What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

After the Big Unit (1 Viewer)

David Yudkin

Footballguy
Once Randy Johnson wins his 300th game, there will be a ***MAJOR*** gap until there is even a serious candidate to win 300 games. Who might even have long-term potential to do it?

The only active player under 35 with 150 wins is Livian Hernandez with 151 at 34!

Santana has 116 wins but is 30. There are only two pitchers under 30 with at least 100 wins (Sabathia 121 at 28 and Garland 110 at 29).

I can't see anyone as an option . . . who is even a remote candidate at this points? Verlander is 26 and has 51 wins. Kazmir is 25 with 51 wins.

 
Unless the game changes, Johnson will be the last. I know it's been said before, but pitchers just don't get enough decisions these days. Also, top-flight pitchers are rarely allowed to pitch through injuries.

 
Great topic. I really don't think there is a pitcher right now in the bigs that will get there. Even CC would have to average 15 wins a season until he is 40 to get there.

With the way the pitchers are used, mid inning guys sniping wins, bullpens blowing up, etc, it will take someone special. The pitcher will have to be drafted young, no college, and fly up through the minors. Get to the majors by the time he is 20, with a very good team and rack up wins early and often. A pitcher that can adapt their game as they get older.

We may not see another in our lifetime.

 
A guy will have to pitch into his 40s. I dont think its gonna be as difficult as you guys are making it sound. I think it will def happen again in our lifetime.

 
Sabathia is has probably the most realistic chance. He's still young, plays for a team that will give him every chance to win 20 a year, has the build to not break down, is able to pitch on short rest and already has 128.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Unless the game changes, Johnson will be the last. I know it's been said before, but pitchers just don't get enough decisions these days. Also, top-flight pitchers are rarely allowed to pitch through injuries.
Not true at all. The way to win 300 games is to win a lot while you are old.Link

All of this is about 300-game winners. I realize, of course, that victories is a generally lousy way to rank pitchers, but it is what it is. Three hundred victories is an iconic thing. Pitcher who win 300 go to the Hall of Fame, no exceptions*. Pitchers who don’t win 300 … maybe they go to the Hall (Gibson, Roberts, Marichal, Drysdale, Hunter) and maybe they don’t (Blyleven, John, Kaat, Tiant, Morris).

*Unless the voters decide to punish Roger Clemens.

So, how do you get to 300? Well, this will sound blindingly obvious, I know, but in order to win 300 games in the big leagues, you pretty much have to win a lot of games as an old man. Blindingly obvious, yes, but this might gets at the question Bill James and I began to talk about in our co-column: Why is it that every time someone wins 300 games (as Randy Johnson should do in the next couple of weeks) people assume that he will be the last one ever to do it?

The reason, I think, is that you can’t project 300 because you have absolutely no idea who is going to win a lot of games from ages 35-44 — and having looked hard at the 12 pitchers who have won 300 (I’m already counting Randy Johnson), winning in those later years is the key to winning 300.

That is, nobody since World War II has clinched 300 victories with dominating performances in their 20s. One way to look at it is to take a look at the winningest pitchers, by age, since the war:

Most wins to 25: Dwight Gooden with 119 (career wins 194), Denny McLain with 114 (career wins 131) — none of Top 17 won 300.

Most wins to 27: Gooden with 142, Don Drysdale with 141 (career wins 209) — none of Top 10 won 300.

Most wins to 29: Catfish Hunter with 184 (career wins 224), Robin Roberts with 179 (career wins 286) — none in Top 6 won 300.

Most wins to 31: Catfish Hunter with 210, Robin Roberts with 206 — none in Top 5 won 300.

Yes, the march to 300 has been mostly about late-life success. Here’s another way to look at it: This is the average number of victories for the 12 pitchers who have won 300 games, by age:

18-24: 32 victories.

25-29: 77 victories.

30-34: 86 victories.

35-39: 79 victories.

40-48: 53 victories.

Pretty easy to see there — the 300-game winners averaged more victories from 35-39 than they did in their supposed prime of 25-29. They pulled in, on average, 53 victories from age 40 to 48 — now, admittedly this is somewhat tilted because Phil Niekro won so many games after age 40 (he won 121), but every one of the 300-gamers pitched after age 40 and won more than a dozen games.

