Bears RBs (1 Viewer)

[Domination]

Thomas Jones was very unimpressive against the Cardinals. So I pose the question, who is the starter Week 1, and do the start all year? Thomas Jones or Cedric Benson?

 

[Got Urlacher?]

Thomas Jones was very unimpressive against the Cardinals. So I pose the question, who is the starter Week 1, and do the start all year? Thomas Jones or Cedric Benson?

Thomas Jones

 

[Garts]

week 6 Benson

 

[imeimex]

Seriously, there are daily threads on this topic.

 

[chris1969]

Seriously, there are daily threads on this topic.

I was just gonna say tat.

 

[Raider Nation]

It's shaping up as a monster battle between Lewis Tillman and Raymont Harris.

 

[flapgreen]

It's shaping up as a monster battle between Lewis Tillman and Raymont Harris.

 

[Keys Myaths]

Thomas Jones was very unimpressive against the Cardinals.

Seriously.STOP OVERREACTING TO PRESEASON GAMES!!! Aaron Brooks was DIVING down draft charts...but I'm sure he's top 10 again after tonight.Preseason means NOTHING. Repeat that to yourself about 5,000 times.

 

[thecardiackid]

Thomas Jones was very unimpressive against the Cardinals.

Seriously.STOP OVERREACTING TO PRESEASON GAMES!!! Aaron Brooks was DIVING down draft charts...but I'm sure he's top 10 again after tonight.Preseason means NOTHING. Repeat that to yourself about 5,000 times.

Agree, but you've got to admit that 4 rushes for 3 yards is *even in the pre-season*The current problem w/ TJ and CHI's running game will be that NO ONE will respect Grossman (and for good reason). 8/9 in the box will make it tough early - till Griese gets the nod. Not impossible, but tough.TJ should be the guy, but I'd still burn the 7th rounder on Benson JIC.

 

[Keys Myaths]

Thomas Jones was very unimpressive against the Cardinals.

Seriously.STOP OVERREACTING TO PRESEASON GAMES!!! Aaron Brooks was DIVING down draft charts...but I'm sure he's top 10 again after tonight.Preseason means NOTHING. Repeat that to yourself about 5,000 times.

Agree, but you've got to admit that 4 rushes for 3 yards is *even in the pre-season*

NO I DON'T!!!It's FOUR RUSHES!!!One running back last year ran 8 times for just 13 yards in a game. Third game of the REGULAR season! (Hint: He finished with 1750 yards and 20 touchdowns).Ah, then there was the guy at the END of last year, who ran for 9 yards on 6 rushes. (Hint: He set the all-time TD record that year).Seriously, you guys that overreact to this crap are the same ones who are going to see LT struggle somewhat in Week 1 and then trade him for Rudi Johnson.Take a step back, relax...and realize...IT'S THE PRESEASON!!!

 

[Aaron Rudnicki]

Thomas Jones is the starter. Preseason means nothing.

Jones was a top-10 RB last year with Kyle Orton at QB. Life is good.

 

[Raider Nation]

Thomas Jones is the starter.

I agree. Until Benson is ready to go.

Jones was a top-10 RB last year with Kyle Orton at QB. Life is good.

This statement implies that you are expecting FAR better QB play out of Grossman. Good luck with all that.

 

[RBM]

John Mullin chimes in on the topic

If Benson better, he should startBy John MullinTribune staff reporterAugust 25, 2006, 10:14 PM CDTHere's Tribune staff reporter John Mullin's take on the Bears' third exhibition game.A clue to the pending decision in the Thomas Jones-Cedric Benson contest at running back may have been provided 10 years ago in Miami. Jimmy Johnson said at the end of training camp that rookie Zach Thomas would be his starting middle linebacker, not a proven veteran two years removed from a Pro Bowl. Asked why Thomas and not the vet, Johnson said simply, "Because Zach is better."Jones' three yards on four carries in less than a half Friday night can be excused as first-game issues coming back from a strained hamstring. The decision to move Benson ahead of Jones in the off-season, however, had less to do with the money paid to Benson than to the simple fact that coaches believe Benson is better—or at least soon will be. Jones was better in 2005; this isn't 2005.The ethic of the NFL isn't that the most experienced guy plays. It is that the best guy plays.The Bears drafted, and paid, Benson not because they didn't like Jones. They simply think Benson is better. If Jones, entering his seventh season, wanted to make a rebuttal argument, Friday wasn't his best case. If the Bears think Benson is better, he should start.jmullin@tribune.com Copyright © 2006, The Chicago Tribune

 

[wraith5]

Thomas Jones is the starter.

I agree. Until Benson is ready to go.

Jones was a top-10 RB last year with Kyle Orton at QB. Life is good.

This statement implies that you are expecting FAR better QB play out of Grossman. Good luck with all that.

This statement implies that you think it could get ANY worse than Kyle Orton... that would be a very tall order.

