What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Archuleta in danger of being benched (1 Viewer)

Weiner Dog said:
redman said:
Archuleta may prove to be the worst free agent signing in Redskins history. And that's saying something. Seems to me he's worse than Ryan Clark for three times the price.
Could be......but Lloyd and Randel El's combined $50+mm in contracts (with $20+mm guaranteed), 357 yards and 1 TD through eight games are making a serious push for the title.
Honestly, there's no comparison between those two guys and AA. Randle El has been a spark for that team as a PR and as a WR, and has been great as a WR3. That's not translated into fantasy points, but the team loves him. Lloyd is simply underutilized, but he has shown that he should be used more. He's even doing little things that help, such as his block out on the edge of Portis' rushing TD that sprung him. I think he'll be fine.

AA flat out sucks. He's gotten every opportunity to perform and simply can't do it.
I feel like we're disagreeing over which diaper smells worse. :D Arculeta was a free-agent signing (...and a terrible free agent signing, at that). The Skins paid too much $$$ for a position that does not dictate such an outlay. Lloyd, however, was not only given a large contract extension, but the Skins also gave a 3rd in '06 and a 4th in '07 to acquire him. To give Lloyd a "he's underuitilized" hall-pass when he's on target for 380 yards and no scores is :X .

To make matters worse, you would think either Lloyd or Randel El would have stepped-up their game with Santana Moss out this past week. The result?? A combined 26 yards receiving between the two. When James Thrash is doubling the receiving totals for your two prized WR signings, there are major problems with the coaching and/or front office.
First off, Randle El has only done positive things for this team. Mainly on special teams, which is a big reason they signed him. He also threw a deep pass on Sunday that warranted a huge pass interference call. Its more than just fantasy stats. Lloyd on the other hand has not done much, but he hasn't done anything to hurt the team. He hasn't dropped easy passes or anything like that. Its not his fault they aren't throwing the ball his way. I do think there are some problems and a tug of war going on with the offense. Again Archuleta has actually hurt this team, while neither of the two wideouts has hurt the team and Randle El has helped. Case closed.
 
Weiner Dog said:
I feel like we're disagreeing over which diaper smells worse. :D

Arculeta was a free-agent signing (...and a terrible free agent signing, at that). The Skins paid too much $$$ for a position that does not dictate such an outlay. Lloyd, however, was not only given a large contract extension, but the Skins also gave a 3rd in '06 and a 4th in '07 to acquire him. To give Lloyd a "he's underuitilized" hall-pass when he's on target for 380 yards and no scores is :X .

To make matters worse, you would think either Lloyd or Randel El would have stepped-up their game with Santana Moss out this past week. The result?? A combined 26 yards receiving between the two. When James Thrash is doubling the receiving totals for your two prized WR signings, there are major problems with the coaching and/or front office.
I stand by what I said about ARE and Lloyd. To understand what I'm getting at, especially as to Lloyd's underutilization, you need to understand that his deep routes either are getting safety coverage up top forcing Brunell to throw underneath (e.g. the Houston game), or he's running free but Brunell's still not throwing to him. Lloyd yesterday, BTW, had a great catch downfield nullified by a very questionable holding penalty. Honestly, Lloyd's not the problem; it's a combo of Brunell always looking for Moss and the coaching staff not calling plays very well - although yesterday's play-calling was an improvement. There are more fundamental problems that need to be sorted out with this offense before we can really judge Lloyd's and ARE's value.
Also, Lloyd drew an important PI call on Roy Williams. It's also important to note that ARE was the one who threw the ball on that PI. ARE and Lloyd combined for the Redskins biggest gain of the day.
 