So take someone like Bert Blyleven. After his 39-year, he had 279 victories … more than half of the 300-gamers had at that age, more than Nolan Ryan, Niekro, Gaylord Perry, Tom Glavine, Randy Johnson or Early Wynn. But he could not quite finish it off. Jack Morris after his 37-year had 237 victories, pretty darned close to the average of the 300-game winners (243). But he only won 17 games in two rough years after that.

So, it’s really impossible to predict. Randy Johnson only had 99 victories at age 31. Phil Niekro only had 97 victories at age 33. Gaylord Perry, Warren Spahn, Nolan Ryan, Early Wynn … these guys did not look like great bets for 300 when they reached their mid-30s. But they won a lot of games late in their careers. Niekro, as a knuckleballer, just kept going and going and going. Perry had a late career renaissance — he won 21 games as a 39-year-old and 47 more after that. Warren Spahn won 20-games or more seven times after he turned 35. Randy Johnson was probably at his very best from age 35 to 40. And so on.

So when looking at potential 300-game winners … well, there’s no way to do it. But we’ll go ahead and take a look anyway and the most likely candidates, from age 26 on up. We’re not including victories from the first part of this year.

Through age 26

300-gamers: Most victories, 95 (Maddux, Seaver, Clemens). Fewest, 2 (Niekro). Average 61.

Active leader: Dontrelle Willis with 68.

Comment: How great a story would it be if Dontrelle Willis could be a big contributor to the Tigers this year?

Through age 27

300 gamers: Most victories, 116 (Clemens and Seaver). Fewest, 6 (Niekro). Average 78.

Active leader: C.C. Sabathia with 117. Carlos Zambrano has 96.

Comment: C.C., as you can see, has more victories through his 27th year than any of the 300-game winners. But he’s way behind Gooden or Drysdale, so it’s way too early to tell. How good will Sabathia be as an old man?

Through age 28

300 gamers: Most victories, 135 (Seaver). Fewest, 17 (Niekro, of course. Randy Johnson had 49). Average 93.

Active leader: Jon Garland with 106.

Comment: Garland actually has more victories through 28 than Nolan Ryan or Tom Glavine. And he does seem to be the type who can keep going out there, pitching league average ball and win 14 or 15 games every year for a while. If he has a mid-30s renaissance … hey, this is the point. You never know.

Through age 29

300 gamers: Most victories, 152 (Clemens). Fewest, 31 (Niekro; Johnson had 68), Average 109.

Active leader: Mark Buehrle with 122.

Comment: See, Buehrle is exactly the kind of guy who might sneak up on everybody in five or six years. He’s off to a great start in 2009 too … Buehrle does seem like the kind of guy who might just win and win, and then have a late 30’s resurgence and suddenly, voila, a potential 300-game winner.

Through age 30

300 gamers: Most victories, 168 (Seaver). Fewest, 54 (Niekro; Johnson had 81). Average, 127.

Active leader: Roy Oswalt with 129.

Comment: Oswalt is actually right on pace, which surprised me. I don’t know how he will age, but people have been overlooking him for years.

Through age 31

300 gamers: Most victories, 184 (Maddux). Fewest, 66 (Niekro; Johnson still had not broken 100). Average 143.

Active leader: Roy Halladay with 131.

Comment: Halladay is a bit behind the curve, but he’s still ahead of Spahn, Perry and Wynn’s pace (not to mention stragglers Niekro and Unit), but he’s just so good now, you wonder if he isn’t going to be better in his 30s than he was in his 20s.*

*Here’s a fun little bit on Halladay. You know last year, he pitched well enough to win the Cy Young … he only finished because Cliff Lee had a stunning year. Well, how’s he pitching this year compared to last?

ERA

Last year: 2.78

This year: 2.78

HR/9

Last year: 0.7

This year: 0.7

Strikeout/9

Last year: 7.5

This year: 7.5

Walks/9

Last year: 1.4

This year: 1.1

Overall (with 2009 projection)

2008: 20-11, 2.78 ERA, 1.053 WHIP, 206 Ks, 39 walks.

2009: 30-4, 2.78 ERA, 1.044 WHIP, 215 Ks, 30 walks.

