Bob Magaw
Footballguy
i read once that coming out of college, two key factors that correlated to future NFL success were starts (i think, maybe wins) & accuracy (completion %)...
so, back to jackson...
most QBs, with few exceptions, struggle early... but it seems like the NATURE of the struggles has to do with the speed & complexity of the game, a lack of knowledge & experience... this could lead to holding the ball too long, taking unnecessary sacks, making dumb throw into coverage...
the alarming issue with jackson, is even when he has had time, whether through good blocking or keeping the play alive with his feet, he has still been appalingly inaccurate... this is his third year in the league...
this prompts a few questions for me...
is a lack of accuracy generally a death blow precursor to a young QBs career?
are there many examples of QBs that were wildly inaccurate earlier in their career & than at some point BECAME accurate?
* interestingly (to me at least), if we use mcnabb as a measuring stick in terms of how jackson has tracked as far as his developmental curve (jackson was supposed to be childress' mcnabb), in his first five seasons, mcnabb had an unimpressive 49%, 58%, 57%, 58% & 57%... in HIS first three seasons, jackson is at 58%, 58% & 51%...
so, back to jackson...
most QBs, with few exceptions, struggle early... but it seems like the NATURE of the struggles has to do with the speed & complexity of the game, a lack of knowledge & experience... this could lead to holding the ball too long, taking unnecessary sacks, making dumb throw into coverage...
the alarming issue with jackson, is even when he has had time, whether through good blocking or keeping the play alive with his feet, he has still been appalingly inaccurate... this is his third year in the league...
this prompts a few questions for me...
is a lack of accuracy generally a death blow precursor to a young QBs career?
are there many examples of QBs that were wildly inaccurate earlier in their career & than at some point BECAME accurate?
* interestingly (to me at least), if we use mcnabb as a measuring stick in terms of how jackson has tracked as far as his developmental curve (jackson was supposed to be childress' mcnabb), in his first five seasons, mcnabb had an unimpressive 49%, 58%, 57%, 58% & 57%... in HIS first three seasons, jackson is at 58%, 58% & 51%...
Last edited by a moderator: