Anyone not like Eddie Lacy? (2 Viewers)

[Shutout]

The useage this year has been sparse. He is on pace for only 211 carries. The most encouraging thing though especially in ppr is how awesome he has been at blocking. He is arguably one of if not the best blocking RB's in the league in only his second year. This will lead to more useage in the passing game and check downs when the Packers are playing catch up. He is on pace to catch 43 balls this year, but over the last 2 weeks they have looked to get some designed screens to him and he is making the D pay. It is still going to get colder here and the Packers may rely more on the run then they have been. So far he is not hurting you but he is not exactly winning you match ups.

THe problem with extrapolating "pace" for a Rb is that we already know it's flawed. There is no reason to run Gore or Lynch 35 times a game in September. But there might be in December when they play two times in three weeks. No reason to run Lacy or somebody in fair weather when the matchups are great for passing. But down the stretch, there might be. Not saying don't estimate but keep in mind the other factors.

 

[The Flying Elvis]

I mean if we are taking away TDs because they were fluky on long runs or catches, can we add TDs he should have gotten from the goal line? It begins to get ridiculous if you are docking players because they had a breakaway play that you don't think is repeatable. Lacy has proven to be a threat in the passing game and has broken open some big screens before so it's part of his game.

A concern over Lacy's carries is valid but it is hard pressed these days to find RBs who you can trust to get over 20 carries a game anyways. Even after a pretty miserable start to the season Lacy is on pace for 1340+ yards and 9 TDs. It's like 95% of what he gave you last year with an injured Rodgers just a different breakdown of rushing versus receiving yards. Ideally people were expecting 1300 rushing yards not just total yards but it's not the Packers offensive strategy.

It seems Lacy has been getting more total yards recently so I wouldn't be surprised to see him end up with something like 1000 rushing yards and 400 receiving yards for the year to go along with 8-10 TDs. That would be a pretty decent year especially for PPR guys.

 

[Eminence]

So If the guy doesn't perform its his fault because he is slow/underused/etc. When he has a good game you should take away the big play because you can't rely on it. Most biased, disingenuous method you can have. I get it that people don't like Lacy but give me a break.

I started the thread...? I'm just being real here that you shouldn't expect Lacey to be busting off a 60 yard reception consistently if not ever again in his career.

That doesn't mean he's not going to continue to produce. It's just not smart to sit down and bump Lacey's value based on the play.

 

[The Flying Elvis]

So If the guy doesn't perform its his fault because he is slow/underused/etc. When he has a good game you should take away the big play because you can't rely on it. Most biased, disingenuous method you can have. I get it that people don't like Lacy but give me a break.

I started the thread...? I'm just being real here that you shouldn't expect Lacey to be busting off a 60 yard reception consistently if not ever again in his career.

That doesn't mean he's not going to continue to produce. It's just not smart to sit down and bump Lacey's value based on the play.

He had a 67 yard reception two weeks ago against the Saints.

So while he may not get them consistently and we can blame them on breakdowns on defense or whatever you want to but lets not act like receiving yards are not part of Lacy's game.

 

[Shutout]

So If the guy doesn't perform its his fault because he is slow/underused/etc. When he has a good game you should take away the big play because you can't rely on it. Most biased, disingenuous method you can have. I get it that people don't like Lacy but give me a break.

I started the thread...? I'm just being real here that you shouldn't expect Lacey to be busting off a 60 yard reception consistently if not ever again in his career.

That doesn't mean he's not going to continue to produce. It's just not smart to sit down and bump Lacey's value based on the play.

Yeah, he may never get a 50+ yard catch again, but these things are so situational (like, maybe he would have broken off three 15-20 yard runs late in the fourth had they left him in the game) that it's really academic HOW he go the points, only that he DID.

At the end of the day, that's what it oils down to: How many points did player "x" get? Honestly, if I have him in a lineup and I see 18 points at the end of the day, it matters not to me at all that he did it in 10 plays, 30, etc. I am looking at the current trend and the current trend suggests he is heavily involved and he is putting up top 10 RB numbers. That's all I need.

 

[Eminence]

I mean if we are taking away TDs because they were fluky on long runs or catches, can we add TDs he should have gotten from the goal line? It begins to get ridiculous if you are docking players because they had a breakaway play that you don't think is repeatable. Lacy has proven to be a threat in the passing game and has broken open some big screens before so it's part of his game.

