culdeus
Footballguy
This.I suspect this idea that you have to be hungry all the time to be thin comes mostly from people eating crappy food.
This.I suspect this idea that you have to be hungry all the time to be thin comes mostly from people eating crappy food.
It’s amazing what percentage of people believe they’re in better than average shape, and losing to a normal BMI would be unhealthy. Perhaps societal norms for what looks “healthy” aren’t healthy at all?Excited for the first obese dude to come in here and point out how many professional athletes are overweight according to BMI tables
I‘ve never seen anything suggesting thin people are hungrier than overweight/obese. I wouldn’t be surprised if the opposite were true.Probably not, but you'd likely be really hungry all the time.Fairly sure I'd be dead from malnutrition if I was at the low end of the supposed 'ideal' range for my height.
That's the challenge. To be well within the healthy BMI range you have to be willing to be hungry a lot. Not many people sign up for that.
But being hungry much of the time would probably add 5 years to your life and decrease the likelihood of needing a knee replacement later in life.
It helps you lose 10-15% of your weight. That's likely better than you'll do with diet/exercise, but not enough to get an obese person into healthy BMI range.Once the price for Ozempic (Semaglutide) and all the T2 Diabetes drugs being taken for weight loss by rich people becomes affordable and insurance covers it, our obesity problems will be a thing of the past. In 10 years, taking Semaglutide et al will be as common as taking statins for high cholesterol. We'll be fine, guys. Right?
I've only recently become aware of this phenomenon because I'm seeing it in my own peer group. I'm sure you've seen it for decades in your line of work. But yeah, I know quite a few people my age who describe getting out of bed in the morning with what I think of as "old man aches and pains" that just stem from physical debilitation more than anything else. I know that's in my future at some point provided I live long enough, but I would be greatly disturbed and freaked out if I was experiencing that sort of aging at 50.I‘ve never seen anything suggesting thin people are hungrier than overweight/obese. I wouldn’t be surprised if the opposite were true.
Your second sentence brings up a very valid point though. You need to consider not only shortened lifespan, but also decreased quality of life related to any excess weight. People are usually quick to volunteer to die younger to eat as they chose (importantly, they lose their enthusiasm when death is actually imminent). But they completely ignore how chronic medical problems related to overweight/obesity negatively impact life for decades before that.
Is the pleasure derived from an extra beer and burger worth it? Dunno, but it's another trade-off people make before disease and debility sets in.
Good that you realize uncertainty about your health - many people just assume they're healthy, until they aren't. Part of the issue with chronic diseases is their insidious onset, and it's better to prevent than treat them.Fwiw, I'm now middle aged and overweight per BMI. Getting under 25 is doable but I definitely wouldn't enjoy life as much.
i don't know how healthy or unhealthy i am as I don't have a pcp and haven't had any health checkups ever really.
This is what I was talking about when I mentioned how much exercise it takes to not have knee and back pain. It's a lot and most people don't do it. And of course weight plays a huge component into that as wellI've only recently become aware of this phenomenon because I'm seeing it in my own peer group. I'm sure you've seen it for decades in your line of work. But yeah, I know quite a few people my age who describe getting out of bed in the morning with what I think of as "old man aches and pains" that just stem from physical debilitation more than anything else. I know that's in my future at some point provided I live long enough, but I would be greatly disturbed and freaked out if I was experiencing that sort of aging at 50.I‘ve never seen anything suggesting thin people are hungrier than overweight/obese. I wouldn’t be surprised if the opposite were true.
Your second sentence brings up a very valid point though. You need to consider not only shortened lifespan, but also decreased quality of life related to any excess weight. People are usually quick to volunteer to die younger to eat as they chose (importantly, they lose their enthusiasm when death is actually imminent). But they completely ignore how chronic medical problems related to overweight/obesity negatively impact life for decades before that.
Is the pleasure derived from an extra beer and burger worth it? Dunno, but it's another trade-off people make before disease and debility sets in.
