What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Biggest bust of the year (1 Viewer)

QB: Cam Newton

RB: Ryan Mathews

WR: Roddy White

TE: Jermichael Finley

K: Who ever the #1 consensus kicker is

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Brees a bust ? lol. closing your eyes and throwing darts or just repeating that year after year until you can finally say you were right? What reasoning could you possibly have to make a prediction like that? hold out? lol. the guy is as dedicated to his craft as anyone on the planet, he does more in his downtime to be prepared to play football as most players do in training camp. That's rediculous.Hold on... let me get my ennie meanie minie moe bust predictor decoder ring out.... Says... Ray Rice, Fitzgerald and Gronk will be busts this year.... You heard it here first. lol.
I'm actually basing this on the coaching staff suspensions as I have a ton of faith in Sean Payton's offensive genius, and I think the "new guy" will be far more conservative. Last year they had 1,117 offensive plays and only 431 were rushing (less than 40%). But in that they rushed it less than 40% of the time, New Orleans was 4th in the league last year in yards per rushing attempt, and the new "coach" will rely on that I believe.Brees led the league in each of the following -completions, completion %, yards, TDs, and passes for 1st downs.And was 2nd in attempts, 20+ yard completions, and sack %.I can't see all of those repeating with all of the bad news coming out of NO.Also, Brees' best games last year were against the Packers, Giants, Vikings, and Panthers (last year #32, #29, #26, and #24 vs the pass in terms of yards given up - and #32, #27, #25 and #24 vs the pass in terms of TDs given up). This year his schedule is at least a bit harder with the AFC West, NFC East, and the 49ers. He only had 3 games last year against teams in the top 13 of pass defenses vs. the pass - the Jags, Rams and Texans - where he had 2 of his 3 worst games throwing only a single TD in both (he is mortal).Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying he'll have a horrible year, but 4,500 yards for 34 TDs and 17 INTs (my projections) shouldn't make him the 1st round pick where he's being taken. The NFL is going to a more pass oriented scheme, so I think other QBs will put up numbers close to those, and you can get them much, much later.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What happened to the Madden curse/Brees last year?
He wasn't on the cover last year. But when he was he suffered a MCL tear that was kept secret all season and threw the most interceptions of his career.ETA: and failed to defend his team's title by losing in the first round to a team that had the worst regular season ever to make the playoffs.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
By position:

WR: Andre Johnson - 20 games and 10 TDs over the past two seasons. Never had a double-digit TD season. Typically 3rd receiver off the board
I think you have to give a guy a pass on this one. AJ was the #1 WR in 2008 and 2009 and top 6 in 2010. He was hurt last year. He justifies being one of the top 3 WRs off the board, period. Every player would be subject to "bust" if you include (or assume injury). So, if you remove that (if an injury does not occur), AJ will not bust. No way. No how.Relative to the spots they will be drafted, I see DeMarco Murray as a huge bust risk and I think you can make a case that Calvin Johnson will be a bust....RELATIVE TO DRAFT SPOT. Impossible you say? Don't we see it every year at WR? Randy Moss. Roddy White. Reggie Wayne. If you look at Calvin's numbers, he has a tendency to be up and down. When he is up, his is beastly, like in 2008 (#3) and 2011 (#1). When he is down, he is still very good, (2009, #23), but not worth what the masses always expect from him and not what you pay.

When you pay "6th-9th" best overall player draft spots for him and you get anything less that top numbers, you lose out. Even in 2010, when he was top 7 or so, you got a great player with really good production, but you had to pay so much to get him, its debatable if it was worth it, especially when you could have drafted a stud QB or RB where you had to take him and could have gotten any of the guys that finished ahead of him for a MUCH lower price (Lloyd, Jennings, Wayne, Bowe, etc).

