Raider Nation
Devil's Advocate
I haven't heard a peep about this guy all season. Does he even get on the field???
And to think, I wanted the Raiders to take him.
And to think, I wanted the Raiders to take him.
The Jets are primarily a 3-4 defense. In the beginning of the season we played a lot of hybrid 4-3 to get him snaps at DE. He got a few pressures and near sacks but nevery actually got one. He did block a punt however and came damn close to blocking a second one.Now he hardly gets on the field. We rarely ever swtich out of the 3-4 and Calvin Pace and Bryan Thomas are both having big years so Gholston is pretty much relegated to special teams. The strange thing is though, whenever they do get him on the field in the 3-4, they rarely ever rush him and usually always drop him back into coverage. All (the few) of the QB pressures and near sacks he has have come out of the handful of 4-3 snaps we played with him at DE in the first 2-3 games. I watch him closely on most plays he is in and can't recall us ever really blitzing him when he actually was lined up in the 3-4.HTH.I haven't heard a peep about this guy all season. Does he even get on the field???And to think, I wanted the Raiders to take him.
Juice can only take you so far
Meh.He was a project all along and the Jets have depth at OLB....I think the Jets looked at what the Giants were able to do with having a lot of bodies that can rush the passer and give them depth and took VG knowing he wouldn't contribute much this year unless there were an injury.....He's working at it though and he even went out on his own and hooked up with Lawrence Taylor who has reported taken a liking to him and will work with him....I don't think you can really judge him on this year and it would be foolish at this point to start making changes and really Calvin Pace is a perfect player to learn from who went through the learning curve to become what seems like now a dominant OLB.....Personally, At draft time I had reservations about Gholston but, once that pick was made, and it was pretty much the concensus Expert pick at that spot, I dropped all expectations for this year knowing he would be making a huge leap. He missed time at the start to finish school and had good players in front of him....At this point I think it's just good knowing he Wants to learn and work at it - IMO that's a good percentage of the battle and most people I would label as Busts at this point just don't get what it takes to play in the NFL and just don't have it in them....He seems totally miscast as a 3-4 OLB. IMO, The Jets should look to unload him to a 4-3 team to play DE.
IMO, they do that on purpose to get him the experience in those situations knowing he can rush the passer when he needs to fall back on his natural talent...At this point it's mostly in his head and learning to be an all around OLB.The Jets are primarily a 3-4 defense. In the beginning of the season we played a lot of hybrid 4-3 to get him snaps at DE. He got a few pressures and near sacks but nevery actually got one. He did block a punt however and came damn close to blocking a second one.Now he hardly gets on the field. We rarely ever swtich out of the 3-4 and Calvin Pace and Bryan Thomas are both having big years so Gholston is pretty much relegated to special teams. The strange thing is though, whenever they do get him on the field in the 3-4, they rarely ever rush him and usually always drop him back into coverage. All (the few) of the QB pressures and near sacks he has have come out of the handful of 4-3 snaps we played with him at DE in the first 2-3 games. I watch him closely on most plays he is in and can't recall us ever really blitzing him when he actually was lined up in the 3-4.I haven't heard a peep about this guy all season. Does he even get on the field???
And to think, I wanted the Raiders to take him.
HTH.
For the record, I believe the Jets would have taken Mcfadden instead.I haven't heard a peep about this guy all season. Does he even get on the field???
And to think, I wanted the Raiders to take him.
The difference is that Mario Williams was laughed at during the draft and Gholston was lauded as a great pick during the draft. Both went in opposite directions. Mario Williams was great from day 1, Gholston has been awful from day 1. I really wanted Gholston on the Patriots as well - thank God we have BB and Pioli, and they knew to pick Jerod Mayo.For the record, I believe the Jets would have taken Mcfadden instead.I haven't heard a peep about this guy all season. Does he even get on the field???
And to think, I wanted the Raiders to take him.
We've got a long way to go though and At this point I'm sure people were still laughing at Mario Williams who I wanted for the Jets in the worst way and still haven't changed my avatar.
