What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Ben Roethlisberger - first ballot HOFer? (1 Viewer)

1st ballot HOFer?

  • Yes

    Votes: 51 34.7%
  • No, but he eventually gets in

    Votes: 52 35.4%
  • Sorry, sit over there with Kenny Stabler

    Votes: 44 29.9%

  • Total voters
    147

David Yudkin

Footballguy
I figured we might as well get this off the ground and debate it for 6 years like we've done in the Hines Ward thread. By that time we should know where things stand with Big Ben.

 
Roethlisberger has taken the third most sacks* of any QB through age 29. He's seemingly injured all the time, and I wonder how he holds up over the rest of his career.

Neil Lomax was done at age 29. David Carr was essentially done. Bledsoe's career trailed off after age 30. Ken O'Brien was basically done by age 31. And the list goes on and on.

He's not Brees or Manning. He takes a lot of hits, often painful ones. I certainly wouldn't be surprised if he started looking like an average (or worse) QB in a couple of years and never recovers.

With that in mind, too early to say.

*Individual sack data only began being available starting in 1969.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Better than average QB on some really good Steeler teams.

So, yes, he is a LOCK because he plays for the Steelers.

 
4 more years with current stats.

2 years past that with average stats.

4-5 more probowls even if they're reputation based.

No superbowls, but 4 more playoff seasons.

Maybe 4 more total playoff game wins.

I think that would get him in.

And I'd project him to do better than that when it's all said and done. So yes, I'd say there's a better than 70% chance at this moment that he'll end his career as a 1st ballot guy.

 
4-5 more probowls even if they're reputation based.
Ben just made his 2nd Pro Bowl in this his 8th season.By comparison, through 8 seasons, Hines Ward ranked 37th in most receiving yards through 8 seasons played by a WR. Roethlisberger ranks 7th in passing yards for QBs through their first 8 seasons played.
 
4-5 more probowls even if they're reputation based.
Ben just made his 2nd Pro Bowl in this his 8th season.By comparison, through 8 seasons, Hines Ward ranked 37th in most receiving yards through 8 seasons played by a WR. Roethlisberger ranks 7th in passing yards for QBs through their first 8 seasons played.
True, but who's battling him in the AFC? Manning (if he's back next year AND in the AFC), Rivers, Schaub am I missing anyone? Brady stopped going to Probowls so he probably doesn't count.That means he just has to finish in the top 3 of 15. Not to mention reputation makes probowl almost a legacy if you're having an average season especially on a good team which the Steelers usually are.
 
Too early to say. If he holds up health-wise, then probably. If he retires with 3-4 rings, he's almost a mortal lock based solely on that. He'll probably make a few more Pro Bowls too, thus far he's had the misfortune of having to fight for one spot with the entire AFC behind Brady and Manning, who may be the 2 best QBs that have ever lived (at the very least, they're in the top 5.) His per attempt numbers have historically been more eye-catching than the raw #s since the Steelers were always at or near the top of the table in run to pass ratio, but now that's changing quite a bit, so the aggregate numbers may follow. The problem is that offenses like NO, NE, and GB these days just pass non-stop, and he's never going to have 600 attempt seasons.

Right now, it just boils down to health. He's still in his 20s and has a lot of football left to play if his body holds up.

 
It's impossible to say yet if he's first ballot or not. But as a strong opponent of Hines Ward in the HOF, I'm an equally strong supporter of Roethlisberger as a HOF QB, especially if he continues his current trajectory.

It's interesting to me that these two Steelers, regardless of their stats, fall on different sides of the eyeball test. Ward has been a great competitor and a winner, but he's never stood out from his peers as a truly extraordinary player. Roethlisberger, on the other hand, is a truly special player with a unique ability to manufacture plays that would pretty much be impossible for any other QB in the league.

 
The problem is that offenses like NO, NE, and GB these days just pass non-stop, and he's never going to have 600 attempt seasons.
His numbers this year project to 547 attempts if he had started 16 games. Wouldn't surprise me at all if he gets 600 next year.
 
Big Ben was never a dominant QB in the NFL, nor the AFC for that matter. He won SB's largely on the back of an elite defense and a studly power running game. Once the defense stopped being elite, Big Ben stopped winning SuperBowls.

