Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Better Late RB "Stash" for future? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Lehigh98
- Start date
Depends on the league format but based on that list, I like Wilson. Bradshaw has been hurt a lot (stem cell stuff done to his feet in the offseason) and New York's offense can score. Wilson could be a beast if Bradshaw goes down.
Same goes for Leshoure but there are more people there to fight off (Smith, Best if ever comes back, etc.).
Same goes for Leshoure but there are more people there to fight off (Smith, Best if ever comes back, etc.).
socrates
Footballguy
The Thin Man?Ryan Williams, Tate and Wilson headline that list, IMO.
Last edited by a moderator:
I like Leshoure the most, especially when we're talking a stash. The competition seems close to nil with Smith being inconsistent and injury-prone and Best having serious concussion issues. Plus, Leshoure is a great goalline bet going forward. Him being one more year removed from the Achillies injury should only mean good things.
Next, I'd say Wilson. Bradshaw only has so many carries left in him, and I liked Wilson at VT.
Hillman and Pead are both behind backs with a ton of carries. But I'm not that high on their talent. Opportunity may make them better options, though. I'm not buying yet.
Competition doesn't bode well for Tate, Hunter, Royster, or Dwyer.
I like Williams and his situation with Beanie. But that line is awful.
I like Miller a lot, but he REALLY could have used another year at UM. Daniel Thomas isn't looking so great, so the opportunity could be there down the line. But he's really raw.
I'd say:
Leshoure
Wilson
Tate
Williams
Rodgers
Next, I'd say Wilson. Bradshaw only has so many carries left in him, and I liked Wilson at VT.
Hillman and Pead are both behind backs with a ton of carries. But I'm not that high on their talent. Opportunity may make them better options, though. I'm not buying yet.
Competition doesn't bode well for Tate, Hunter, Royster, or Dwyer.
I like Williams and his situation with Beanie. But that line is awful.
I like Miller a lot, but he REALLY could have used another year at UM. Daniel Thomas isn't looking so great, so the opportunity could be there down the line. But he's really raw.
I'd say:
Leshoure
Wilson
Tate
Williams
Rodgers
flc735
Footballguy
when i am thinking long term, i ask 'who will have the most value in 1 year from now'. you always have the option to trade so looking beyond that is pointless.
so for me, its wilson. he seems to be the safest bet to gain significant value in a year from now. i don't think he will have to play that well in order to put himself in that position ff value wise
ryan wilson is in this boat too, but i don't think his value will rise with an average season like wilson's will. if both players do play well this year, i think wilson will be thought to have a higher upside based on team
j rodgers will have to have a great season to convince us he can become more than a ppr rb2 at best.
we will know the book on royster this year, so he is not a buy low long term guy, imo
same goes for the rest of the non rookies except tate.
i don't think tate will succeed on a different team, but if/when he changes teams, his value will be very high through that offseason
so for me, its wilson. he seems to be the safest bet to gain significant value in a year from now. i don't think he will have to play that well in order to put himself in that position ff value wise
ryan wilson is in this boat too, but i don't think his value will rise with an average season like wilson's will. if both players do play well this year, i think wilson will be thought to have a higher upside based on team
j rodgers will have to have a great season to convince us he can become more than a ppr rb2 at best.
we will know the book on royster this year, so he is not a buy low long term guy, imo
same goes for the rest of the non rookies except tate.
i don't think tate will succeed on a different team, but if/when he changes teams, his value will be very high through that offseason
Last edited by a moderator:
HittinHard
Footballguy
Leshoure i the one i would be targetting.
Similar threads