If that's what YOU want to do, then yes. Everyone is free to look at a player and their production any way that they want. But I'm not a half glass full guy when it comes to Lacey and a 50+ yard reception. It's cool and it's great but it's definitely a fluke.

There are times when a player's production on the field is superficial and should be discredited. I'm not going to tell you when that is, that's your judgement call to make.

Another way to look at it, is to look at Jonathan Franklin. He was the guy the Packers' wanted on those screen passes. I'm certain that sooner or later they are going to look to add a shifty RB like that to the passing game.

 

[Eminence]

So If the guy doesn't perform its his fault because he is slow/underused/etc. When he has a good game you should take away the big play because you can't rely on it. Most biased, disingenuous method you can have. I get it that people don't like Lacy but give me a break.

I started the thread...? I'm just being real here that you shouldn't expect Lacey to be busting off a 60 yard reception consistently if not ever again in his career.

That doesn't mean he's not going to continue to produce. It's just not smart to sit down and bump Lacey's value based on the play.

He had a 67 yard reception two weeks ago against the Saints.

So while he may not get them consistently and we can blame them on breakdowns on defense or whatever you want to but lets not act like receiving yards are not part of Lacy's game.

That's really not what I'm arguing though, I don't even know what I'm arguing. Lacey plays with maybe the best Quarterback in the league so defenses shift coverage over to Cobb and Nelson. It's no surprise to me that Lacey catches a few balls in the flat, bounces off a few defenders, and pops off a few 15+ receptions.

 

[The Flying Elvis]

So If the guy doesn't perform its his fault because he is slow/underused/etc. When he has a good game you should take away the big play because you can't rely on it. Most biased, disingenuous method you can have. I get it that people don't like Lacy but give me a break.

I started the thread...? I'm just being real here that you shouldn't expect Lacey to be busting off a 60 yard reception consistently if not ever again in his career.

That doesn't mean he's not going to continue to produce. It's just not smart to sit down and bump Lacey's value based on the play.

He had a 67 yard reception two weeks ago against the Saints.

So while he may not get them consistently and we can blame them on breakdowns on defense or whatever you want to but lets not act like receiving yards are not part of Lacy's game.

That's really not what I'm arguing though, I don't even know what I'm arguing. Lacey plays with maybe the best Quarterback in the league so defenses shift coverage over to Cobb and Nelson. It's no surprise to me that Lacey catches a few balls in the flat, bounces off a few defenders, and pops off a few 15+ receptions.

This would seem to support the notion that it isn't really a fluke when Lacy pops off a long screen pass but just a natural part of his game every now and then just as it is not no one really calls it a fluke if Jamaal Charles breaks open a long TD because it is recognized as part of his appeal and skillset.

 

[Eminence]

So If the guy doesn't perform its his fault because he is slow/underused/etc. When he has a good game you should take away the big play because you can't rely on it. Most biased, disingenuous method you can have. I get it that people don't like Lacy but give me a break.

I started the thread...? I'm just being real here that you shouldn't expect Lacey to be busting off a 60 yard reception consistently if not ever again in his career.

That doesn't mean he's not going to continue to produce. It's just not smart to sit down and bump Lacey's value based on the play.

He had a 67 yard reception two weeks ago against the Saints.

So while he may not get them consistently and we can blame them on breakdowns on defense or whatever you want to but lets not act like receiving yards are not part of Lacy's game.

That's really not what I'm arguing though, I don't even know what I'm arguing. Lacey plays with maybe the best Quarterback in the league so defenses shift coverage over to Cobb and Nelson. It's no surprise to me that Lacey catches a few balls in the flat, bounces off a few defenders, and pops off a few 15+ receptions.

This would seem to support the notion that it isn't really a fluke when Lacy pops off a long screen pass but just a natural part of his game every now and then just as it is not no one really calls it a fluke if Jamaal Charles breaks open a long TD because it is recognized as part of his appeal and skillset.

I'm saying a 50 / 60 yard play is a fluke. Beyond that, the Packers clearly wanted to use Jonathan Franklin as a receiving back. So while it's easy to forecast a few more plays like that for Lacey this season, longterm I don't view him has a pass catching back.

