What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Anyone want a pet dire wolf? (1 Viewer)

There are many movies that point out in painful detail why this is a bad idea.

You'd figure that people who are smart enough to use DNA to reverse engineer an animal would be smart enough to know why you shouldn't do that.

But we have a front-row seat to the end times here in Thoughtlessland™, a place where you can get limitless popcorn for free ninety-nine, so everybody relax and get comfortable before the animals bite our faces off.
 
Just because you can . . .
I think everyone in the world saw Jurassic Park and yet almost nobody learned a thing from it.

I didn't know whether to laugh or cry with the emoji. I mean, it was a huge blockbuster and I thought it taught a pretty clear lesson and sent a pretty effective message. Welp. Guess I was wrong.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
People are so ____________ that most probably walked away from the movie thinking, "oh heck yeah we need to actually make dinosaurs that was awesome". It's actually impressive how consistently people engage with art and walk away with the polar opposite message that was intended.
 
Last edited:
All they did was take a grey wolf and splice in a few gene edits that have been recovered from dire wolves. Specifically they edited the color and the genes that control for size.

This hybrid does not have same genome as dire wolf.


This thing is still a grey wolf, similar to how their wooly mouse with a couple wooly mammoth gene edits was just a mouse and not a wooly mammoth.

This technology is how we make GMO, except we typically grab from non-extinct species.

No science fiction risk.
 
All in. My first "dog" was a Wolf hybrid. Amazing animal. Always thought it be cool to have big dogs since we already have big cats.
 
Just because you can . . .
Laughing because I just gave a presentation where my theme was "there is a large difference between what you can do... and what you should do."

I'm just disappointed that we couldn't work a voir dire pun in there somehow.
Sorry but I can post this.

Damn, that ended too soon. I was looking forward to the Pesci/Tomei questioning/testimony part.
 
Dire wolves werent even wolves and from their own press release all they did was add in 15 genes from a dire wolf to a grey wolf. Which is a major accomplishment, however it is still a wolf. There are 2000+ spots to edit on the genome and editing a few does not change the species.





From their own press release:

Colossal has made 20 unique precision germline edits including 15 edits from the ancient gene variants

 
Just because you can . . .
Laughing because I just gave a presentation where my theme was "there is a large difference between what you can do... and what you should do."

I'm just disappointed that we couldn't work a voir dire pun in there somehow.
Sorry but I can post this.

Damn, that ended too soon. I was looking forward to the Pesci/Tomei questioning/testimony part.
I've probably watched the movie at least 5 times
 
Just because you can . . .
Laughing because I just gave a presentation where my theme was "there is a large difference between what you can do... and what you should do."

I'm just disappointed that we couldn't work a voir dire pun in there somehow.
Sorry but I can post this.

Damn, that ended too soon. I was looking forward to the Pesci/Tomei questioning/testimony part.
I love the, "that explains the hostility" joke from the judge.
 
Pretty much what I have already posted a few times, but from a science site:


I suspect when they get good enough at this, the 'de-extincted' species will be so close to the original that it's an irrelevant question that is only of philosophical interest.
 
Pretty much what I have already posted a few times, but from a science site:


I suspect when they get good enough at this, the 'de-extincted' species will be so close to the original that it's an irrelevant question that is only of philosophical interest.
Yes, but with caveats.

You have to keep the genome close enough that it can be carried to term in a surrogate. It might not be possible to create the species as it existed just because no animals are close enough to it today.

And I believe that this was the most segments that were edited in a genome and survived and they are only 1% of the way there.
 
Last edited:
this technology is in its infancy. 50 years from now could be a very different world. I hope govts can manage this. I'm mostly concerned with the bioengineering of human, particularly in counties with moral standards that are not equivalent to ours.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top