Should be an interesting next few days as the AP writers go after each other. I'll personally give it a thumbs-down though.Just saw on NBC Sports, Cushing retains AP DROY with 18 votes. Byrd had 13 and Matthews had 10.So... yea.
Should be an interesting next few days as the AP writers go after each other. I'll personally give it a thumbs-down though.Just saw on NBC Sports, Cushing retains AP DROY with 18 votes. Byrd had 13 and Matthews had 10.So... yea.
And there goes any respect I previously had for the AP awards.Just saw on NBC Sports, Cushing retains AP DROY with 18 votes. Byrd had 13 and Matthews had 10.
I guess even the AP writers are not as upset as everyone thinks. And why would you take away wins from a team? This is not the NCAA where they take away wins even though we all know the game was played and who won.Why are people up in arms about his meaningless AP ROY award but no one wants the Texans to have to vacate wins? What if Houston had made the playoffs, would people care more?
Whar a shock. An SC player on roids. Say it ain't so. What a joke.Wasn't there talk of him doing roids in College?
No kidding. They basically had a referendum in front of them asking if PED use should be rewarded, and they answered back "yes". Sends a terrible message. They should never have done the re-vote for this very reason.fridayfrenzy said:And there goes any respect I previously had for the AP awards.ang12 said:Just saw on NBC Sports, Cushing retains AP DROY with 18 votes. Byrd had 13 and Matthews had 10.
Right. Because, of course, that message hadn't already been sent when Luis Castillo was drafted in the first round.No kidding. They basically had a referendum in front of them asking if PED use should be rewarded, and they answered back "yes". Sends a terrible message. They should never have done the re-vote for this very reason.fridayfrenzy said:And there goes any respect I previously had for the AP awards.ang12 said:Just saw on NBC Sports, Cushing retains AP DROY with 18 votes. Byrd had 13 and Matthews had 10.
So why exactly do you think he was taking hCG then? The diet thing just doesn't seem to make any sense for someone who is supposed to be uber-careful about his body.But he said "PROOF". It isnt proof by any stretch.Is it an indicator? Yes. But it sure as hell aint proof.GroveDiesel said:Actually, TJ Quinn talked to a bunch of doping experts who said exactly that. Cushing has apparently been claiming that he just naturally has levels of hcg in him that would have created a positive test result. If that were true, then he would have tested positive more than once. Which we didn't. Which makes it far more likely that he got busted and then stopped using. As for your apparent argument that Cushing may have been using it to lose weight, he'd have to be the dumbest athlete ever if that were the case. He wasn't exactly a guy that needed to lose weight in the first place. And using a drug that's clearly listed on the banned list to lose weight would be unimaginably stupid. If he was using it to lose weight, they should just ban him from the league for being dumb.wtf kind of jump in logic is that??????Obviously TJ Quin doesnt know what he is talking about when it comes to supplements and ancillaries.ESPN's TJ Quinn actually makes a good point. He says that Cushing's subsequent "clean" tests are actually proof that he WAS guilty. Otherwise the cgh would have appeared in the other tests as well.
Please dont move the goalpost.
He's guilty of using hCG... and it is not an anabolic steroid.
And as far as "If that were true, then he would have tested positive more than once. Which we didn't"...
Umm, this is at least his second positive test in under a year in the NFL![]()
When looking for proof he is taking steroids, it doesn't really matter what anyone speculates or thinks. They didn't invent the stuff to hide steroid use, so it must have other uses. Do I think he was using? heck yeah. Does anyone thinking it provide proof? Heck no.So why exactly do you think he was taking hCG then? The diet thing just doesn't seem to make any sense for someone who is supposed to be uber-careful about his body.
So if an adult male is caught taking a banned substance that is only plausibly taken by those coming off a roid cycle this doesn't have any implications to you?Do you think Manny Ramirez was using steroids? He was busted for hCG too.Massraider "gets it"."It doesn't matter what I believe, it only matters what I can prove!"When looking for proof he is taking steroids, it doesn't really matter what anyone speculates or thinks. They didn't invent the stuff to hide steroid use, so it must have other uses. Do I think he was using? heck yeah. Does anyone thinking it provide proof? Heck no.So why exactly do you think he was taking hCG then? The diet thing just doesn't seem to make any sense for someone who is supposed to be uber-careful about his body.