 

[wraith5]

John Mullin chimes in on the topic

If Benson better, he should startBy John MullinTribune staff reporterAugust 25, 2006, 10:14 PM CDTHere's Tribune staff reporter John Mullin's take on the Bears' third exhibition game.A clue to the pending decision in the Thomas Jones-Cedric Benson contest at running back may have been provided 10 years ago in Miami. Jimmy Johnson said at the end of training camp that rookie Zach Thomas would be his starting middle linebacker, not a proven veteran two years removed from a Pro Bowl. Asked why Thomas and not the vet, Johnson said simply, "Because Zach is better."Jones' three yards on four carries in less than a half Friday night can be excused as first-game issues coming back from a strained hamstring. The decision to move Benson ahead of Jones in the off-season, however, had less to do with the money paid to Benson than to the simple fact that coaches believe Benson is better—or at least soon will be. Jones was better in 2005; this isn't 2005.The ethic of the NFL isn't that the most experienced guy plays. It is that the best guy plays.The Bears drafted, and paid, Benson not because they didn't like Jones. They simply think Benson is better. If Jones, entering his seventh season, wanted to make a rebuttal argument, Friday wasn't his best case. If the Bears think Benson is better, he should start.jmullin@tribune.com Copyright © 2006, The Chicago Tribune

Good to see the folks on this board aren't the only ones who over-react to the preseason. Benson WILL BE the starter at some point - assuming he gets his act together, learns to pick up the blitz, stays healthy, and stops alienating his team. I don't see that happening this season. He'll get carries, but not starts.

 

[Raider Nation]

John Mullin chimes in on the topic

If Benson better, he should startBy John MullinTribune staff reporterAugust 25, 2006, 10:14 PM CDTHere's Tribune staff reporter John Mullin's take on the Bears' third exhibition game.A clue to the pending decision in the Thomas Jones-Cedric Benson contest at running back may have been provided 10 years ago in Miami. Jimmy Johnson said at the end of training camp that rookie Zach Thomas would be his starting middle linebacker, not a proven veteran two years removed from a Pro Bowl. Asked why Thomas and not the vet, Johnson said simply, "Because Zach is better."Jones' three yards on four carries in less than a half Friday night can be excused as first-game issues coming back from a strained hamstring. The decision to move Benson ahead of Jones in the off-season, however, had less to do with the money paid to Benson than to the simple fact that coaches believe Benson is better—or at least soon will be. Jones was better in 2005; this isn't 2005.The ethic of the NFL isn't that the most experienced guy plays. It is that the best guy plays.The Bears drafted, and paid, Benson not because they didn't like Jones. They simply think Benson is better. If Jones, entering his seventh season, wanted to make a rebuttal argument, Friday wasn't his best case. If the Bears think Benson is better, he should start.jmullin@tribune.com Copyright © 2006, The Chicago Tribune

Good to see the folks on this board aren't the only ones who over-react to the preseason. Benson WILL BE the starter at some point - assuming he gets his act together, learns to pick up the blitz, stays healthy, and stops alienating his team. I don't see that happening this season. He'll get carries, but not starts.

Benson will not start at ANY TIME this season, whether Jones is healthy or not? Can I visit your planet?

 

[RBM]

John Mullin chimes in on the topic

If Benson better, he should startBy John MullinTribune staff reporterAugust 25, 2006, 10:14 PM CDTHere's Tribune staff reporter John Mullin's take on the Bears' third exhibition game.A clue to the pending decision in the Thomas Jones-Cedric Benson contest at running back may have been provided 10 years ago in Miami. Jimmy Johnson said at the end of training camp that rookie Zach Thomas would be his starting middle linebacker, not a proven veteran two years removed from a Pro Bowl. Asked why Thomas and not the vet, Johnson said simply, "Because Zach is better."Jones' three yards on four carries in less than a half Friday night can be excused as first-game issues coming back from a strained hamstring. The decision to move Benson ahead of Jones in the off-season, however, had less to do with the money paid to Benson than to the simple fact that coaches believe Benson is better—or at least soon will be. Jones was better in 2005; this isn't 2005.The ethic of the NFL isn't that the most experienced guy plays. It is that the best guy plays.The Bears drafted, and paid, Benson not because they didn't like Jones. They simply think Benson is better. If Jones, entering his seventh season, wanted to make a rebuttal argument, Friday wasn't his best case. If the Bears think Benson is better, he should start.jmullin@tribune.com Copyright © 2006, The Chicago Tribune

Good to see the folks on this board aren't the only ones who over-react to the preseason. Benson WILL BE the starter at some point - assuming he gets his act together, learns to pick up the blitz, stays healthy, and stops alienating his team. I don't see that happening this season. He'll get carries, but not starts.

You can take it however you want, but just so you know John Mullin is one of the top, if not thee top reporter tuned in to the Bears out there

 

[thecardiackid]

Thomas Jones was very unimpressive against the Cardinals.

Seriously.STOP OVERREACTING TO PRESEASON GAMES!!!

Aaron Brooks was DIVING down draft charts...but I'm sure he's top 10 again after tonight.

Preseason means NOTHING. Repeat that to yourself about 5,000 times.

