This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
If you would, could you post the draft reports to the first post so that we can all find 'em easier?Thanks.
Oh, I'm in, no doubt.
Hey Old M sorry to hear about your family matter. I hope you and your family are doing better soon. Take your time the rush around here to pick in these drafts should not be happening and this is just one of many reasons why. That and the fact it did not even start yet.SunnyDoll could you please explain to me what i have done this eyar to top last year? Before i go off on you and let you know how I feel about you saying that in the first place....thanks I will be waiting anxiously..was it my opinion on TE's in this league that topped last year? I mean what did I say other than that? NOTHING..and while were on it what did i do last year...pile on i am used it it and LOVE it..please dont turn this into FF for women ONLY league.
Last year, there were only 10 RB that scored 200 points in this format . . . and two of them have almost no chance of repeating (Anderson and Jones).Top 5 WR scored almost 300 points last year. While there is more depth at WR, there is less value left with the remaining RB.
and the math genius here did what last year? Or are you proud of you finish? also i got killed by injury last year and last time i checked that was nothing I could control. Worry about your own team Cal and the math book you use to draft it. I will take care of mine. Myabe I will get my boy from MIT hgere to help me run the numbers....LMAO. Don't wory about my finish from last year be much more worried about how i do this year..Just imagine if i finish high or anywhere above you?
Yeah, would have taken James if he was there, but without the 1 pt per rec for RBs, the next tier of RBs was much less appealing. My RBs will suffer, but with 5 WRs counting, I like the risk of doing this. Heck, if people keep leaving the good WRs out there for 3rd tier TEs, I may grab 2 more at the turn.
QB: DENVER DENMINNESOTA MIN
Dave i am sure you got my email about being able to keep the leagues where they are all year. I did not get a response and would think that is a no? Please let me know so i can move on and use my sponsorships in another way. Also can you tell me if there were any rule changes from last year in this league please?Thanks
Culpepper and Jones did not lose significant time? Come on kid..stop now it obvious you are clueless in the hobby..Or did you expect to have a bigger year from BJ and Cullp and i am sure that BJ would be drafted in the same spot as Culpin the same draft again? Lets see this year where they go in the draft..Perry..Klein..HALL.. Bennett....Kinney PATTEN..Clayton.. BALT D RAY LEWIS BUUFF D SPIKES!!! ETC ETC they were ALL RIDDLED WITH INJURY ALL YEAR WHAT ARE YOU TALKING AOBUT?? your an dope for talking like this ANDHAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOUR TALKING ABOUT..OBVIOUSLY!!! MY WHOLE TEAM WAS CRUCIFIED BY INJURY..HOW CAN YOU SAY ANYTHING BUT??: ENOUHG OF THIS BS!!! OBVIOUSLY!!!..please
Rules stayed the same from last year to this year. Still mulling over the MFL thing. Could you get us 4 free leagues?
You didn't draft Culpepper, you drafted MIN QB, and said at the time, "BJ can get it done." This is all you can come up with for being "crucified" with injuries? 241 points from a team QB and 185 points (#10 overall) for a team defense? And 3 games missed from Juliis Jones. You were in 15th place, over 600 points behind. If Minnesota performed as the #1 QB and Baltimore performed as the #1 defense that would have left you still 400 points behind. That'd have to be some mighty big games from J.Jones!
Yes I could but four would be the limit but as I stated in the email these leagues would also have to be considered League of Champions Qualifier leagues which would mean the winners would hopefully accept there invite into the 2007 Champions league of the LOC. I not sure how much of an issue this might be here but the LOC is a pretty good thing for the FF hobby. It was started five years ago with the hopes of it someday being on of the best leagues on the internet and it is getting better every year...below is a link to our homepage so you guys can look it over. But please don't use anything about me against the LOC. I am really not the bad guy some of you think and love FF and do much work on it free of charge while letting others also have there chances to play vs top competition around the net for free. If this all is Ok and sounds OK to you it would be my pleasure to have all four Anarchy leagues as LOC Qualifiers. In the case that the Champion did not take his spot next year( I hope this would not be the case) the invite would go to the next highest point owner and so on. But I would hope we could get most of the winners first. Let me know and guys it would be great if you gave me the chance at a new beginning here instead of putting me down for every and anything I might say or have an opinion on. If so i will do my best to keep in good standing and try not to do what in the past has caused me to be in this spot in the first place. Dave let me know as i think this could be a match made in heaven and save twilight and myself from a lot of work also.http://www.ufflonline.com/LOC.html
Nobody talked more trash than you last year...NOBODY. 1. You failed miserably...then disappeared.