He was?He had 4.5 sacks his first year and went weeks 10-17 without one. IMO, these are not numbers that indicate he was great from day one.Mario Williams was great from day 1
Lawrence Taylor, an All-America at North Carolina, was the first-round draft pick of the New York Giants and the second player selected overall in the 1981 NFL Draft. The 6-3, 237-pound linebacker set the tone for his pro career with an outstanding rookie season during which he recorded a career-high 133 tackles, 9.5 sacks, 8 passes defensed, two forced fumbles, a fumble recovery and an interception.
1) You don't know if the Great BB and Pioli pick Mayo over Gholston2) Mario was NOT good right awayPhlash said:The difference is that Mario Williams was laughed at during the draft and Gholston was lauded as a great pick during the draft. Both went in opposite directions. Mario Williams was great from day 1, Gholston has been awful from day 1. I really wanted Gholston on the Patriots as well - thank God we have BB and Pioli, and they knew to pick Jerod Mayo.For the record, I believe the Jets would have taken Mcfadden instead.I haven't heard a peep about this guy all season. Does he even get on the field???
And to think, I wanted the Raiders to take him.
We've got a long way to go though and At this point I'm sure people were still laughing at Mario Williams who I wanted for the Jets in the worst way and still haven't changed my avatar.
Great point. The system for rookie contracts, specifically the early pics, is entirely broke. Thats why a lot of teams shun away from the #1 overall. The money they command is absurd. Take Jamarcus as an example. I wouldn't say he's going to be a total bust, but as of right now, he is an iffy prospect at best. He certainly is no Matt Ryan. Yet he got an absurd amount of money. Now the NFL teams aren't broke by any means, but in terms of the salary cap, taking these chances can really cripple a franchise. Why would anyone in their right mind go for a Jamarcus when they can grab a fairly proven qb via free agency for far less money. I understand the potential for a franchise qb is very tempting, but the risk/reward ratio is beyond what any sane individual would gamble on. Yet the system is such that these things happen. I think there will be significant changes to the rook cap come next collective bargaining...Now as far as gholston goes, being a jets fan I am highly disappointed. The shelf life of the average football player is not that long, so how can you take a chance on a 'project' at the #4 overall?!? With that kind of money?!? You do 'projects' in the later rounds. Even in the 2nd and 3rd rounds, you need to get players that are ready to contribute in a fairly quick manner. That is the nature of the league. If you look at teams that are consistently good in this league, one thing will stand out. They cut their ties with high paid players, because they always draft guys that can come in and fit into their system and contribute right away, while their cost is still fairly minimal. Fit into their system is a big part of it. Someone should have realized that he might not fit into the 3-4. There were other players at that slot that could have fit needs for the jets, not like it was him and then a huge fall off behind him...THe past few years haven't been too good in the first round for us. DBrick is all but a bust at this point. Mangold and Revis are OK, too early to gauge Keller...This is what is wrong with the NFL Draft - I am fine with giving him a year to develop but he has something like a $60M contract! No room for development when your the 3rd highest paid player on the freking team! This has to be issue #1 in the new contract - bring in the NBA system - works MUCH better.