Weiner Dog said:
redman said:
Archuleta may prove to be the worst free agent signing in Redskins history. And that's saying something. Seems to me he's worse than Ryan Clark for three times the price.
Could be......but Lloyd and Randel El's combined $50+mm in contracts (with $20+mm guaranteed), 357 yards and 1 TD through eight games are making a serious push for the title.
Honestly, there's no comparison between those two guys and AA. Randle El has been a spark for that team as a PR and as a WR, and has been great as a WR3. That's not translated into fantasy points, but the team loves him. Lloyd is simply underutilized, but he has shown that he should be used more. He's even doing little things that help, such as his block out on the edge of Portis' rushing TD that sprung him. I think he'll be fine.

AA flat out sucks. He's gotten every opportunity to perform and simply can't do it.
I feel like we're disagreeing over which diaper smells worse. :D Arculeta was a free-agent signing (...and a terrible free agent signing, at that). The Skins paid too much $$$ for a position that does not dictate such an outlay. Lloyd, however, was not only given a large contract extension, but the Skins also gave a 3rd in '06 and a 4th in '07 to acquire him. To give Lloyd a "he's underuitilized" hall-pass when he's on target for 380 yards and no scores is :X .

To make matters worse, you would think either Lloyd or Randel El would have stepped-up their game with Santana Moss out this past week. The result?? A combined 26 yards receiving between the two. When James Thrash is doubling the receiving totals for your two prized WR signings, there are major problems with the coaching and/or front office.
First off, Randle El has only done positive things for this team. Mainly on special teams, which is a big reason they signed him. He also threw a deep pass on Sunday that warranted a huge pass interference call. Its more than just fantasy stats. Lloyd on the other hand has not done much, but he hasn't done anything to hurt the team. He hasn't dropped easy passes or anything like that. Its not his fault they aren't throwing the ball his way. I do think there are some problems and a tug of war going on with the offense. Again Archuleta has actually hurt this team, while neither of the two wideouts has hurt the team and Randle El has helped. Case closed.
Fess up. Is this Antwaan?? :bye: WR's are not given $20mm+ contracts to play special teams and block downfield. Randle El and Lloyd were specifically signed to jump-start the Skins lagging passing game from '05. The result?? The Skins are sitting at 3-5 (probably 2-6 if TO didn't drop last week's bomb from Romo) and averaging the same yards/game and on pace for nine less receiving TD's. What's the excuse?? The team has the same QB, RB, TE, and OL PLUS added a top-shelf OC?? The one difference in this year's offense is the tag-team combo of Randel El and Lloyd.

With a straight face, how can you say the two wideouts have not hurt their team?? :confused:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think redman's statement is a relevant one. You're arguing with 3 guys who have watched every minute of every redskins game this year. You're just looking up stats.

Was Randle El overpaid? Yes, sure he was, considering they signed him as a special teamer/#3 wideout. But again, he is at least giving them something positive. Archuleta has only given something negative to the skins and the redskins made a larger investment in him. Furthermore, as I stated before, SS was not a position of need given that the alternative was resigning Ryan Clark for 1/3, maybe 1/4 of the cost of Archuleta. At wideout we had no options and it was a position of need.

How can I say the two wideouts have not hurt the team? Because they have not. There have not been any dropped passes, or 15 yard penalties (save for the bogus call on Randle El's td celebration at Indy). As Redman said, the Skins have not thrown the ball downfield with regularity, and that for one is where Lloyd is most dangerous. His number just has not been called. A combination of the Redskins oline, play calling and quarterback play have all hurt the redskins offense this year. Brandon Lloyd has not hurt it and Randle El has actually helped as a #3 WR and as arguably the best punt returner in football. Did they overpay for Randle El? Yes. But at least he will help the team. Lloyd has been underutilized to this point, so he can't really be judged. Again, Archuleta is making more than either of the 2 guys and he's getting benched for Troy Vincent who has been with the team for 2 weeks. He has been awful this year. If the Redskins sign Freddie Mitchell off of the street and he moves himself ahead of Lloyd or Randel El on the depth chart, then we can compare. Until then, there is really no argument on who is the worst signing of the 3.

