What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Brandon Jackson >> Antonio Pittman (1 Viewer)

BUMP now that BJackson is likely to be the starting RB for Green Bay
Question is, will he take it this season or next? Most likely, it will come after Morency has a multi fumble game, probably game 2, lol...
Funny how B Jackson is going the starting RB for GB in some people's minds, merely because he was drafted?I've never seen Jackson listed as a can't miss RB, so I'll wait to see.Funny stuff...Id
 
Did you buy into his highlight reel, or have you watched him play alot ?
I watched both play a lot...Jackson is the goods, Pittman will be a situational player in the NFL at best.
Ive watched them both play and They are both good #2RB's, good for the depth chart and thats it. Jackson looks like he running with mud upto his waiste.From NFL draft scoutCompares To: J.J. Arrington, Arizona Cardinals … With only one season of heavy rush load work, Jackson is still a work in progress, but he shows he is a decent underneath receiver with some value as a return specialist … He appears to be very capable of breaking a game open with his speed, but while he flashes brilliance, he also disappears for long stretches on the field, making him appear to be better as a change of pace back than a featured runner … With two shoulder surgeries in two years, his durability is another concern.
 
Did you buy into his highlight reel, or have you watched him play alot ?
I watched both play a lot...Jackson is the goods, Pittman will be a situational player in the NFL at best.
Ive watched them both play and They are both good #2RB's, good for the depth chart and thats it. Jackson looks like he running with mud upto his waiste.From NFL draft scoutCompares To: J.J. Arrington, Arizona Cardinals … With only one season of heavy rush load work, Jackson is still a work in progress, but he shows he is a decent underneath receiver with some value as a return specialist … He appears to be very capable of breaking a game open with his speed, but while he flashes brilliance, he also disappears for long stretches on the field, making him appear to be better as a change of pace back than a featured runner … With two shoulder surgeries in two years, his durability is another concern.
:lmao: Where are you getting this stuff from?Arrington does not have the lateral agility for change of direction and making defenders miss that Jackson has and never will. Arrignton is a limited Rb Jackson is well rounded in everything you need a Rb to do. Arrington is a poor mans Michael Bennett without the speed. Jackson's only questions are durability. He will play well as long as he is healthy.
 
Did you buy into his highlight reel, or have you watched him play alot ?
I watched both play a lot...Jackson is the goods, Pittman will be a situational player in the NFL at best.
Ive watched them both play and They are both good #2RB's, good for the depth chart and thats it. Jackson looks like he running with mud upto his waiste.From NFL draft scoutCompares To: J.J. Arrington, Arizona Cardinals … With only one season of heavy rush load work, Jackson is still a work in progress, but he shows he is a decent underneath receiver with some value as a return specialist … He appears to be very capable of breaking a game open with his speed, but while he flashes brilliance, he also disappears for long stretches on the field, making him appear to be better as a change of pace back than a featured runner … With two shoulder surgeries in two years, his durability is another concern.
:banned: Where are you getting this stuff from?Arrington does not have the lateral agility for change of direction and making defenders miss that Jackson has and never will. Arrignton is a limited Rb Jackson is well rounded in everything you need a Rb to do. Arrington is a poor mans Michael Bennett without the speed. Jackson's only questions are durability. He will play well as long as he is healthy.
I think this is from the NFL.com player description.Green Bay's first rounder was compared to Johnny Jolly, whom they drafted in the 6th last year.Hopefully they are better than that.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Would you care to define your comment form the original post? What does twice the career mean exactly? You didn't exactly back it up with anything specific. It's more of a jab than anything else. So far you've made a proclamation that can not be defined in a measurable sense.
Is it "measurable" now? ;)
 
Pittman got all of of the press from the media hacks over at ESPN as they were erroneously tooting the Turtle10's horn all year, but Jackson is twice the runner that Pittman is and has the prototype frame for an NFL RB.You heard it here first, Jackson will have twice the NFL career that A. Pittman will have even though most of you don't realize it.You've been notified.
What's the last player you hyped that actually turned out good?
 
Pittman got all of of the press from the media hacks over at ESPN as they were erroneously tooting the Turtle10's horn all year, but Jackson is twice the runner that Pittman is and has the prototype frame for an NFL RB.You heard it here first, Jackson will have twice the NFL career that A. Pittman will have even though most of you don't realize it.You've been notified.
What's the last player you hyped that actually turned out good?
:own3d:
 
Pittman got all of of the press from the media hacks over at ESPN as they were erroneously tooting the Turtle10's horn all year, but Jackson is twice the runner that Pittman is and has the prototype frame for an NFL RB.You heard it here first, Jackson will have twice the NFL career that A. Pittman will have even though most of you don't realize it.You've been notified.
What's the last player you hyped that actually turned out good?
:lmao:
You're on a fishing trip? Thanks for letting us know. The hype on Jackson is getting unbearable.
 
