What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Active Shooter in Munich (2 Viewers)

Shooter was apparently an 18 yr old German of Iranian descent, who was receiving psychiatric treatment.

He was apparently obsessed with mass shootings, and specifically American school shootings.

The police have found no connections to ISIS

The German police hypothesize that he was inspired by Anders Breivik who shot and killed about seventy students precisely five years ago (he also set off a bomb, killing 7 more)

The wound to the shooters head appears self inflicted

 
Shooter was apparently an 18 yr old German of Iranian descent, who was receiving psychiatric treatment.

He was apparently obsessed with mass shootings, and specifically American school shootings.

The police have found no connections to ISIS

The German police hypothesize that he was inspired by Anders Breivik who shot and killed about seventy students precisely five years ago (he also set off a bomb, killing 7 more)

The wound to the shooters head appears self inflicted
Obama's on the ☎ apologizing for America. 

 
Increase awareness, identification, and mental health care.
I think it goes beyond that - we need to do something to keep them from hurting themselves and others.

Many cannot be trusted to stay on their meds without supervision.

 
I think it goes beyond that - we need to do something to keep them from hurting themselves and others.

Many cannot be trusted to stay on their meds without supervision.
Legalize and tax marijuana. Divert the funds from prisons to mental hospitals. Let the people decide if they want to spend tax money on preventing mass shootings, or live with the alternative.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Eventually it gets to the point where the world has to decide if mass destruction of ISIS in Iraq and Syria is worth stopping the number of deaths that will happen if we let ISIS run wild for another 10 years.

 
Eventually it gets to the point where the world has to decide if mass destruction of ISIS in Iraq and Syria is worth stopping the number of deaths that will happen if we let ISIS run wild for another 10 years.
You might want to read the thread before you post stuff like this

(Hint: ISIS not involved in this shooting)

 
Is he an immigrant from the Middle East? He's Muslim, right?


Shooter was apparently an 18 yr old German of Iranian descent, who was receiving psychiatric treatment.

He was apparently obsessed with mass shootings, and specifically American school shootings.

The police have found no connections to ISIS

The German police hypothesize that he was inspired by Anders Breivik who shot and killed about seventy students precisely five years ago (he also set off a bomb, killing 7 more)

The wound to the shooters head appears self inflicted
If you don't know Anders Breivik  - He's pretty much a Nazi

 
Woof, in that case this is even worse than if it was ISIS. I don't even know anymore.

So many people just want to kill other people. Sad to say but maybe we need another big war to clear out some of these idiots. How long before North Korea starts acting up?

I know I'm safe in the USA but I hate hearing about this bad stuff happening in Europe.

 
Legalize and tax marijuana. Divert the funds from prisons to mental hospitals. Let the people decide if they want to spend tax money on preventing mass shootings, or live with the alternative.
Lock up the crazies is what politicians will call it to score points.

 
Lock up the crazies is what politicians will call it to score points.
What do you call it? You suggest that people need to be monitored to make sure they stay on their meds. Maybe technology will find an answer. My daughter has diabetes and her insulin pump/blue glucose monitor can link to her phone. Maybe there becomes a time when medication levels can be monitored digitally?

 
Is he an immigrant from the Middle East? He's Muslim, right?
Born and raised in Germany, but often the second generation is more radical than their immigrant parents and then the third generation assimilates - I saw a study somewhere - I'll try to find it.

We are the Borg - resistance is futile (said it before anyone else got the chance).

 
What do you call it? You suggest that people need to be monitored to make sure they stay on their meds. Maybe technology will find an answer. My daughter has diabetes and her insulin pump/blue glucose monitor can link to her phone. Maybe there becomes a time when medication levels can be monitored digitally?
And if they don't want to take them?  Throw them in prison?  

Until they hurt themselves or someone else they still have rights.  It's not an easy problem to solve.

 
Lock up the crazies is what politicians will call it to score points.
We tried that. Liberals screamed jumped up and down and held their breath so RayGun closed all the mental institutions and then liberals screamed jumped up and down and held their breath. Never ending cycle with "those people". 

 
What do you call it? You suggest that people need to be monitored to make sure they stay on their meds. Maybe technology will find an answer. My daughter has diabetes and her insulin pump/blue glucose monitor can link to her phone. Maybe there becomes a time when medication levels can be monitored digitally?
Clearly, they cannot function on their own, but maybe some kind of halfway house arrangement? The problem is that they would have to be assigned there by some kind of competency hearing. Then who goes? The bipolar? The autistic? The severe ADHD types? Where is the line drawn?

And who pays?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
And if they don't want to take them?  Throw them in prison?  