 
With a straight face, how can you say the two wideouts have not hurt their team?? :confused:
Financially, it can be argued (as you have) that ARE and Lloyd hurt the team. But on the field and in the locker room, both of these guys have improved the team, and there is still room for more improvement.I still say it's too early to definitively declare either salaries as detremental to the future success of the team.But I wear burgundy and gold colored glasses, so...grain of salt, anyone? :D
 
I would add that Randle El's punt returning skills are so good that he's worth about a 10-yard completion on average for every possession following a punt just from that. I don't think you've seen the best that these receivers have to offer on offense by a long shot. Of interest, I found this on the extremeskins.com message board which I found interesting:

On his (Lloyd's) weekly radio show with Bram he mentioned the difference with Santana not being there. The defense actually did not play much zone and instead focused more on stopping Portis and stacking the box. In many of the games so far the defense has actually been using a coverage to take away Moss and Lloyd and there speed, and it seemed everyone was copying this.With Moss out they let up on the coverages and thus Mark was able to pass more. The one thing I noticed is the OL was great as far as pass coverage yesterday and Mark did not just stay with the first read because he was about to get hit or sacked, he was able to go through all the reads and find the open WR.
 
argh, forgot to add my question: How do the homers see Sean Taylor's role changing with the switch from Archuleta to Vincent? Will he make more/less/same impact as an IDP in fantasy leagues? TIA for any opinions.

 
argh, forgot to add my question: How do the homers see Sean Taylor's role changing with the switch from Archuleta to Vincent? Will he make more/less/same impact as an IDP in fantasy leagues? TIA for any opinions.
I would not expect any drastic change from him; perhaps his tackles per game go up slightly given that Vincent is not the force in the run defense that Archuleta (a tackling machine) is, but that's about it. That defense loves to play Taylor deep, in the "centerfield" position, and to rely upon his athleticism and opportunism to provide deep pass support or to run upfield from there to make tackles. He's a pretty classic free safety who rarely plays inside the box like strong safeties do.
 
Let's get back to the point, which is Archuleta and the defense.

Here's a great article from today's Washington Post on how they plan to use him from here on out.

Same Position, but Different Jobs

Roles on Redskins Change For Vincent and Archuleta

By Howard Bryant

Washington Post Staff Writer

Tuesday, November 7, 2006; E01

In the short term of the Washington Redskins' season, it is unlikely that a single event has embellished the fates of two men more than what occurred in the waning seconds to Redskins safeties Adam Archuleta and Troy Vincent on Sunday.

Vincent, playing in only his second game as a member of the Redskins, was the hero in the wild 22-19 win over Dallas, blocking the field goal attempt with six seconds left that first kept the Redskins from losing a heartbreaking game and then led them to a stunning win, when fellow safety Sean Taylor picked up the loose ball and ran 30 yards, setting up Nick Novak's winning 47-yard field goal.

Had Vincent not interceded, the lasting image of Sunday afternoon would not have been the elation that at least for one afternoon elevated a slumping team but of a loss caused by the return of a constant nemesis: the Redskins' inability to defend the deep middle part of the field.

With 13 seconds left in a tie game, Dallas tight end Jason Witten beat Archuleta down the right hash mark for a 28-yard catch from quarterback Tony Romo that for the moment appeared to set up the winning field goal for the Cowboys.

Those two plays in the final seconds seemed to take on a certain symbolism, for that day assistant head coach-defense Gregg Williams replaced Archuleta with Vincent in the starting lineup. It marked Williams's first major change of the season in his defensive lineup and was the first time this season that Archuleta, the safety the Redskins signed to a six-year, $30-million contract with $10 million guaranteed -- the biggest contract for a safety in NFL history -- did not start a game for the Redskins.

Archuleta, who was not at Redskins Park yesterday, was unavailable for comment and his agent did not return a call seeking comment.

Archuleta's play clearly is not the only reason the Redskins have given up so many big plays -- teams have thrown at safety Sean Taylor, targeted every cornerback and linebacker on the roster, and the inability of the defensive line to produce consistent pressure has left the secondary vulnerable -- but during the bye week Williams began devising a new role for him and unveiled it Sunday.