Oh don't get me wrong. I actually like it...that's why I thought it worth mentioning.Contrarian.Yeah, would have taken James if he was there, but without the 1 pt per rec for RBs, the next tier of RBs was much less appealing. My RBs will suffer, but with 5 WRs counting, I like the risk of doing this. Heck, if people keep leaving the good WRs out there for 3rd tier TEs, I may grab 2 more at the turn.
Thanks. Very suprised that I was the first to draft a WR. I think people are reaching a bit on lesser RBs and TEs, esp with RBs not getting a ppr.Oh don't get me wrong. I actually like it...that's why I thought it worth mentioning.Contrarian.Yeah, would have taken James if he was there, but without the 1 pt per rec for RBs, the next tier of RBs was much less appealing. My RBs will suffer, but with 5 WRs counting, I like the risk of doing this. Heck, if people keep leaving the good WRs out there for 3rd tier TEs, I may grab 2 more at the turn.
One of the basic things I tried to do last year was go where the herd wasn't. Seemed to work pretty well. With 16 teams, and being on the turn, the last thing you should be doing is getting involved with/following runs.Thanks. Very suprised that I was the first to draft a WR. I think people are reaching a bit on lesser RBs and TEs, esp with RBs not getting a ppr.Oh don't get me wrong. I actually like it...that's why I thought it worth mentioning.Contrarian.Yeah, would have taken James if he was there, but without the 1 pt per rec for RBs, the next tier of RBs was much less appealing. My RBs will suffer, but with 5 WRs counting, I like the risk of doing this. Heck, if people keep leaving the good WRs out there for 3rd tier TEs, I may grab 2 more at the turn.
if Jordan hadn't been there, I would have taken a WR. he was the last RB i had ranked over the 1st tier WRs.Thanks. Very suprised that I was the first to draft a WR. I think people are reaching a bit on lesser RBs and TEs, esp with RBs not getting a ppr.Oh don't get me wrong. I actually like it...that's why I thought it worth mentioning.Contrarian.Yeah, would have taken James if he was there, but without the 1 pt per rec for RBs, the next tier of RBs was much less appealing. My RBs will suffer, but with 5 WRs counting, I like the risk of doing this. Heck, if people keep leaving the good WRs out there for 3rd tier TEs, I may grab 2 more at the turn.
FWIW, I _probably_ would have taken Jordan, but I think he is due for a bit of a fall as he won't get as many yards receiving this year and he won't get a point for those receptions he does make.if Jordan hadn't been there, I would have taken a WR. he was the last RB i had ranked over the 1st tier WRs.Thanks. Very suprised that I was the first to draft a WR. I think people are reaching a bit on lesser RBs and TEs, esp with RBs not getting a ppr.Oh don't get me wrong. I actually like it...that's why I thought it worth mentioning.Contrarian.Yeah, would have taken James if he was there, but without the 1 pt per rec for RBs, the next tier of RBs was much less appealing. My RBs will suffer, but with 5 WRs counting, I like the risk of doing this. Heck, if people keep leaving the good WRs out there for 3rd tier TEs, I may grab 2 more at the turn.
My team from league 3:1.11: Ronnie Brown2.6: Torry Holt
Fair point. I read somewhere how the more successful TE's play on weaker WR units...so that would support your opinion, FWIW.Chumpson said:
CoughCoughCooleyCoughCough
Wide receiver UNITS. Name me one guy not named Moss that did one iota of anything in Washington last year.David Patten had the second most receptions (22) and yardage (217) and NO WR OTHER THAN MOSS SCORED A TD.
Right, so overall, the Wide Receiver Unit in WAS should be pretty poor, leading to a good season for Cooley.
I thought you were pointing to WAS as an example of a team with strong WRs and a high scoring fantasy TE as an example AGAINST what SLBD was saying.I guess I misinterpreted what you were saying (certainly wasn't the first time I did this and it won't be the last time either)
Am I missing something?
I thought you were pointing to WAS as an example of a team with strong WRs and a high scoring fantasy TE as an example AGAINST what SLBD was saying.I guess I misinterpreted what you were saying (certainly wasn't the first time I did this and it won't be the last time either)
Am I missing something?
i just like Witten 
NP. I had just drafted Cooley over Witten based partly upon that principle (and the fact that I own Owens).I thought you were pointing to WAS as an example of a team with strong WRs and a high scoring fantasy TE as an example AGAINST what SLBD was saying.I guess I misinterpreted what you were saying (certainly wasn't the first time I did this and it won't be the last time either)
Am I missing something?
I thought you were pointing to WAS as an example of a team with strong WRs and a high scoring fantasy TE as an example AGAINST what SLBD was saying.I guess I misinterpreted what you were saying (certainly wasn't the first time I did this and it won't be the last time either)
Am I missing something?
