What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Adrian Peterson vs the 2006 Rookie RBs (1 Viewer)

So my Adrian Peterson comparison of being a fast Eddie George (earlier post) was supposed to be a compliment.  It seemed that it might have been taken as a slight.  Remember Eddie George in his prime was pretty good.  Now imagine him with sub-4.4 speed.  Wow.

I don't see how AP is like Emmitt Smith.  He runs way faster and is much taller.  But I might be missing something, what are you guys thinking?  Running style maybe?
I don't think a fast Eddie George is a slight at all - wouldn't that be Dickerson?About Emmitt, I don't see that one. The two most recent guys that remind me a lot of Emmitt are Cadillac and DeAngelo. Both of them are smaller (5-9ish, 215lb) backs who are very productive, especially getting to the endzone, without elite speed.
I don't see Emmitt and Caddy comps. Caddy is much quicker and explosive. Emmiitt is more elusive and smooth, much more like Edge to me in running style.Oh, and any comp for a RB that doesn't discuss vision is lacking. It is usually not mentioned because it is very subjective. Emmitt had excellent vision to go long with a great OL. Edge has that type of vision. I can't make enough of an opinion about Caddy yet. Vision is one of the most important abilities of a back but because it is harder to measure, it gets overlooked. Curtis Martin had/has the best vision of any back I have ever seen. Uber talented studs like Kevin Jones have yet to grasp the vision part of being a back.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Does anyone have any thoughts on the article I came across? It seemed like it might be news worthy?

See below so you don't have to hunt for it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here's an interesting article on Peterson. It wasn't an NCAA infraction according to OU, but something seems strange about it to me. Read for yourself.

link: http://www.shns.com/shns/g_index2.cfm?acti...ARLSON-04-20-06

By JENNI CARLSON

The Oklahoman

20-APR-06

Adrian Peterson broke no laws and violated no rules.

He went to a dealership, picked out a car and filled out the paperwork. After driving the car for a couple weeks, Oklahoma's stud running back returned it because, as his mother said, the family couldn't afford the payments.

An internal investigation at OU determined it wasn't an NCAA infraction.

So, why does this whole thing give me a queasy feeling?

Not because of the football program. Not because of the athletic department either, though it goes before the NCAA's infractions committee later this week and faces charges of lacking institutional control after the men's basketball program made excessive calls to recruits. It's not even that the dealership that let Peterson drive free was all about getting people into cars, then hammering out the financing. The practice isn't common, but it isn't unheard of either.

No, the heebie jeebies are because of Peterson. The kid is so darn close to realizing every dream he's ever had. Heisman Trophy. National championship. No. 1 pick in the NFL Draft. Fortune could be his. So could fame.

Peterson is on the verge of having it all.

But he has none of it yet.

Yo, Adrian. Don't be a knucklehead. Dream Street is right around the corner, but there's still time to detour. It can happen to anyone, even the best of players.

Peterson might have done nothing wrong, but forcing an internal investigation is never a good thing.

A trip down Maurice Clarett Way proves as much. First came the charges that the former Ohio State standout falsified a police report. Then improper academic help to stay eligible, then thousands of dollars in improper benefits, then two charges of aggravated robbery.

Peterson's indiscretions are minor compared to that. He missed enough class last fall that he had to sit out a practice, then had this car deal.

Not exactly Clarett-like.

Thing is, Peterson needs to be careful. There is no such thing as a can't-miss player. There is shouldn't-miss. There are no guarantees beyond that.

But if Peterson just plays it straight for the next nine months, he won't miss.

This is it for him, after all. His Oklahoma days are over once the 2006-07 campaign is. It'll be the worst kept secret of next season.

Healthy knees are a precious commodity in football, particularly for running backs. And if last season's ankle injury did anything, it showed Peterson how fleeting health can be.

Peterson can make a mint if he can just avoid pitfalls.

No doubt Peterson is still a youngster. Even though he recently turned 21, plenty of us can attest we made our silliest decisions when we were that age.

Thing is, few of us were known by the masses and stood to make millions upon college graduation. The expectations on Peterson are higher. They just are. It might not seem fair. But it's part of the deal when you're a big-time college football player.