 
Michael Turner - He is getting older and losing some speed in the first place but this new offense is going to be based more on the big play ability of Julio Jones and Roddy White. With only needing to spend a 2nd round pick on him I would pass
I'm not trying to be a Michael Turner proponent, but I'm seeing a lot of questionable logic applied to his situation. The guy is going at the end of the 3rd round (ADP35, RB17). He finished RB6 last year. I expect a dip in production, too, but he could see a significant dip and still finish above RB17. I don't play PPR but he's going ADP41, RB19 in there. So I don't think he's actually a very good bust candidate.
I didnt look at his ADP and apologize for posting him if that data is correct. If he is going off the board @ rb 17 in non ppr than he is descent value (eventhough I wouldnt want him). I thought he would be higher than that. I apologize...........
 
Dez Bryant. Never seems to live up to expectations.
He's been in the league for two years, as a late 1st round pick. He's had some injuries, and some issues maturing. These are his numbers for the first two years of his career:2010: 45/561/62011: 63/928/9In two seasons, he's put up 108/1489/15, and none of that is including his ST's contributions.A guy like Micheal Crabtree has never lived up to expectations. Dez Bryant had SKY-high expectations, and still has had a very respectable career to date. I mean, Over 60 catches, almost 1,000 yards, and almost 10 TD's his second year and he's a disappointment?He has the talent to live up to people's sky-high expectations, even if they were wrong to have them right out of the gate.
 
I'll add a couple of non-injury busts, I don't think these were mentioned:

Adrian Peterson. Guys rarely fare well a year after the injury he had. He will be only 9 months removed from his surgery, not even a year. If anyone can do it, it's him, but I read somewhere that Charles would have a better chance than him, since Charles is lighter and has to put less weight on his legs (also Charles has 11-12 months of healing as opposed to AP's 9). The Vikings also lost Steve Hutchinson (even though he was hurt, he was still effective). Even if he plays 16 games, I don't we will see the "real AP" until next year.

Matthew Stafford. His numbers were boosted by a ridiculous 1284 yards and 12 td's in his last 3 games. Before that hot streak, after 13 games, he was on pace for 4620 yards and and 36 tds. While I think he is a big time qb who will have big time games, expecting 5000 yards and 40 tds, even though the NFL has changed, is a little ridiculous in my eyes. If he finishes with 4500 yards and 35 tds it'll still be a monster year, but his ADP is 27th. There are other 4500 yards/30 td types (Romo, Eli, Rivers) going 30-40 picks after him. I don't think he is a bust for performance reasons, but he is a bust for your team because you will draft him expecting to have a major advantage at qb, while guys who wait 40 picks will get very similar stats to your qb.

 
a lot of mathews doubters. I do think he will get hurt, but he played hurt last year and finished 7th?

Oh yea no Tolbert vulture TD this year

So what gives? Are you guys predicting a major injury?

relative to the guys drafted after him have had some type of injuries..

so i predict rbs ADP 4-20 will be bust

:suds:

 
QB:Payton Manning (One solid hit away from being having a setback with his neck)

RB:Marshawn Lynch (Cannot sustain the TD streak that inflated his value last season, plus I feel they will throw more with Flynn there now)

RB:Adrian Peterson (The dude is a human T-Rex, but I just don't think he will be back to himself until at least next season, if ever)

WR:Jordy Nelson (His value was based on the long TD and won't match his TD total from last year. I also believe Randall Cobb will be a larger part of the offense this season)

WR:Andre Johnson (Dude was a specimen for years, but we're seeing him become waaay too fragile to draft him as high as he has been going...too many red flags)

TE:Rob Gronkowski (I think the addition of Brandon Lloyd and the late season surge Aaron Hernandez had will have an impact on the Cave dweller. I think he will still eclipse 1,000 yds and 10 TD's, but he won't match last season's TD totals)

 
Tony Romo - lots of pressure on the Cowboys this year. Jerry looks around the division and sees Eli, Vick, and now RG3. Cowboys get off to a bad start and panic will set in. Romo has never gotten it done when it counts. This year he will get benched. Print it.

