2 hours ago, Zow said:
I bought it to the extent that he may now be serious about trying to stop a repeat of 1/6 on 1/20. I say this because if I were his attorney it's what I'd be advising him to do to distance himself from any liability on 1/20 and hopefully to mitigate any liability he may have and may be facing from 1/6. Put differently, given that a bunch of idiots storming capitals on 1/20 isn't going to win the presidency back for him, it's in Trump's best interests for 1/20 to be calm and smooth. And, we know Trump, if anything, does look out for his own interests. So, yeah, in a weird way I think he does mean that he doesn't want violence on 1/20 like what happened on 1/6 (which I do think he wanted but realizes now that was a mistake).
Expand