You had me and then you lost me - VG aside (too early to say) I am very pleased with the Jet drafts under theis regime. Brick started slow but has developed into a very good OT - he is a stud pass blocker and his run blocking has developed. Considering they could have had Bush, V Young and Leinart instead I am happy with the pick. Mangold has been an excellent center- maybe not all pro yet but is an above avg starter at a tough position to fill.Revis is OK? Are you serious? Her is a STUD lockdown corner right now - possible Pro Bowl year in progress. GREAT pick Keller is early but has shown enough to tel me he is no Johnny Mitchell - he should be a weapon down the stretch and a solid pick as well. There have been some busts - that Schlegal pick was awful - but overall this team has drafted well the past few years IMOGreat point. The system for rookie contracts, specifically the early pics, is entirely broke. Thats why a lot of teams shun away from the #1 overall. The money they command is absurd. Take Jamarcus as an example. I wouldn't say he's going to be a total bust, but as of right now, he is an iffy prospect at best. He certainly is no Matt Ryan. Yet he got an absurd amount of money. Now the NFL teams aren't broke by any means, but in terms of the salary cap, taking these chances can really cripple a franchise. Why would anyone in their right mind go for a Jamarcus when they can grab a fairly proven qb via free agency for far less money. I understand the potential for a franchise qb is very tempting, but the risk/reward ratio is beyond what any sane individual would gamble on. Yet the system is such that these things happen. I think there will be significant changes to the rook cap come next collective bargaining...Now as far as gholston goes, being a jets fan I am highly disappointed. The shelf life of the average football player is not that long, so how can you take a chance on a 'project' at the #4 overall?!? With that kind of money?!? You do 'projects' in the later rounds. Even in the 2nd and 3rd rounds, you need to get players that are ready to contribute in a fairly quick manner. That is the nature of the league. If you look at teams that are consistently good in this league, one thing will stand out. They cut their ties with high paid players, because they always draft guys that can come in and fit into their system and contribute right away, while their cost is still fairly minimal. Fit into their system is a big part of it. Someone should have realized that he might not fit into the 3-4. There were other players at that slot that could have fit needs for the jets, not like it was him and then a huge fall off behind him...THe past few years haven't been too good in the first round for us. DBrick is all but a bust at this point. Mangold and Revis are OK, too early to gauge Keller...This is what is wrong with the NFL Draft - I am fine with giving him a year to develop but he has something like a $60M contract! No room for development when your the 3rd highest paid player on the freking team! This has to be issue #1 in the new contract - bring in the NBA system - works MUCH better.
D'Brick is not a bust, just not the top flight player everyone thought. I say everyone because he was the consensus best tackle coming out, hands down. You're also likely wrong on Revis who is turning into a top corner in only his second year. I think he and Rhodes are actually pro-bowl bound (and not Justin Miller KR pro-bowl, either).Great point. The system for rookie contracts, specifically the early pics, is entirely broke. Thats why a lot of teams shun away from the #1 overall. The money they command is absurd. Take Jamarcus as an example. I wouldn't say he's going to be a total bust, but as of right now, he is an iffy prospect at best. He certainly is no Matt Ryan. Yet he got an absurd amount of money. Now the NFL teams aren't broke by any means, but in terms of the salary cap, taking these chances can really cripple a franchise. Why would anyone in their right mind go for a Jamarcus when they can grab a fairly proven qb via free agency for far less money. I understand the potential for a franchise qb is very tempting, but the risk/reward ratio is beyond what any sane individual would gamble on. Yet the system is such that these things happen. I think there will be significant changes to the rook cap come next collective bargaining...Now as far as gholston goes, being a jets fan I am highly disappointed. The shelf life of the average football player is not that long, so how can you take a chance on a 'project' at the #4 overall?!? With that kind of money?!? You do 'projects' in the later rounds. Even in the 2nd and 3rd rounds, you need to get players that are ready to contribute in a fairly quick manner. That is the nature of the league. If you look at teams that are consistently good in this league, one thing will stand out. They cut their ties with high paid players, because they always draft guys that can come in and fit into their system and contribute right away, while their cost is still fairly minimal. Fit into their system is a big part of it. Someone should have realized that he might not fit into the 3-4. There were other players at that slot that could have fit needs for the jets, not like it was him and then a huge fall off behind him...THe past few years haven't been too good in the first round for us. DBrick is all but a bust at this point. Mangold and Revis are OK, too early to gauge Keller...This is what is wrong with the NFL Draft - I am fine with giving him a year to develop but he has something like a $60M contract! No room for development when your the 3rd highest paid player on the freking team! This has to be issue #1 in the new contract - bring in the NBA system - works MUCH better.