His skillset doesn't scream that he should be popping off plays like that. You give the ball to a guy like Jahvid Best in that situation and he'll make what Lacey does look silly. I hope you get what I'm saying. The guy is an absolute workhorse of a back.

 

[unckeyherb]

So If the guy doesn't perform its his fault because he is slow/underused/etc. When he has a good game you should take away the big play because you can't rely on it. Most biased, disingenuous method you can have. I get it that people don't like Lacy but give me a break.

I started the thread...? I'm just being real here that you shouldn't expect Lacey to be busting off a 60 yard reception consistently if not ever again in his career.

That doesn't mean he's not going to continue to produce. It's just not smart to sit down and bump Lacey's value based on the play.

Whats your point though? Name me the players that you DO expect to consistently bust off 60 yard TD receptions? The fact that he is in the position to do so from time to time is enough for me. Do I think it will happen again this year? Probably not. But I would have said that after week 8 when he had 123 yards receiving. But what do you know...next game..

 

[sho nuff]

Lacy will keep getting decent reception yardage.

Watch the last 2 games.

Oline creating enough time...deep routes, when they are covered...leaving Lacy open in the middle for a decent gain.

And he has turned into a good back running the screen pass too.

 

[packer_junkie]

The Johnathan Franklin thing doesn't hold a ton of value to me. At the time, the pack were really down on Starks (injuries) and probably close to moving on, Ted Thompson drafts based on value not need (Rodgers, Nelson, Cobb, etc) so at the time, he got his guy Lacy (who had some injury questions himself) than later felt like Franklin sitting there would be a great compliment. Lacy has shown more skill as a receiver than the Packers ever imagined (something like a 90% catch rate) and as crazy as it sounds, in the open field like that is when he is at his best. Anyone who has watched the packers all year (like i have) can clearly see that getting Lacy involved in the passing game has become a much bigger priority and 3-5 catches a game from here on out will be the norm IMO. Also, great post above about the coverage dictating his opportunity for big gains. With the 2-high look most D's are running, Lacy is getting to top speed vs less guys and is a beast for safeties to bring down, especially ones that suck and don't care like the bears ones.

Lacy top 8-10 RB ROS which is right where I drafted him. also helps that while GB is 6-3, they are on the outside looking in for the playoff race and will ramp up his carries if needed moving forward.

 

[unckeyherb]

Through week 10, Lacy is RB 10 in my .5 ppr league. Remaining matchups:

Philly (19th against RBs)

@ Minny (25th against RBs)

NWE (27th against RBs)

Atlanta (32nd against RBs)

@ Buffalo (3rd against RBs)

@ Tampa (22nd against RBs)

This week and week 15 against Buffalo are the only rough matchups (not really sure that this week against the birds is that rough either). I really thought he'd be a top 3 RB this year, so the early season was disappointing, but he should finish right around RB7-8 and against those defenses could easily have some big games to put him into top 5 range.

Week one of my playoffs against Atlanta is pretty effing sweet.

 

[LionOfGosforth]

Through week 10, Lacy is RB 10 in my .5 ppr league. Remaining matchups:

Philly (19th against RBs)

@ Minny (25th against RBs)

NWE (27th against RBs)

Atlanta (32nd against RBs)

@ Buffalo (3rd against RBs)

@ Tampa (22nd against RBs)

This week and week 15 against Buffalo are the only rough matchups (not really sure that this week against the birds is that rough either). I really thought he'd be a top 3 RB this year, so the early season was disappointing, but he should finish right around RB7-8 and against those defenses could easily have some big games to put him into top 5 range.

Week one of my playoffs against Atlanta is pretty effing sweet.

For this week, given Eagles are soft in the secondary, have to believe Rodgers will throw constantly. Whether they're at their own 20 or Eagles 1, he'll throw. I like Lacy's recent trend in the passing game so he's still a reasonable start but i'm personally benching him for TY Hilton or G.Tate in flex, haven't decided which one yet. Can't have another 14/50 rushing statline and then having to rely heavily on what he does in the receiving game, too risky for me (this week).

 

[The Flying Elvis]

Hmm... Another 30+ yard receiving TD from Fat Eddie.

