Instinctive
Footballguy
He'd be a perfect fit for basically all 10s teams. Glad to get you back finally.Oh man. I was going to take him here. Would have been a perfect fit for my 10s team.
He'd be a perfect fit for basically all 10s teams. Glad to get you back finally.Oh man. I was going to take him here. Would have been a perfect fit for my 10s team.
Yes thanks, I made the correction.Billy Knight's 1st season was 74-75. Are you sure you don't mean 70's?
A Dallas beat writer used to dog this guy fiercely back in the day (Not sure if it was Randy Galloway, Blackie Sherrod, or other), always calling him Joe Barely Cares.I'll take a position Mister CIA already had to cut him a break.
I'm looking at my 1980s squad, and I can see that I'm going to need scoring from my center. There's no do-it-all centers left in that decade, but there's a nice scoring 5 available:
19.12: C Joe Barry Carroll, 1980s
Don't have time for a real write-up, but here's an interesting overview of his days in Golden State and how he almost became a Milwaukee Buck. During his peak years between 1982-87 -- even while something of a malcontent always trying to find his way out of Oakland -- he was a steady 22-8 guy who'd swat a shot or two most games.
@higgins
Are you kidding me? Do you even watch basketball? Lillard carry them? He's the 3rd option on this team and is there to keep the floor spacing. This offense runs through D-Wade first. Not role-player-behind-LeBron Wade (although that is one of the best 2nd options in league history and was that team's best "go get a bucket guy"), but go-around-over-and-through-your-defense 2006 Finals MVP Wade. He gets screen and rolls from the most versatile and agile 7 footer to ever play the game in Giannis (who will decidedly NOT spend any time trying to go 1 on 4 from the top of the key like the Bucks do with him) Then if the defense collapses, Iggy and Horford set secondary screens for Lillard and Wade while the corners and driving lanes remain open and Giannis is free to cut and dive like the animal he is.But do I gain more in the 10s? Current Instinctive Power Ranking with teams as is (and a little projection for reasonable fill-ins, though any drafter could make a bad pick I suppose), by tier, with a shot at an order within tiers but not one I'd go to the grave defending:
- Tier 2 (all pretty tight, difficult to pick some apart from each other):
Jayrod - the brickiest team of the decade by far. Can Lillard carry them? Reminds me of grit and grind with a little more PG pizazz and some off the bounce verve at the 2 in exchange for slightly worse defense.
Looked at him when I took Green, opted for the better defense but man Korver might be the best shooter outside of Curry ever. All he takes are difficult 3s and to hit them at the level he hits is insane.
FWIW, I think you have Wade clearly in the wrong decade, both based on his peak and his skill set. And you kind of even admit it right here. You want 2006 Wade, not oft injured Wade who would pick his spots. Even in real life while the Heat were winning titles, they were playing their best when they shooting around Wade and Lebron - they were closing out games with Chalmers, Wade, Lebron (during his best shooting stretch of his career), Battier, and Bosh in the playoffs.Are you kidding me? Do you even watch basketball? Lillard carry them? He's the 3rd option on this team and is there to keep the floor spacing. This offense runs through D-Wade first. Not role-player-behind-LeBron Wade (although that is one of the best 2nd options in league history and was that team's best "go get a bucket guy"), but go-around-over-and-through-your-defense 2006 Finals MVP Wade. He gets screen and rolls from the most versatile and agile 7 footer to ever play the game in Giannis (who will decidedly NOT spend any time trying to go 1 on 4 from the top of the key like the Bucks do with him) Then if the defense collapses, Iggy and Horford set secondary screens for Lillard and Wade while the corners and driving lanes remain open and Giannis is free to cut and dive like the animal he is.
:shakesheadindisgust:
ETA: And did you just casually forget about defense? I have 1 elite defender and three plus defenders and 4 guys who can flat out run the break for easy buckets.
D-Wade highlight reel.ETA2: I mean Wade is somewhere around the 3-5th greatest SG of all time.
That wasn't how this was explained at the outset nor how I drafted. Wade won more rings and had more all-star teams in the 10's and made an equal number of all-NBA teams in the 2010's. He played more games and had more winshares in the 2010's. His career is split down the middle about as much as anyone else in this draft. I get all of Dwayne Wade in a decade in which he was a prominent player is how it was spelled out. I don't have to put him in the decade with his very best season. Do you not get to include Dirk's NBA Finals MVP heroics since he is in the 2000's? Does MJ's DPOY/MVP season not get credited because it was in the 80's? Does Wes Unseld's 1960's regular season MVP season get seperated from his 1970's championship and Finals MVP?FWIW, I think you have Wade clearly in the wrong decade, both based on his peak and his skill set. And you kind of even admit it right here. You want 2006 Wade, not oft injured Wade who would pick his spots. Even in real life while the Heat were winning titles, they were playing their best when they shooting around Wade and Lebron - they were closing out games with Chalmers, Wade, Lebron (during his best shooting stretch of his career), Battier, and Bosh in the playoffs.
There is no way that the lane won't be clogged, I would be begging everybody to shoot long jumpers other than Lillard. Overall, while I think this is the most talented team of the 10s, it's not a very cohesive idea of a team. It would probably work in the real 30-team NBA, but not against the super teams of the decade.