It appears that Archuleta's new role will be closer to the line of scrimmage, where he can shut down the run and blitz the quarterback. Against Dallas, when Williams employed a 3-2-6 formation, he used Archuleta as a third safety, in his words a cross between a linebacker and safety. Of Archuleta's skill set, pass coverage -- especially in the Redskins' scheme where a safety is asked to cover deep patches of the field while still reacting to run coverage -- represents his weakest area.

"We need to put players in the best situations for them and Adam needs to be around the box more, and we finally have the personnel situation where I can get him around the box more," Williams said. "We blitzed several times and he was close to getting there. And we'll continue to do that. He's like that hybrid safety, hybrid linebacker and we're going to get him around the line of scrimmage as much as we can."

If the move was not a repudiation of Archuleta, who has struggled finding his rhythm and place in his first season in Washington, it underscored the need for change in the defensive secondary beyond merely having its best players healthy. Sunday's game was the first time the Redskins put their projected lineup on the field since the first preseason game against Cincinnati on Aug. 13, but Williams nevertheless felt he needed to sit Archuleta in favor of Vincent.

Vincent does not refer to himself as replacing Archuleta or succeeding him. He says this because it is unfair to a teammate, and because after being in the NFL for 15 years, he says the worst mistake a player can make is to turn the good fortune of one game into a mandate.

"I'm not the answer. I just want to be a piece to the puzzle," he said. "I don't take anything for granted, and I have to earn my position every single day, not just on Sundays but Wednesdays, Thursdays and Fridays, making sure my teammates know they can hold me accountable because I'm going to hold them accountable."

Within days of Vincent's signing, a coming change was obvious. Vincent replaced Archuleta in key passing situations in a 36-22 loss to Indianapolis on Oct. 22, even though he had practiced just twice with the team. Entering Sunday, the Redskins had given up more pass plays of 40 yards or more than any team in football. Only the Green Bay Packers had given up more plays of 30 yards or more. A disturbing percentage of those plays had occurred over the middle of the field, between the hash marks.

And Sunday, Vincent was in the seam when Terrell Owens got past him for what -- had Owens not dropped the ball -- would have been a game-breaking 74-yard touchdown.

During yesterday's news conference, Coach Joe Gibbs said Archuleta plays in numerous defensive packages. Yet, there is no question Archuleta's playing time in passing situations has decreased since the arrival of Vincent.

"I don't think he's just in the box. I think he's doing quite a bit of stuff for us," Gibbs said. "He's our captain on our punt return. I think he plays all the things. He plays in the secondary in coverage. I think what Troy brings to the table is someone who has a lot of experience and can make a lot of the calls, and is very sharp."
I'd liken his situation going forward to that of Brian Dawkins, who this year for the first time is inserted into the lineup as a LB during passing situations.
 
argh, forgot to add my question: How do the homers see Sean Taylor's role changing with the switch from Archuleta to Vincent? Will he make more/less/same impact as an IDP in fantasy leagues? TIA for any opinions.
I would not expect any drastic change from him; perhaps his tackles per game go up slightly given that Vincent is not the force in the run defense that Archuleta (a tackling machine) is, but that's about it. That defense loves to play Taylor deep, in the "centerfield" position, and to rely upon his athleticism and opportunism to provide deep pass support or to run upfield from there to make tackles. He's a pretty classic free safety who rarely plays inside the box like strong safeties do.
Agreed. They didn't appear to use him any differently this week.He's having his best tackle season yet, though. He's on pace for 80-30. He has 25-9 in his last four games.
 
