What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

If you're Brandon Aiyuk, how much more money per year would you have to make in PIT, CLE or NE to leave SF? (1 Viewer)

If you're Aiyuk, how much more money per year would you have to make in PIT, CLE or NE to leave SF?


  • Total voters
    59
If I was Aiyuk, I would have all the money I could ever need already and would move to the team most likely to win me a ring regardless of the salary
Guys still on their first contract really aren't getting huge amounts of money. Aiyuk has made $12.5 million in his career so far. For normal peeps, that's plenty of money, but for pro athletes, that's not all that much. Jefferson's recent extension included a $37 million signing bonus and another $73 million guaranteed. Obviously way more than Aiyuk has made to date.
 
I voted zero but it’s not about being paid more elsewhere. I want to be compensated as elite. If San Fran won’t show me that respect, then I would move on.

Thanks but I don't understand. You'd leave SF if they don't pay you as elite for another team that would pay the same as SF?
Maybe he gets more targets somewhere else. Maybe it sets him up for another, mid/late career contract at a higher pay level. Maybe it’s pure ego. Maybe pure stats. I can think of plenty of reasons.

My question was he said it was about being paid as elite.
I think the answer still stands. :shrug:

That's an answer to a different question.

My question was asking Grid about it being about seen as elite when he said,
I voted zero but it’s not about being paid more elsewhere. I want to be compensated as elite. If San Fran won’t show me that respect, then I would move on.

For Aiyuk it might be about targets or next contract or other things. I didn't understand the point about it being seen as elite but willing to go to another team for the same money. I was trying to understand his point.

But the real issue is Aiyuk and what he'll do. It's interesting.

Back to Aiyuk, it looks like we have some answer in New England made an offer and he said no. I assume it was for more money than he's set to make in SF. So we have a little bit of an answer for him.
 
Last edited:
As mentioned, we have some insight now on what Aiyuk might be thinking as he told New England no.

But the original point of this thread was not Aiyuk, but what would YOU do if you were him?

I still contend I'd stay in SF unless another PIT/CLE/NE offered a ridiculously better offer. And even then I'm not sure.
 
Sounds like the Pats were ready to pony up $30M but Aiyuk had no interest.

I don't think the Steelers talks is totally dead but the 49ers wanted too much. According to local sports radio in Pittsburgh:

Here is what the Steelers are willing to put into a trade for Brandon Aiyuk:
  • Dan Moore Jr
  • James Daniels
  • Calvin Austin
  • 2nd round pick
The 49ers want one of these back in trade for Aiyuk:
  • 1st round pick
  • Pat Freiermuth
  • George Pickens
Gonna be difficult to get something done IMO. Aiyuk wants to get paid + play for a contender. The 49ers want commiserate value.

Getting one would be hard, and achieving both is going to be especially tricky.
Lol Pickens for Aiyuk is a push, especially given contract considerations. Khan is too savvy to make a move like that.
 
A zillion dollars. For me personally, $X + a Super Bowl ring would be worth more than $Y, where X and Y are both many millions of dollars.
I also choose this option fully acknowledging I might sing a different tune once millions of dollars of no longer life changing money to me. From where I sit though, there is little difference between 40 million rich and 50 million rich, especially knowing and seeing IRL how sums of money that large just generate more money exponentially via smart investment. Unless you really need a mega mansion, you're already at generational wealth with that kind of bank account/portfolio.
 
idk the tax rate in the states of cities he plans to go to but it's been a big conversation amongst NFL players.
I know Pittsburgh has a jock tax which is expected to be shot down by their Supreme Court and that's for visiting athletes

Here's an example of taxes and athletes-


I figure Aiyuk is asking "what would I truly take home"
 
As mentioned, we have some insight now on what Aiyuk might be thinking as he told New England no.

But the original point of this thread was not Aiyuk, but what would YOU do if you were him?

I still contend I'd stay in SF unless another PIT/CLE/NE offered a ridiculously better offer. And even then I'm not sure.