I am also starting to get some sense as to why people are so afraid of growing old alone. I always just assumed it was a normal need for human companionship. Now I'm beginning to realize that some of my colleagues should rationally be worried about shoveling their driveway, walking on icy sidewalks, stepping in and out of the shower, etc. I'm clumsy, and I've fallen probably half a dozen times while out running, but I was never worried about suffering anything worse than some scraped-up hands and bloody knees. It's hard to wrap my mind around the idea that something as simple as falling on the sidewalk could result in serious injury. (I'm not at that point of course, but I can see that from here.)
Yep, it's like the proverbial frog in the pot of boiling water. People normalize all sorts of symptoms as "just getting old", without connecting the dots that much of it is preventable, or at least able to be delayed. By the time they accumulate enough problems to see a doctor, usually they've earned a disease or three, many of which limit their ability to lose weight.I've only recently become aware of this phenomenon because I'm seeing it in my own peer group. I'm sure you've seen it for decades in your line of work. But yeah, I know quite a few people my age who describe getting out of bed in the morning with what I think of as "old man aches and pains" that just stem from physical debilitation more than anything else. I know that's in my future at some point provided I live long enough, but I would be greatly disturbed and freaked out if I was experiencing that sort of aging at 50.I‘ve never seen anything suggesting thin people are hungrier than overweight/obese. I wouldn’t be surprised if the opposite were true.
Your second sentence brings up a very valid point though. You need to consider not only shortened lifespan, but also decreased quality of life related to any excess weight. People are usually quick to volunteer to die younger to eat as they chose (importantly, they lose their enthusiasm when death is actually imminent). But they completely ignore how chronic medical problems related to overweight/obesity negatively impact life for decades before that.
Is the pleasure derived from an extra beer and burger worth it? Dunno, but it's another trade-off people make before disease and debility sets in.
I am also starting to get some sense as to why people are so afraid of growing old alone. I always just assumed it was a normal need for human companionship. Now I'm beginning to realize that some of my colleagues should rationally be worried about shoveling their driveway, walking on icy sidewalks, stepping in and out of the shower, etc. I'm clumsy, and I've fallen probably half a dozen times while out running, but I was never worried about suffering anything worse than some scraped-up hands and bloody knees. It's hard to wrap my mind around the idea that something as simple as falling on the sidewalk could result in serious injury. (I'm not at that point of course, but I can see that from here.)
There are different flavors of pain. For me, I experience just a little stiffness and pain after prolonged inactivity, which quickly goes away when I exercise. Chronic arthritis and muscle/tendon/ligament/disk damage are different, of course, but I firmly believe there is a lot of truth to the "use it or lose it" adage.This is what I was talking about when I mentioned how much exercise it takes to not have knee and back pain. It's a lot and most people don't do it. And of course weight plays a huge component into that as wellI've only recently become aware of this phenomenon because I'm seeing it in my own peer group. I'm sure you've seen it for decades in your line of work. But yeah, I know quite a few people my age who describe getting out of bed in the morning with what I think of as "old man aches and pains" that just stem from physical debilitation more than anything else. I know that's in my future at some point provided I live long enough, but I would be greatly disturbed and freaked out if I was experiencing that sort of aging at 50.I‘ve never seen anything suggesting thin people are hungrier than overweight/obese. I wouldn’t be surprised if the opposite were true.
Your second sentence brings up a very valid point though. You need to consider not only shortened lifespan, but also decreased quality of life related to any excess weight. People are usually quick to volunteer to die younger to eat as they chose (importantly, they lose their enthusiasm when death is actually imminent). But they completely ignore how chronic medical problems related to overweight/obesity negatively impact life for decades before that.
Is the pleasure derived from an extra beer and burger worth it? Dunno, but it's another trade-off people make before disease and debility sets in.
I am also starting to get some sense as to why people are so afraid of growing old alone. I always just assumed it was a normal need for human companionship. Now I'm beginning to realize that some of my colleagues should rationally be worried about shoveling their driveway, walking on icy sidewalks, stepping in and out of the shower, etc. I'm clumsy, and I've fallen probably half a dozen times while out running, but I was never worried about suffering anything worse than some scraped-up hands and bloody knees. It's hard to wrap my mind around the idea that something as simple as falling on the sidewalk could result in serious injury. (I'm not at that point of course, but I can see that from here.)
