prosopis
Arizona Chupacabra
Thanks ABlooks like we are all on the seat/tex O9 - ALL ABOARD - LET'S HIT THIS!

Thanks ABlooks like we are all on the seat/tex O9 - ALL ABOARD - LET'S HIT THIS!
THE DODGERS WIN THE DODGERS WINSea/Tex O9 -105Parlay LAD -108, SF/LAD U8.5 -120I reccomend you ignore these plays.
NICE!looks like we are all on the seat/tex O9 - ALL ABOARD - LET'S HIT THIS!![]()
![]()
Would like to thank my GB MP for the 5 units this weekend.I didn't get a chance to do anything as it was my son's 6th birthday and I had a party and housework to do. So I came on to see MP post about the late steam against the Dodgers on Saturday. Threw some units there. And than last night, I see a bandwagon over Tex/Sea, so I'm all on it. Then MP throws the old "I got a great number on the under"....so I know we were good to go over there.I'd rather be on the right side with a so-so number than the wrong side with a great number.I'll be a bit hard pressed to do much research this week as I'm going away this weekend and have an alleged football draft this Thursday, so I'm just going to count on my degenerates to post some leans and let me coattail the hell out of them.Sea/Tex o9 is now +100Decided to play it for 2 units, just for the helluva it. Texas offense is more than capable of putting up 9 runs on any given night, and Millwood isn't the kind of pitcher I see throwing a no-hitter. g'luck
Would like to thank my GB MP for the 5 units this weekend.I didn't get a chance to do anything as it was my son's 6th birthday and I had a party and housework to do. So I came on to see MP post about the late steam against the Dodgers on Saturday. Threw some units there. And than last night, I see a bandwagon over Tex/Sea, so I'm all on it. Then MP throws the old "I got a great number on the under"....so I know we were good to go over there.![]()
and have an alleged football draft this Thursday
Is the draft in question?
The reason I mention this is that they may quit the practice of messing with the baseballs. Keep an eye on their totals when the Rockies get home, could be "over" time once again.Anyone see that story on the Rockies and how they have been reverse-juicing their baseballs? Seem like they put their balls in a humidor and wet them down. After being famous for the long ball over the years, this year they are 40-60-7 over/under overall, 2-8 on their most recent homestand.
link to story.
Would like to thank my GB MP for the 5 units this weekend.I didn't get a chance to do anything as it was my son's 6th birthday and I had a party and housework to do. So I came on to see MP post about the late steam against the Dodgers on Saturday. Threw some units there. And than last night, I see a bandwagon over Tex/Sea, so I'm all on it. Then MP throws the old "I got a great number on the under"....so I know we were good to go over there.I'd rather be on the right side with a so-so number than the wrong side with a great number.I'll be a bit hard pressed to do much research this week as I'm going away this weekend and have an alleged football draft this Thursday, so I'm just going to count on my degenerates to post some leans and let me coattail the hell out of them.Sea/Tex o9 is now +100Decided to play it for 2 units, just for the helluva it. Texas offense is more than capable of putting up 9 runs on any given night, and Millwood isn't the kind of pitcher I see throwing a no-hitter. g'luckg'luck
No fade at all. I wait until football season for that![]()
Nothing like making money off of me one night then making money being on the opposite of me the next. I did post that I played the Under after you guys, so you didn't exactly fade me, but cashed nonetheless.
Can't the same thing be said for just about any other sport you bet onBoth bets were very good, but only one can cash - that's baseball.
SEA (56 - 61) 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 6In my defense of the late play I posted. Under 9 +115 was a very good bet. Your Over 9 +100 was also a very good bet. You were on the right side obviously, but with 15 cents extra of vig both bets were about the same. Both bets were very good, but only one can cash - that's baseball.
I hate to try and enter the warped mind of MP, but I think he's saying that without point spreads you can't win with either team. But I could be way off considering he's not very lucid.Can't the same thing be said for just about any other sport you bet onBoth bets were very good, but only one can cash - that's baseball.![]()
Yes, but it's easier to get two +EV bets in baseball just with the vig. In football it would be like me getting Bengals +136 and getting Washington pk -110 earlier in the week. Both good bets, both won't win.Can't the same thing be said for just about any other sport you bet onBoth bets were very good, but only one can cash - that's baseball.![]()
How was this not a good bet at +200? You went a little overboard here. I can't predict the outcome. Millwood and Felix could have pitched gems like Maddux and Schmidt last night. You don't know though, you can't predict the outcome. I wish I could look into the future and predict the outcome. I got Under 9 +115. Let's say this was a 50/50 play, even though it likely wasn't. Let's not get complicated though. Under 9 +115 had a 50/50 shot of winning. If you gave me Under 9 +200 you turn my play into a 65% play.SEA (56 - 61) 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 6In my defense of the late play I posted. Under 9 +115 was a very good bet. Your Over 9 +100 was also a very good bet. You were on the right side obviously, but with 15 cents extra of vig both bets were about the same. Both bets were very good, but only one can cash - that's baseball.