~Lt Daniel Kaffey~
i think ull need to explain to me again how a person testing positive for a substance that would only be present if steroids were used is not proof ?Massraider "gets it"."It doesn't matter what I believe, it only matters what I can prove!"When looking for proof he is taking steroids, it doesn't really matter what anyone speculates or thinks. They didn't invent the stuff to hide steroid use, so it must have other uses. Do I think he was using? heck yeah. Does anyone thinking it provide proof? Heck no.So why exactly do you think he was taking hCG then? The diet thing just doesn't seem to make any sense for someone who is supposed to be uber-careful about his body.
~Lt Daniel Kaffey~
KEPT BRIAN CUSHING(notes) (17)
Don Banks, Sports Illustrated.com
Bob Berger, Sporting News Radio
Chris Berman, ESPN
Steve Cohen, Sirius Satellite Radio
Frank Cooney, SportsXChange
Mark Craig, Minneapolis Star Tribune
Tom Curran, Comcast Sportsnet
Vinny Ditrani, The Record
Rick Gosselin, Dallas Morning News
Paul Gutierrez, Sacramento Bee
Clark Judge, CBSSports.com
John McClain, Houston Chronicle
Gary Myers, New York Daily News
Danny O'Neil, Seattle Times
Pete Prisco, CBSSports.com
Adam Teicher, Kansas City Star
Charean Williams Fort Worth Star-Telegram
KEPT JAIRUS BYRD(notes) (4)
Brian Allee-Walsh, New Orleans.com
Paul Domowitch, Philadelphia Daily News
Ashley Fox, Philadelphia Inquirer
Armando Salguero, Miami Herald
KEPT CLAY MATTHEWS(notes) (3)
Jim Corbett, USA Today
Tony Grossi, Cleveland Plain Dealer
Kent Somers, Arizona Republic
CHANGED TO BRIAN CUSHING (1)
Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Jairus Byrd)
CHANGED FROM BRIAN CUSHING (19)
Jarrett Bell, USA Today (Jairus Byrd)
Clifton Brown, The Sporting News (Jairus Byrd)
Rich Cimini, New York Daily News (Clay Matthews)
John Clayton, ESPN The Magazine (Clay Matthews)
Bob Costas, HBO/NBC Sports (Clay Matthews)
John Czarnecki, Fox Sports (Brian Orakpo(notes))
Boomer Esiason, CBS/Westwood One (Jairus Byrd)
Mark Gaughan, Buffalo News (Jairus Byrd)
Nancy Gay, AOL Fanhouse (Jairus Byrd)
Bob Glauber, Newsday (Jairus Byrd)
Dave Goldberg, AOL Fanhouse (Clay Matthews)
Ira Kaufman, Tampa Tribune (Jairus Byrd)
Peter King, Sports Illustrated (Clay Matthews)
Matt Maiocco, Santa Rosa Press Democrat (Clay Matthews)
Alex Marvez, Foxsports.com (Jairus Byrd)
Pat McManamon, Akron Beacon Journal (Jairus Byrd)
Dan Pompei, Chicago Tribune (Clay Matthews)
Adam Schein, Sirius NFL Radio (Brian Orakpo)
Frank Schwab, Colorado Springs Gazette (Clay Matthews)
ABSTAINED (3)
Howie Long, Fox Sports
Chris Mortensen, ESPN
Tom Silverstein, Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel
Note: All had Cushing in the original balloting.
CHANGED FROM JAIRUS BYRD (2)
Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Brian Cushing)
David Elfin, Washington Times (Brian Orakpo)
CHANGED FROM BRIAN ORAKPO (2)
Howard Balzer, Fox Sports Net (James Laurinaitis(notes))
Len Shapiro, Miami Herald (Clay Matthews)
Fixed.Your constant semantics are annoying btw Choke....but I'm sure you already knew that.Unlike Choke, I don't need to see a live streaming video of Cushing putting a syringe is his ###, followed by a notarized confession, to know that he, WITHOUT QUESTION, USED STEROIDS.