Agree, but you've got to admit that 4 rushes for 3 yards is *even in the pre-season*

NO I DON'T!!!It's FOUR RUSHES!!!

Seriously, you guys that overreact to this crap are the same ones who are going to see LT struggle somewhat in Week 1 and then trade him for Rudi Johnson.

Take a step back, relax...and realize...

IT'S THE PRESEASON!!!

Wasn't trying to get you all riled up there.And you cut out my "disclaimer"... Maybe I'm overreacting a little (own BOTH TJ and CB in one league btw), but my real concern is IF they start the season w/ Grossman and IF he continues to :X , it will be tough sledding for either back. Turnovers killing drives and scoring opps, lots of 3 and outs, etc.

The regular season (bad) stat lines are fine, everyone has a rough week or two, but all I'm saying is I was hoping for a little more out of TJ (and the CHI rush O) than a .75 YPC - considering it's getting late in the pre-season, he's coming off a long TC vacation, and they were playing friggin ZONA. Decent D, but really. Hell, I'd have been overjoyed with 6 for 25. I'm sure they want to work him in slowly after the hammy, so I understand the limited work.

Would this performance scare me away from drafting TJ? Of course not. But his performance didn't do a whole lot for a guy fighting for a starting spot - who is looking over his shoulder @ a top 1st round RB (that the GM loves).

 

[Raider Nation]

Benson will not start at ANY TIME this season, whether Jones is healthy or not?



Can I visit your planet?

I will be sure to remind you of this come Oct or Nov.

Don't bother marking it on your calendar.I'll be the one bumping this thread.

 

[Raider Nation]

Benson will not start at ANY TIME this season, whether Jones is healthy or not?



Can I visit your planet?

I will be sure to remind you of this come Oct or Nov.

Don't bother marking it on your calendar.I'll be the one bumping this thread.

It's really satisfying to see when someone bumps their own mistakes. to you.

Just so we're clear here.Your contention is, if Jones is healthy all year, Benson will start ZERO games?

Again ----->

 

[JohnnyU]

Benson will not start at ANY TIME this season, whether Jones is healthy or not?



Can I visit your planet?

I will be sure to remind you of this come Oct or Nov.

Don't bother marking it on your calendar.I'll be the one bumping this thread.

It's really satisfying to see when someone bumps their own mistakes. to you.

Just so we're clear here.Your contention is, if Jones is healthy all year, Benson will start ZERO games?

Again ----->

Never mind. I see you didn't quote the guy right. I believe both of us believe Benson will start sometime this year, whether Jones is healthy or not.

 

[Raider Nation]

Benson will not start at ANY TIME this season, whether Jones is healthy or not?



Can I visit your planet?

I will be sure to remind you of this come Oct or Nov.

Don't bother marking it on your calendar.I'll be the one bumping this thread.

It's really satisfying to see when someone bumps their own mistakes. to you.

Just so we're clear here.Your contention is, if Jones is healthy all year, Benson will start ZERO games?

Again ----->

Never mind. I see you didn't quote the guy right, but instead replied to his post as if his was yours.

I knew you were smarter than that. Jones had his chance. Benson will play in the final preseason game on the 31st, and he'll never look back.

 

[Steelers4Life]

There are a few ways that I can see Benson starting this year.

1. If Jones is ineffective - I wouldn't hold my breath on that one.

2. If Jones gets injured - It's possible. Few RBs don't get dinged up at some point.

3. If the Bears fall out of playoff contention - I don't think their defense or division will allow that to happen.

I do not see Benson starting a game in 2006 if none of these things happen.

Assuming health from both players, I see Jones getting around 300 carries plus receptions, Benson getting around 150 carries, and Peterson about 50. That's about 40 more runs than last year, but given the fact that Benson will likely be more ready to contribute than he was last year, I'd say it's reachable.

 

[glen5839]

If there's a God in Heaven, Benson will take this job and run with it. Please fantasy football Gods shine down upon me, just this once.

 

[eefflrat]

I have both Jones $20, and benson $48 in my auction keeper league (220 CAP), and I can keep them both but I was hoping to toss Benson back and get him cheaper. After Jones' outing last night I am a little concerned that I won't be able to do that. Our keepers are due midnight tonight and frozen until draft next weekend. I don't even know how Benson is doing at this point, has he taken a hit yet? If he comes back to practice Monday and hurts his houlder again I have wasted a spot and cap room that I could use.

Tough call for me.

 

[tmc94]

I have both Jones $20, and benson $48 in my auction keeper league (220 CAP), and I can keep them both but I was hoping to toss Benson back and get him cheaper. After Jones' outing last night I am a little concerned that I won't be able to do that. Our keepers are due midnight tonight and frozen until draft next weekend. I don't even know how Benson is doing at this point, has he taken a hit yet? If he comes back to practice Monday and hurts his houlder again I have wasted a spot and cap room that I could use. Tough call for me.

So right now you are spending about 1/5th of your cap on a guy that may or may not start this year and you're wondering if you should throw him back?