TEX (61 - 58) 0 3 0 0 3 1 1 2 X 10
It was a good bet, yet it was over 2/3 through? It wasn't a good bet at Under +200.
Yes, but it's easier to get two +EV bets in baseball just with the vig. In football it would be like me getting Bengals +136 and getting Washington pk -110 earlier in the week. Both good bets, both won't win.Can't the same thing be said for just about any other sport you bet onBoth bets were very good, but only one can cash - that's baseball.![]()
I am guessing its not a good bet because you lost.How was this not a good bet at +200? You went a little overboard here. I can't predict the outcome. Millwood and Felix could have pitched gems like Maddux and Schmidt last night. You don't know though, you can't predict the outcome. I wish I could look into the future and predict the outcome. I got Under 9 +115. Let's say this was a 50/50 play, even though it likely wasn't. Let's not get complicated though. Under 9 +115 had a 50/50 shot of winning. If you gave me Under 9 +200 you turn my play into a 65% play.SEA (56 - 61) 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 6In my defense of the late play I posted. Under 9 +115 was a very good bet. Your Over 9 +100 was also a very good bet. You were on the right side obviously, but with 15 cents extra of vig both bets were about the same. Both bets were very good, but only one can cash - that's baseball.
TEX (61 - 58) 0 3 0 0 3 1 1 2 X 10
It was a good bet, yet it was over 2/3 through? It wasn't a good bet at Under +200.
Come on, you know at 65% anyone would kill the books. Even measly Marshallplan would kill books making 65% plays.
We can't predict the outcomes. I get the best numbers I can on the sides I think are right and hope my plays come in. That's all I can do.
Your a very good football capper, where you identify which side is right and pound it.
Yes, but it's easier to get two +EV bets in baseball just with the vig. In football it would be like me getting Bengals +136 and getting Washington pk -110 earlier in the week. Both good bets, both won't win.Can't the same thing be said for just about any other sport you bet onBoth bets were very good, but only one can cash - that's baseball.![]()
so why didn't you scalp it?
![]()
this time I was serious... if the Bengals win you win +136-110=26, otherwise +100-100=0Isn't that the whole point???Yes, but it's easier to get two +EV bets in baseball just with the vig. In football it would be like me getting Bengals +136 and getting Washington pk -110 earlier in the week. Both good bets, both won't win.Can't the same thing be said for just about any other sport you bet onBoth bets were very good, but only one can cash - that's baseball.![]()
so why didn't you scalp it?
![]()
![]()
The scalping comment again... I had a very good Bengals number last night. Maybe somebody got +140 (who knows where), but I got +136 at Pinny as they were moving up, then after I played it, it came back down to +130 or so.
Your right, I wasn't fortuante to play Washington pk earlier in the week. Who can actually predict preseason line movements? Especially home favorites going to a home dog. I just faded the steam and played the Bengals.this time I was serious... if the Bengals win you win +136-110=26, otherwise +100-100=0Isn't that the whole point???Yes, but it's easier to get two +EV bets in baseball just with the vig. In football it would be like me getting Bengals +136 and getting Washington pk -110 earlier in the week. Both good bets, both won't win.Can't the same thing be said for just about any other sport you bet onBoth bets were very good, but only one can cash - that's baseball.![]()
so why didn't you scalp it?
![]()
![]()
The scalping comment again... I had a very good Bengals number last night. Maybe somebody got +140 (who knows where), but I got +136 at Pinny as they were moving up, then after I played it, it came back down to +130 or so.
Wrong. I be your pardon but it IS a good bet. It doesn't matter whether I win or lose, you see, it's HOW I play the game. That's why someone like you will NEVER kill the books. It's because you don't undestand the bigger picture like I do. This is not to say you don't know, more likely you are just clueless. Let me explain some things to you like I am not 21 years old, but 51...that I bet $1000, not 5...and I will talk to you like you are 12! Okay?!I am guessing its not a good bet because you lost.How was this not a good bet at +200? You went a little overboard here. I can't predict the outcome. Millwood and Felix could have pitched gems like Maddux and Schmidt last night. You don't know though, you can't predict the outcome. I wish I could look into the future and predict the outcome. I got Under 9 +115. Let's say this was a 50/50 play, even though it likely wasn't. Let's not get complicated though. Under 9 +115 had a 50/50 shot of winning. If you gave me Under 9 +200 you turn my play into a 65% play.SEA (56 - 61) 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 6In my defense of the late play I posted. Under 9 +115 was a very good bet. Your Over 9 +100 was also a very good bet. You were on the right side obviously, but with 15 cents extra of vig both bets were about the same. Both bets were very good, but only one can cash - that's baseball.
TEX (61 - 58) 0 3 0 0 3 1 1 2 X 10
It was a good bet, yet it was over 2/3 through? It wasn't a good bet at Under +200.
Come on, you know at 65% anyone would kill the books. Even measly Marshallplan would kill books making 65% plays.
We can't predict the outcomes. I get the best numbers I can on the sides I think are right and hope my plays come in. That's all I can do.