 

[Carter_Can_Fly]

Hmm... Another 30+ yard receiving TD from Fat Eddie.

But he does not have that in his game. It is just not possible. Oh wait, that is 3 games in a row. He also had a 37 yard rush in the game.

 

[unckeyherb]

Guy is producing great numbers, is being used in the passing game and most importantly, is excelling at that part of the puzzle. Was RB 10 heading into this week and his 125 yards and 2 tds are only going to move him up. Kudos to those that didn't raise the white flag in late September. Got a legit top RB for the playoff push.

 

[sho nuff]

Its not how we thought it would be...but he is.putting up numbers down the stretch and the.schedule is pretty nice.

 

[TDorBust]

I will throw it out there before the nay-sayers try to spin it.

What happens if the Packers are not over-powering other teams and up 20 points?

Well glad you asked personally I see this as a benefit for Lacy in a couple ways:

-He will actually play a full 60 mins of football (Mid 3rd week 10 and Mid 4th week 11 he left that game if I am not mistaken)

-Packers would likely look to control the game more but at the moment Rodgers is hitting 60-70 yard TDs it would seem regularly

-Packers would need to "DRIVE" the ball more thus giving Lacy more chances to get some of those 3-4-5 yard runs instead of just hitting 1 or 2 30+ yard plays

In the end I feel the Packers are in a real good spot and as long as Rodgers can keep producing its going to allow Lacy to get his as well. The biggest obstacle you will see is if Rodgers/Quarless turn into better targets than they already have, I could see them taking away any chance Lacy gets a dump-off other than designed screen plays.

 

[Shutout]

Other guys ranked around Lacy outside of the big 3: Forte, Lynch, Murray, Foster, Bell, Ball, Dougie, Gio.

Lacy's receptions should go up; his carries should go up (thinking 300+); with defenses fearing Rodgers arm and opening bigger lanes, his ypc should go up; with a better, more productive offense, his TD's could go up (12-15 total seems realistic).

Point is, I could definitely see situations where Lacy is #1 Fantasy RB by the end of the year. I can't say that about any of the guys listed above.

Actually, i think the point is i could pencil any of those other guys in for #1 numbers and they'd finish #1.

So you are saying that you could see any one of Lynch, Murray, Foster, Bell, Ball, Martin or Gio finishing as the RB1 this year? And more so than Lacy?

Also, all you can do is pencil numbers in. 300 carries is not really an increase from last year (averaged 20 per game over 14 games last year, which would put him into 320+ territory), nor is 12+ TDs-he had 11 last year. Do you disagree that having a healthy Rodgers, Cobb, Nelson should push the defenses back a little, giving him more running room? Do you disagree that these pieces that were missing for most of last year will have a positive impact on the offense and should put Lacy in more chances to score?

I agree that Mike McCarthy has a 14 year history of throwing the ball near the goal line and has had only one running back crack more than 11 total TDs in a single season during that time, Deuce McCallister with 16 TDs in 2002. Deuce is also the only back to crack 2,000 total yards in a McCarthy offense (2003).

I think Eddie can achieve maybe 1,800 yards and maybe 15 TDs because of the reasons you state, but he is working against a lot of history on all fronts. And FTR I have him as RB#4 on my board, a lot of that also to do with the fact that I think he has a higher floor than many RBs.

Yes, if he stays healthy, his floor is high. He can't hardly avoid a 100/10 season if he tried.

IMO, there's a lot oversaid and thought about how McCarthy throws and hasn't run a lot in GB,etc. My opinion is the way you get to have a long coaching career in the NFL is by recognizing AND using your strengths. In Green Bay, it has been the passing, combined with a very pedestrian running game. When he DID have a great runner, he used him. Simple as that. We all know he's too smart to not restrain Rodgers. But he is smart enough to know he can lean on a good, capable runner and maybe preserve his star QB (throwing at the goal line can take a toll on a QB, especially if they bootleg to buy time).

Much like how things set up for a perfect storm for Charles and Shady last year, it looks like this for Lacy. How on Earth do you even begin to put adequate defenders in the box with Aaron Rodgers, Randall Cobb, Jordy Nelson, and a host of other capable players? IF (I know it might not happen) Finley returns, wow...You can't possibly defend the interior middle of that field and you're going to have a stampeding bull coming right down at you.

how on earth do you stop a stampeding bull ??