An interesting question to consider, how much better is the small-ball Curry-Thompson-Iggy-Durant-Green lineup than any other team we'll have in this 2010s draft?
Here are the rules:D-Wade highlight reel.
Game winners, clutch playoff plays, jumpers, dunks, blocks at the rim, steals, etc. He splits double teams regularly and dunks on the best of shot blockers. He put Garnett on skates in one clip and dunks on Duncan on another.
That wasn't how this was explained at the outset nor how I drafted. Wade won more rings and had more all-star teams in the 10's and made an equal number of all-NBA teams in the 2010's. He played more games and had more winshares in the 2010's. His career is split down the middle about as much as anyone else in this draft. I get all of Dwayne Wade in a decade in which he was a prominent player is how it was spelled out. I don't have to put him in the decade with his very best season. Do you not get to include Dirk's NBA Finals MVP heroics since he is in the 2000's? Does MJ's DPOY/MVP season not get credited because it was in the 80's? Does Wes Unseld's 1960's regular season MVP season get seperated from his 1970's championship and Finals MVP?
That answer to all that is no.
Other than picking teammates, I don't see any way in which 10s Wade is even remotely close to the player than 00s Wade was. All of his all-defense selections were in that decade, all of his first team All-NBA teams (5 of 8 total - you are stretching to call the 09-10 year the 2010s), his finals MVP, and his statistics are all MUCH better.For players that cross eras, you get credit for their full careers but the players need to be placed according to their “best” years or judges will be asked to discount that player in their rankings. For example, a player had their best seven years in the 1970s and had three lesser years in the 1980s as they got older – if that player got placed on a 1980s roster we will all laugh at them and lower our rankings for said player accordingly. If a career is fairly close between decades, the drafter can decide where to place them with no penalty. Feel free to debate and support your decisions – that why we here.
Oh, come on. That's splitting hairs. He's talking about not putting Magic or Kobe in the 90's where they barely played or were past their prime. Note the first line "For players that cross eras, you get credit for their full careers but the players need to be placed according to their “best” years or judges will be asked to discount that player in their rankings."Here are the rules:
Other than picking teammates, I don't see any way in which 10s Wade is even remotely close to the player than 00s Wade was. All of his all-defense selections were in that decade, all of his first team All-NBA teams (5 of 8 total - you are stretching to call the 09-10 year the 2010s), his finals MVP, and his statistics are all MUCH better.
I appreciate you giving Wade credit for his AS selection in his final year though.
Wade's 00s contained his higher upside/10's had the longevity and all that goes with it. Frankly I don't feel the judges would substantially "knock" Wade due to his inclusion on either team. Many players fit that criteria while other players most certainly will not (we'll see what GMs do).Oh, come on. That's splitting hairs. He's talking about not putting Magic or Kobe in the 90's where they barely played or were past their prime. Note the first line "For players that cross eras, you get credit for their full careers but the players need to be placed according to their “best” years or judges will be asked to discount that player in their rankings."
Best is in quotes can be classified a million ways and with a career like Wade, he is clearly a great player in both decades so I get credit for his whole career in either decade. His prime extended into the 2010's.
*And Wade still has 7 ASG's in the 2010's. 2009-2010 is a 2010 year. Don't even need the farewell season's to have more in 2010's.
Yeah, I think Wade is fine in either decade and he should get credit for his whole career wherever he’s placed.Oh, come on. That's splitting hairs. He's talking about not putting Magic or Kobe in the 90's where they barely played or were past their prime. Note the first line "For players that cross eras, you get credit for their full careers but the players need to be placed according to their “best” years or judges will be asked to discount that player in their rankings."
Best is in quotes can be classified a million ways and with a career like Wade, he is clearly a great player in both decades so I get credit for his whole career in either decade. His prime extended into the 2010's.
*And Wade still has 7 ASG's in the 2010's. 2009-2010 is a 2010 year. Don't even need the farewell season's to have more in 2010's.
changed the entire ethic of that team. under Coos it was always, "let Russ handle the D". KC and the last undrafted 60s Celt made the Green as much a defensive as offensive organization. and boy were they offensive...19.15 KC Jones, PG 60s
Jones played 9 years in the NBA and won 8 titles, was selected to the HOF in 1989, and was arguably the best defensive guard in the 1960s (in the final 7 years of his career, he never finished lower than 11th in DWS and 3 times finished in the top 3 - finishing behind only Russell and Wilt). In addition to his defense, he was one of the best distributors in the game, finishing 5th, 3rd, 3rd, and 8th in the four seasons he started at PG after Cousy retired.
My 60s squad is going to be tough to score against, with Jones, West, and Debusschere.
@Yo Mama
Had my eye on him also. Figured the whole lost career to injury might keep him dropping. Nice grab.19.14 Vin Baker, PF, 90s
This is the guy I thought I could've/should've taken over Green, can't believe he fell all the way back to me. 4x All-Star and 2x All-NBA, average around 20/10 for a 4 year stretch.
crapI am moving Dirk to the 2010s, where I think I have a better team than my 2000s squad, and can compete with Scoob for best in show now.