Pittman got all of of the press from the media hacks over at ESPN as they were erroneously tooting the Turtle10's horn all year, but Jackson is twice the runner that Pittman is and has the prototype frame for an NFL RB.You heard it here first, Jackson will have twice the NFL career that A. Pittman will have even though most of you don't realize it.You've been notified.
What's the last player you hyped that actually turned out good?
:bag:
You're on a fishing trip? Thanks for letting us know. The hype on Jackson is getting unbearable.
:lmao: then stop reading jackson threads.
 
Pittman got all of of the press from the media hacks over at ESPN as they were erroneously tooting the Turtle10's horn all year, but Jackson is twice the runner that Pittman is and has the prototype frame for an NFL RB.You heard it here first, Jackson will have twice the NFL career that A. Pittman will have even though most of you don't realize it.You've been notified.
What's the last player you hyped that actually turned out good?
:fishing:
You're on a fishing trip? Thanks for letting us know. The hype on Jackson is getting unbearable.
:bag: then stop reading jackson threads.
:lmao: , this thread was created several months ago.
 
You guys can yap all you want about morency but his starting job is probably less secure than lendale white. It wouldnt take much to supplant him and for TT to take jackson in rd2 that says he is high on him. I for one have no problem taking him at the 1.4 rookie pick in a rookie draft, who else is worthy of that pick? nobody unless you want to draft a qb.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Would you care to define your comment form the original post? What does twice the career mean exactly? You didn't exactly back it up with anything specific. It's more of a jab than anything else. So far you've made a proclamation that can not be defined in a measurable sense.
Is it "measurable" now? :thumbup:
Measurable? How many yards have they had so far? Interesting that you would wait until after the draft to see where each guy would end up before making any response. You still failed to back up your comments. All you were doing was OSU bashing. You failed to make any actual analysis.I will say this and that is Jackson is in the perfect situation. If he fails to deliver with this situation then he never will. If he doesn't deliver you'll look even more foolish. These guys were so close going in that it easy to sit back now and make a judgement based on who drafted them and what their situation is. But a career is long time so I wouldn't be surprised if this looks different 4 years from now.
 
Would you care to define your comment form the original post? What does twice the career mean exactly? You didn't exactly back it up with anything specific. It's more of a jab than anything else. So far you've made a proclamation that can not be defined in a measurable sense.
Is it "measurable" now? ;)
I just want to point out... Priest Holmes and Willie Parker were UDFA. Tatum Bell and JJ Arrington were 2nd round backs. Where a player is drafted is not dispositive in how good of a career one will have.I'm not saying, just saying.
 
Would you care to define your comment form the original post? What does twice the career mean exactly? You didn't exactly back it up with anything specific. It's more of a jab than anything else. So far you've made a proclamation that can not be defined in a measurable sense.
Is it "measurable" now? ;)
I just want to point out... Priest Holmes and Willie Parker were UDFA. Tatum Bell and JJ Arrington were 2nd round backs. Where a player is drafted is not dispositive in how good of a career one will have.I'm not saying, just saying.
No kidding. I guess that loser QB out of Michigan that got drafted in the 6th round several years ago must be out of the league by now, right? Tom Brady I think his name was? Oh, and that guy that played for the Broncos for a few years, Terrell Davis. That guy wasn't better than RBs taken in the 1st or 2nd round. Nope, no way. Get back to me in 5 years and we'll see who was right.
 
Would you care to define your comment form the original post? What does twice the career mean exactly? You didn't exactly back it up with anything specific. It's more of a jab than anything else. So far you've made a proclamation that can not be defined in a measurable sense.
Is it "measurable" now? :thumbup:
I just want to point out... Priest Holmes and Willie Parker were UDFA. Tatum Bell and JJ Arrington were 2nd round backs. Where a player is drafted is not dispositive in how good of a career one will have.I'm not saying, just saying.
No kidding. I guess that loser QB out of Michigan that got drafted in the 6th round several years ago must be out of the league by now, right? Tom Brady I think his name was? Oh, and that guy that played for the Broncos for a few years, Terrell Davis. That guy wasn't better than RBs taken in the 1st or 2nd round. Nope, no way. Get back to me in 5 years and we'll see who was right.
You guys are right. Hucks just wanted to bash an OSU player. That was and is his point. He doesn't care about Jackson. He only cares that at this very moment, 1 day after the draft, Jackson's career looks brighter than Pittman's.What's interesting to me is that I never disputed that Jackson might have the better career. A big part how ell a player does is what situation they're drafted into. Clearly Jackson has a great opportunity and it stands to reason he should get off to a great start.I called hucks out because he was OSU bashing, not providing any actual analysis. This is suppose to be a fantsy board, not a college fan board. He's the reason I don't go to those boards.
 