Your a very good football capper, where you identify which side is right and pound it.![]()
I honestly thought that was the reason I was gambling, to try and predict the outcome better than the book does... I don't care if it's curling, baseball, football or moose tossing...I guess I don't understand the reasoning of playing a side just because you get a good line... sure, if EVERY bet was 50/50, that would make sense, but I have yet to experience a season where every bet is like that...How was this not a good bet at +200? You went a little overboard here. I can't predict the outcome. Millwood and Felix could have pitched gems like Maddux and Schmidt last night. You don't know though, you can't predict the outcome. I wish I could look into the future and predict the outcome. I got Under 9 +115. Let's say this was a 50/50 play, even though it likely wasn't. Let's not get complicated though. Under 9 +115 had a 50/50 shot of winning. If you gave me Under 9 +200 you turn my play into a 65% play.SEA (56 - 61) 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 6In my defense of the late play I posted. Under 9 +115 was a very good bet. Your Over 9 +100 was also a very good bet. You were on the right side obviously, but with 15 cents extra of vig both bets were about the same. Both bets were very good, but only one can cash - that's baseball.
TEX (61 - 58) 0 3 0 0 3 1 1 2 X 10
It was a good bet, yet it was over 2/3 through? It wasn't a good bet at Under +200.
Come on, you know at 65% anyone would kill the books. Even measly Marshallplan would kill books making 65% plays.
We can't predict the outcomes. I get the best numbers I can on the sides I think are right and hope my plays come in. That's all I can do.
Your a very good football capper, where you identify which side is right and pound it.
I WAS you.I don't understand your post one bit Sonny. Were you talking to Prosposis or me?
I'm combining both Charv. Combining my opinion with good numbers (at least trying to). Sometimes moreso one and less of the other. Last night I had Dodgers +102. A good number and an opinion of mine. I thought they were the right side, they were the hot team and their bats cancelled out Schmidt's pitching advantage so I liked the + vig. Tonight it's the Phils RL -135. I could have had better this morning or last night, but I wasn't home. I didn't look at the lines. I like the play and I caught a rogue number at a slow moving book (SIA). It's already scalpableI honestly thought that was the reason I was gambling, to try and predict the outcome better than the book does... I don't care if it's curling, baseball, football or moose tossing...I guess I don't understand the reasoning of playing a side just because you get a good line... sure, if EVERY bet was 50/50, that would make sense, but I have yet to experience a season where every bet is like that...How was this not a good bet at +200? You went a little overboard here. I can't predict the outcome. Millwood and Felix could have pitched gems like Maddux and Schmidt last night. You don't know though, you can't predict the outcome. I wish I could look into the future and predict the outcome. I got Under 9 +115. Let's say this was a 50/50 play, even though it likely wasn't. Let's not get complicated though. Under 9 +115 had a 50/50 shot of winning. If you gave me Under 9 +200 you turn my play into a 65% play.SEA (56 - 61) 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 6In my defense of the late play I posted. Under 9 +115 was a very good bet. Your Over 9 +100 was also a very good bet. You were on the right side obviously, but with 15 cents extra of vig both bets were about the same. Both bets were very good, but only one can cash - that's baseball.
TEX (61 - 58) 0 3 0 0 3 1 1 2 X 10
It was a good bet, yet it was over 2/3 through? It wasn't a good bet at Under +200.
Come on, you know at 65% anyone would kill the books. Even measly Marshallplan would kill books making 65% plays.
We can't predict the outcomes. I get the best numbers I can on the sides I think are right and hope my plays come in. That's all I can do.
Your a very good football capper, where you identify which side is right and pound it.
I WAS you.I don't understand your post one bit Sonny. Were you talking to Prosposis or me?
Well this part made sense, except for the whole "your" vs. "you're" thing. Nice job.Your a very good football capper, where you identify which side is right and pound it.
Lead off triple by the Tigers.I just saw Gambino's sig.![]()
Okay, I hafta take Detroit at +144 vs. Beckett. I don't think Beckett, or Boston right now for that matter, should be -154 vs. Detroit.
2.5 units
Yeah, nice way to start, along with a passed ball. 3 - 0. I get the feeling though, this is gonna be a long one...Lead off triple by the Tigers.I just saw Gambino's sig.![]()
Okay, I hafta take Detroit at +144 vs. Beckett. I don't think Beckett, or Boston right now for that matter, should be -154 vs. Detroit.
2.5 units
What the ####.I'm assuming there is a brawl or something going on right now considering they haven't updated the score in awhile.Wanted to play the Atl over, but couldn't get it in. I did get in:
Pedro -133
You mean 15?Met's game isn't going so well for me. Hopefully, we'll come back with 11 soon
Come on David Wright!!!!!!You mean 15?Met's game isn't going so well for me. Hopefully, we'll come back with 11 soon![]()
Figures... Atl over hits with ease, Mets aren't even close.Wanted to play the Atl over, but couldn't get it in. I did get in:
Pedro -133
If I post something you gonna play or fade it?Anyone have some late action?![]()
Depends.If I post something you gonna play or fade it?Anyone have some late action?![]()
![]()
Depends.If I post something you gonna play or fade it?Anyone have some late action?![]()
![]()