McMurphy has come off as a dooshnozzle with an agenda. This confirms it.
To be fair to McMurphy, journalists sometimes publish factually incorrect information through no fault of their own, and that is likely to have happened here, as the Powell police have admitted they changed the record to reflect what actually happened. So if the record McMurphy used to make his story said he was arrested, McMurphy was reporting the facts as presented to him.
The first problem McMurphy faces is he didn't follow any standard of journalistic integrity to fix errors in his reporting. It's certainly acceptable, if not expected, to fix errors when they are found to have occurred. But to fix the errors with journalistic integrity requires doing it in such a way that acknowledges the error in the report had occurred. For example, editing the article to say "originally this story reported that.... but it's since been found that....". McMurphy didn't do that at all.
Urban's response on B1G Media Day was the day after McMurphy's original story posted, which claimed that Zach had been arrested in both 2009 and 2015. When asked about the incidents (the arrests), Urban gave a detaiiled answer about how he responded in 2009 to the arrest, but to explain his response to the 2015 arrest, he said he just heard something about that the night before, asked his people to look into it, and there was nothing, and who creates a story like that?
Well, to answer Urban's question, McMurphy did create a story like that. And once McMurphy realized the facts in his story were wrong (to no fault of his own), he began editing his post on Facebook. He edited it numerous times over the next week, and any Facebook user can see every edited version and the date it was posted by clicking the three dots in the upper right hand corner of the post, selecting more options, and view edit history. Unfortunately 99.99999% of users never do that, and Facebook shows the user no indication that they are reading an edited post. So now, anyone who has seen Urban's response, and then sees McMurphy's post that he responded to, it looks like Urban didn't know about the 2015 investigation, when in reality Urban was responding to the story's claim that Zach had been arrested in 2015.
The second problem McMurphy faces is that he doubled down on the confusion he created. A week after Urbans response, and after he edited his post, he published a new post that was an exclusive interview with Courtney Smith with the premise that Urban had to have known about the investigation (premise: see his story that now says Zach was investigated in 2015 and Urbans response saying he knew nothing about it), so that means he must have lied at B1G Media Day and was covering up Courtney's abuse to keep Zach as a coach.
As soon as OSU got wind of Urban potentially covering up domestic violence, he was put on leave and here we are with this circus. When all it comes down to is McMurphy posted a story with outlandish claims, Urban responding that he didn't know about them (the outlandish claims), McMurphy editing his story so that it was factually correct, and then running with a new story on the premise that Urban's response was to the factually correct edited version of his story.
So yes, to be fair to McMurphy, it's not his fault that Powell originally had the 2015 report as an arrest, but everything that has gone on since then is because Brett McMurphy is a a ####### #######!!!!