Probowls are a popularity contest and a ton of players sit out that allow for guys like Big Ben (and Tim Tebow) to say they "made it".

With that said, he will probably get in simply for the fact that he has a few rings. But he isn't getting in on the first ballot.

 
Big Ben was never a dominant QB in the NFL, nor the AFC for that matter. He won SB's largely on the back of an elite defense and a studly power running game. Once the defense stopped being elite, Big Ben stopped winning SuperBowls.
Was this written from the future? If so, please let us know when the Steelers' defense stopped being elite and how many SBs they won before that happened.
 
The problem is that offenses like NO, NE, and GB these days just pass non-stop, and he's never going to have 600 attempt seasons.
His numbers this year project to 547 attempts if he had started 16 games. Wouldn't surprise me at all if he gets 600 next year.
It's possible, but it's equally likely that he'll max out around 525-550. The Steelers' identity is to run the ball and stop the run. Tomlin has echoed that it's the style he prefers. They're not dumb enough to glue themselves to a game plan that will inhibit their offensive capability, but they've abandoned the run for the air more this year than I've seen in the last decade or so. I think they'd prefer to "ground and pound" more, and if they obtain the personnel (mainly OL) to facilitate that, they'll gravitate back that way.Steelers threw the ball 539 times this season and still ranked 19th in pass attempts. You have guys these days throwing 650-660 times, so Ben's probably never going to have as gaudy numbers as some of his contemporaries, that's just the way it's going to be. I'd much rather he retire as Troy Aikman than Dan Marino, though.
 
The problem is that offenses like NO, NE, and GB these days just pass non-stop, and he's never going to have 600 attempt seasons.
His numbers this year project to 547 attempts if he had started 16 games. Wouldn't surprise me at all if he gets 600 next year.
600 attempts in 16 games is 37.5 per game.His ATT/GM so far:
Code:
YEAR  ATT/GM2004   21.12005   22.32006   31.32007   26.92008   29.32009   33.72010   32.42011   34.2
So, he's trending upwards, but a big jump to get to 37.5. Not to mention that he's only played in 16 games once in his career.
 
Roethlisberger's never made the playoffs when the defense didn't rank in the top 3 in points allowed.
Now give me the % of seasons they had a top 3 defense in points allowed and also won the Super Bowl from 2004-present and compare that to the # of seasons they had a top-3 scoring defense and the # of Super Bowls they won from 1980-2004.
 
Big Ben was never a dominant QB in the NFL, nor the AFC for that matter. He won SB's largely on the back of an elite defense and a studly power running game. Once the defense stopped being elite, Big Ben stopped winning SuperBowls.
Was this written from the future? If so, please let us know when the Steelers' defense stopped being elite and how many SBs they won before that happened.
:goodposting:
 
His ATT/GM so far:

YEAR ATT/GM2004 21.12005 22.32006 31.32007 26.92008 29.32009 33.72010 32.42011 34.2So, he's trending upwards, but a big jump to get to 37.5. Not to mention that he's only played in 16 games once in his career.
Interesting. Kind of amazing that his ATT/GM are up by 50 percent in just a few short years.
It's possible, but it's equally likely that he'll max out around 525-550. The Steelers' identity is to run the ball and stop the run.
:no: They are not a running team, even more so now that Mendenhall will be limited, at least in the early part of next year. Would you rather go with a gimpy Mendy, or Ben chucking it to Wallace, Brown, and Sanders?
 
His ATT/GM so far:

YEAR ATT/GM2004 21.12005 22.32006 31.32007 26.92008 29.32009 33.72010 32.42011 34.2So, he's trending upwards, but a big jump to get to 37.5. Not to mention that he's only played in 16 games once in his career.
Interesting. Kind of amazing that his ATT/GM are up by 50 percent in just a few short years.
It's possible, but it's equally likely that he'll max out around 525-550. The Steelers' identity is to run the ball and stop the run.
:no: They are not a running team, even more so now that Mendenhall will be limited, at least in the early part of next year. Would you rather go with a gimpy Mendy, or Ben chucking it to Wallace, Brown, and Sanders?
They are not a running team right now, no. But even with that, they still run the ball 45% of the time, compare that with NE, NO, or Detroit. What I'm saying is that they want to, and if possible will, gravitate closer to a 50/50 split going forward. That's where they WANT to be.
 