20.09 Tyson Chandler
Actually a pretty great Center for the 2000s. Amazing dive/roll player, DPOY, all-star, 3x all defense, one of the league leaders in true shooting%. I'll have a little bit of clogged lane syndrome, but you won't score. all 5 guys can guard at least 3 positions. Three guys can really shoot. Two guys will dominate the boards against most of these teams. And spacing was just different in the 2000s.
2000s team, which I now assess at somewhere between 2nd and 4th:
Chauncey Billups
Tracy McGrady
Shane Battier
Tyson Chandler
Ben Wallace
It also sets up what I think is a contender for best in show and the 2010s:
Jrue Holiday
Khris Middleton
Kawhi Leonard
Dirk Nowitzki
Joakim Noah
3 absolutely incredible defenders, multiple DPOYs, four guys who shoot ~40% from three, two guys with close to 50-40-90 careers, tons of WINGSPAN, great rebounding...
I'll call this the reverse @scoobus where I move a Pantheon guy from 2000 to 2010 instead of the 10s to the 00s to try and lock down a decade and make a better "best in show" team.
A team with Joe Johnson, Kevin Love, and Lamarcus Aldridge to go along with Lebron is not going to have spacing issues. And Love is the only defensive liability on that team.Well nobody bit on my not-so-hidden attempt to get some 00s vs 10s reactions...
I was going to take Chandler next round. Not a lot of good big men to pick from.crap
Johnson and Aldridge are both defensive liabilities lol.A team with Joe Johnson, Kevin Love, and Lamarcus Aldridge to go along with Lebron is not going to have spacing issues. And Love is the only defensive liability on that team.
They're perfectly adequate.Johnson and Aldridge are both defensive liabilities lol.
This was who I was hoping would drop back to me. Would have been a fantastic roll man for Steve Nash and a backstop for my ####ty backcourt.I am moving Dirk to the 2010s, where I think I have a better team than my 2000s squad, and can compete with Scoob for best in show now.
20.09 Tyson Chandler
Actually a pretty great Center for the 2000s. Amazing dive/roll player, DPOY, all-star, 3x all defense, one of the league leaders in true shooting%. I'll have a little bit of clogged lane syndrome, but you won't score. all 5 guys can guard at least 3 positions. Three guys can really shoot. Two guys will dominate the boards against most of these teams. And spacing was just different in the 2000s.
2000s team, which I now assess at somewhere between 2nd and 4th:
Chauncey Billups
Tracy McGrady
Shane Battier
Tyson Chandler
Ben Wallace
It also sets up what I think is a contender for best in show and the 2010s:
Jrue Holiday
Khris Middleton
Kawhi Leonard
Dirk Nowitzki
Joakim Noah
3 absolutely incredible defenders, multiple DPOYs, four guys who shoot ~40% from three, two guys with close to 50-40-90 careers, tons of WINGSPAN, great rebounding...
I'll call this the reverse @scoobus where I move a Pantheon guy from 2000 to 2010 instead of the 10s to the 00s to try and lock down a decade and make a better "best in show" team.
This makes it really clear what a steal of a pick Joe Johnson was.Since we haven't talked about D-Wade enough today (because clearly some people think he is not worthy of being considered great), I'm going to explain why he is #1 SG in the era.
Let's look at the other SG's (so far) in the 2010's:
So after looking at all of that, you have 1 guy with the potential to reach Wade's status (Harden), 2 guys with an outside chance (Klay & Mitchell) and the rest range from good to below average.
- Monta Ellis - zero rings, zero awards
- James Harden - MVP, 7x all-NBA, 9x All-star, no all-D teams (known as a turnstile)...better scorer, worse defender, no rings
- Bradley Beal - 3x all-star, having a nice scoring year, but 1/2 year on a losing team....no defensive accolades
- Devin Booker - 2x all-star, good scorer, poor defender
- Joe Johnson - 7x all star, 1x all-NBA, no rings, no defensive accolades
- Khris Middleton - 2x all-star, good scorer, decent defender...not great at anything.
- Donovan Mitchell - 2x all-star, great scorer, decent defender...most like Wade, but has played 3.5 seasons TOTAL so far
- DeMar Derozan - 4x all star, 2x all-NBA...known commodity and not as good as Wade at anything (maybe 3 pt shooting)
- Kyle Korver - 1x all-star. Has only started 1/3 of his career games. Great shooter, but a one-dimensional role player.
- Danny Green - 3x NBA champ (the first guy on this list with any rings). Good role player, but no ASG's or All-NBAs.
- JJ Redick - Great shooter. No rings, no individual awards, started 1/2 of his games.
- Klay Thompson - 5x all-star, 3 rings, 1 all-D, 2x All-NBA. Great player, but he's never been better than #3 on his own team.
Make no mistake, D-Wade is one of the top 4 greatest SGs of ALL-TIME. #3 #4 #3 #3 #3 He is a 2-way threat, did it as an alpha and a #2 and had both peak excellence and longevity.
The disrespect is embarrassing for anyone that thinks he isn't the best SG among the list above.