I'd liken his situation going forward to that of Brian Dawkins, who this year for the first time is inserted into the lineup as a LB during passing situations.
That sounds about right -- if he plays in the base defense. You guys have been pasting so many good articles that I'm not sure where I read it, but I'm pretty certain there's a quote somewhere that says Archuleta would be used in this nickel package only for now.Archuleta played a similar role under Lovie Smith in St. Louis when the Rams lost all their 195 pound LBs to injury a few years ago and thrived. He may get some value back after all if he plays on all downs in a run support/pass rush role. This week, I'm pretty sure the Skins would've been in a nickel package frequently with all the three WR sets (including Crayton and Witten) the Cowboys ran. It'll be interesting to see how much he plays against the Eagles, who will probably spread the field out a good bit too.
 
I think redman's statement is a relevant one. You're arguing with 3 guys who have watched every minute of every redskins game this year. You're just looking up stats. Was Randle El overpaid? Yes, sure he was, considering they signed him as a special teamer/#3 wideout. But again, he is at least giving them something positive. Archuleta has only given something negative to the skins and the redskins made a larger investment in him. Furthermore, as I stated before, SS was not a position of need given that the alternative was resigning Ryan Clark for 1/3, maybe 1/4 of the cost of Archuleta. At wideout we had no options and it was a position of need. How can I say the two wideouts have not hurt the team? Because they have not. There have not been any dropped passes, or 15 yard penalties (save for the bogus call on Randle El's td celebration at Indy). As Redman said, the Skins have not thrown the ball downfield with regularity, and that for one is where Lloyd is most dangerous. His number just has not been called. A combination of the Redskins oline, play calling and quarterback play have all hurt the redskins offense this year. Brandon Lloyd has not hurt it and Randle El has actually helped as a #3 WR and as arguably the best punt returner in football. Did they overpay for Randle El? Yes. But at least he will help the team. Lloyd has been underutilized to this point, so he can't really be judged. Again, Archuleta is making more than either of the 2 guys and he's getting benched for Troy Vincent who has been with the team for 2 weeks. He has been awful this year. If the Redskins sign Freddie Mitchell off of the street and he moves himself ahead of Lloyd or Randel El on the depth chart, then we can compare. Until then, there is really no argument on who is the worst signing of the 3.
Dude, you can watch the leg-kicks of every Skins cheerleader for all I care. Facts are facts. The Skins spent BIG $$$ (...and multiple mid-round picks) for Lloyd and Randel El to give their offense a boost. What happened?? The Skins offense went from averaging 22.4 pts/game in '05 to a current scoring average of 20.2 pts/game. More importantly, the Skins are on pace for a 6-10 record after going 10-6 last year with a playoff birth. To say Lloyd and Randel El have not hurt the team b/c they have not dropped balls or had 15-yard penalties is simply letting them off the hook too easily. Their job is to get open and make plays.Heck...give me $20mm+ and I'll stand on the line of scrimmage and promise not to jump offside.
 
Wiener Dog, after repeated criticism from you about how the Redskins do business from a personnel standpoint, we get it that you don't approve. Whatever.

I think it goes beyond that, however, given your insistence on bashing the signings of two offensive players in a IDP forum thread who don't even play defense and aren't the subject of the thread. I've posted in other places that Saunders, Brunell and the offensive line are/have been - in order - the three things most responsible for the Redskins' offensive woes.

You want to pile on about Lloyd and ARE. Fine. You have yet to make the case (or even attempt it) that ARE's and Lloyd's lack of productivity has nothing to do with those three things. When you can do that and make sense, I'll start taking your arguments seriously.

 
Heck...give me $20mm+ and I'll stand on the line of scrimmage and promise not to jump offside.
Well thats a ridiculous comment given that we've already discussed the real problems with the offense; oline, play calling and brunell. Coming from 2 redskins homers, I think you lack actual insight into the situation, so listen up. But to address you're comment, again, Archuleta has been benched, Lloyd and Randel El have maintained their place on the depth chart. So archuleta has a contract worth more than either WR and he's standing on the sidelines, not even on the line of scrimmage! Randle El is not even in the conversation of worst Redskins signings in my opinion. I'm not saying he was a great signing given his contract, but at least he's contributed to some of the team's bigger plays this year, which have been few and far between in the passing game, end of story!
 
