Barksdale Ballers
Footballguy
What can BJGE do against the Jets in a short week? Do SJax owners hold out to find out if he's active and not start BJGE? Did that manhandling the Jets did to the Rams make SJax more likely to play?
I have Morris too, but seems like Morris and BJGE alone are solid, but together are too risky a play, especially in Morris's first game back. Could be going to the bottom of the barrel for this one (DWard against the Ravens)plus it sounds like SJax will probably be out in week 11 --- sounds like you need to find another RB this week (if Morris plays)
Speculation on how the carries might be divided up, David? I know it could go in any number of ways but in your opinion, how does the backfield shape up if Morris is able to play?I heard today that Morris may be well enough to play.
Well, we don't have much to go on in terms of BJGE and Morris splitting the workload. I would guess an equal split between those to with Faulk getting a couple carries and most of the receptions. It would be interesting to see which guy got the goal line looks, as they both seem to be decent short yardage guys.Speculation on how the carries might be divided up, David? I know it could go in any number of ways but in your opinion, how does the backfield shape up if Morris is able to play?I heard today that Morris may be well enough to play.
That's what I was wondering about too. Both have done well as goal-line RBs so which one gets the call? The other thing is the Patriots lost nothing going from Morris to BJGE. Bellichick likes Morris a lot but is that enough to ignore how good the kid has played?Well, we don't have much to go on in terms of BJGE and Morris splitting the workload. I would guess an equal split between those to with Faulk getting a couple carries and most of the receptions. It would be interesting to see which guy got the goal line looks, as they both seem to be decent short yardage guys.Speculation on how the carries might be divided up, David? I know it could go in any number of ways but in your opinion, how does the backfield shape up if Morris is able to play?I heard today that Morris may be well enough to play.
I agree. But for those in the market for a RB for the remainder of the season, Morris might be someone to target if he was dropped following his knee injury. He's available in my league, for example, and if the indications are he'll return to the starting lineup (even if he's in a RBBC with BJGE), then he has value because he was playing well before he got hurt. Overall, the next three weeks look very tough. The Patriots get Miami in Week 12 and the Dolphins' run defense has been good although Julius Jones ran all over them yesterday (very surprising lack of defense from Miami in that game). And in Week 13, the Patriots face the Steelers. But if you've made it to Week 14, the Patriots get Seattle that week and then close out with:Week 15: at OaklandWeek 16: vs. ArizonaWeek 17: at BuffaloThat's a solid final month and the Patriots' running game has a chance to do well in all of those games in my opinion. So whoever is getting double-digit carries and the goal-line looks will have value as a RB3 at worst those weeks.JMJ said:I wouldn't start virtually any RB versus Kris Jenkins and the Jets run D.
don't think I have ever heard "bench your RB vs the the Jets D" - brings a tear to this Jet fan's eye!JMJ said:I wouldn't start virtually any RB versus Kris Jenkins and the Jets run D.
I thought the same thing when I saw the thread... "tough Jets D"...don't think I have ever heard "bench your RB vs the the Jets D" - brings a tear to this Jet fan's eye!JMJ said:I wouldn't start virtually any RB versus Kris Jenkins and the Jets run D.
Me too... I love the J-E-T-S!don't think I have ever heard "bench your RB vs the the Jets D" - brings a tear to this Jet fan's eye!JMJ said:I wouldn't start virtually any RB versus Kris Jenkins and the Jets run D.
So is the consensus here that BenJarvus' run as the starter with 20+ carries is over?Do the Pats definitely revert back to the split backfield once Sammy Morris returns?Well, we don't have much to go on in terms of BJGE and Morris splitting the workload. I would guess an equal split between those to with Faulk getting a couple carries and most of the receptions. It would be interesting to see which guy got the goal line looks, as they both seem to be decent short yardage guys.Speculation on how the carries might be divided up, David? I know it could go in any number of ways but in your opinion, how does the backfield shape up if Morris is able to play?I heard today that Morris may be well enough to play.
If the consensus = 1 person (me), then I guess I speak for everyone. My opinion remains that the Pats won't have anyone getting 20 carries a game on a regular basis. I will check in to see if Morris is expected to play tomorrow, but I might not get an answer until later this afternoon.So is the consensus here that BenJarvus' run as the starter with 20+ carries is over?Do the Pats definitely revert back to the split backfield once Sammy Morris returns?Well, we don't have much to go on in terms of BJGE and Morris splitting the workload. I would guess an equal split between those to with Faulk getting a couple carries and most of the receptions. It would be interesting to see which guy got the goal line looks, as they both seem to be decent short yardage guys.Speculation on how the carries might be divided up, David? I know it could go in any number of ways but in your opinion, how does the backfield shape up if Morris is able to play?I heard today that Morris may be well enough to play.
If I had to guess, I would think BB will sit Morris regardless this week due to the 10 day break between games. Morris should be back for week 12.I'm hearing Jordan is very unlikely to play this week and they are still debating about what to do with Morris. Will still try to find out more today . . .
Nice work as usual. Always a mess figuring out the NE RB situation and add a short week into the mix and it's even worse, so keep the updates coming.I'm hearing Jordan is very unlikely to play this week and they are still debating about what to do with Morris. Will still try to find out more today . . .
