What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Bands/Artists You Like, But Shouldn't (1 Viewer)

But like you said, younger me would not have really liked it...which is why I was so shocked there weren't dudes like me at her concert.

I don't know her entire catalogue, and I can't listen to her for too long, but songs like "the greatest" and "Video Games" are achingly great.
Blue Bannisters came out right after NFR. I probably rank it right behind NFR as far as listening thru the album.
Haven't listened to either of those yet. Have her first on vinyl and her second (EP) ordered. Both are great. Ultraviolence which I really really also like and which my kid says is her best is arriving today, also on vinyl. That one was produced by Dan Auerbach of the Black Keys apparently.
The majority of her releases are either good or great, but Ultraviolence is my favorite. She melded very well with Auerbach. She owns the tones and lyrics exceptionally well.
 
I don’t think I buy into any kind of music being something one “shouldn’t like”.
These last few random music threads have been brutal - why are we concentrating on the negatives and bands we "shouldn't like" or ones we "should like but don't". Music should be about sharing things we do like and celebrating the talent instead of ****ting on bands others may love.

Word.
 
What!!!! Muse are a fantastic band.
I don't disagree but my daughter claims they're emo, which probably comes from Twilight.
They are progressive rock all the way.
I hate labels with music more and more as I get older, but while I think their music does have flashes of progressive rock, they are much more Queen than Yes. Queen also had flourishes of prog rock, especially on their early albums, but like Muse, never stuck their toe in the deep end for too long.
 
What!!!! Muse are a fantastic band.
I don't disagree but my daughter claims they're emo, which probably comes from Twilight.
They are progressive rock all the way.
I hate labels with music more and more as I get older, but while I think their music does have flashes of progressive rock, they are much more Queen than Yes. Queen also had flourishes of prog rock, especially on their early albums, but like Muse, never stuck their toe in the deep end for too long.
Well I don't mind labeling sub genres of rock music. There are various styles of rock.

I also maybe have a different view of what the my definition of "Progressive" rock is. It does not mean long self indulgent songs to me.

It's about seeking new sonic landscapes each and every album and building upon each record.....much like Rush did 1975 thru 1992.

Muse definitely has a lot of Queen flourishes as well as Rush riffage on their earlier records.

I actually did not like Muses last two albums....not my cup of tea. But thru Drones I looooooove their stuff.
 
What!!!! Muse are a fantastic band.
I don't disagree but my daughter claims they're emo, which probably comes from Twilight.
They are progressive rock all the way.
I hate labels with music more and more as I get older, but while I think their music does have flashes of progressive rock, they are much more Queen than Yes. Queen also had flourishes of prog rock, especially on their early albums, but like Muse, never stuck their toe in the deep end for too long.
Well I don't mind labeling sub genres of rock music. There are various styles of rock.

I also maybe have a different view of what the my definition of "Progressive" rock is. It does not mean long self indulgent songs to me.

It's about seeking new sonic landscapes each and every album and building upon each record.....much like Rush did 1975 thru 1992.

Muse definitely has a lot of Queen flourishes as well as Rush riffage on their earlier records.

I actually did not like Muses last two albums....not my cup of tea. But thru Drones I looooooove their stuff.
I am with ya regarding progressive rock. Some think it has to be all long songs, crazy time sigs and flashy playing, but the Moody Blues were one of the originators of what became the genre, and they didn't really focus on any of those things.

I am with ya on Muse as well. I love Muse up until Drones as well (and I think Drones is highly underrated, even if the lyrics are a bit daft at times). The last two albums had their moments, but it feels like the band's creative peak is in the rearview mirror. What a peak it was, though! The Rome DVD from the 2nd Law tour is still one of the five best concert DVDs/Blu-rays ever. :cool:
 
I am big Ambrosia fan - mostly drawn to their debut album, but also the next two. They were more progressive than the "Chicago-esque" turn they made with their slow soppier hits (that I still kinda like ...)

The other one that I wouldn't say i shouldn't like, but are certainly a dated sound is "Charlie" - their first album not only has one of the best songs ever - the tunes are just really solid. They never really hit it big but did have a few songs that charted. My favs didn't even chart ...Johnny Hold Back and No Second Chance

Charlie - 1st album
 
Last edited:
I am big Ambrosia fan - mostly drawn to their debut album, but also the next two. They were more progressive than the "Chicago-esque" turn they made with their slow soppier hits (that I still kinda like ...)

The other one that I wouldn't say i shouldn't like, but are certainly a dated sound is "Charlie" - their first album not only has one of the best covers ever - the tunes are just really solid. They never really hit it big but did have a few songs that charted. My favs didn't even chart ...Johnny Hold Back and No Second Chance

Charlie - 1st album
Did you ever hear Road Island, the final Ambrosia album? It’s a fascinating combination of Wall-era Floyd and Journey-type stuff. A little reminiscent of mid-period Utopia.
 
The other one that I wouldn't say i shouldn't like, but are certainly a dated sound is "Charlie" - their first album not only has one of the best covers ever - the tunes are just really solid. They never really hit it big but did have a few songs that charted. My favs didn't even chart ...Johnny Hold Back and No Second Chance

Charlie - 1st album
They smelled nice too (my fellow geezers will remember this).
 
I am big Ambrosia fan - mostly drawn to their debut album, but also the next two. They were more progressive than the "Chicago-esque" turn they made with their slow soppier hits (that I still kinda like ...)

The other one that I wouldn't say i shouldn't like, but are certainly a dated sound is "Charlie" - their first album not only has one of the best covers ever - the tunes are just really solid. They never really hit it big but did have a few songs that charted. My favs didn't even chart ...Johnny Hold Back and No Second Chance

Charlie - 1st album
Did you ever hear Road Island, the final Ambrosia album? It’s a fascinating combination of Wall-era Floyd and Journey-type stuff. A little reminiscent of mid-period Utopia.

no, I will check it out! tks man!
 
The other one that I wouldn't say i shouldn't like, but are certainly a dated sound is "Charlie" - their first album not only has one of the best covers ever - the tunes are just really solid.
Without looking it up — Charlie did “It’s Inevitable”, right? Haven’t heard that song in decades, but I remember Casey Kasem queuing it up.

ohhhh good call, I had completely forgotten that song/video ...
 
The other one that I wouldn't say i shouldn't like, but are certainly a dated sound is "Charlie" - their first album not only has one of the best covers ever - the tunes are just really solid.
Without looking it up — Charlie did “It’s Inevitable”, right? Haven’t heard that song in decades, but I remember Casey Kasem queuing it up.

ohhhh good call, I had completely forgotten that song/video ...
How can you forget a massive pie fight?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top