Yeah...how do you defend that?CHANGED FROM JAIRUS BYRD (2)
Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Brian Cushing)
lololololololol........when the pittsburgh guy finds out steroids were involved he switched over to cushing.
If Roids were good enough for the Steel Curtain...Yeah...how do you defend that?CHANGED FROM JAIRUS BYRD (2)
Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Brian Cushing)
lololololololol........when the pittsburgh guy finds out steroids were involved he switched over to cushing.
He didn't think they should have done the re-vote and so voted for Cushing as a form of protest.Yeah...how do you defend that?CHANGED FROM JAIRUS BYRD (2)
Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Brian Cushing)
lololololololol........when the pittsburgh guy finds out steroids were involved he switched over to cushing.
Good for him. The whole thing stinks of a witch hunt. He got caught, denied, and will serve his suspension. This happens every year, I think.He didn't think they should have done the re-vote and so voted for Cushing as a form of protest.Yeah...how do you defend that?CHANGED FROM JAIRUS BYRD (2)
Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Brian Cushing)
lololololololol........when the pittsburgh guy finds out steroids were involved he switched over to cushing.
A witchhunt?massraider said:Good for him. The whole thing stinks of a witch hunt. He got caught, denied, and will serve his suspension. This happens every year, I think.GregR said:He didn't think they should have done the re-vote and so voted for Cushing as a form of protest.sho nuff said:Yeah...how do you defend that?Kool-Aid Larry said:CHANGED FROM JAIRUS BYRD (2)
Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Brian Cushing)
lololololololol........when the pittsburgh guy finds out steroids were involved he switched over to cushing.
Why are people acting like this is the first guy to ever use PEDs? He won an award given by 50 sportswriters, that he received no bonus for. No big deal.
Yeah.I think people are picking and choosing which cheaters they are offended by/upset about.A witchhunt?massraider said:Good for him. The whole thing stinks of a witch hunt. He got caught, denied, and will serve his suspension. This happens every year, I think.GregR said:He didn't think they should have done the re-vote and so voted for Cushing as a form of protest.sho nuff said:Yeah...how do you defend that?Kool-Aid Larry said:CHANGED FROM JAIRUS BYRD (2)
Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Brian Cushing)
lololololololol........when the pittsburgh guy finds out steroids were involved he switched over to cushing.
Why are people acting like this is the first guy to ever use PEDs? He won an award given by 50 sportswriters, that he received no bonus for. No big deal.![]()
Easier to predict than the tides. From PFT:vandyt said:Should be an interesting next few days as the AP writers go after each other. I'll personally give it a thumbs-down though.ang12 said:Just saw on NBC Sports, Cushing retains AP DROY with 18 votes. Byrd had 13 and Matthews had 10.
So... yea.
Backlash against AP voters who supported Brian Cushing is building
Posted by Mike Florio on May 13, 2010 11:57 AM ET
The biggest steroids-related story that the NFL has seen in years, if not ever, continues to grow tentacles. The morning after the unprecedented Associated Press do-over regarding the defensive rookie of the year award, anger is mounting within some media circles regarding the decision of 17 voters to vote once again for Brian Cushing, who gave in September a urine sample that tested positive for hCG, a non-steroid commonly used after a cycle of steroids. (One voter, Ed Bouchette of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, actually changed his vote from Bills defensive back Jairus Byrd to Cushing.)
The backlash started last night, when Austin Murphy of Sports Illustrated threw off the gloves and targeted the band of sportswriters who opted not to ban Cushing from receiving the honor. "Memo to 18 AP voters who let Brian Cushing keep his award, despite clear PED use: you should be drug-tested yourselves," Murphy said via Twitter. "What a f'ing joke."