Yet another WaPost article on Arch:

Archuleta Struggles to Find Place With Redskins

By Howard Bryant

Washington Post Staff Writer

Tuesday, November 7, 2006; 4:28 PM

On March 11, Adam Archuleta, Antwaan Randle El, Todd Collins and Andre Carter were welcomed in style by the Washington Redskins coaches and upper management, including owner Daniel Snyder. A multiple-limousine convoy shuttled the group to Morton's for filet mignon and seafood, and to a Washington Wizards game at MCI Center, their faces shown on the giant scoreboard drawing a standing ovation.

It was a glittering evening in an off-season that stoked expectations, a moment of smart-spending muscle that would be remembered when the Redskins met those expectations on the field.

Archuleta was the handpicked choice of assistant head coach -- defense Gregg Williams, but those days in March when he would brainstorm with Williams until the late hours -- a courtship that culminated in a six-year, $30 million contract with $10 million guaranteed, a record for a safety -- have been the high point for him in Washington.

He has since lost his starting safety job to newly acquired Troy Vincent and with it much of his playing time. Yesterday at Redskins Park, Archuleta spoke for the first time in detail about losing his starting job as well as his difficult adjustment to no longer being merely a member of a football team, but a high-profile free agent signing whose every move on the field is scrutinized.

"It's been an up and down year. I wasn't born with a silver spoon in my mouth. I've had a lot of adversity thrown my way. And for whatever reason, this is the situation that presented itself. This is the way things are meant to be," Archuleta said. "It's just a matter of me getting back to who I am and what's important to me and playing the game the way I see it, through my eyes and not through someone else's, and it will work out."

Some of what Archuleta said yesterday was guarded; he was clearly unwilling to engage beyond a certain level of detail. In Sunday's win against Dallas, Archuleta played mostly in third-down, six-defensive back passing situations while Vincent played at safety in the base and five defensive back formations, with Kenny Wright as the nickel back. Archuleta said it was painful to not be on the field as a regular for the first time in his eight-game Redskins career.

"Yeah, that's an understatement, but this is the way things are meant to be," he said. "I've always had detractors and people trying to pull me down my whole life, and this is one more thing. To me, it's one more obstacle, and this will make me a better player, a stronger player. And you better believe I will come back and play the way I'm capable of playing."

In a sense, Archuleta has become the symbol of a high-priced but underachieving defense. He was the only regular to lose his starting position, though the defense has been leaky in numerous areas, especially the pass rush. No team in football has produced fewer sacks per play than the Redskins.

After Sunday's win, the Redskins' rankings in pass defense dropped again. The Redskins were 26th in total defense entering the game and are now 30th, ahead of the 4-4 New York Jets and 2-6 Tennessee Titans. Of the 19 defensive categories the league charts, the Redskins are 29th or worse in six, including last in passing yards against, interceptions and sacks per pass play.

The Redskins, a top 10 defense the last two years, rank in the top ten in but one column: net punting average.

Numerous Redskins players believe Archuleta is playing with a broken confidence, unused to his circumstances andf or his part, he appeared to intimate that he may be scrutinized more for his deficiencies, yet made no excuses.

"Every player has strengths and weaknesses, and in my opinion and in the opinion of a lot of other people, I excel underneath," he said. "A lot of people said, and I've come under a lot criticism over my career that I can't cover, that I can't do this and I can't do that. Do I agree with it? No. Are there a lot of other safeties who are better in the passing game than me? Absolutely.

"Unfortunately, our secondary has given up some big plays this year and I've been a part of that," he said. "But ultimately, it's my responsibility."
It sounds like he's essentially the dime back when they run with 6 DB's, and that on top of that he's going to likely be playing within 10-15 yards of the line of scrimmage during those situations.
 
