What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Any of you guys care to decrypt a message for me? (1 Viewer)

Gachi

Footballguy
I would really appreciate it.

I have tried numerous types of programs online, but I'm not getting anything. Maybe I'm doing something wrong.

Here's a portion of the message:

4372656174652061207465787420646f63756d656e742e2

Do you guys recognize what type of code this is?

I assure you that it's nothing illegal. It's just directions on a school assignment.

 
4372656174652061207465787420646f63756d656e742e2
This is interesting to say the least. Obviously it is some sort of offshoot of the work we see in Glibb's "Exploring the Ceylon Linear Series" from '87. Of course there is more than a smattering of Leong (especially in the middle fifth) and a sprinkling of some of that "Fairbanks United" garbage that popped up about 8-9 years ago.

I'm really excited about the use of non-sequential footholds at the start. Pretty daring if you ask me. There is also something to be said about the unabashed Kinshasa-Bloc formations after the crevasse. Not too shabby considering the context.

But ultimately the whole thing falls flat. In bits and pieces it doesn't look too bad but as a collective unit it collapses under its own weight. Too much emphasis on the yardage and the accent. Not enough attention to the base-4 standard. I'd put it on par with some of Haskel and Stern's early work.

 
4372656174652061207465787420646f63756d656e742e2
This is interesting to say the least. Obviously it is some sort of offshoot of the work we see in Glibb's "Exploring the Ceylon Linear Series" from '87. Of course there is more than a smattering of Leong (especially in the middle fifth) and a sprinkling of some of that "Fairbanks United" garbage that popped up about 8-9 years ago.

I'm really excited about the use of non-sequential footholds at the start. Pretty daring if you ask me. There is also something to be said about the unabashed Kinshasa-Bloc formations after the crevasse. Not too shabby considering the context.

But ultimately the whole thing falls flat. In bits and pieces it doesn't look too bad but as a collective unit it collapses under its own weight. Too much emphasis on the yardage and the accent. Not enough attention to the base-4 standard. I'd put it on par with some of Haskel and Stern's early work.
Rubbish. I thought it was brilliant.

 
4372656174652061207465787420646f63756d656e742e2
This is interesting to say the least. Obviously it is some sort of offshoot of the work we see in Glibb's "Exploring the Ceylon Linear Series" from '87. Of course there is more than a smattering of Leong (especially in the middle fifth) and a sprinkling of some of that "Fairbanks United" garbage that popped up about 8-9 years ago.

I'm really excited about the use of non-sequential footholds at the start. Pretty daring if you ask me. There is also something to be said about the unabashed Kinshasa-Bloc formations after the crevasse. Not too shabby considering the context.

But ultimately the whole thing falls flat. In bits and pieces it doesn't look too bad but as a collective unit it collapses under its own weight. Too much emphasis on the yardage and the accent. Not enough attention to the base-4 standard. I'd put it on par with some of Haskel and Stern's early work.
You want to know about onslaught, you ask this guy.

 
Raider Nation said:
Officer Pete Malloy said:
4372656174652061207465787420646f63756d656e742e2
This is interesting to say the least. Obviously it is some sort of offshoot of the work we see in Glibb's "Exploring the Ceylon Linear Series" from '87. Of course there is more than a smattering of Leong (especially in the middle fifth) and a sprinkling of some of that "Fairbanks United" garbage that popped up about 8-9 years ago.

I'm really excited about the use of non-sequential footholds at the start. Pretty daring if you ask me. There is also something to be said about the unabashed Kinshasa-Bloc formations after the crevasse. Not too shabby considering the context.

But ultimately the whole thing falls flat. In bits and pieces it doesn't look too bad but as a collective unit it collapses under its own weight. Too much emphasis on the yardage and the accent. Not enough attention to the base-4 standard. I'd put it on par with some of Haskel and Stern's early work.
Rubbish. I thought it was brilliant.
Your mother is a whore.

 
Raider Nation said:
Officer Pete Malloy said:
4372656174652061207465787420646f63756d656e742e2
This is interesting to say the least. Obviously it is some sort of offshoot of the work we see in Glibb's "Exploring the Ceylon Linear Series" from '87. Of course there is more than a smattering of Leong (especially in the middle fifth) and a sprinkling of some of that "Fairbanks United" garbage that popped up about 8-9 years ago.

I'm really excited about the use of non-sequential footholds at the start. Pretty daring if you ask me. There is also something to be said about the unabashed Kinshasa-Bloc formations after the crevasse. Not too shabby considering the context.

But ultimately the whole thing falls flat. In bits and pieces it doesn't look too bad but as a collective unit it collapses under its own weight. Too much emphasis on the yardage and the accent. Not enough attention to the base-4 standard. I'd put it on par with some of Haskel and Stern's early work.
Rubbish. I thought it was brilliant.
Your mother is a whore.
Regardless...

 
Preliminary mathematical analysis shows that the number 6 stands for the letter "I"; the frequency would tend to suggest a strong correlation with timschochet's writing. When you put that together with the fact that the frequent sequence 74 stands for "me", the evidence becomes overwhelming that the writer is timschochet. Statistically, 99.387% certainty.

 
I would really appreciate it.

I have tried numerous types of programs online, but I'm not getting anything. Maybe I'm doing something wrong.

Here's a portion of the message:

4372656174652061207465787420646f63756d656e742e2

Do you guys recognize what type of code this is?

I assure you that it's nothing illegal. It's just directions on a school assignment.
As far as the letters in it... does it only contain letters between A and F?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top