Vic Ketchman of Jaguars.com was more tactful, but just as powerful. "The message is that what Cushing did is no big deal," Ketchman writes. "The message is that a lot of sportswriters believe that what Cushing did is nothing more than what a lot of other players do, and that message greatly disappoints me. This kid had the look coming out of college. Everybody knew it but we all turned our back on it. The use of performance-enhancing drugs sickens me. It is, in my opinion, the ultimate in cheating. This is far worse than what Bill Belichick did with a video camera. As everyone knows, I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of innocent until proven guilty. In Cushing's case, he's been proven guilty, yet, he's being suspended for two games fewer than a guy who wasn't even charged with a crime.
"Worse, yet, my media brothers are allowing Cushing to keep his award. Shame on them. They sold out."
Our good friend Howard Balzer of the Sports Xchange and the St. Louis Globe-Democrat, who changed his own vote from Brian Orakpo to James Laurinaitis, was candid via e-mail.
"I'm almost too stunned for words," Balzer said. "When I found out the result of the Cushing vote and how some made their vote a protest of the process, I couldn't believe it.
"The AP gave us a chance to right a wrong and it was fumbled badly. And Cushing has the gall to say he is still 'honored.' Makes me want to gag.
"Those that say the AP move was unprecedented . . . of course, it was. When has an award been given one season, and before the next season is played we learn the winner used PEDs that previous year?
"In retrospect, the AP should have stripped him of the award, had a re-vote and declared him ineligible.
"Everyone that voted for Cushing originally should have considered one thing and one thing only before re-voting: If he had been suspended last season would we have voted for him? That answer is probably obvious, especially because the missed games would have impacted his production.
"This should have been easy. It makes no sense."
We agree. And, frankly, we have an even bigger problem with the idea that people voted for Cushing the second time around not because they thought that Cushing should keep the award, but because they disagreed with the notion of doing the vote all over again.
Folks, if that's the way you feel, then don't vote at all, like ESPN's Chris Mortensen. Better yet, resign your position as a member of the panel.
Really, if the voters disagree sufficiently strongly with the decision to conduct a second vote that they're willing to go Veruca Salt and vote for Cushing again despite clear evidence he was using a banned substance that is the lemon juice to the hypodermic tequila shot, why in the hell didn't they simply quit instead?
John McClain of the Houston Chronicle, whom we respect and like, has taken this thing to a new level, openly calling it "absurd" to have a second vote.
Again, then why participate at all?
And if the folks who decided to make a mockery of the process didn't have the nerve to walk away from the 50-person club, the AP should force their hand, and force them out.
We know that at least 18 members of the sportswriting community, including our good friend Tom Curran, may not appreciate our message or the manner in which we're delivering it. When we take a hard stand on an issue like this, we do it because we believe it's important to be willing to point out from time to time that the emperor is riding down the street butt-naked on a horse.
In this case, we believe that the emperor is aware that he's naked, that he's standing up in the saddle doing the Cabbage Patch, that he has a long piece of toilet paper stuck to his left foot, and that he intentionally put it there.
From my days as a blogger goon who had to cover the Jags website, I tended to enjoy Vic Ketchman's work. But the above is a really poorly done piece in my opinion, and I'm someone who had no qualms with the prospect of Cushing losing the award.The Cushing-Roethlisberger comparison is ludicrous. If you want to talk about it in terms of being charged with or proven guilty of crimes, neither has been charged nor proven guilty of a crime.Easier to predict than the tides. From PFT:vandyt said:Should be an interesting next few days as the AP writers go after each other. I'll personally give it a thumbs-down though.ang12 said:Just saw on NBC Sports, Cushing retains AP DROY with 18 votes. Byrd had 13 and Matthews had 10.
So... yea.
Backlash against AP voters who supported Brian Cushing is building
Posted by Mike Florio on May 13, 2010 11:57 AM ET
The biggest steroids-related story that the NFL has seen in years, if not ever, continues to grow tentacles. The morning after the unprecedented Associated Press do-over regarding the defensive rookie of the year award, anger is mounting within some media circles regarding the decision of 17 voters to vote once again for Brian Cushing, who gave in September a urine sample that tested positive for hCG, a non-steroid commonly used after a cycle of steroids. (One voter, Ed Bouchette of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, actually changed his vote from Bills defensive back Jairus Byrd to Cushing.)