Lest you think these expectations impossible for Peterson to bear, roll this one around in your head _ Peterson is a month and a half older than Chris Paul.

The Hornets rookie handled it in the NBA. So can Peterson.

He must realize he is operating under different rules. There is right, there is wrong, and there is the appearance of wrong. Situations like this car deal might turn out to be legit, but they look sketchy. They bring investigators running, and that's never a good thing.

Frankly, it's not like Peterson has to be eligible for sainthood once his college career is done. He just needs to remember how close his dreams are and how quickly they can take a hit.

You don't have to do something wrong to make a mistake.
 
By JENNI CARLSON
You can stop reading there. Probably the worst writer writing for any top 50 sports market paper. She once wrote an entire sports column where one knee ligament was talking to the other.
 
I just want to mention to all of those calling him AP, that that is a serious and terrible mistake. His coaches, teammates, friends refer to him as:

AD

for Adrian.

Carry on.

 
By JENNI CARLSON
You can stop reading there. Probably the worst writer writing for any top 50 sports market paper. She once wrote an entire sports column where one knee ligament was talking to the other.
Exactly. Peterson bought the car after arranging financing but then decided he couldn't afford it. I don't how returning a car makes a guy look like he's doing something wrong, actually it does the opposite. The NCAA's view was that he didn't pay on the car during the two weeks he had it and players aren't allowed to receive special treatment that the rest of the students don't receive. http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=2413962

 
I just want to mention to all of those calling him AP, that that is a serious and terrible mistake. His coaches, teammates, friends refer to him as:

AD

for Adrian.

Carry on.
"All Day"
 
I just want to mention to all of those calling him AP, that that is a serious and terrible mistake. His coaches, teammates, friends refer to him as:

AD

for Adrian.

Carry on.
actually it's for All Day
 
So the writer above might be a clown, but the information in the article is probably factually accurate. Does that warrant concern? Will this raise additional investigations by the NCAA?

Does anyone from Oklahoma have any more insight into this?

Thanks.

 
Also, I know that some debate on whether Peterson will come back to OU after this year. I do not think it is in doubt, unless performance or injury issues, .... he is coming out. Peterson has a child now, and the financial burden for his family might come into play. Yes, many college athletes have children, but it is a consideration. Some of the local press is reporting that Peterson will come back for Senior year. But, that is purely rhetoric at this time in the year.

 
So my Adrian Peterson comparison of being a fast Eddie George (earlier post) was supposed to be a compliment. It seemed that it might have been taken as a slight. Remember Eddie George in his prime was pretty good. Now imagine him with sub-4.4 speed. Wow.

I don't see how AP is like Emmitt Smith. He runs way faster and is much taller. But I might be missing something, what are you guys thinking? Running style maybe?
I don't think a fast Eddie George is a slight at all - wouldn't that be Dickerson?About Emmitt, I don't see that one. The two most recent guys that remind me a lot of Emmitt are Cadillac and DeAngelo. Both of them are smaller (5-9ish, 215lb) backs who are very productive, especially getting to the endzone, without elite speed.
I don't see Emmitt and Caddy comps. Caddy is much quicker and explosive. Emmiitt is more elusive and smooth, much more like Edge to me in running style.Oh, and any comp for a RB that doesn't discuss vision is lacking. It is usually not mentioned because it is very subjective. Emmitt had excellent vision to go long with a great OL. Edge has that type of vision. I can't make enough of an opinion about Caddy yet. Vision is one of the most important abilities of a back but because it is harder to measure, it gets overlooked. Curtis Martin had/has the best vision of any back I have ever seen. Uber talented studs like Kevin Jones have yet to grasp the vision part of being a back.
I agree with you, but I've never heard of DeAngelo lacking vision though it's something that's hard to tell from college.
 
Also, I know that some debate on whether Peterson will come back to OU after this year. I do not think it is in doubt, unless performance or injury issues, .... he is coming out. Peterson has a child now, and the financial burden for his family might come into play. Yes, many college athletes have children, but it is a consideration. Some of the local press is reporting that Peterson will come back for Senior year. But, that is purely rhetoric at this time in the year.
I never expected him to play his senior year. RB's don't pass up the chance to be a top pick considering how easy it is for them to get injured.
 