 
I think Cam Newton will underperform his ADP. Might finish more like QB10 than QB4, which wouldn't be disastrous but would be a pretty big bust since he's going in the 2nd round. QB rushing TDs are one of the most volatile and least predictable stats in the game; I would not be at all surprised if he only ran for, say, 6 this season.
A few people now have mentioned Newton based on his rushing stats.While it is indeed difficult to envision Cam having that many rushing TDs again, I think people are overlooking his ability as a passer, and how he could very well take a giant leap forward after having no offseason last year.
The other point on Newton, is that last year he did all without the OTAs, preseason, etc. I agree I see his rushing TDs going down, but I see his passing TDs going up a good amount, since he has had time to work with the WR. Also, Nanee leaving is a blessing too. Should almost be a lock as a top 5 QB.
 
Many good candidates to choose from

1) at QB, I can't see taking Peyton at QB9. That's pretty risky.

2) at RB, there are a landmine of bust candidates after the top 5 RBs are off the board. From Chris Johnson at RB6 to Jamaal Charles at RB13, there are a lot of question marks and injury risks from that group.

3) at WR, I think Wes Welker at WR5 will bust, but likely won't be the biggest bust. I think Lloyd will eat into Welker's production more than the TEs. Welker had a career year YPC wise and isn't a big TD producer, so to justify a 2nd round pick on him would require him to catch another 105+ passes. I just don't see that happening.

Other WR candidates are Jordy Nelson, Victor Cruz, and Kenny Britt. Nelson and Cruz are coming off of career years and Britt has too many injury concerns to justify WR21 ADP.

4) at TE, while I think they are worth their draft slots, Gronkowski and Graham carry the most risk of busting since they will have to produce big numbers.

 
I am not understanding the Cam Newton mentions. Sure Newton won't score 14 TDs on the ground. But he's a lock for 500 yards rushing and 6-7 TDs again to go along with 3700+ passing yards and 22+ TD passes. He need to cut down on the interceptions, but if he gets 3700/22/15 and 500/7 on the ground, that's easily top 5 QB material, and his upside is through the roof. Please help me understand. Do you all think he's going to get hurt or regress from last year?

 
Tony Romo - lots of pressure on the Cowboys this year. Jerry looks around the division and sees Eli, Vick, and now RG3. Cowboys get off to a bad start and panic will set in. Romo has never gotten it done when it counts. This year he will get benched. Print it.
there is no pressure on dallas. no one thinks they can win the division. there was pressure back a few years ago when they were suppose to be the best team in the nfc but not now.
 
'fightingillini said:
I am not understanding the Cam Newton mentions. Sure Newton won't score 14 TDs on the ground. But he's a lock for 500 yards rushing and 6-7 TDs again to go along with 3700+ passing yards and 22+ TD passes. He need to cut down on the interceptions, but if he gets 3700/22/15 and 500/7 on the ground, that's easily top 5 QB material, and his upside is through the roof. Please help me understand. Do you all think he's going to get hurt or regress from last year?
I think this is where it gets difficult for me. Last year, 4200 yds and 29 TD's would have only been good for QB9 or 10.1. Brees - 5,476 / 47

2. Rodgers - 4,643 / 48

3. Brady - 5,249 / 42

4. Cam - 4,051 / 35

5. Stafford - 5,038 / 41

6. Eli - 4,933 / 30

7. Rivers - 4,624 / 28

8. Ryan - 4,177 / 31

9. Romo 4,184 / 32

Plus this year you've got a healthy Mike Vick, an improved Big Ben OL, and even a healthy Schaub and Peyton Manning each with the potential for 4,000-4,200 / 28-30.