Ok lets keep score.

1. Who gets picked higher in NFL draft?

C.Henry=1 - LHUCKS=0 - FBG=0, Brandon Jackson(2/63) was drafted higher than Antonio Pittman(4/107). But so was C.Henry (2/50).

Unless you said C.Henry=1, LHUCKS=0, FBG=0.

2. Who will go higher in FF rook draft?

C.Henry could go higher then both ? Could happen.

3. Who does better there rookie year?

Will see.

4. Who has a better NFL career?

Too early.

LHUCKS is spiking the ball on 5 yard runs. :goodposting:

But it's the guy that said C.Henry who has his arms raised after the TD.

Score C.Henry =1 - LHUCKS=0 - FBG=0. But it's only the 1st quarter. :thumbup:

 
Pittman got all of of the press from the media hacks over at ESPN as they were erroneously tooting the Turtle10's horn all year, but Jackson is twice the runner that Pittman is and has the prototype frame for an NFL RB.You heard it here first, Jackson will have twice the NFL career that A. Pittman will have even though most of you don't realize it.You've been notified.
Your hate for the Big 10 is beginning to effect your credibility. Not sure what it is you've got against the Big 10 and Ohio State but I'm beginning to think it's clouding your judgement. Kinda makes me wonder where your true agenda is.
:violin:
 
Pittman got all of of the press from the media hacks over at ESPN as they were erroneously tooting the Turtle10's horn all year, but Jackson is twice the runner that Pittman is and has the prototype frame for an NFL RB.You heard it here first, Jackson will have twice the NFL career that A. Pittman will have even though most of you don't realize it.You've been notified.
What's the last player you hyped that actually turned out good?
:violin:
You're on a fishing trip? Thanks for letting us know. The hype on Jackson is getting unbearable.
ooops
 
I've never been that high on Pittman and would've agreed pre-draft that Jackson certainly was the better prospect, but judging your opinion on the first preseason game- albeit against a 2nd/3rd string Steeler defense- is a bit premature.

From what I've been hearing, Jackson hasn't looked too hot either in camp.

:shrug:

 
Judging Pittman or Meachem based on last night would be the same as judging Brees just based on last night and dropping him to QB#25. The sample size is not large enough to draw conclusions.

 
LHUCKS isn't all about bashing the Big Ten. I seem to recall him speaking rather highly of Laurence Maroney and Santonio Holmes this spring/summer.

He'll call it like he sees it. But if given the chance to throw another jab... You know he will. :headbang:

 
LHUCKS isn't all about bashing the Big Ten. I seem to recall him speaking rather highly of Laurence Maroney and Santonio Holmes this spring/summer. He'll call it like he sees it. But if given the chance to throw another jab... You know he will. :shrug:
That's exactly right...when it comess to FF I don't mess around with bias. You'll see plenty of Big10 pimping if you look for it...and I've been more outspoken than anybody on Chris "Mr. Bust of the year"Henry. You only need to look at my avatar to see that both Henry and I attended the same university.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pittman got all of of the press from the media hacks over at ESPN as they were erroneously tooting the Turtle10's horn all year, but Jackson is twice the runner that Pittman is and has the prototype frame for an NFL RB.You heard it here first, Jackson will have twice the NFL career that A. Pittman will have even though most of you don't realize it.You've been notified.
Your hate for the Big 10 is beginning to effect your credibility. Not sure what it is you've got against the Big 10 and Ohio State but I'm beginning to think it's clouding your judgement. Kinda makes me wonder where your true agenda is.
:headbang:
How's that? What exactly did you own me on? I never made any comment to Jackson's ability one way or the other. I merely pointed out your biases. This really just proves what I was saying anyway. :popcorn:
 
LHUCKS said:
Pittman got all of of the press from the media hacks over at ESPN as they were erroneously tooting the Turtle10's horn all year, but Jackson is twice the runner that Pittman is and has the prototype frame for an NFL RB.You heard it here first, Jackson will have twice the NFL career that A. Pittman will have even though most of you don't realize it.You've been notified.
What's the last player you hyped that actually turned out good?
:thumbup:
You're on a fishing trip? Thanks for letting us know. The hype on Jackson is getting unbearable.
ooops
What's the Oops for? 3.2YPC have you that excited? :goodposting:
 