The backlash started last night, when Austin Murphy of Sports Illustrated threw off the gloves and targeted the band of sportswriters who opted not to ban Cushing from receiving the honor. "Memo to 18 AP voters who let Brian Cushing keep his award, despite clear PED use: you should be drug-tested yourselves," Murphy said via Twitter. "What a f'ing joke."
Vic Ketchman of Jaguars.com was more tactful, but just as powerful. "The message is that what Cushing did is no big deal," Ketchman writes. "The message is that a lot of sportswriters believe that what Cushing did is nothing more than what a lot of other players do, and that message greatly disappoints me. This kid had the look coming out of college. Everybody knew it but we all turned our back on it. The use of performance-enhancing drugs sickens me. It is, in my opinion, the ultimate in cheating. This is far worse than what Bill Belichick did with a video camera. As everyone knows, I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of innocent until proven guilty. In Cushing's case, he's been proven guilty, yet, he's being suspended for two games fewer than a guy who wasn't even charged with a crime.
"Worse, yet, my media brothers are allowing Cushing to keep his award. Shame on them. They sold out."
...
Amazing. This guy won the AP Defensive Rookie of the Year Award TWICE.A record that will never be broken.Congrats, Cushing.ang12 said:Just saw on NBC Sports, Cushing retains AP DROY with 18 votes. Byrd had 13 and Matthews had 10.So... yea.
I thought hCG was used in in-vitro fertilization to induce ovulation in women prior to egg retrieval.On ESPN:HOUSTON -- Houston Texans linebacker Brian Cushing says he neither injected nor took any banned substances even though he tested positive for a performance-enhancing drug.Cushing was suspended for four games without pay last week for violating the NFL's drug policy. His appeal was denied.Cushing confirms he tested positive for hCG, a fertility drug that is on the league's banned substance list. He says he has no idea how it turned up in a drug test.Come on...I personally don't have a big problem with him using whatever he was using; if anyone seriously believes that a good percentage of football players aren't on some PED, they're living in a fantasy world.He got busted; he should serve his suspension and take any other repercussions that follow. But at least man up and either admit it or keep your mouth shut and don't say anything.To lie after the fact is pathetic.
Check out Wikipedia; it's got a good desription of why it is used in coonjuction with anabolic roids. Basically, once you cycle off the roids, it helps get your testosterone under control and back to normal levels.I thought hCG was used in in-vitro fertilization to induce ovulation in women prior to egg retrieval.On ESPN:HOUSTON -- Houston Texans linebacker Brian Cushing says he neither injected nor took any banned substances even though he tested positive for a performance-enhancing drug.Cushing was suspended for four games without pay last week for violating the NFL's drug policy. His appeal was denied.Cushing confirms he tested positive for hCG, a fertility drug that is on the league's banned substance list. He says he has no idea how it turned up in a drug test.Come on...I personally don't have a big problem with him using whatever he was using; if anyone seriously believes that a good percentage of football players aren't on some PED, they're living in a fantasy world.He got busted; he should serve his suspension and take any other repercussions that follow. But at least man up and either admit it or keep your mouth shut and don't say anything.To lie after the fact is pathetic.
Agreed. What's worse is Mark Schelerth going around on NFL Live saying hCG might be naturally occurring when the overwhelming majority of experts have explicitly denied this possibility. If there are sources for his assertion, I'd like to see them. Cushing's statement also sinks the arguments of those running around talking about how he took hCG for weight loss.On ESPN:HOUSTON -- Houston Texans linebacker Brian Cushing says he neither injected nor took any banned substances even though he tested positive for a performance-enhancing drug.Cushing was suspended for four games without pay last week for violating the NFL's drug policy. His appeal was denied.Cushing confirms he tested positive for hCG, a fertility drug that is on the league's banned substance list. He says he has no idea how it turned up in a drug test.Come on...I personally don't have a big problem with him using whatever he was using; if anyone seriously believes that a good percentage of football players aren't on some PED, they're living in a fantasy world.He got busted; he should serve his suspension and take any other repercussions that follow. But at least man up and either admit it or keep your mouth shut and don't say anything.To lie after the fact is pathetic.
