What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

bears @ packers (1 Viewer)

So QBR, Completion percentage, completions, avg yard per attempt....like the stats that you use to evaluate a QB.
To be honest I've never given a lot of attention to QB rating or ESPN's QBR.

But would be interested in seeing the numbers.

Either way, I stand by my statement.  Any stat system that has Fitzpatrick as a better QB than Rodgers this year, or ever, is a joke.

 
the game finally became watchable and the bears challenge in the red zone.  i aint gunna wait around thru a bunch of commercials.

 
To be honest I've never given a lot of attention to QB rating or ESPN's QBR.

But would be interested in seeing the numbers.

Either way, I stand by my statement.  Any stat system that has Fitzpatrick as a better QB than Rodgers this year, or ever, is a joke.
:shrug: not sure what to tell you, Rodgers hasn't been good since 2014 and is awful this year.

 
To be honest I've never given a lot of attention to QB rating or ESPN's QBR.

But would be interested in seeing the numbers.

Either way, I stand by my statement.  Any stat system that has Fitzpatrick as a better QB than Rodgers this year, or ever, is a joke.
I dont believe your thinking about the actual WR's    (ARod had WR3 Cobb)  Fitz had two WR1's

 
So much for the best run D in the league...oof. Dallas shreds them and now the Bears moving it very well on the ground.
This was more schedule inflation.   They played the Jags, Minnesota (AP gets hurt), Lions and NYGs.  All four are in the bottom 25% of the league in team rushing.   Buffalo has out gained any two of those teams going into this week. 

 
:shrug: not sure what to tell you, Rodgers hasn't been good since 2014 and is awful this year.
Just looked at ESPN QBR this year.

Rodgers is 6th at 72.8.  Fitzpatrick is 26th at 51.7.

You said Fitzpatrick had better stats citing QBR as the first one and asking if I watch ESPN.

WTF are you talking about?

 
hey babe  im just telling ya what i believe   MN sucks at running the ball  OR they could have a SB team    Who do you believe they played with a running game?
no I agree. just your grammar is atrocious. wondering if you've been drinking or if that's for real

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just looked at ESPN QBR this year.

Rodgers is 6th at 72.8.  Fitzpatrick is 26th at 51.7.

You said Fitzpatrick had better stats citing QBR as the first one and asking if I watch ESPN.

WTF are you talking about?
They were both at ~60 the last time I saw it.

 
The Pack could really use Kuhn right now.

If Jackson is out and it looks like he is, they need to turn to Ripkowski.

Seriously if they are going to win this game they will need to run eventually, let the FB takes some carries.

eta - I know this won't happen but it's what they should do.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Pack could really use Kuhn right now.

If Jackson is out and it looks like he is, they need to turn to Ripkowski.

Seriously if they are going to win this game they will need to run eventually, let the FB takes some carries.

eta - I know this won't happen but it's what they should do.
88 looks good

 
A team like Chicago has little if any room for error, whether it be from their own mistakes or getting screwed by the refs. Tonight it was screwed by the refs. They can't win this game now.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top