"I thought I was in good shape, but I didn't make the play," Archuleta said softly. "Guys were busting their butts all game, and I let everybody down. [The blocked field goal] was a big relief, but in the back of your mind, you're thinking, 'Why couldn't I make the big play?' I'm going through a lot of stuff right now. There's a lot being thrown at me. What's going to matter is how I respond."
A quote from a different article in the Washington Times. I actually feel bad for the guy. Sounds like it really is a mental thing with the guy. Regardless, fantasy wise, I'm not going near the guy, just like I'm not going near another pissing contest with weiner.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/sports/2006...24239-1602r.htm

 
southeastjerome said:
"I thought I was in good shape, but I didn't make the play," Archuleta said softly. "Guys were busting their butts all game, and I let everybody down. [The blocked field goal] was a big relief, but in the back of your mind, you're thinking, 'Why couldn't I make the big play?' I'm going through a lot of stuff right now. There's a lot being thrown at me. What's going to matter is how I respond."
...just like I'm not going near another pissing contest with weiner.
I only thank the high Heavens I did not reference the $30mm Andre Carter signing. You'd probably be pimping him for not jumping offsides or spilling Gatorade on the sidelines.I know Skins fans want to throw Brunell under the bus, but the guy is enjoying the highest QB rating of his 13-year career. Campbell could not resurrect the mess we see today.

 
southeastjerome said:
"I thought I was in good shape, but I didn't make the play," Archuleta said softly. "Guys were busting their butts all game, and I let everybody down. [The blocked field goal] was a big relief, but in the back of your mind, you're thinking, 'Why couldn't I make the big play?' I'm going through a lot of stuff right now. There's a lot being thrown at me. What's going to matter is how I respond."
...just like I'm not going near another pissing contest with weiner.
I only thank the high Heavens I did not reference the $30mm Andre Carter signing. You'd probably be pimping him for not jumping offsides or spilling Gatorade on the sidelines.
ah ah ah ahi'm glad that the Redskins have picked up our garbage "Carter & LLoyd" :thumbup:
 
southeastjerome said:
"I thought I was in good shape, but I didn't make the play," Archuleta said softly. "Guys were busting their butts all game, and I let everybody down. [The blocked field goal] was a big relief, but in the back of your mind, you're thinking, 'Why couldn't I make the big play?' I'm going through a lot of stuff right now. There's a lot being thrown at me. What's going to matter is how I respond."
...just like I'm not going near another pissing contest with weiner.
I only thank the high Heavens I did not reference the $30mm Andre Carter signing. You'd probably be pimping him for not jumping offsides or spilling Gatorade on the sidelines.
ah ah ah ahi'm glad that the Redskins have picked up our garbage "Carter & LLoyd" :thumbup:
Dana <cough><cough> StubbenfieldThe Skins paid him top-coin after his monster '97 season.
 
Definately Stubblefield (not stubbenfield) was a big bust. Carter doesn't look like a good signing either. I'm not disagreeing with you there. You're making no points, you toss out there bad signings, and yes there are many, but you're making no argument that comes close to saying why any of these signings are worse than Archuleta! In my opinion Stubbs is the only argument vs. Archuleta right now. Again, how can you argue against the guy being the worst? The skins paid him a record contract, for a safety. I'll say that again, a record contract for a safety and he's on the bench after 7 games, and its not due to injury. Take it to the bank %^&*@! dog!

It's easy for brunell to have a decent rating, he doesn't throw the ball deep ever. Go look up some more stats! Actually, if you want to check look up some more stats to support your argument instead of watching the games, look up the spread of where Brunell is throwing the ball. You'll find that it is not deep outside, where Lloyd is strongest. When he throws the ball downfield, it is usually in or around the hash marks, not near the sidelines, again where Lloyd flourishes. I don't know if this is on Brunell or on the play calling, but the Redskins offense has become so predictable and seems to call the wrong play pretty often. But again, you know more than the homer's do. Bong!

 
I thought Al Saunders' offense is all about throwing the ball deep and attacking downfield? Why is Brunell not throwing deep more? He certainly has the weapons. Did he lose his arm strength again like in 2004?