That's part of the problem - coming in with all these expectations. If Brick wasn't drafted that high people wouldn't care that he isn't a shut down tackle. Can't get away from that, so I think you're right, in a sense, that you have to lock in the locks. But, I think as a Jets fan, we will take some solid picks and not have HUGE disappointments like in years past. I really like the last few drafts with Brick, Mangold, Revis, Kerry Rhodes (4th rounder in 2005), Leon Washington (5th round, 2006). I think the pick I was most angry about was in 2002, when we took Bryan Thomas in the first round, and no one had heard of him - which was funny because even the boo birds at MSG didn't get angry or get excited, haha. But it took him 4 years, and now he is a solid contributor, though not spectacular. Gholston could very well be a bust, I just think it's hard to evaluate draft classes before a 3 year time period has passed. Good dialogue, reminding me why I like this place.Agreed on the Brick, based on what his expetations were coming in, he hasn't lived up. That was kind of the point of my entire tirade, which is early in the 1st round, you have to lock in locks, especially for the money you are dishing out. I am a fan of mangold and revis, and they didn't come in with the expectations that dbrick did either. Thinking back, we have had a decent first round over the past few years, I am going to flip flop on my initial assessment! Thanks for shedding light on it. Still highly disappointed with gholston though...
Hope you didn't work too hard on that dynamite analysis.Hmmmm....AJ Hawk - AverageB Carpentar - OverratedV Gholston - Overrated2009 Draft - James Laurinaitis?Just hope your team doesn't waste a 1st rounder on someone from "The" Overrated State University.
good stuff and that is probably a realistic time table for Gholston - but that is not acceptable when he has something like a 5 year 60M contract - If they thought he was this much of a project shame on them. You can't pick projects in the top 10 - shouldhave traded down for anything and grabbed someone elseFerguson isn't gonna be Jon Ogden, so many may consider him a bust. However, i think he's played well this year. He's got less reponsability playing next to Faneca and he has held up better against the bull rush (a MAJOR weakness last year). He's even gotten out on some running plays and been very effective due to his good footwork and agility. He's not an all pro, but he's gonna be this team's starter for a decade.Mangold hasn't gotten as good as many expected since his outstanding rookie year, but again, he's a 10 year starter on the online. Revis is a stud, as is David Harris. (when healthy). That was an OUSTANDING draft. The FO targetted system guys that they really wanted and they paid the necessary price to get them. I was laughing my ### off at the people on the jets boards who were crying over giving up mid-round picks to move up. Morons.The 3rd round has actually been our worst round. The draft where they took Schlegal was a joke. The guy was obviously slow and stiff and had no upside. I'm not a huge Eric Smith fan either. But considering the home runs they hit with Rhodes, cotchery, Leon and possible Dwight Lowry, the jets have to be considered one of the top mid-round drafting teams in the league.As for Gholston, its WAY too early to tell. He's switching positions and was fairly raw to begin with. I'm not writing him off yet. I will say that i am a tad disapointed in his special teams play. I figured he'd be a monster wedge breaker this year. (after all, it's just running forward and hitting someone) but that hasnt worked out. a few weeks ago, he got broken down badly and missed an open field tackle. He was playing way too high. At this point, i'm hoping he can develop into a 3rd down player by next year and then hopefuly a servicable starter by year 3 (When Bryan Thomas should be winding down a bit)
I think the Jets were thinking keep him from the Pats as well - when the Jets finally stop worrying about what the Pats think and do they will be on their way to turning this franchise around - tonight could be a big step.agreed. If my prediction is consistent with their expectations of Gholston, it was probably a bad pick. I didnt think he'd come out gang busters like Merriman did, but i did think he'd produce something. I didnt want him on the Patriots, so i'm not that upset with the pick
1) You don't know if the Great BB and Pioli pick Mayo over Gholston2) Mario was NOT good right awayPhlash said:The difference is that Mario Williams was laughed at during the draft and Gholston was lauded as a great pick during the draft. Both went in opposite directions. Mario Williams was great from day 1, Gholston has been awful from day 1. I really wanted Gholston on the Patriots as well - thank God we have BB and Pioli, and they knew to pick Jerod Mayo.For the record, I believe the Jets would have taken Mcfadden instead.We've got a long way to go though and At this point I'm sure people were still laughing at Mario Williams who I wanted for the Jets in the worst way and still haven't changed my avatar.I haven't heard a peep about this guy all season. Does he even get on the field???