David > everyone else (put together)If the consensus = 1 person (me), then I guess I speak for everyone. My opinion remains that the Pats won't have anyone getting 20 carries a game on a regular basis. I will check in to see if Morris is expected to play tomorrow, but I might not get an answer until later this afternoon.So is the consensus here that BenJarvus' run as the starter with 20+ carries is over?Do the Pats definitely revert back to the split backfield once Sammy Morris returns?Well, we don't have much to go on in terms of BJGE and Morris splitting the workload. I would guess an equal split between those to with Faulk getting a couple carries and most of the receptions. It would be interesting to see which guy got the goal line looks, as they both seem to be decent short yardage guys.Speculation on how the carries might be divided up, David? I know it could go in any number of ways but in your opinion, how does the backfield shape up if Morris is able to play?I heard today that Morris may be well enough to play.
Gut call on things shake out tomorrow night David?Jordan listed as doubtful. Morris listed as questionable.
From what I am hearing, Morris may be well enough to go and it's going to be a team decision whether he is well enough to contribute and if they are risking a reinjury. Jordan definitely had a set back and got worse than last week, so I would not be surprised if he were out next week as well.Not sure how to classify Morris "looking like he could go." I'll see what else I can drum up by game time tomorrow. As of this exact moment, I would guess they play it safe and sit him, meaning another week of BJGE getting a decent workload and Faulk the receptions. But certainly that's a guess.Gut call on things shake out tomorrow night David?Jordan listed as doubtful. Morris listed as questionable.
Never easy it seems, but that certainly seems like the logical move, especially with BJGE running solidly. Now have to decide how he'll do against Jets D and how will BB use him even if he is the featured back.From what I am hearing, Morris may be well enough to go and it's going to be a team decision whether he is well enough to contribute and if they are risking a reinjury. Jordan definitely had a set back and got worse than last week, so I would not be surprised if he were out next week as well.Not sure how to classify Morris "looking like he could go." I'll see what else I can drum up by game time tomorrow. As of this exact moment, I would guess they play it safe and sit him, meaning another week of BJGE getting a decent workload and Faulk the receptions. But certainly that's a guess.Gut call on things shake out tomorrow night David?Jordan listed as doubtful. Morris listed as questionable.
Yup, I agree..but the GL TD I put at 20%..he will not have much traction to run and ball be slippery..Be raining all nite!18/65/.40 2/13/0 Jets rushing defense will shut him down. He'll have a shot at a GL TD but may not convert, hence the 40% chance at a TD.
I'm in the same situation and thinking of doing the same thing....fly19382 said:I'm leaning towards starting BJGE over Portis or Betts. I own both and could also pick up Alexander. I am just really uncomfortable with any of them right now. Any thoughts?
This would be outstanding, but I don't see it. I'm hesitant to even play him at my flex spot this week. The Jets have one of the best run D's in the NFL, and I don't see how a sloppy field will help an already slow RB. I see GE with about 40-60 total yards in this game, so he would need a TD to go along with that. I don't like praying for TD plunges myself. Also, I think Faulk will have a much bigger role in this game than the last. A power running game was working against the Bills, and that's why GE had the big game. That won't work against the Jets.With the type of RB that BJGE is, I would think that he could benifit from a sloppy field. I think that the quick and shifty RBs struggle, but the more power backs should benifit.21/111/1 2/18
I completely agree. I was going to put him in as my RB2 ... but I have more confidence in Rhodes this week.This would be outstanding, but I don't see it. I'm hesitant to even play him at my flex spot this week. The Jets have one of the best run D's in the NFL, and I don't see how a sloppy field will help an already slow RB. I see GE with about 40-60 total yards in this game, so he would need a TD to go along with that. I don't like praying for TD plunges myself. Also, I think Faulk will have a much bigger role in this game than the last. A power running game was working against the Bills, and that's why GE had the big game. That won't work against the Jets.With the type of RB that BJGE is, I would think that he could benifit from a sloppy field. I think that the quick and shifty RBs struggle, but the more power backs should benifit.21/111/1 2/18
Link?I ask because there is nothing that I can see on the Globe site that says this.I'm not saying that it's inaccurate either, only that I don't see it from the source listed.Just an updateatriots: Morris might play11/13/08 10:18 AMTHE NEWSPatriots running back Sammy Morris practiced for two straight days this week and he may be able to play on Thursday night, according to the Boston Globe.Our ViewMorris has been dealing with a knee injury, and his practice time has been limited, so even if he does suit up, it isn't wise for fantasy owners to have huge expectations.
I saw the same thing.http://www.rototimes.com/nfl/player.php?tqid=3447Link?I ask because there is nothing that I can see on the Globe site that says this.Just an update:
Patriots: Morris might play
11/13/08 10:18 AM
THE NEWS
Patriots running back Sammy Morris practiced for two straight days this week and he may be able to play on Thursday night, according to the Boston Globe.
Our View
Morris has been dealing with a knee injury, and his practice time has been limited, so even if he does suit up, it isn't wise for fantasy owners to have huge expectations.
I'm not saying that it's inaccurate either, only that I don't see it from the source listed.