That, friends, is consistency.

Through age 32

300 gamers: Most victories, 203 (Seaver). Fewest, 81 (Niekro). Average, 160.

Active leader: Tim Hudson with 146.

Comment: Hudson had Tommy John surgery at the end of last season. Well, if you want to compare … Tommy John himself had surgery at 31, and he had 124 victories. He finished with 288. So, if Hudson can have the Tommy John second-half of a career …

Through age 33

300 gamers: Most victories, 221 (Maddux). Fewest, 97 (Niekro). Average, 176.

Active leader: Livan Hernandez with 147.

Comment: Just think how many more victories Livan could get with the Mets if he didn’t have the bum Beltran in center field.

Through age 34

300 gamers Most victories, 240 (Maddux). Fewest , 110 (Niekro). Average, 195.

Active leader: Matt Morris with 121.

Comment: Morris actually retired but he still has more victories than any active 34-year-old.

Through age 35

300 gamers: Most victories, 257 (Maddux). Fewest, 130 (Niekro, Johnson had 160). Average, 211.

Active leader: Bartolo Colon with 150.

Comment: Bartolo does seem older than 35, doesn’t he?

Through age 36

300 gamers: Most victories, 275 (Maddux). Fewest, 145 (Niekro). Average, 228.

Active leader: Andy Pettitte, 215.

Comment: Pettitte actually is not much off the pace. He has about as many victories through 36 as Perry, more than Unit. I don’t think Pettitte quite has the distance, but it’s not impossible.

Through age 37

300 gamers: Most victories, 289 (Maddux). Fewest, 162 (Niekro). Average, 243.

Active leader: Pedro Martinez with 219.

Comment: Pedro was ahead of the average every year until he turned 35. He has obviously faded badly the last three years and he isn’t going to win 300 … unless he starts throwing the knuckleball.

Age 38

Reached 300: Greg Maddux and Steve Carlton.

Age 39

Reached 300: No one.

Age 40

Reached 300: Warren Spahn, Roger Clemens, Tom Seaver.

Age 41

Reached 300: Don Sutton and Tom Glavine.

Age 42

Reached 300: No one.

Age 43

Reached 300: Early Wynn, Nolan Ryan Gaylord Perry.

Age 45

Reached 300: Presumably, Randy Johnson.

Age 46

Reached 300: Phil Niekro.

 
A guy will have to pitch into his 40s. I dont think its gonna be as difficult as you guys are making it sound. I think it will def happen again in our lifetime.
:lmao: I think there is a 100% chance of it happening again in the next 25 years.
 
Joe

Pitchers that reach 300 average 53 wins when they're 40+. It takes alot of luck and health so its really hard to come up with a favorite, especially since alot of pitchers need to change the way they pitch to reach that milestone. Right now, I'd say Oswalt may be the best bet, but he's going to need to continue to evolve as a pitcher since his days as an overpowering starter are over. I think Santana is as good a bet as any, and being in CitiField should help him a fair amount, especially if the Mets can get a competent GM sometime soon.

As absurd as it may sound, Jamie Moyer may actually have a shot. Admittedly, he needs to improve from the way he's pitched thus far, but him regaining the form he had last year isn't inconceivable, and he may be able to maintain that form for 4 or more years and get the remaining victories he needs. Another guy with an outside shot is Wakefield - is it really so absurd to see him keep trucking along for another 10 years?

 
It would be interesting to see the numbers re: how many pitchers by decade have pitched past the ages of 35 and 40. Also, I wonder about the effect of steroids on pitcher longevity. Does it burn a guy out and make him more susceptible to injury or extend his career? Or is it a wash?

 
It would be interesting to see the numbers re: how many pitchers by decade have pitched past the ages of 35 and 40. Also, I wonder about the effect of steroids on pitcher longevity. Does it burn a guy out and make him more susceptible to injury or extend his career? Or is it a wash?
I think it's harder to get wins vs the huge hitters/small parks of today.
 