Don't know. The last three teams the Packers have faced haven't figured it out.

Noticed you stop reposting my "ridiculous" statement that he couldn't avoid 1,000/10 season if he tried every week.

Believe now?

 

[unckeyherb]

Yep. I was definitely off with his touches going up, which I'm still surprised about; but his YPC is up (4.25), his receptions are up, his YPR is way up (12 yards per compared to 7 last year) and he is on pace for 12 TD's. I'd love to see Larry's explanation of how Rodgers to Jordy is a bad impact on Lacy still. If this guy ever got 20+ carries a game he'd be unstoppable. As it stands he's a very solid RB1. Hopefully as it gets colder out they start leaning on him a bit more.

 

[sho nuff]

Yep. I was definitely off with his touches going up, which I'm still surprised about; but his YPC is up (4.25), his receptions are up, his YPR is way up (12 yards per compared to 7 last year) and he is on pace for 12 TD's. I'd love to see Larry's explanation of how Rodgers to Jordy is a bad impact on Lacy still. If this guy ever got 20+ carries a game he'd be unstoppable. As it stands he's a very solid RB1. Hopefully as it gets colder out they start leaning on him a bit more.

They throw those long balls...and next thing you know, there is Lacy on a dumpoff going one on one against a corner. Ill take Lacy in that matchup any day of the week.

When teams do blitz...that is when the screen game becomes better too.

If the Oline keeps stopping 4 man rushes, I don't see much changing with how good this offense can be.

 

[unckeyherb]

125/1 with another receiving td to boot. 5 TDs over the last three games. since running the gauntlet weeks 1-3 he's has one bad game, 2 good games and 5 RB1 games. Good call Larry.

 

[humpback]

he played well today--but again--today just proved that our expectations have been lowered. A juicy matchup against a defense that has been weak as of late. His team is moving the ball like crazy and his qb is totally on point-his team scores 38pts-and what does he end up with--63 yards and a td. An elite RB1 in that perfect storm of events would normally have far bigger numbers. However--those numbers are indicative of a high upside rb2 taking into account todays perfect storm.

Expectations have been lowered, but this wasn't the perfect storm, it was a blowout where he only had 4 touches in the 2nd half (none in the 4th qtr). The perfect storm would have been more like a 38-31 game.

Now I know who drafts crappy Alabama RBs.

You're not even good at trolling. Shoo, fly.

I don't troll. That's the sad part. You're the one hopping threads pumping up bad Bama RBs.

Might want to check the Richardson thread, Inspector Gadget.

Well, plausible deniability would be key. Go-Go-Gadget arms.

The two RBs you were bashing last week combined for over 50 fantasy points (PPR)- who do you hate this week?

I personally love ADP 1.05 being RB11 and Ingram at RB26. You?

Update?

 

[sho nuff]

As I said in today's game thread....Lacy is paying off for those who held on to him and had patience and those who bought him low.

 

[avina1]

simply a beast.

 

[rockaction]

he played well today--but again--today just proved that our expectations have been lowered. A juicy matchup against a defense that has been weak as of late. His team is moving the ball like crazy and his qb is totally on point-his team scores 38pts-and what does he end up with--63 yards and a td. An elite RB1 in that perfect storm of events would normally have far bigger numbers. However--those numbers are indicative of a high upside rb2 taking into account todays perfect storm.

Expectations have been lowered, but this wasn't the perfect storm, it was a blowout where he only had 4 touches in the 2nd half (none in the 4th qtr). The perfect storm would have been more like a 38-31 game.

Now I know who drafts crappy Alabama RBs.

You're not even good at trolling. Shoo, fly.

I don't troll. That's the sad part. You're the one hopping threads pumping up bad Bama RBs.

Might want to check the Richardson thread, Inspector Gadget.

Well, plausible deniability would be key. Go-Go-Gadget arms.

The two RBs you were bashing last week combined for over 50 fantasy points (PPR)- who do you hate this week?

I personally love ADP 1.05 being RB11 and Ingram at RB26. You?

Update?

We'll see at the end of the year. Was this guy 1.05? Doubt it.