Don't get me wrong. I'm no means a Cam hater (plenty of threads on this topic) and do believe he will continue to get better in terms of NFL performance improvement. But when every one-for-one reduction in record rush TD would have to be matched by a corresponding increase in pass TD just to break even, that to me is a enough risk to avoid him at his ADP next year. So yes, he has a ton of upside in his pass stats, but there is also potential downside in his rush stats.

I don't think he'll be an NFL bust by any means next year, but there are many historically proven passers available much cheaper that can (and have) finish in that same range.

 
Tony Romo - lots of pressure on the Cowboys this year. Jerry looks around the division and sees Eli, Vick, and now RG3. Cowboys get off to a bad start and panic will set in. Romo has never gotten it done when it counts. This year he will get benched. Print it.
there is no pressure on dallas. no one thinks they can win the division. there was pressure back a few years ago when they were suppose to be the best team in the nfc but not now.
Pressure from the inside. This Garrett/Romo thing isn't going to go on forever if they never become winners.
 
Predicting injuries is not something I am going to do in here. I like the Wallace suggestion and Jordy. I'll give one at each position. Not sure what the definition of a bust is, but these guys will fail to live up to their draft slots.QB - Cam Newton. I think he finishes in the Top 15 but not in the top 10. I don't see how he replicates those rushing numbers. Maybe not a bust but certainly going to disappoint.RB - Matt Forte - Missing the offseason, and they didn't add Bush to hold a clipboard. Offense is changing.WR - Vincent Jackson - He's always been a one-dimensional guy. He's big and fast but I'm not sure this team is going to air the ball out much.TE - Dustin Keller - this whole team is going to be a train wreck in slow motion.
If Tebow takes over I exact Keller to benefit. The implosion may actually benefit him.Martellus Bennett is beng drafted at TE-21<Him.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'fightingillini said:
I am not understanding the Cam Newton mentions. Sure Newton won't score 14 TDs on the ground. But he's a lock for 500 yards rushing and 6-7 TDs again to go along with 3700+ passing yards and 22+ TD passes. He need to cut down on the interceptions, but if he gets 3700/22/15 and 500/7 on the ground, that's easily top 5 QB material, and his upside is through the roof. Please help me understand. Do you all think he's going to get hurt or regress from last year?
I think this is where it gets difficult for me. Last year, 4200 yds and 29 TD's would have only been good for QB9 or 10.1. Brees - 5,476 / 47

2. Rodgers - 4,643 / 48

3. Brady - 5,249 / 42

4. Cam - 4,051 / 35

5. Stafford - 5,038 / 41

6. Eli - 4,933 / 30

7. Rivers - 4,624 / 28

8. Ryan - 4,177 / 31

9. Romo 4,184 / 32

Plus this year you've got a healthy Mike Vick, an improved Big Ben OL, and even a healthy Schaub and Peyton Manning each with the potential for 4,000-4,200 / 28-30.

Don't get me wrong. I'm no means a Cam hater (plenty of threads on this topic) and do believe he will continue to get better in terms of NFL performance improvement. But when every one-for-one reduction in record rush TD would have to be matched by a corresponding increase in pass TD just to break even, that to me is a enough risk to avoid him at his ADP next year. So yes, he has a ton of upside in his pass stats, but there is also potential downside in his rush stats.

I don't think he'll be an NFL bust by any means next year, but there are many historically proven passers available much cheaper that can (and have) finish in that same range.
People don't like to hear logical arguments when it comes to Cam Newton. Just a warning.
 
I'm with Sabertooth--two of the OP's choices are based on fairly non-existent injury history. Mathews played 14 games last year and averaged 4.9 ypc. Steven Jackson has played 15, 16, and 15 games the last three years.

I think Cam Newton will underperform his ADP. Might finish more like QB10 than QB4, which wouldn't be disastrous but would be a pretty big bust since he's going in the 2nd round. QB rushing TDs are one of the most volatile and least predictable stats in the game; I would not be at all surprised if he only ran for, say, 6 this season.