The NFL means not for long. The 49ers have a ton of contracts to renegotiate in the next couple of years. 2 years into your contract the SB contending 49ers team might look radically different.
 
I’m disappointed there isn’t a “he should stay in SF for $26M a year as it’s his best chance to win a SB” option.

To me that is the correct answer.
Best chance to win a SB would be the correct answer to many fans but obviously BA is after $$$ and I think his preference would be PIT because of Tomlinson over other destinations.
Stefanski is a two-time NFL coach of the year and runs an offense similar to Kyle Shanahan but many black players would love to play for Tomlinson and you can't blame them.
 
As mentioned, we have some insight now on what Aiyuk might be thinking as he told New England no.

But the original point of this thread was not Aiyuk, but what would YOU do if you were him?

I still contend I'd stay in SF unless another PIT/CLE/NE offered a ridiculously better offer. And even then I'm not sure.
I agree with this.

I appreciate some people view the numbers as a sign of recognition/respect. And certainly, he's allowed to want/aim for more money.

I think there's a realistic point where you have so much money--that more of it doesn't really change your life that much. I look at Dan Hurley from UCONN basketball. Kentucky and the Lakers offered him quite a bit more than the UCONN deal. But he stayed at UCONN for a measly 50 million.

For a lot of people, once you hit a certain threshold, more money isn't making a difference in your life. And then it becomes more about what you want aside from the money. I really value being where I'm at now. I think Dan Hurley clearly does too.

Me personally, if I was an NFL player, I would get the most I could out of SF and stay there. If all they can get me to is 20 million--cool. I heard the number 26 million tossed around. Even knowing I could get more elsewhere--I'd take the 26 to stay where I want to be/can win.
 
Different for each place.

Pit - good culture, fields or Russ are competent (one should be at least), $1 million more because I put some value on a better chance for a Super Bowl.

NE - $2 million. Maye could be great, things are changing but I’m not embarrassed to be a Patriot.

CLE - $5 million. Good coaching staff but I want nothing to do with Watson.
I think the odds either Fields or Russ are competent are extremely low and that'd definitely factor in for me if I were Aiyuk.
 
Different for each place.

Pit - good culture, fields or Russ are competent (one should be at least), $1 million more because I put some value on a better chance for a Super Bowl.

NE - $2 million. Maye could be great, things are changing but I’m not embarrassed to be a Patriot.

CLE - $5 million. Good coaching staff but I want nothing to do with Watson.
I think the odds either Fields or Russ are competent are extremely low and that'd definitely factor in for me if I were Aiyuk.
:shrug: agree to disagree.
I do agree that it’s a factor.
 
As mentioned, we have some insight now on what Aiyuk might be thinking as he told New England no.

But the original point of this thread was not Aiyuk, but what would YOU do if you were him?

I still contend I'd stay in SF unless another PIT/CLE/NE offered a ridiculously better offer. And even then I'm not sure.
I agree with this.

I appreciate some people view the numbers as a sign of recognition/respect. And certainly, he's allowed to want/aim for more money.

I think there's a realistic point where you have so much money--that more of it doesn't really change your life that much. I look at Dan Hurley from UCONN basketball. Kentucky and the Lakers offered him quite a bit more than the UCONN deal. But he stayed at UCONN for a measly 50 million.

For a lot of people, once you hit a certain threshold, more money isn't making a difference in your life. And then it becomes more about what you want aside from the money. I really value being where I'm at now. I think Dan Hurley clearly does too.

Me personally, if I was an NFL player, I would get the most I could out of SF and stay there. If all they can get me to is 20 million--cool. I heard the number 26 million tossed around. Even knowing I could get more elsewhere--I'd take the 26 to stay where I want to be/can win.

Yes. I see this in all walks of life, not just NFL star WRs making a zillion dollars.

Money is great. No doubt. But it's not everything. For a WR, that might mean picking what team and offensive system you go with.

For one of us, that might mean taking a job that pays less but you enjoy way more.