It would be interesting to see the numbers re: how many pitchers by decade have pitched past the ages of 35 and 40. Also, I wonder about the effect of steroids on pitcher longevity. Does it burn a guy out and make him more susceptible to injury or extend his career? Or is it a wash?
I think it's harder to get wins vs the huge hitters/small parks of today.
:goodposting:
Smaller parks/bigger hitters=more runs/less chance to win.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It would be interesting to see the numbers re: how many pitchers by decade have pitched past the ages of 35 and 40. Also, I wonder about the effect of steroids on pitcher longevity. Does it burn a guy out and make him more susceptible to injury or extend his career? Or is it a wash?
I think it's harder to get wins vs the huge hitters/small parks of today.
:sadbanana:
Smaller parks/bigger hitters=more runs/less chance to win.
I think the main issue in this scenario is that pitchers might get pulled earlier in games or before pitching 5 innings, both of which could result in few wins (assuming the bullpen blew more leads).I happen to think (but don't feel like scampering to research it) that pitchers are older by the time they get to the majors and also suffer from 5-man rotations. Starting later and getting fewer starts is a bad combination for career win totals.Guys like Clemens, Maddux, and Glavine were brought up at 20 or 21 AND pitched into their 40s. So they got more opportunities early and late in their compared to most pitchers.
 
It would be interesting to see the numbers re: how many pitchers by decade have pitched past the ages of 35 and 40. Also, I wonder about the effect of steroids on pitcher longevity. Does it burn a guy out and make him more susceptible to injury or extend his career? Or is it a wash?
I think it's harder to get wins vs the huge hitters/small parks of today.
:thumbup:
Smaller parks/bigger hitters=more runs/less chance to win.
Wouldn't your team then also score more runs, which would give you the same chance to win? Who cares if you win 2-1 or 8-6, a win is a win.
 
With the way the pitchers are used, mid inning guys sniping wins, bullpens blowing up, etc, it will take someone special. The pitcher will have to be drafted young, no college, and fly up through the minors. Get to the majors by the time he is 20, with a very good team and rack up wins early and often.
You mean someone like Rick Porcello? A Tigers fan can dream can't he :goodposting:
 
CC is the only guy with a shot if he stays healthy. His team should stay stacked and he stays in the game. The game has changed such that 300 wins will be very rare in the future.

 
Unless the game changes, Johnson will be the last. I know it's been said before, but pitchers just don't get enough decisions these days. Also, top-flight pitchers are rarely allowed to pitch through injuries.
Not true at all. The way to win 300 games is to win a lot while you are old.Link

All of this is about 300-game winners. I realize, of course, that victories is a generally lousy way to rank pitchers, but it is what it is. Three hundred victories is an iconic thing. Pitcher who win 300 go to the Hall of Fame, no exceptions*. Pitchers who don’t win 300 … maybe they go to the Hall (Gibson, Roberts, Marichal, Drysdale, Hunter) and maybe they don’t (Blyleven, John, Kaat, Tiant, Morris).

*Unless the voters decide to punish Roger Clemens.

So, how do you get to 300? Well, this will sound blindingly obvious, I know, but in order to win 300 games in the big leagues, you pretty much have to win a lot of games as an old man. Blindingly obvious, yes, but this might gets at the question Bill James and I began to talk about in our co-column: Why is it that every time someone wins 300 games (as Randy Johnson should do in the next couple of weeks) people assume that he will be the last one ever to do it?

The reason, I think, is that you can’t project 300 because you have absolutely no idea who is going to win a lot of games from ages 35-44 — and having looked hard at the 12 pitchers who have won 300 (I’m already counting Randy Johnson), winning in those later years is the key to winning 300.

That is, nobody since World War II has clinched 300 victories with dominating performances in their 20s. One way to look at it is to take a look at the winningest pitchers, by age, since the war:

Most wins to 25: Dwight Gooden with 119 (career wins 194), Denny McLain with 114 (career wins 131) — none of Top 17 won 300.

Most wins to 27: Gooden with 142, Don Drysdale with 141 (career wins 209) — none of Top 10 won 300.

Most wins to 29: Catfish Hunter with 184 (career wins 224), Robin Roberts with 179 (career wins 286) — none in Top 6 won 300.

Most wins to 31: Catfish Hunter with 210, Robin Roberts with 206 — none in Top 5 won 300.

Yes, the march to 300 has been mostly about late-life success. Here’s another way to look at it: This is the average number of victories for the 12 pitchers who have won 300 games, by age:

18-24: 32 victories.