I'm not buying CJ2K at RB5, either. He looked almost like he didn't care about football last year. I wouldn't take him until about RB10, and can see him finishing closer to RB20.
His TDs are not the usual QB TDs, he is basically the goal line back. He had 8 rushing TDs from inside the 5 yard line. I think he will still have double digit rushing TDs.
 
Michael Turner - He is getting older and losing some speed in the first place but this new offense is going to be based more on the big play ability of Julio Jones and Roddy White. With only needing to spend a 2nd round pick on him I would pass
yep touches/ carries will be split even with Rogers
 
Going back to the madden curse, it really has been every year. Vince young 9 tds 17 ints. Favre with 22 ints with the jets. Hillis sucked. Even fitzgerald had his worst year the year he split the cover with polamalu. Mcnabb probably did the best, but then tore his acl late in the season.

 
'fightingillini said:
I am not understanding the Cam Newton mentions. Sure Newton won't score 14 TDs on the ground. But he's a lock for 500 yards rushing and 6-7 TDs again to go along with 3700+ passing yards and 22+ TD passes. He need to cut down on the interceptions, but if he gets 3700/22/15 and 500/7 on the ground, that's easily top 5 QB material, and his upside is through the roof. Please help me understand. Do you all think he's going to get hurt or regress from last year?
I think this is where it gets difficult for me. Last year, 4200 yds and 29 TD's would have only been good for QB9 or 10.1. Brees - 5,476 / 47

2. Rodgers - 4,643 / 48

3. Brady - 5,249 / 42

4. Cam - 4,051 / 35

5. Stafford - 5,038 / 41

6. Eli - 4,933 / 30

7. Rivers - 4,624 / 28

8. Ryan - 4,177 / 31

9. Romo 4,184 / 32

Plus this year you've got a healthy Mike Vick, an improved Big Ben OL, and even a healthy Schaub and Peyton Manning each with the potential for 4,000-4,200 / 28-30.

Don't get me wrong. I'm no means a Cam hater (plenty of threads on this topic) and do believe he will continue to get better in terms of NFL performance improvement. But when every one-for-one reduction in record rush TD would have to be matched by a corresponding increase in pass TD just to break even, that to me is a enough risk to avoid him at his ADP next year. So yes, he has a ton of upside in his pass stats, but there is also potential downside in his rush stats.

I don't think he'll be an NFL bust by any means next year, but there are many historically proven passers available much cheaper that can (and have) finish in that same range.
You can't just add his rushing and passing production to compare to QBs who don't run often...rushing production is worth more in most leagues. In a normal 4 pts per pass TD league, 500/7 on the ground is worth 92 points, while 500/7 through the air is worth 48 points. It would take 1000/13 (roughly double his rushing production) in passing to equal those 92 points. So, using the 3700/22 above, another QB would need 4700/35 in passing to match it. Based on last years numbers, that puts Cam at QB5. Rushing production is the reason that Cam was QB4 on that list over Stafford, despite fewer total yards and TDs.

 
Tony Romo - lots of pressure on the Cowboys this year. Jerry looks around the division and sees Eli, Vick, and now RG3. Cowboys get off to a bad start and panic will set in. Romo has never gotten it done when it counts. This year he will get benched. Print it.
Silliest prediction I have heard yet this preseason.
 
TE - Dustin Keller - this whole team is going to be a train wreck in slow motion.
If Tebow takes over I exact Keller to benefit. The implosion may actually benefit him.
What would make you think that? It can't be based off Tebow throwing to TE's last year.... explain.
No one knows what will happen in NY. Most assume Sanchez will screw up and Tebow will take over but he could respond well to the challenge too.As for Keller if Tebow does start he didn't have a TE like him in Denver either, someone who could take a 7 yard pass 15 yards or more. It s a guess based on talent. I think they'll use him to earn yards after the catch because Tim is a better short passer and Keller will move the chains.It's a guess but if you have good players you use them. Time will tell but I still like Keller to be top 10 or 12.
 
