What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Brandon Jacobs or Ahmad Bradshaw? (1 Viewer)

Who should you start against New Orleans this week?

  • Brandon Jacobs

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Ahmad Bradshaw

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Despite the topic being posed as a typical WDIS question, I think there's Shark Pool value in the thread.

I foresee two primary trains of thought here. First, can the Saints move the ball quickly, get an early lead, and turn the game into a shootout? This scenario might get Bradshaw more snaps and catches, where he's obviously proven he can be dangerous. Or can the Giants' defense hold the Saints down and try to dominate time of possession? Surely both Jacobs and Bradshaw would benefit from this, but you traditionally picture a big, bruising back at the center of this strategy. However, Jacobs has not always produced with lots of carries and Bradshaw has repeatedly shown that he can do significant damage with a lighter workload.

This is not an easy question, IMO.

 
:popcorn: This is how I see it??? The Giants should try to limit the amount of touches by Brees and the NO offense. This should lead to a grind it out kind of game. The Giants Def is good enough to do this and Jacobs should be good in this situation. Just my opinion, :nerd: , but I think that this may not hold true. I have heard that key players on the NY Def are questionable and amy not play in this game,! Which, if they are not available could turn this into a shootout. This would render Jacobs useless, pretty much as he's been all year!!! :confused: I am a Jacobs owner in both leagues that I am in. I sat him in favor of K. Moreno in one and had to start him in another. :popcorn: I sit and wonder when he will turn into the legitamate FF player that he was......that he was.......he was...was!!! :unsure: Stay Tuned!!!!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top