25-29: 77 victories.

30-34: 86 victories.

35-39: 79 victories.

40-48: 53 victories.

Pretty easy to see there — the 300-game winners averaged more victories from 35-39 than they did in their supposed prime of 25-29. They pulled in, on average, 53 victories from age 40 to 48 — now, admittedly this is somewhat tilted because Phil Niekro won so many games after age 40 (he won 121), but every one of the 300-gamers pitched after age 40 and won more than a dozen games.

So take someone like Bert Blyleven. After his 39-year, he had 279 victories … more than half of the 300-gamers had at that age, more than Nolan Ryan, Niekro, Gaylord Perry, Tom Glavine, Randy Johnson or Early Wynn. But he could not quite finish it off. Jack Morris after his 37-year had 237 victories, pretty darned close to the average of the 300-game winners (243). But he only won 17 games in two rough years after that.

So, it’s really impossible to predict. Randy Johnson only had 99 victories at age 31. Phil Niekro only had 97 victories at age 33. Gaylord Perry, Warren Spahn, Nolan Ryan, Early Wynn … these guys did not look like great bets for 300 when they reached their mid-30s. But they won a lot of games late in their careers. Niekro, as a knuckleballer, just kept going and going and going. Perry had a late career renaissance — he won 21 games as a 39-year-old and 47 more after that. Warren Spahn won 20-games or more seven times after he turned 35. Randy Johnson was probably at his very best from age 35 to 40. And so on.

So when looking at potential 300-game winners … well, there’s no way to do it. But we’ll go ahead and take a look anyway and the most likely candidates, from age 26 on up. We’re not including victories from the first part of this year.

Through age 26

300-gamers: Most victories, 95 (Maddux, Seaver, Clemens). Fewest, 2 (Niekro). Average 61.

Active leader: Dontrelle Willis with 68.

Comment: How great a story would it be if Dontrelle Willis could be a big contributor to the Tigers this year?

Through age 27

300 gamers: Most victories, 116 (Clemens and Seaver). Fewest, 6 (Niekro). Average 78.

Active leader: C.C. Sabathia with 117. Carlos Zambrano has 96.

Comment: C.C., as you can see, has more victories through his 27th year than any of the 300-game winners. But he’s way behind Gooden or Drysdale, so it’s way too early to tell. How good will Sabathia be as an old man?

Through age 28

300 gamers: Most victories, 135 (Seaver). Fewest, 17 (Niekro, of course. Randy Johnson had 49). Average 93.

Active leader: Jon Garland with 106.

Comment: Garland actually has more victories through 28 than Nolan Ryan or Tom Glavine. And he does seem to be the type who can keep going out there, pitching league average ball and win 14 or 15 games every year for a while. If he has a mid-30s renaissance … hey, this is the point. You never know.

Through age 29

300 gamers: Most victories, 152 (Clemens). Fewest, 31 (Niekro; Johnson had 68), Average 109.

Active leader: Mark Buehrle with 122.

Comment: See, Buehrle is exactly the kind of guy who might sneak up on everybody in five or six years. He’s off to a great start in 2009 too … Buehrle does seem like the kind of guy who might just win and win, and then have a late 30’s resurgence and suddenly, voila, a potential 300-game winner.

Through age 30

300 gamers: Most victories, 168 (Seaver). Fewest, 54 (Niekro; Johnson had 81). Average, 127.

Active leader: Roy Oswalt with 129.

Comment: Oswalt is actually right on pace, which surprised me. I don’t know how he will age, but people have been overlooking him for years.

Through age 31

300 gamers: Most victories, 184 (Maddux). Fewest, 66 (Niekro; Johnson still had not broken 100). Average 143.

Active leader: Roy Halladay with 131.

Comment: Halladay is a bit behind the curve, but he’s still ahead of Spahn, Perry and Wynn’s pace (not to mention stragglers Niekro and Unit), but he’s just so good now, you wonder if he isn’t going to be better in his 30s than he was in his 20s.*

*Here’s a fun little bit on Halladay. You know last year, he pitched well enough to win the Cy Young … he only finished because Cliff Lee had a stunning year. Well, how’s he pitching this year compared to last?