I agree with the sentiment that a true bust is a guy that is still playing (and likely in your fantasy lineup), just not playing anywhere near as well as you expected when you drafted him, aka Chris Johnson. (Michael Vick was pretty disappointing too.)

Usually, I don't consider an injured player a bust, except when you draft a player that always gets hurt with a very high draft pick. In that category, I would put Andre Johnson and Darren McFadden. Both of those guys are extremely talented when they play, but are also very slow healers. AJ has gotten hurt the past couple of seasons, and takes much longer to get back than the original estimate. Add to that the fact that he's never had a double-digit TD season, and I don't think he's worth the price you'd have to pay to take him.

Same with McFadden. He seems very brittle, and has only exceeded 113 carries once in his first 4 seasons. Two years ago in a startup dynasty league, I drafted him in the 8th round, where he ended up being a steal. Now, you'd probably have to pick him in the 1st or 2nd (admittedly I haven't paid attention to ADP as I'm only in established dynasty leagues), and you have to pay a price assuming he's going to stay healthy when history says he won't.

 
I am not understanding the Cam Newton mentions. Sure Newton won't score 14 TDs on the ground. But he's a lock for 500 yards rushing and 6-7 TDs again to go along with 3700+ passing yards and 22+ TD passes. He need to cut down on the interceptions, but if he gets 3700/22/15 and 500/7 on the ground, that's easily top 5 QB material, and his upside is through the roof. Please help me understand. Do you all think he's going to get hurt or regress from last year?
I think this is where it gets difficult for me. Last year, 4200 yds and 29 TD's would have only been good for QB9 or 10.1. Brees - 5,476 / 47

2. Rodgers - 4,643 / 48

3. Brady - 5,249 / 42

4. Cam - 4,051 / 35

5. Stafford - 5,038 / 41

6. Eli - 4,933 / 30

7. Rivers - 4,624 / 28

8. Ryan - 4,177 / 31

9. Romo 4,184 / 32

Plus this year you've got a healthy Mike Vick, an improved Big Ben OL, and even a healthy Schaub and Peyton Manning each with the potential for 4,000-4,200 / 28-30.

Don't get me wrong. I'm no means a Cam hater (plenty of threads on this topic) and do believe he will continue to get better in terms of NFL performance improvement. But when every one-for-one reduction in record rush TD would have to be matched by a corresponding increase in pass TD just to break even, that to me is a enough risk to avoid him at his ADP next year. So yes, he has a ton of upside in his pass stats, but there is also potential downside in his rush stats.

I don't think he'll be an NFL bust by any means next year, but there are many historically proven passers available much cheaper that can (and have) finish in that same range.
Your league score rushing yards the same as passing? Big whiff on your analysis here. :pics:
In most (all) of the leagues I've played in rushing yards are worth twice or more (not even mentioning tds)... so at a minimum you should be using 4700/29-4950/29.

Where does that get him in your rankings above?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gronkowski

Matt Flynn - beating Detroit in dramatic fashion last year, made him a multi-millionaire...expect a Matt Cassel-esque letdown once he starts for Seattle.

Mike Vick

Tebow

D. Jackson

CJ Spiller - Fred Jackson >>> Spiller..simply put, Jackson is just so much better at the position

Randy Moss

Alex Smith - back to being a lackluster QB..

M. Stafford

 
Maurice Jones-Drew

Andre Johnson

Wes Welker

Cam Newton - I think he'll finish around QB7, which Redrafters will be eager to call a bust. But Dynasty and Keeper owners will call it "solid".

