal. Better to joke about it.
Very cleverly crafted. The possible confusion over what's meant is just part of the charm of that headline.Here's a fearmongering headline from a Baltimore TV station:
"Warplane shot down object over northern Canada, Prime Minister Trudeau says"
Article says nothing at all about a warplane, or any type of plane.
The Qingdao Marine Development Bureau sent a message to fishing boats that an unidentified flying object was detected in waters near Rizhao and authorities were preparing to be able to shoot it down, Shanghai-based news outlet The Paper reported on Sunday.
Fishing boats were ordered to be on alert and “avoid risks”, the report said, without saying when the message was sent or when the object was sighted.
“If debris falls around your boat, please help take pictures as evidence. If conditions allow, please help salvage it,” the message said.
The sighting comes as the People’s Liberation Army holds a week-long military exercise in the Bohai Strait, an area connecting the Bohai Sea and the northern part of the Yellow Sea.