I have to agree.MrTwo94 may have come off a bit abrasive, but I didn't catch any name-calling. I wouldn't have handled it the way he did, but I don't think he's ban-worthy.And I'll add that the claim that someone put on 15 pounds of muscle that fast naturally while doing all that cardio at the same time raised my eyebrows. I'm no expert by any stretch but I was going to toss out the BS flag myself, albeit more tactfully and with less confrontation.I hope you don't get banned. I happen to agree with you 100%.I didn't say it was a suggestion. I think I called it a threat. And I said it was unfounded. And I said if you follow through with it that I'll get over it. I did not do any name calling. I can see how one might claim it was a personal attack, but it really wasn't. I did use the phrase "full of crap" which isn't nice, but it wasn't until after a ridiculous claim had been repeated. Perhaps "full of misinformation" would have been more diplomatic. Condescending tone? Sure, it got to that point when the guy refused to acknowledge physiological facts or even do the slightest bit of research. The condescending tone probably gave it the feel of a personal attack, but I really didn't perceive it to be that way.Finally, at no point did I 'spout out about how smart I am'. Where'd you even get that from? I try to only speak on subjects I'm well versed on. I know what subjects I am not informed on (trust me, there are plenty) and I keep my mouth shut on them or limit myself to questions. If everyone did this, forums would be a lot more dense with information. Speaking of which, I've clogged up this thread enough. If you decide not to ban me for informing an uninformed poster but wish to clarify anything else, PM me or e-mail me. Banned or not, I'm not planning any more off topic posts in this thread.It wasn't a suggestion. Personal attacks, name calling and the general condescending tone you've used in this thread isn't good for anyone on the board. We're a community that tries to foster intelligent and informative discussion about the NFL. You're obviously and intelligent guy that has a lot of information, but you're not going to stick around here if you can't learn to be cool with other posters. If you want to go to spout out on message boards about how smart you are, I'm sure you can find many other boards for that.
Brian Cushing claims he took no banned substances
Posted by Mike Florio on May 13, 2010 2:23 PM ET
In a stunning press conference that showed defiance and denial rather than remorse or contrition, Texans linebacker Brian Cushing flatly denied on Thursday taking any substance banned by the NFL.
It's a far cry from conceding that he took a non-steroidal substance. He's basically saying he took nothing, and that the NFL is wrong.
Cushing confirmed that he tested positive for hCG, and he expressed concern that, if it showed up in impermissible levels without him taking hCG once, it could happen again. At one point, he said that doctors are looking into "why it would keep reoccurring," ignoring the fact that, in multiple tests since September, it apparently hasn't reoccurred.
Cushing claims that he initially feared that he had a tumor after learning of the positive test in October, and that he spent the balance of the 2009 season fearful that he might die. (Seriously. He said that. And no one asked whether he had an MRI or other medical tests that detect the presence of, you know, tumors.)
He expressed on several occasions that he plans to "respect the process of the NFL," but he has shown no respect for the process by publicly refuting it. His position reconfirms our belief that, once a player's suspension has been finalized, all confidentiality should be waived and the league should be able to put all relevant information on the table.
As it currently stands, the league imposes the suspension, and then the player can say whatever he wants. Including the PED version of "it wasn't me."
Finally, one of the reporters flat-out asked Cushing what he thought about our suggestion that he should decline the AP defensive rookie of the year award.
Cushing's response: "Why?"
Hey, at least that's better than, "There's a reason I have a few more zeros at the end of my contract than he do."
Sports writers are hilarious, I read this article on FoxSports this morning. Darned if you do, darned if you don't:On ESPN:
HOUSTON -- Houston Texans linebacker Brian Cushing says he neither injected nor took any banned substances even though he tested positive for a performance-enhancing drug.