Big Ben was never a dominant QB in the NFL, nor the AFC for that matter. He won SB's largely on the back of an elite defense and a studly power running game. Once the defense stopped being elite, Big Ben stopped winning SuperBowls.
You do realize that the Steelers won their last Super Bowl when Roethlisberger led a 2-minute drive for a TD at the end of the game after the defense completely collapsed in the 4th quarter, blowing a double digit lead, right? He didn't have a great game other than that, but that drive was money. To answer the question, if he wins another Super Bowl, absolutely. No way does a QB who wins three rings as a starter not get in on the first try.
 
To answer the question, if he wins another Super Bowl, absolutely. No way does a QB who wins three rings as a starter not get in on the first try.
This is the correct answer.Without that 3rd ring, there will always be a debate.With it there is none.
 
They are not a running team right now, no. But even with that, they still run the ball 45% of the time, compare that with NE, NO, or Detroit. What I'm saying is that they want to, and if possible will, gravitate closer to a 50/50 split going forward. That's where they WANT to be.
I'm not sure how it happened, but PIT, NO, and PIT essentially all had a similar number of rushing attemtpts this year. But both NE and NO had a lot more passing attempts. For some reason, the Saints and Pats ran way more total plays.
 
Lock...3 SB trips, 2 rings, another 5-6 years still to go in the NFL, maybe another Super Bowl run along the way...he gets in for sure and most folks around the NFL regard him as a top3-5 QB no matter what the stats might say.

 
Lock...3 SB trips, 2 rings, another 5-6 years still to go in the NFL, maybe another Super Bowl run along the way...he gets in for sure and most folks around the NFL regard him as a top3-5 QB no matter what the stats might say.
I don't see how anyone could make an argument that Big Ben is remotely even close to Rodgers, Brees, PManning, or Brady. Best case, Ben would be playing for 5th . . . and that's best case scenario.
 
Lock...3 SB trips, 2 rings, another 5-6 years still to go in the NFL, maybe another Super Bowl run along the way...he gets in for sure and most folks around the NFL regard him as a top3-5 QB no matter what the stats might say.
I don't see how anyone could make an argument that Big Ben is remotely even close to Rodgers, Brees, PManning, or Brady. Best case, Ben would be playing for 5th . . . and that's best case scenario.
But where were Brees and Brady at age 29? Brees was a career .500 QB and Brady was mostly a game manager with a good D. Both entered their peak years at 30. Reasonable to believe Roethlisberger will do the same with two young stud WRs and an improving, young O-line.
 
I don't see how anyone could make an argument that Big Ben is remotely even close to Rodgers, Brees, PManning, or Brady.
If we are talking about quarterbacking a team to wins... he's better. (though I understand the Manning and Brady counteragument) We are talking abut the Hall of Fame, yes? Not the Hall of Stats.
 
I don't see how anyone could make an argument that Big Ben is remotely even close to Rodgers, Brees, PManning, or Brady.
If we are talking about quarterbacking a team to wins... he's better. (though I understand the Manning and Brady counteragument) We are talking abut the Hall of Fame, yes? Not the Hall of Stats.
Do you really think that Rodgers, Brady, Brees, or Manning couldn't win if they had the #1 defense to support them? Really?
 
I don't see how anyone could make an argument that Big Ben is remotely even close to Rodgers, Brees, PManning, or Brady.
If we are talking about quarterbacking a team to wins... he's better. (though I understand the Manning and Brady counteragument) We are talking abut the Hall of Fame, yes? Not the Hall of Stats.
Do you really think that Rodgers, Brady, Brees, or Manning couldn't win if they had the #1 defense to support them? Really?
Do you really think Rodgers, Brady, Brees or Manning would throw the ball as much as they do and put up the stats they do if their defenses didn't let the other team score so many points? Really?
 