Also, I know that some debate on whether Peterson will come back to OU after this year.  I do not think it is in doubt, unless performance or injury issues, .... he is coming out.  Peterson has a child now, and the financial burden for his family might come into play.  Yes, many college athletes have children, but it is a consideration.  Some of the local press is reporting that Peterson will come back for Senior year.  But, that is purely rhetoric at this time in the year.
I never expected him to play his senior year. RB's don't pass up the chance to be a top pick considering how easy it is for them to get injured.
I know. But many in that area really believe he is coming back. I see no reason for him to come back unless injury or performance (probably due to Bomar's ineffectiveness).There was even a local news article with quotes from AP saying as much. All rhetoric.

 
So my Adrian Peterson comparison of being a fast Eddie George (earlier post) was supposed to be a compliment. It seemed that it might have been taken as a slight. Remember Eddie George in his prime was pretty good. Now imagine him with sub-4.4 speed. Wow.

I don't see how AP is like Emmitt Smith. He runs way faster and is much taller. But I might be missing something, what are you guys thinking? Running style maybe?
As a life-long Sooners fan and someone who lived in Dallas from '90 thorough '95, the only similarity I see between the two is their fearlessness. Emmitt was one of the best at deflecting big hits, but when he wanted to he dropped his head and pounded defenders. AD on the other hand looks for contact. He's a FB in a RB's body.
 
So my Adrian Peterson comparison of being a fast Eddie George (earlier post) was supposed to be a compliment.  It seemed that it might have been taken as a slight.  Remember Eddie George in his prime was pretty good.  Now imagine him with sub-4.4 speed.  Wow.

I don't see how AP is like Emmitt Smith.  He runs way faster and is much taller.  But I might be missing something, what are you guys thinking?  Running style maybe?
I would be absolutly shocked if AP ran a sub 4.4 40.
His 40 times from the offseason conditioning program were 4.41 and 4.35. I'm not sure if these were electronically timed. But he does have legit home run game speed with 80+ yd TD runs in 2004 and 2005. I would not compare him to Emmitt or Eddie George. He is more like Eric Dickerson. A taller, extremely fluid runner with power and elusiveness. I see some Herschel Walker and Bo Jackson in him too.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So my Adrian Peterson comparison of being a fast Eddie George (earlier post) was supposed to be a compliment. It seemed that it might have been taken as a slight. Remember Eddie George in his prime was pretty good. Now imagine him with sub-4.4 speed. Wow.

I don't see how AP is like Emmitt Smith. He runs way faster and is much taller. But I might be missing something, what are you guys thinking? Running style maybe?
I would be absolutly shocked if AP ran a sub 4.4 40.
His 40 times from the offseason conditioning program were 4.41 and 4.35. I'm not sure if these were electronically timed. But he does have legit home run game speed with 80+ yd TD runs in 2004 and 2005. I would not compare him to Emmitt or Eddie George. He is more like Eric Dickerson. A taller, extremely fluid runner with power and elusiveness. I see some Herschel Walker and Bo Jackson in him too.
I personally trust no times that come from offseason conditioning or really any that come from only team sources. Just one of my things I guess.
 
Does anyone from Oklahoma have any more insight into this?
Given the massive dump Sampson took all over the basketball program prior to leaving and the presence of the NCAA, my feelings are that Stoops probably has the football program on lockdown and it will remain as such through the upcoming season.Nothing to see and less to worry about. There is no way Peterson plays another year. Barring an injury that will have an negative impact on his draft status, he enters the draft.
There was even a local news article with quotes from AP saying as much. All rhetoric.
Yep.
 
Were are all those people who thought AP was the clear man over Bush a year and a half ago? :whistle: :tumbleweed:

I was saying it then and will stick by it now... Bush >>> Peterson. Both should be stars or at the very least very effective in the NFL though.
I'm still sticking to Peterson > Bush. Peterson has been nicked up and played without any semblance of a passing game and still put up good numbers, especially at the end of the year when he was healthy. As far as real football, I'd rather have Peterson if he can improve his receiving enough to be an every down back in the NFL.
me too
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top