It helps you lose 10-15% of your weight. That's likely better than you'll do with diet/exercise, but not enough to get an obese person into healthy BMI range.
BMI is stupid, and it's sad that it gets treated as a serious scientific measurement.
It's just weight over height squared. Why squared? People are 3-dimensional. But it fit the very small data set the 18th-century Belgian scientist who came up with it was using in his study of populational averages. He never meant it to be used as a weight-loss guideline, and it sucks as one, but here we are almost 200 years later.
It's not just NFL players BMI gets wrong. It will also tell a skinny guy with no muscle and a beer gut that he's at an ideal weight. That was me 10 years ago. Thankfully I wasn't dumb enough to let that guide me.
Other measurements like waist:hip ratio help, too. But BMI is the best experimentally validated, quick-and-dirty measure of adiposity, which correlates to disease and risk of death. As I said upthread, it tends to underestimate obesity, which hardly anyone ever complains about, shockingly.BMI is stupid, and it's sad that it gets treated as a serious scientific measurement.
It's just weight over height squared. Why squared? People are 3-dimensional. But it fit the very small data set the 18th-century Belgian scientist who came up with it was using in his study of populational averages. He never meant it to be used as a weight-loss guideline, and it sucks as one, but here we are almost 200 years later.
It's not just NFL players BMI gets wrong. It will also tell a skinny guy with no muscle and a beer gut that he's at an ideal weight. That was me 10 years ago. Thankfully I wasn't dumb enough to let that guide me.
I don't think BMi is the end all. And you're right that it fails the really skinny fat guy and the elite muscle bound athlete. But I don't think that it should be thrown out either
usually kg/m2Weight over height squared? In what units?
While my BMI says I’m overweight I went for a heart scan last week and got the results back today. My calcium score was a zero with zero lesions detected!Just into the overweight at a 26 @ 6 foot and 195.
It's not stupid. For 90%+ of the population it is a quick and easy measure of just how damn fat we are. If you are in that 10%, just ignore it and carry onBMI is stupid, and it's sad that it gets treated as a serious scientific measurement.
That score is good for coronary artery disease risk, but doesn’t give you a pass for all the other conditions associated with being heavy.While my BMI says I’m overweight I went for a heart scan last week and got the results back today. My calcium score was a zero with zero lesions detected!Just into the overweight at a 26 @ 6 foot and 195.The scan says it corresponds to an arterial age of 39 (I turn 48 soon). So overweight is good?
![]()
Was 57% overweight then as a sample.The similar thread function on the forum is fun. From 2018 https://forums.footballguys.com/threads/whats-your-body-mass-index-bmi.772977/
I wonder how much we've changed?
It's true. Women almost have it worse. Thankfully they have Lizzo and Ashley graham trying to sell to dudes that big is better.This is an interesting conversation because it's a bunch of dudes. If you go look out at women they don't really have this whole "but I'm built, brrah" angle to lean on and they are getting fatter and fatter. Women as a gender now contribute more weight of the planet, and are accelerating towards a world where they are 50% obese, not just over weight.
Women contribute more weight? That can’t be right?This is an interesting conversation because it's a bunch of dudes. If you go look out at women they don't really have this whole "but I'm built, brrah" angle to lean on and they are getting fatter and fatter. Women as a gender now contribute more weight of the planet, and are accelerating towards a world where they are 50% obese, not just over weight.
Women as a gender weigh more than men on the planet now. This is skewed a bit because there are more of them. Several Asian cultures women are considerably fatter than their male demographic counterpart.Women contribute more weight? That can’t be right?This is an interesting conversation because it's a bunch of dudes. If you go look out at women they don't really have this whole "but I'm built, brrah" angle to lean on and they are getting fatter and fatter. Women as a gender now contribute more weight of the planet, and are accelerating towards a world where they are 50% obese, not just over weight.