Pittman got all of of the press from the media hacks over at ESPN as they were erroneously tooting the Turtle10's horn all year, but Jackson is twice the runner that Pittman is and has the prototype frame for an NFL RB.You heard it here first, Jackson will have twice the NFL career that A. Pittman will have even though most of you don't realize it.You've been notified.
Your hate for the Big 10 is beginning to effect your credibility. Not sure what it is you've got against the Big 10 and Ohio State but I'm beginning to think it's clouding your judgement. Kinda makes me wonder where your true agenda is.
tap
 
Pittman got all of of the press from the media hacks over at ESPN as they were erroneously tooting the Turtle10's horn all year, but Jackson is twice the runner that Pittman is and has the prototype frame for an NFL RB.You heard it here first, Jackson will have twice the NFL career that A. Pittman will have even though most of you don't realize it.You've been notified.
Your hate for the Big 10 is beginning to effect your credibility. Not sure what it is you've got against the Big 10 and Ohio State but I'm beginning to think it's clouding your judgement. Kinda makes me wonder where your true agenda is.
tap
Why?
 
Pittman got all of of the press from the media hacks over at ESPN as they were erroneously tooting the Turtle10's horn all year, but Jackson is twice the runner that Pittman is and has the prototype frame for an NFL RB.You heard it here first, Jackson will have twice the NFL career that A. Pittman will have even though most of you don't realize it.You've been notified.
Your hate for the Big 10 is beginning to effect your credibility. Not sure what it is you've got against the Big 10 and Ohio State but I'm beginning to think it's clouding your judgement. Kinda makes me wonder where your true agenda is.
tap
Why?
I often find it informative to learn from others' mistakes.
 
Pittman got all of of the press from the media hacks over at ESPN as they were erroneously tooting the Turtle10's horn all year, but Jackson is twice the runner that Pittman is and has the prototype frame for an NFL RB.You heard it here first, Jackson will have twice the NFL career that A. Pittman will have even though most of you don't realize it.You've been notified.
Your hate for the Big 10 is beginning to effect your credibility. Not sure what it is you've got against the Big 10 and Ohio State but I'm beginning to think it's clouding your judgement. Kinda makes me wonder where your true agenda is.
tap
Why?
I often find it informative to learn from others' mistakes.
Mistake?
 
Pittman got all of of the press from the media hacks over at ESPN as they were erroneously tooting the Turtle10's horn all year, but Jackson is twice the runner that Pittman is and has the prototype frame for an NFL RB.You heard it here first, Jackson will have twice the NFL career that A. Pittman will have even though most of you don't realize it.You've been notified.
Your hate for the Big 10 is beginning to effect your credibility. Not sure what it is you've got against the Big 10 and Ohio State but I'm beginning to think it's clouding your judgement. Kinda makes me wonder where your true agenda is.
tap
Why?
I often find it informative to learn from others' mistakes.
Mistake?
How about inability to identify talent.
 
Pittman got all of of the press from the media hacks over at ESPN as they were erroneously tooting the Turtle10's horn all year, but Jackson is twice the runner that Pittman is and has the prototype frame for an NFL RB.You heard it here first, Jackson will have twice the NFL career that A. Pittman will have even though most of you don't realize it.You've been notified.
Your hate for the Big 10 is beginning to effect your credibility. Not sure what it is you've got against the Big 10 and Ohio State but I'm beginning to think it's clouding your judgement. Kinda makes me wonder where your true agenda is.
tap
Why?
I often find it informative to learn from others' mistakes.
Mistake?
How about inability to identify talent.
You are very knowledgeable on that subject. I'm not saying you will turn out wrong on this one but to be bumping this thread at this time and thinking you are vindicated just makes you look bad. Might as well bump the AJ Hawk bust thread while you are at it.
 
Pittman got all of of the press from the media hacks over at ESPN as they were erroneously tooting the Turtle10's horn all year, but Jackson is twice the runner that Pittman is and has the prototype frame for an NFL RB.You heard it here first, Jackson will have twice the NFL career that A. Pittman will have even though most of you don't realize it.You've been notified.
Your hate for the Big 10 is beginning to effect your credibility. Not sure what it is you've got against the Big 10 and Ohio State but I'm beginning to think it's clouding your judgement. Kinda makes me wonder where your true agenda is.
tap
Why?
I often find it informative to learn from others' mistakes.
Mistake?
How about inability to identify talent.
I appluad you Lhucks. I didn't think you had it in you to come back and admit that Jackson is a bust.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top