And to think, I wanted the Raiders to take him.
3) Mario didn't have to make the change to OLB, I'm surprised more people here didn't expect a transition... Again, given the transition AND players in front of him who are playing Great football right now, I really didn't expect him to play that much.
But, given, as you say, how much Gholston was lauded at the draft, I personly won't kill the Jets FO if he turns out to be not that great... I don't fault Front offices for moves like that - What I fault them for is the Bradway Dewayne Robertson type drafts where you trade TWO 1st round picks for a Combine Stud few people had in their top 10 a few months before the draft.....
Overall, I think the Jets drafts have been real good with this Front office... I haven't agreed with all the picks but, they at least make sense... I wasn't in favor of D'brickashaw Ferguson either but, I saw the logic in the pick and it wasn't some stupid radical move teams tend to make.
Raiders should probably find Walker, DMac and Russell before they starting looking for other teams players.I haven't heard a peep about this guy all season. Does he even get on the field???And to think, I wanted the Raiders to take him.
Yeah that definitely deserves a@ Amber Alert
I see what you're saying but, imo THE most important thing here is if the player "Want's It" or not..... Especially for a player changing roles like this and I think the fact that he's thinking outside the box and spending his own time and going out on his own to seek help is a MAJOR plus and tends to make you believe he's doing all the other work he needs to as well.Real easy for a player like this to take the money and run...I do think the Jets do a lot of due dilligence with the draft and must have gone over it 1000 times if they thought VG had the fortitute to work at it and do all he could to make the transition.It's not like they drafted Demetrius Underwood here - It's a guy with a ton of talent seemingly willing to do the hard work.Barring injury - I didn't and still won't expect much until after this Season / offseason and a full training camp.sure LT was a freak during his prime and had a HoF careerbut i dunno if reaching out to a serious drug addict and all that goes along with that personality is a good idea.. and i don't think it's gonna be that productive
How them sour grapes tasting? Enjoy watching the bowl games this yearHmmmm....AJ Hawk - AverageB Carpentar - OverratedV Gholston - Overrated2009 Draft - James Laurinaitis?Just hope your team doesn't waste a 1st rounder on someone from "The" Overrated State University.
agreed . . . was looking for a thread because I was wondering what happened . . .perfect thread title!!!Yeah that definitely deserves a@ Amber Alert
![]()
From here on in, any time a scout says a player "Looks like Tarzan but plays like Jane" ... Vernon will be the one pictured.The New York Jets took linebacker Vernon Gholston with the sixth pick of the 2008 draft and word is coming out now that there were a bunch of folks on the team who didn't want to select him, according to the New York Daily News.
And that feeling of discontent over the pick is growing since the 23-year-old Gholston has now had 24 games of experience in the NFL and hasn't had one crummy sack. That makes sense, of course, because he's barely getting any playing time right about now.
It turns out that the main reason Gholston was drafted was because of the extra enthusiasm then-coach Eric Mangini felt for Gholston: "That one's on Eric," one source told the Daily News.
Yeah, I'm completely off the Bandwagon of Any Hope....It officially looks like this guy is a total washout.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/rumors/post/Ne...?urn=nfl,201700
From here on in, any time a scout says a player "Looks like Tarzan but plays like Jane" ... Vernon will be the one pictured.The New York Jets took linebacker Vernon Gholston with the sixth pick of the 2008 draft and word is coming out now that there were a bunch of folks on the team who didn't want to select him, according to the New York Daily News.
And that feeling of discontent over the pick is growing since the 23-year-old Gholston has now had 24 games of experience in the NFL and hasn't had one crummy sack. That makes sense, of course, because he's barely getting any playing time right about now.
It turns out that the main reason Gholston was drafted was because of the extra enthusiasm then-coach Eric Mangini felt for Gholston: "That one's on Eric," one source told the Daily News.
The Jets' Vernon Gholston Needed One Sack To Earn $9 Million... And Never Got It
Dashiell Bennett | Mar. 1, 2011, 11:43 AM | 249 | comment
Former first-round draft pick Vernon Gholston was cut by the New York Jets this week after three years of not living up to his potential.