 

[georg013]

Lots of guys probably pissed off the sky didnt fall and will look for any way to put a negative spin on Lacys success. This is to be expected. Anyone who bought into the overreaction machine deserves what he got for abandoning ship for lessor talent. The fact is, Lacy is just getting started...right in time for the playoffs.

 

[JimmyJabroni]

This guy is the only reason I still have a shot in my league. I got him from a distressed owner and he has been money ever since. Love this dude.

 

[rockaction]

I'd just like to point out that I've picked up C.J. Anderson, Tre Mason, and Denard off of the waiver wire.

And my 1.08 ADP in Demaryius Thomas is sort of wiping his butt with E. Lacy right now.

 

[humpback]

 

[rockaction]

Yeah, awesomesauce! I drafted Eddie Lacy way ahead of when he should go!

 

[Faust]

Packers show they can finish with Eddie Lacy

 

[unckeyherb]

As was opined by many in this thread, the defense's fears of Rodgers throwing to Nelson and Cobb is opening up lanes for Lacy. And Lacy is capitalizing on his opportunity. Oh and the quality of this offense is leading to more scoring opps as well. Everything clicking at the right time.

 

[unckeyherb]

Yeah, awesomesauce! I drafted Eddie Lacy way ahead of when he should go!

He's going to be RB 5 once this week is over. Not sure where you thought he should go?

 

[Hendo]

Very lucky I traded Rivers&Stacy in week 4 for this guy in my dyno when people were jumping off the ship in here. Talent rises to the top

 

[humpback]

Yeah, awesomesauce! I drafted Eddie Lacy way ahead of when he should go!

Shocker, you're wrong yet again.

Lacy is the #1 RB in PPR in his last 4 games (when you began your incoherent tirade in here). The other guy you blasted, Ingram, has been great as well. You're clueless.

 

[rockaction]

Yeah, awesomesauce! I drafted Eddie Lacy way ahead of when he should go!

Shocker, you're wrong yet again.

Lacy is the #1 RB in PPR in his last 4 games (when you began your incoherent tirade in here). The other guy you blasted, Ingram, has been great as well. You're clueless.

Yeah, I have ODB, Thomas, Gordon, Brees, and Gronk on my team.

Shut the #### up, #######. And stop following me.

eta* And Gore. And C.J. And Mason. And McKinnon. And DET. And Prater. Shhhh...

Your 1.05 RB benefits from bounty. Good job. I said I'd stay out of the Ingram thread, and have. Go home, fly.

eta2* Hell, I stayed out of this one, until you were a jerkstore about it.

 

[humpback]

Yeah, awesomesauce! I drafted Eddie Lacy way ahead of when he should go!

Shocker, you're wrong yet again.

Lacy is the #1 RB in PPR in his last 4 games (when you began your incoherent tirade in here). The other guy you blasted, Ingram, has been great as well. You're clueless.

Yeah, I have ODB, Thomas, Gordon, Brees, and Gronk on my team.

Shut the #### up, #######. And stop following me.

eta* And Gore. And C.J. And Mason. And McKinnon. And DET. And Prater. Shhhh...

Your 1.05 RB benefits from bounty. Good job. I said I'd stay out of the Ingram thread, and have. Go home, fly.

What do you know, you're wrong again. You're the clown who started trolling me with this post.

Way to brag about that mediocre team btw.

 

[rockaction]

Yeah, awesomesauce! I drafted Eddie Lacy way ahead of when he should go!

Shocker, you're wrong yet again.

Lacy is the #1 RB in PPR in his last 4 games (when you began your incoherent tirade in here). The other guy you blasted, Ingram, has been great as well. You're clueless.

Yeah, I have ODB, Thomas, Gordon, Brees, and Gronk on my team.

Shut the #### up, #######. And stop following me.

eta* And Gore. And C.J. And Mason. And McKinnon. And DET. And Prater. Shhhh...

Your 1.05 RB benefits from bounty. Good job. I said I'd stay out of the Ingram thread, and have. Go home, fly.

What do you know, you're wrong again. You're the clown who started trolling me with this post.

Way to brag about that mediocre team btw.

Yeah, and I'd left and said I wouldn't come back. And you have to do this.

