I'm confused now. Did my explanation about how they weren't the same after explaining the additional overhead costs of affirmatively paying private loans not make sense?
of course it did, but it was lawyer lingo. props for that, but my whole point was $10,000 is $10,000. you watered it down with the expense cost of paying off private loans so a no go. fine, let's pay off kids car loans up to $10,000 but deduct $2000 in administration costs. so they get $8000.00. bingo.
more votes. stupid policy to be teaching kids when they are approaching making mature decisions for their life & family.
you think it's a good idea, fine.
I think it is horrendous for the future of the next generation. nothing surprises me anymore when the motivation to get votes overrides what is best for the country. and using taxpayers money to do it. doubling the IRS squad should really crank some of you up to get more from those who work to those that choose not to. more votes, right?
not singling you out Woz, just surprised you are in favor of the loan forgiveness.