How big a bust has Gholston been? Well, Adam Schefter reminded everyone today that Gholston had a clause built into his contract (before the 2010 season) that would award him a $9 million bonus if he simply recorded one sack. Or caused a fumble. Or a recovered a fumble. Or caught an interception.
In 45 NFL games, he did none of those things. Zero. They even moved him from linebacker to defensive end and tried to devise schemes specifically to help him out. Nothing.
He did get a sack in a 2009 preseason game, which prompted coach Rex Ryan to say, ''It was the first of many." Unfortunately, the best he could do was 16 total tackles in three seasons.
Aundray BruceSteve EntmanQuentin CoryattJohn CopelandTrev AlbertsJust off the top of my head...Big fella fell one sack short of getting a $9 million bonus.Quick, name 5 bigger draft day defensive busts! I can't either.
LOL. I bet he thought that 9mil would be in his bank account no later than two games in to the season.Big fella fell one sack short of getting a $9 million bonus.
Quick, name 5 bigger draft day defensive busts!
I can't either.
The Jets' Vernon Gholston Needed One Sack To Earn $9 Million... And Never Got It
Dashiell Bennett | Mar. 1, 2011, 11:43 AM | 249 | comment
Former first-round draft pick Vernon Gholston was cut by the New York Jets this week after three years of not living up to his potential.
How big a bust has Gholston been? Well, Adam Schefter reminded everyone today that Gholston had a clause built into his contract (before the 2010 season) that would award him a $9 million bonus if he simply recorded one sack. Or caused a fumble. Or a recovered a fumble. Or caught an interception.
In 45 NFL games, he did none of those things. Zero. They even moved him from linebacker to defensive end and tried to devise schemes specifically to help him out. Nothing.
He did get a sack in a 2009 preseason game, which prompted coach Rex Ryan to say, ''It was the first of many." Unfortunately, the best he could do was 16 total tackles in three seasons.
"Bigger" busts, not "other" busts, or is draft position (higher than Gholston), the main criteria?Aundray BruceSteve EntmanQuentin CoryattJohn CopelandTrev AlbertsJust off the top of my head...Big fella fell one sack short of getting a $9 million bonus.Quick, name 5 bigger draft day defensive busts! I can't either.![]()
Um....yes. No. Maybe?All kidding aside, I think you have to consider Gholston the biggest defensive bust in probably the last 15-20 years."Bigger" busts, not "other" busts, or is draft position (higher than Gholston), the main criteria?Aundray BruceSteve EntmanBig fella fell one sack short of getting a $9 million bonus.
Quick, name 5 bigger draft day defensive busts!
I can't either.
Quentin Coryatt
John Copeland
Trev Alberts
Just off the top of my head...![]()
I've got to admit I got nothing on the Trev Alberts nomination. I could make (small) arguments that injuries and circumstance derailed some of those other guys. Had no idea A. Bruce had an 11 year career. Emtman was ferocious when healthy.Um....yes. No. Maybe?All kidding aside, I think you have to consider Gholston the biggest defensive bust in probably the last 15-20 years."Bigger" busts, not "other" busts, or is draft position (higher than Gholston), the main criteria?Aundray BruceSteve EntmanBig fella fell one sack short of getting a $9 million bonus.
Quick, name 5 bigger draft day defensive busts!
I can't either.
Quentin Coryatt
John Copeland
Trev Alberts
Just off the top of my head...![]()
As a fan I can't be that upset.....Um....yes. No. Maybe?All kidding aside, I think you have to consider Gholston the biggest defensive bust in probably the last 15-20 years."Bigger" busts, not "other" busts, or is draft position (higher than Gholston), the main criteria?Aundray BruceSteve EntmanBig fella fell one sack short of getting a $9 million bonus.
Quick, name 5 bigger draft day defensive busts!
I can't either.
Quentin Coryatt
John Copeland
Trev Alberts
Just off the top of my head...![]()