ERA

Last year: 2.78

This year: 2.78

HR/9

Last year: 0.7

This year: 0.7

Strikeout/9

Last year: 7.5

This year: 7.5

Walks/9

Last year: 1.4

This year: 1.1

Overall (with 2009 projection)

2008: 20-11, 2.78 ERA, 1.053 WHIP, 206 Ks, 39 walks.

2009: 30-4, 2.78 ERA, 1.044 WHIP, 215 Ks, 30 walks.

That, friends, is consistency.

Through age 32

300 gamers: Most victories, 203 (Seaver). Fewest, 81 (Niekro). Average, 160.

Active leader: Tim Hudson with 146.

Comment: Hudson had Tommy John surgery at the end of last season. Well, if you want to compare … Tommy John himself had surgery at 31, and he had 124 victories. He finished with 288. So, if Hudson can have the Tommy John second-half of a career …

Through age 33

300 gamers: Most victories, 221 (Maddux). Fewest, 97 (Niekro). Average, 176.

Active leader: Livan Hernandez with 147.

Comment: Just think how many more victories Livan could get with the Mets if he didn’t have the bum Beltran in center field.

Through age 34

300 gamers Most victories, 240 (Maddux). Fewest , 110 (Niekro). Average, 195.

Active leader: Matt Morris with 121.

Comment: Morris actually retired but he still has more victories than any active 34-year-old.

Through age 35

300 gamers: Most victories, 257 (Maddux). Fewest, 130 (Niekro, Johnson had 160). Average, 211.

Active leader: Bartolo Colon with 150.

Comment: Bartolo does seem older than 35, doesn’t he?

Through age 36

300 gamers: Most victories, 275 (Maddux). Fewest, 145 (Niekro). Average, 228.

Active leader: Andy Pettitte, 215.

Comment: Pettitte actually is not much off the pace. He has about as many victories through 36 as Perry, more than Unit. I don’t think Pettitte quite has the distance, but it’s not impossible.

Through age 37

300 gamers: Most victories, 289 (Maddux). Fewest, 162 (Niekro). Average, 243.

Active leader: Pedro Martinez with 219.

Comment: Pedro was ahead of the average every year until he turned 35. He has obviously faded badly the last three years and he isn’t going to win 300 … unless he starts throwing the knuckleball.

Age 38

Reached 300: Greg Maddux and Steve Carlton.

Age 39

Reached 300: No one.

Age 40

Reached 300: Warren Spahn, Roger Clemens, Tom Seaver.

Age 41

Reached 300: Don Sutton and Tom Glavine.

Age 42

Reached 300: No one.

Age 43

Reached 300: Early Wynn, Nolan Ryan Gaylord Perry.

Age 45

Reached 300: Presumably, Randy Johnson.

Age 46

Reached 300: Phil Niekro.
Tremendous post. Because of injuries and the unlikelihood of accurately projecting any pitcher into the late 30's/early 40's mean we are truly only blindly throwing darts at this point. For those saying Buerhle is the best chance since he throws only 85, while you may be true, what about Nolan Ryan throwing 95+ into this 40's. Simply put, we have no idea what type of pitcher lasts that long just as we basically have little idea which pitcher will blow their arm out before they reach 100 wins.
 
It would be interesting to see the numbers re: how many pitchers by decade have pitched past the ages of 35 and 40. Also, I wonder about the effect of steroids on pitcher longevity. Does it burn a guy out and make him more susceptible to injury or extend his career? Or is it a wash?
I think it's harder to get wins vs the huge hitters/small parks of today.
:popcorn:
Smaller parks/bigger hitters=more runs/less chance to win.
Wouldn't your team then also score more runs, which would give you the same chance to win? Who cares if you win 2-1 or 8-6, a win is a win.
more runs=more pitches=less innings pitched per/game=less wins.
 
I was thinking about this the other day and while it's true that the ability to keep on pitching after 35 is a big factor, you rarely if ever see a guy pitch past 45. There comes a certain point that a guy just can't field the position anymore. Someone like Wakefield or Moyer will end up being a perfect example of a guy who will leave the game not because he can't throw his pitches anymore, but because he can't do things like cover first.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top