Until they hurt themselves or someone else they still have rights.  It's not an easy problem to solve.
This is where we establish mental health guidelines. People aren't put on certain meds for the fun of it. It's deemed necessary by Dr. At that point it, doesn't become a choice of the patient any longer. 

I fully understand that this is an extreme measure. As mentioned the other options are to live with the consequences of mass murders happening. We will never rid the world of radical ideology, mental illness, or guns. Some one, at some point, will lose some thing.

 
We tried that. Liberals screamed jumped up and down and held their breath so RayGun closed all the mental institutions and then liberals screamed jumped up and down and held their breath. Never ending cycle with "those people". 
Wow, that's...not at all how it went.

 
This is where we establish mental health guidelines. People aren't put on certain meds for the fun of it. It's deemed necessary by Dr. At that point it, doesn't become a choice of the patient any longer. 

I fully understand that this is an extreme measure. As mentioned the other options are to live with the consequences of mass murders happening. We will never rid the world of radical ideology, mental illness, or guns. Some one, at some point, will lose some thing.
How do we establish those guidelines? Seems like we'd need medical opinions backed by judicial rulings. It makes it a crime to have a mental illness.

 
How do we establish those guidelines? Seems like we'd need medical opinions backed by judicial rulings. It makes it a crime to have a mental illness.
Not really. That would mean that we should incarcerate a person based solely on mental illness. The crime would be failure to take medication that would allow you to interact with society with causing harm to yourself or others.

 
Not really. That would mean that we should incarcerate a person based solely on mental illness. The crime would be failure to take medication that would allow you to interact with society with causing harm to yourself or others.
The government forcing people to take medications or be locked up is kind of scary. I don't trust our government that much.

 
Not really. That would mean that we should incarcerate a person based solely on mental illness. The crime would be failure to take medication that would allow you to interact with society with causing harm to yourself or others.
Every U.S. state already has involuntary commitment laws.  The standard to commit a person isn't the failure to take medication, but rather the second point you raised -- whether the individual poses an imminent threat to themselves or the public. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Every U.S. state already has involuntary commitment laws.  The standard to commit a person isn't failure to take medication.  It's usually whether they pose an imminent threat to themselves or the public. 
Sorry, there was a typo in my original statement. Mental illness does NOT mean we incarcerate. The failure to take/stay on meds would be the crime. Sorry for the confusion. 

How do you determine an imminent threat to themselves or the public? This brings us back to finding ways to protect ourselves, or go about our lives knowing that we could be a victim. Odds are against it and are definitely stacked in our favor that it won't happen. Same as flying on a plane.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The government forcing people to take medications or be locked up is kind of scary. I don't trust our government that much.


Then you must be a gun owner? You have nothing to worry about. 
 To protect yourself if put in a situation where a mentally ill person decides to open fire. And to protect yourself from a government that you don't trust. 

 
 To protect yourself if put in a situation where a mentally ill person decides to open fire. And to protect yourself from a government that you don't trust. 
You can turn in your guns and get a Obamacare credit. Hillary will protect you now.  

 
Perhaps, but it's a difficult balance between protecting the public vs. protecting an individual from being held against their will.  What standard would you suggest?
It took me reading it three times to figure that out! If a person cannot control his own behavior and he has a mental illness that potentially makes him a threat to the safety of others, then that person needs strict supervision and possibly confinement. The problem becomes how to decide that, as we are getting into depriving freedom before a crime is committed here. I'm not 100% comfortable with that.

 
RIGHT WING ALERT RIGHT WING ALERT! Shooter has right wing link. RIGHT WING ALERT RIGHT WING ALERT!!! 

http://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1488508/nine-dead-and-ten-injured-with-death-toll-expected-to-rise-after-gunman-goes-on-the-rampage-at-munich-shopping-centre/

investigators say there is an “obvious link” between Friday’s shooting at a Munich mall and far-right Norwegian killer Anders Behring Breivik.

The link is obvious,” said Munich police chief Hubertus Andrae, describing the gunman as obsessed with mass killings.

He added the killer researched the theme of rampages and may have researched Breivik’s lethal killing spree.

interesting. 

Now if he pledged allegiance to ISIS there would be no link to ISIS. 

 
He apparently used a picture of Breivik as his WhatApp profile picture, so I'm guessing that's what the "obvious link" that guy was talking about is. 

Sounds especially ####ed up and weird. He apparently used a pretty girl's Facebook account to send targeted invites to young 1st and 2nd generation immigrant men to have them show up at that McDonalds. Most of the dead were under 21 and the BBC identified them as immigrants; 3 Kosovans, 3 Turks, and 1 Greek.

Illegally acquired gun, serial number filed off.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top