It's a sliding scale with a few different things on the scale.

In general, I always tell people to strongly go toward the job that you're happier with.
 
As mentioned, we have some insight now on what Aiyuk might be thinking as he told New England no.

But the original point of this thread was not Aiyuk, but what would YOU do if you were him?

I still contend I'd stay in SF unless another PIT/CLE/NE offered a ridiculously better offer. And even then I'm not sure.
Honestly it would come down to how much of the money is guaranteed. 26 million a year for 4 years from san fran with half guaranteed and that same contract from another team where a larger amount is guaranteed makes it a no brainer to take the second option.

The bolded part is silly to me, if I'm Aiyuk I take less money and accept a trade to the Raiders because they're my favorite team. It's like starting a poll in the FFA and asking what would I do if I was Joe Bryant in regards to what fly's on the board :shrug:
 
The bolded part is silly to me, if I'm Aiyuk I take less money and accept a trade to the Raiders because they're my favorite team.

:shrug: No worries as we can disagree there. I don't think it's silly to ask what we might do in a situation like that. With everyone speculating what Aiyuk might do, we're all guessing. I thought it might be an interesting topic to talk about what we might do. And yes, maybe this is better for the FFA but thought it was interesting.
 
The bolded part is silly to me, if I'm Aiyuk I take less money and accept a trade to the Raiders because they're my favorite team.

:shrug: No worries as we can disagree there. I don't think it's silly to ask what we might do in a situation like that. With everyone speculating what Aiyuk might do, we're all guessing. I thought it might be an interesting topic to talk about what we might do. And yes, maybe this is better for the FFA but thought it was interesting.
I guess but to think of it from the perspective of a player that played 2 years of Junior college, 2 years at ASU to get himself into the NFL plus all the other off field work vs the perspective of a fan who hasn't had to do any hard work and looks at it soley from the perspective of money and rings.
 
I'm not a 9'ers fan, per se, but I admire and respect their Team as what I feel is the best Team in the NFL at this time.

Any issues they're facing (and I can only think of two), appear to me to be minor, at best.

To the best of my knowledge, Trent Williams is simply exercising his unwritten right as an established tenured veteran who's regarded as one of the best at his position in the entire League, to skip training camp, because at the end of the day, he really doesn't need to be there. Lynch and Co. will get his financial business worked out, and that situation will be just fine. Doesn't even register on the radar.

Brandon Aiyuk and his representation have a very high opinion of him, and, IMHO, a lack of self-awareness. IMHO, he is the least important, and most easily replaced skill position Player in that offense.

Purdy: Playing on a Mr. Irrelevant Rookie Contract, running the offense like a seasoned vet, exactly the way offensive mastermind Kyle wants it run.
CMC: bona-fide unicorn, straw that stirs the drink, with a minor tweak that will amount to nothing by the time they host the Jets Monday, September 9th 8:20pm ET.
Deebo and Kittle: they may not be unicorns, but they're close. Like CMC, Swiss Army Knife types with unique skill sets that set them apart from their positional peers.

This offense is predicted on CMC/Deebo/Kittle basically putting 3 Queens on the chess board at the same time. Aiyuk, while certainly being a very good WR at the least, is the most 'conventional' player of the group. I have no doubt a mastermind of Kyle Shanahan's caliber, if he has peak CMC/Deebo/Kittle at his disposal, can more than get by with Jauan Jennings, Ricky Pearsall or a number of 'X' WR who will become available shortly, to generate that offense without missing a beat.

The 9'ers don't have to do anything they don't want to do about Aiyuk, and they shouldn't...and they'll be just fine.

Even without him, this is still a strong, balanced Team capable of going 13-4, attaining the #1 NFC Seed, and the odds-on favorite to rep the NFC in the Super Bowl and likely win it.

You do you, Aiyuk.
 
Another factor is spouses / family. For some athletes, the inside of one stadium / hockey rink etc looks like any other. The family probably feels their location more than they do.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top