I play in a sixteen (now down to fourteen) team league usually, you fool. I'm #1 overall in points. By eighty of them. And #1 HTH.

Have fun with your trolling. You're on ignore from now on. You can't even acquit yourself with dignity in the FFA.

Cheers.

And here you go. #32

 

[sho nuff]

Pretty darn happy with Lacy, Bell as my rbs...didn't need to go high for a wr with Evans now, Gordon, ODB.

With the crap out there at RB...Lacyis earning that high draft spot easy right now.

 

[humpback]

Yeah, awesomesauce! I drafted Eddie Lacy way ahead of when he should go!

Shocker, you're wrong yet again.

Lacy is the #1 RB in PPR in his last 4 games (when you began your incoherent tirade in here). The other guy you blasted, Ingram, has been great as well. You're clueless.

Yeah, I have ODB, Thomas, Gordon, Brees, and Gronk on my team.

Shut the #### up, #######. And stop following me.

eta* And Gore. And C.J. And Mason. And McKinnon. And DET. And Prater. Shhhh...

Your 1.05 RB benefits from bounty. Good job. I said I'd stay out of the Ingram thread, and have. Go home, fly.

What do you know, you're wrong again. You're the clown who started trolling me with this post.

Way to brag about that mediocre team btw.

Yeah, and I'd left and said I wouldn't come back. And you have to do this.

I play in a sixteen (now down to fourteen) team league usually, you fool. I'm #1 overall in points. By eighty of them. And #1 HTH.

Have fun with your trolling. You're on ignore from now on. You can't even acquit yourself with dignity in the FFA.

Cheers.

And here you go. #32

You started trolling me about Lacy and Ingram for some reason, and they've both made you look like an absolute fool- I barely had to do anything. Now you get all butt-hurt when I point out just how wrong you were. Oh, well.

 

[rockaction]

Yeah, awesomesauce! I drafted Eddie Lacy way ahead of when he should go!

Shocker, you're wrong yet again.

Lacy is the #1 RB in PPR in his last 4 games (when you began your incoherent tirade in here). The other guy you blasted, Ingram, has been great as well. You're clueless.

Yeah, I have ODB, Thomas, Gordon, Brees, and Gronk on my team.

Shut the #### up, #######. And stop following me.

eta* And Gore. And C.J. And Mason. And McKinnon. And DET. And Prater. Shhhh...

Your 1.05 RB benefits from bounty. Good job. I said I'd stay out of the Ingram thread, and have. Go home, fly.

What do you know, you're wrong again. You're the clown who started trolling me with this post.

Way to brag about that mediocre team btw.

Yeah, and I'd left and said I wouldn't come back. And you have to do this.

I play in a sixteen (now down to fourteen) team league usually, you fool. I'm #1 overall in points. By eighty of them. And #1 HTH.

Have fun with your trolling. You're on ignore from now on. You can't even acquit yourself with dignity in the FFA.

Cheers.

And here you go. #32

You started trolling me about Lacy and Ingram for some reason, and they've both made you look like an absolute fool- I barely had to do anything. Now you get all butt-hurt when I point out just how wrong you were. Oh, well.

You're such a Bama #####.

url

 

[Reegus]

Larry? Where are you? Someone post the missing picture.

 

[humpback]

Yeah, awesomesauce! I drafted Eddie Lacy way ahead of when he should go!

Shocker, you're wrong yet again.

Lacy is the #1 RB in PPR in his last 4 games (when you began your incoherent tirade in here). The other guy you blasted, Ingram, has been great as well. You're clueless.

Yeah, I have ODB, Thomas, Gordon, Brees, and Gronk on my team.

Shut the #### up, #######. And stop following me.

eta* And Gore. And C.J. And Mason. And McKinnon. And DET. And Prater. Shhhh...

Your 1.05 RB benefits from bounty. Good job. I said I'd stay out of the Ingram thread, and have. Go home, fly.

What do you know, you're wrong again. You're the clown who started trolling me with this post.

Way to brag about that mediocre team btw.

Yeah, and I'd left and said I wouldn't come back. And you have to do this.

I play in a sixteen (now down to fourteen) team league usually, you fool. I'm #1 overall in points. By eighty of them. And #1 HTH.

