big words after the fact.$1,000 says you're wrong.The Pats SHOULD have been favored by 3.5, if not more. Hindsight is pretty easy hey? The line was good if not too low. You're delusional to think otherwise.it was delusional to think the pats should have been favored by that much. And that has next to nothing to do with thinking the pats could win by more than a field goal. Lines are about probabilities, not possibilities.You are clearly incapable of being impartial as you hate the Patriots. You don't "take out home field" and adjust the line. The line was 3.5, and it was not delusional in the slightest bit to think the pats would win by more then 3.5. That's pure hyperbole or trolling. I have lots of Denver fan friends who were surprised at the low 2.5 opening spread and thought it should be around 4 or 5.Low? The line favored the pats by 6.5 over the number one seed in the conference when you back out home field. somehow people convinced themselves the pats were a monster after looking merely ok against the Chiefs.delusional to think the pats win todays game by more then 3? Most neutral fans were surprised the line opened so low. To call someone who thought NE would win this game "delusional" is idiotic.Vegas: Making billions off delusional homers since day 1.Yep heard 5x as much action came in on the Pats this weekend.This will be a day not long forgotten in Vegas lore. Sharps made a KILLING.
That's like saying it was delusional to say Carolina wouldn't be up by more then 15 by halftime. Everyone would take that bet pre game.