I don't see how anyone could make an argument that Big Ben is remotely even close to Rodgers, Brees, PManning, or Brady.
If we are talking about quarterbacking a team to wins... he's better. (though I understand the Manning and Brady counteragumenht) We are talking abut the Hall of Fame, yes? Not the Hall of Stats.
Do you really think that Rodgers, Brady, Brees, or Manning couldn't win if they had the #1 defense to support them? Really?
Do you really think Rodgers, Brady, Brees or Manning would throw the ball as much as they do and put up the stats they do if their defenses didn't let the other team score so many points? Really?
The Pats, Packers, and Saints each have had games where they were up by 40 points and STILL were passing and trying to score. So yes. They would still air it out. ESPECIALLY in the current state of the NFL.
 
I don't see how anyone could make an argument that Big Ben is remotely even close to Rodgers, Brees, PManning, or Brady.
If we are talking about quarterbacking a team to wins... he's better. (though I understand the Manning and Brady counteragument) We are talking abut the Hall of Fame, yes? Not the Hall of Stats.
That's a ridiculous statement, but typical for a Steelers homer. Has the Steeler fanbase ever met a good Steeler that they didn't overrate?
 
'GridironMenace said:
Big Ben was never a dominant QB in the NFL, nor the AFC for that matter. He won SB's largely on the back of an elite defense and a studly power running game. Once the defense stopped being elite, Big Ben stopped winning SuperBowls. Probowls are a popularity contest and a ton of players sit out that allow for guys like Big Ben (and Tim Tebow) to say they "made it". With that said, he will probably get in simply for the fact that he has a few rings. But he isn't getting in on the first ballot.
See Troy Aikman.
 
Is Ben a 1st ballot hof'r if his career were over today? Not imho; however, would he likely get in at some point? He gets my vote and I think it is more likely than not that he would make it.

He may be a lock for 1st ballot if he continues to play well and be sucessful over the next few years, but right this minute I don't think he is there quite yet.

 
'David Yudkin said:
'apalmer said:
'David Yudkin said:
'BigSteelThrill said:
'David Yudkin said:
I don't see how anyone could make an argument that Big Ben is remotely even close to Rodgers, Brees, PManning, or Brady.
If we are talking about quarterbacking a team to wins... he's better. (though I understand the Manning and Brady counteragumenht) We are talking abut the Hall of Fame, yes? Not the Hall of Stats.
Do you really think that Rodgers, Brady, Brees, or Manning couldn't win if they had the #1 defense to support them? Really?
Do you really think Rodgers, Brady, Brees or Manning would throw the ball as much as they do and put up the stats they do if their defenses didn't let the other team score so many points? Really?
The Pats, Packers, and Saints each have had games where they were up by 40 points and STILL were passing and trying to score. So yes. They would still air it out. ESPECIALLY in the current state of the NFL.
And that's exactly why basing HOF arguments purely on regular season statistics is comical.
 
And that's exactly why basing HOF arguments purely on regular season statistics is comical.
Roger Craig ranks Top 3 in both yards from scrimmage and total TD in Super Bowls. That hasn't helped him much in terms of HOF balloting. Jim Plunkett ranks second in SB passer rating and won two titles.Sometimes post season stats matter . . . sometimes they don't.
 
Everyone is hating on him and saying the defense and run game helped him blah blah. The point of the NFL is winning, he made clutch plays at the most crucial times. No one man could bring him down and is phenomenal.

 
'Frenchy Fuqua said:
'David Yudkin said:
'Ministry of Pain said:
Lock...3 SB trips, 2 rings, another 5-6 years still to go in the NFL, maybe another Super Bowl run along the way...he gets in for sure and most folks around the NFL regard him as a top3-5 QB no matter what the stats might say.
I don't see how anyone could make an argument that Big Ben is remotely even close to Rodgers, Brees, PManning, or Brady. Best case, Ben would be playing for 5th . . . and that's best case scenario.
But where were Brees and Brady at age 29? Brees was a career .500 QB and Brady was mostly a game manager with a good D. Both entered their peak years at 30. Reasonable to believe Roethlisberger will do the same with two young stud WRs and an improving, young O-line.
Let's plug Ben into the GB or NO offense and see what kind of stats he produces. Despite all the rings that Brady, Brees, Manning, and Rodgers have won, Big Ben has still carved out his piece of the pie. Meaning he has faced the best of the best from this era and has 2 rings to show for it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top