Have fun with your trolling. You're on ignore from now on. You can't even acquit yourself with dignity in the FFA.

Cheers.

And here you go. #32

You started trolling me about Lacy and Ingram for some reason, and they've both made you look like an absolute fool- I barely had to do anything. Now you get all butt-hurt when I point out just how wrong you were. Oh, well.

You're such a Bama #####.

url

It's like you're trying to be more incorrect with each post. I'm not a Bama fan in the slightest, I've been blasting Richardson forever in that thread, and I don't even own Lacy. However, unlike you I actually have a clue about football, and I know that Lacy and Ingram are pretty good RBs.

So clueless.

 

[rockaction]

Yeah, awesomesauce! I drafted Eddie Lacy way ahead of when he should go!

Shocker, you're wrong yet again.

Lacy is the #1 RB in PPR in his last 4 games (when you began your incoherent tirade in here). The other guy you blasted, Ingram, has been great as well. You're clueless.

Yeah, I have ODB, Thomas, Gordon, Brees, and Gronk on my team.

Shut the #### up, #######. And stop following me.

eta* And Gore. And C.J. And Mason. And McKinnon. And DET. And Prater. Shhhh...

Your 1.05 RB benefits from bounty. Good job. I said I'd stay out of the Ingram thread, and have. Go home, fly.

What do you know, you're wrong again. You're the clown who started trolling me with this post.

Way to brag about that mediocre team btw.

Yeah, and I'd left and said I wouldn't come back. And you have to do this.

I play in a sixteen (now down to fourteen) team league usually, you fool. I'm #1 overall in points. By eighty of them. And #1 HTH.

Have fun with your trolling. You're on ignore from now on. You can't even acquit yourself with dignity in the FFA.

Cheers.

And here you go. #32

You started trolling me about Lacy and Ingram for some reason, and they've both made you look like an absolute fool- I barely had to do anything. Now you get all butt-hurt when I point out just how wrong you were. Oh, well.

You're such a Bama #####.

url

It's like you're trying to be more incorrect with each post. I'm not a Bama fan in the slightest, I've been blasting Richardson forever in that thread, and I don't even own Lacy. However, unlike you I actually have a clue about football, and I know that Lacy and Ingram are pretty good RBs.

So clueless.

Keep taking Lacy at 1.05 and see how you do.

 

[unckeyherb]

Yeah, awesomesauce! I drafted Eddie Lacy way ahead of when he should go!

Shocker, you're wrong yet again.Lacy is the #1 RB in PPR in his last 4 games (when you began your incoherent tirade in here). The other guy you blasted, Ingram, has been great as well. You're clueless.

Yeah, I have ODB, Thomas, Gordon, Brees, and Gronk on my team.

Shut the #### up, #######. And stop following me.

eta* And Gore. And C.J. And Mason. And McKinnon. And DET. And Prater. Shhhh...

Your 1.05 RB benefits from bounty. Good job. I said I'd stay out of the Ingram thread, and have. Go home, fly.

What do you know, you're wrong again. You're the clown who started trolling me with this post.Way to brag about that mediocre team btw.

Yeah, and I'd left and said I wouldn't come back. And you have to do this.

I play in a sixteen (now down to fourteen) team league usually, you fool. I'm #1 overall in points. By eighty of them. And #1 HTH.

Have fun with your trolling. You're on ignore from now on. You can't even acquit yourself with dignity in the FFA.

Cheers.

And here you go. #32

You started trolling me about Lacy and Ingram for some reason, and they've both made you look like an absolute fool- I barely had to do anything. Now you get all butt-hurt when I point out just how wrong you were. Oh, well.

You're such a Bama #####.

url

Just because Larry tucked tail and ran far from this thread doesn't mean we need another terrible poster in here. Just sayin.

 

[rockaction]

Just because Larry tucked tail and ran far from this thread doesn't mean we need another terrible poster in here. Just sayin.

Keep taking Lacy at 1.05 and get back to me on how you do in your leeg.

 

[unckeyherb]

Ok I kept him and I'm first in my league. Next question?

 

[sho nuff]

Both leagues I have lacy in...I am rolling along just fine.

There are not many RBs that are just going to keep getting that many carries down the stretch.

To even argue against him at this point just is horrible.