 
I thought Al Saunders' offense is all about throwing the ball deep and attacking downfield? Why is Brunell not throwing deep more? He certainly has the weapons. Did he lose his arm strength again like in 2004?
Brunell's arm strength looks good. He throws a pretty ball when he steps into it (and to be clear, his arm has never had problems; it was a leg injury in 2004 that messed up his throwing). The problem is a combination of Brunell's hesitation to take risks (possibly a holdover effect of Gibbs' admonishment that a QB must first and foremost protect the football), the fact that most defenses they've faced have played their safeties back in deep zones, and what I believe has been poor play calling that has not played to the strength of the offense and that has, as a consequence, put Brunell and the o-line into unfavorable game situations when asked to pass. Notably, with Moss out the Cowboys on Sunday played more people up in the box and put their secondary into man coverage a lot, and not coincidentally more throws were attempted and completed farther downfield. I think they'll rededicate themselves to running, and the offense will open up a bit once that's established. The primary reason why I fault Saunders is that he's tried to have a power running team become more of a finesse team that passes more and runs more draws and outside runs. It hasn't been a good fit, and I think they're starting to change that.
 
wow......

One week after being benched in favor of S Troy Vincent, S Adam Archuleta saw zero snaps on defense against Philadelphia.

Archuleta played plenty of special teams, but didn't see the field when the Redskins were on defense.

has this guy some value in a dinasty ??

there's a hope that Joe "retarted" Gibbs & co. will get fired next year ?

:confused:

 
wow......

One week after being benched in favor of S Troy Vincent, S Adam Archuleta saw zero snaps on defense against Philadelphia.

Archuleta played plenty of special teams, but didn't see the field when the Redskins were on defense.

has this guy some value in a dinasty ??

there's a hope that Joe "retarted" Gibbs & co. will get fired next year ?

:confused:
Nice article here explaining how the in-the-box safety is becoming extinct.

LINK

 
Last edited by a moderator:
wow......

One week after being benched in favor of S Troy Vincent, S Adam Archuleta saw zero snaps on defense against Philadelphia.

Archuleta played plenty of special teams, but didn't see the field when the Redskins were on defense.

has this guy some value in a dinasty ??

there's a hope that Joe "retarted" Gibbs & co. will get fired next year ?

:confused:
Nice article here explaining how the in-the-box safety is becoming extinct.

LINK
Think I saw something similar to that a couple of weeks ago in the FBG IDP content... ;)
 
wow......

One week after being benched in favor of S Troy Vincent, S Adam Archuleta saw zero snaps on defense against Philadelphia.

Archuleta played plenty of special teams, but didn't see the field when the Redskins were on defense.

has this guy some value in a dinasty ??

there's a hope that Joe "retarted" Gibbs & co. will get fired next year ?

:confused:
Nice article here explaining how the in-the-box safety is becoming extinct.

LINK
Think I saw something similar to that a couple of weeks ago in the FBG IDP content... ;)
Ya gettin the feeling I like this article ... :lmao:
 
why don't the Skins just make him a LB if he's such a liability in coverage?
I actually saw him once in nickel coverage playing in the area of a MLB.But, when Vincent went out with an injury yesterday, Archuleta is not who replaced him. Vernon Fox came in.From Archuleta's agent:
"Adam has been made to be a scapegoat," Wichard said in a telephone interview after watching Sunday's loss on television. "It's been proven the last couple of games that it's certainly not just Adam. Gregg Williams and [safeties coach] Steve Jackson, they wanted Adam Archuleta and they recruited him to Washington because of how they had seen him play on film."They know what type of player he is, and [Chicago Bears Coach] Lovie Smith wanted to sign Adam in the worst way, and so did Gregg Williams. I don't know what's changed in all of that since March, but Gregg Williams was the person recruiting Adam in free agency, and Adam hasn't changed as a player since then."
 
I actually agree with the agent in that AA's not the only problem on this defense by a long shot. That said, he's absolutely terrible in coverage and doesn't deserve to play (much less for what they're paying him).

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top