It's complete garbage even as a quick and dirty measure. "Hey, scale of 1-10, how fat is that guy?" would be a far more useful obesity metric. BMI doesn't tell us anything we can't figure out with an eye test, and it even gets some of that wrong.It's not stupid. For 90%+ of the population it is a quick and easy measure of just how damn fat we are. If you are in that 10%, just ignore it and carry onBMI is stupid, and it's sad that it gets treated as a serious scientific measurement.
If all the dudes here posted pictures of themselves you would have a point. Considering we can't use the eye test in here, BMI is fine to get a general sense of how fat you all areIt's complete garbage even as a quick and dirty measure. "Hey, scale of 1-10, how fat is that guy?" would be a far more useful obesity metric. BMI doesn't tell us anything we can't figure out with an eye test, and it even gets some of that wrong.It's not stupid. For 90%+ of the population it is a quick and easy measure of just how damn fat we are. If you are in that 10%, just ignore it and carry onBMI is stupid, and it's sad that it gets treated as a serious scientific measurement.
Yes I know doctor. I was joking.That score is good for coronary artery disease risk, but doesn’t give you a pass for all the other conditions associated with being heavy.While my BMI says I’m overweight I went for a heart scan last week and got the results back today. My calcium score was a zero with zero lesions detected!Just into the overweight at a 26 @ 6 foot and 195.The scan says it corresponds to an arterial age of 39 (I turn 48 soon). So overweight is good?
![]()
The fact the test was even ordered implies you have elevated LDL cholesterol, and an intermediate pre-test risk of vascular disease, between 7.5-20% over the next 10 years.
You want to be 6’1”, 165lbs ?!? Seems extremely thin to me.6'1" - 172 this morning. I have a slight belly and could probably lose 5-10 more pounds.
You want to be 6’1”, 165lbs ?!? Seems extremely thin to me.6'1" - 172 this morning. I have a slight belly and could probably lose 5-10 more pounds.
Sorry, hard to tell with all the hyperbole and hot takes in this thread. Also, most insurers won’t pay for expensive tests if there isn’t an approved indication, as there are downstream consequences and risks involved (eg. radiation exposure) with every study.Yes I know doctor. I was joking.That score is good for coronary artery disease risk, but doesn’t give you a pass for all the other conditions associated with being heavy.While my BMI says I’m overweight I went for a heart scan last week and got the results back today. My calcium score was a zero with zero lesions detected!Just into the overweight at a 26 @ 6 foot and 195.The scan says it corresponds to an arterial age of 39 (I turn 48 soon). So overweight is good?
![]()
The fact the test was even ordered implies you have elevated LDL cholesterol, and an intermediate pre-test risk of vascular disease, between 7.5-20% over the next 10 years.
My primary ( who I’ve seen since I was 19) ordered it for two reasons. I am almost 48 and he’s big on pre-checks, and two I’ve been skinny all my life and I’m about 15 pounds heavier now that I was 10 years ago.
That's basically where I'm at, 6'7" 190 lbs. A BMI of 21.5 puts me right in the middle of the healthy range. But without factoring in muscle mass and cardiovascular health, I could be a tall skinny fat person in terrible shape. I do have thin genetics, however I also think that food restrictions and choices like skipping breakfast might be working against people who are trying to lose weight. I grew up on healthy food so my taste buds prefer that over whatever processed stuff is now going into fast food. Medication can also easily manipulate people's weight. My stomach ballooned and I went up to 220 when being forced to take anti psychotic pills and kept cooped up inside for 2 weeks.You want to be 6’1”, 165lbs ?!? Seems extremely thin to me.6'1" - 172 this morning. I have a slight belly and could probably lose 5-10 more pounds.
I’ve met @MTskibum. He looked a healthy weight, but that was in ski clothes.You want to be 6’1”, 165lbs ?!? Seems extremely thin to me.6'1" - 172 this morning. I have a slight belly and could probably lose 5-10 more pounds.