 
'Dippa said:
I am not understanding the Cam Newton mentions. Sure Newton won't score 14 TDs on the ground. But he's a lock for 500 yards rushing and 6-7 TDs again to go along with 3700+ passing yards and 22+ TD passes. He need to cut down on the interceptions, but if he gets 3700/22/15 and 500/7 on the ground, that's easily top 5 QB material, and his upside is through the roof. Please help me understand. Do you all think he's going to get hurt or regress from last year?
I think this is where it gets difficult for me. Last year, 4200 yds and 29 TD's would have only been good for QB9 or 10.I don't think he'll be an NFL bust by any means next year, but there are many historically proven passers available much cheaper that can (and have) finish in that same range.
You can't just add his rushing and passing production to compare to QBs who don't run often...rushing production is worth more in most leagues. In a normal 4 pts per pass TD league, 500/7 on the ground is worth 92 points, while 500/7 through the air is worth 48 points. It would take 1000/13 (roughly double his rushing production) in passing to equal those 92 points. So, using the 3700/22 above, another QB would need 4700/35 in passing to match it. Based on last years numbers, that puts Cam at QB5. Rushing production is the reason that Cam was QB4 on that list over Stafford, despite fewer total yards and TDs.
The differences in scoring systems is a fair point and appreciate pointing it out. Assuming just one scenario where Cam increases his pass stats and gears down the run, he would need 4,200 / 28 passing and 600 / 10 to match his FF point production (442 pts) from last year in the more standard scoring systems. That's a big year but certainly doable. With a reasonable floor at 3,700 / 22 and 500 / 7, that would seem a good bet at ADP QB4-5 range.My league is pretty QB-intensive with pass TD = 6pts and also penalizes for INTs and sacks. In those types of leagues (which I'm seeing is the minority), it's a little different story. His relatively high sacks (35) and INT's (17) combined with his lower second half 2011 pass stats make his ADP seem higher and more of a bust-risk vs. more efficient passers you can find in the ADP QB5-10 range.

 
I am not understanding the Cam Newton mentions. Sure Newton won't score 14 TDs on the ground. But he's a lock for 500 yards rushing and 6-7 TDs again to go along with 3700+ passing yards and 22+ TD passes. He need to cut down on the interceptions, but if he gets 3700/22/15 and 500/7 on the ground, that's easily top 5 QB material, and his upside is through the roof. Please help me understand. Do you all think he's going to get hurt or regress from last year?
Agree, Cam is something special. Remember last year he did all that as a rookie with no OTA or most preseason. That is incredible! Some are predicting 30+/20 in TDs. Speed, Size, intelligence, strong arm, good work effort, loved by teammates, a leader and a love of the game. I can't imagine how good he is going to be with practice with his teammates. I hope many others pass on him in my leagues.
 
I guess I just want to have the chance to draft Rodgers, Stafford, Rice, Calvin or McCoy. After that its all risky, not only for injury but for those players teams not allowing them to produce the numbers we predict them to have. If Foster plays 15 games, he's the best. But he could play 8. Pretty much every NFL player can miss weeks. Just hope you dont draft them guys.

We can all make a case for or against all players, with the exception of Rodgers.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I guess I just want to have the chance to draft Rodgers, Stafford, Rice, Calvin or McCoy. After that its all risky, not only for injury but for those players teams not allowing them to produce the numbers we predict them to have. If Foster plays 15 games, he's the best. But he could play 8. Pretty much every NFL player can miss weeks. Just hope you dont draft them guys.We can all make a case for or against all players, with the exception of Rodgers.
Rodgers has been on the season ending injured reserve twice in his career already.
 
DeMarco Murray seems like a gamble at his price
:thumbup:I think Murray is certainly talented and could be very good but the projections based off a small sample leaves little room for additional value considering the price to draft/acquire him. To put it in context, he is being drafted in 2012 around the same spot as Hillis and Mendenhall in 2011. They ironically underperformed last year but that is not the point. Hillis and Mendenhall were coming off great 2010 seasons where they were top producers, not just demonstrating potential.http://subscribers.footballguys.com/2011/11pprmock_1.php I think Murray would be better equated to where Ryan Matthews and Jahvid Best were drafted last year.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top