Normal BMI doesn’t guarantee health, just as elevated BMI doesn’t = unhealthy 100% of the time. But the odds you have one or more chronic medical problems increase as you get into the obese range. Same goes for underweight.That's basically where I'm at, 6'7" 190 lbs. A BMI of 21.5 puts me right in the middle of the healthy range. But without factoring in muscle mass and cardiovascular health, I could be a tall skinny fat person in terrible shape. I do have thin genetics, however I also think that food restrictions and choices like skipping breakfast might be working against people who are trying to lose weight. I grew up on healthy food so my taste buds prefer that over whatever processed stuff is now going into fast food. Medication can also easily manipulate people's weight. My stomach ballooned and I went up to 220 when being forced to take anti psychotic pills and kept cooped up inside for 2 weeks.You want to be 6’1”, 165lbs ?!? Seems extremely thin to me.6'1" - 172 this morning. I have a slight belly and could probably lose 5-10 more pounds.
No worries at all. And yeah I had to pay for my test. Insurance wouldn’t cover it.Sorry, hard to tell with all the hyperbole and hot takes in this thread. Also, most insurers won’t pay for expensive tests if there isn’t an approved indication, as there are downstream consequences and risks involved (eg. radiation exposure) with every study.Yes I know doctor. I was joking.That score is good for coronary artery disease risk, but doesn’t give you a pass for all the other conditions associated with being heavy.While my BMI says I’m overweight I went for a heart scan last week and got the results back today. My calcium score was a zero with zero lesions detected!Just into the overweight at a 26 @ 6 foot and 195.The scan says it corresponds to an arterial age of 39 (I turn 48 soon). So overweight is good?
![]()
The fact the test was even ordered implies you have elevated LDL cholesterol, and an intermediate pre-test risk of vascular disease, between 7.5-20% over the next 10 years.
My primary ( who I’ve seen since I was 19) ordered it for two reasons. I am almost 48 and he’s big on pre-checks, and two I’ve been skinny all my life and I’m about 15 pounds heavier now that I was 10 years ago.
Out of curiosity, how much did they charge?No worries at all. And yeah I had to pay for my test. Insurance wouldn’t cover it.Sorry, hard to tell with all the hyperbole and hot takes in this thread. Also, most insurers won’t pay for expensive tests if there isn’t an approved indication, as there are downstream consequences and risks involved (eg. radiation exposure) with every study.Yes I know doctor. I was joking.That score is good for coronary artery disease risk, but doesn’t give you a pass for all the other conditions associated with being heavy.While my BMI says I’m overweight I went for a heart scan last week and got the results back today. My calcium score was a zero with zero lesions detected!Just into the overweight at a 26 @ 6 foot and 195.The scan says it corresponds to an arterial age of 39 (I turn 48 soon). So overweight is good?
![]()
The fact the test was even ordered implies you have elevated LDL cholesterol, and an intermediate pre-test risk of vascular disease, between 7.5-20% over the next 10 years.
My primary ( who I’ve seen since I was 19) ordered it for two reasons. I am almost 48 and he’s big on pre-checks, and two I’ve been skinny all my life and I’m about 15 pounds heavier now that I was 10 years ago.
This is probably accurate. We are a nation of eaters. Nearly every person in here would benefit by cutting a decent amount of calories out of our dietsBut perhaps what our society characterizes as “extremely thin” is actually healthy?
100 even.Out of curiosity, how much did they charge?
It’s absolutely accurate. All this talk of starving to death, looking malnourished/extremely skinny, etc. at a healthy BMI is nonsense. There‘s really not a good excuse why we can’t maintain our weight +/- a few pounds as we age.This is probably accurate. We are a nation of eaters. Nearly every person in here would benefit by cutting a decent amount of calories out of our dietsBut perhaps what our society characterizes as “extremely thin” is actually healthy?
That’s pretty cheap. Glad it ended up being reassuring.100 even.Out of curiosity, how much did they charge?
Figured it was worth it to know as on my moms side there is a history, all widowmakers in their mid-60’s. Was relieved to see that at this point that specific artery isn’t a concern.
FWIW, a while back, I was in the best shape of my life training for a couple of Iron Man triathlons and was eating pretty normally. And obviously training a ton. And still was around 190 which would be overweight on the chart.![]()