Cushing was suspended for four games without pay last week for violating the NFL's drug policy. His appeal was denied.
Cushing confirms he tested positive for hCG, a fertility drug that is on the league's banned substance list. He says he has no idea how it turned up in a drug test.
Come on...
I personally don't have a big problem with him using whatever he was using; if anyone seriously believes that a good percentage of football players aren't on some PED, they're living in a fantasy world.
He got busted; he should serve his suspension and take any other repercussions that follow. But at least man up and either admit it or keep your mouth shut and don't say anything.
To lie after the fact is pathetic.
Cushing cost himself votes with silence
Maybe there is a plausible reason for Brian Cushing’s failed steroid test.
He ran out of time to give it.
I waited for Cushing to publicly proclaim his innocence beyond a media-released statement. I needed to see and hear sincerity in Cushing’s face and voice if I were to entertain the possibility of once again voting him the NFL Defensive Rookie of the Year. I had to believe Cushing was drug-free during the 2009 season.
I’m still waiting, but the Associated Press isn’t. I submitted my ballot by the noon ET Wednesday deadline.
Cushing’s name wasn’t on it.
The physically imposing Houston Texans linebacker had almost five days to stand before the cameras and state his case after news of the failed test surfaced. Even though he was dealing with a family crisis, Cushing still had ample opportunity to detail why he would reportedly register positive for HCG (human chorionic gonadotropin), a fertility drug commonly taken by steroid users to kick-start natural testosterone production at the end of a cycle.
This explanation was especially important considering how much Cushing has gotten dogged for allegedly using performance-enhancing drugs in the past. Cushing has vehemently denied those claims and never failed a prior test (at least to our knowledge) before the HCG red flag last September. Yet when you type his name into a Google search engine, these are two of the first three suggestions: Brian Cushing before and after (photos) and Brian Cushing steroids.
I hear nothing but rave reviews from those who know Cushing as a driven and loyal player and person. They would love to believe Cushing’s muscles and 2009 success -- 133 tackles, four sacks and four interceptions -- came solely from hard work and natural athletic skill.
Right now, I can’t take that leap of faith. It’s the duck theory. If it looks like a duck and waddles like a duck, then -- quack, quack -- it’s probably a duck.
Cushing is now the face of steroid use in the NFL just like Tony Mandarich and the late Lyle Alzado in previous generations. Whether he can erase that image depends on Cushing’s subsequent actions and words. He can eventually move past this like Julius Peppers, another NFL Defensive Rookie of the Year who tested positive for a banned substance in 2002.
Cushing’s attempt to clear his name should begin in earnest with a news conference by no later than Monday’s Texans minicamp. That's too late for me to consider Cushing’s mea culpa in my balloting.
I already voted for Buffalo safety Jairus Byrd.
Really? When was the other time he tested positive?But he said "PROOF". It isnt proof by any stretch.Is it an indicator? Yes. But it sure as hell aint proof.Actually, TJ Quinn talked to a bunch of doping experts who said exactly that. Cushing has apparently been claiming that he just naturally has levels of hcg in him that would have created a positive test result. If that were true, then he would have tested positive more than once. Which we didn't. Which makes it far more likely that he got busted and then stopped using. As for your apparent argument that Cushing may have been using it to lose weight, he'd have to be the dumbest athlete ever if that were the case. He wasn't exactly a guy that needed to lose weight in the first place. And using a drug that's clearly listed on the banned list to lose weight would be unimaginably stupid. If he was using it to lose weight, they should just ban him from the league for being dumb.wtf kind of jump in logic is that??????Obviously TJ Quin doesnt know what he is talking about when it comes to supplements and ancillaries.ESPN's TJ Quinn actually makes a good point. He says that Cushing's subsequent "clean" tests are actually proof that he WAS guilty. Otherwise the cgh would have appeared in the other tests as well.
Please dont move the goalpost.
He's guilty of using hCG... and it is not an anabolic steroid.
And as far as "If that were true, then he would have tested positive more than once. Which we didn't"...
Umm, this is at least his second positive test in under a year in the NFL![]()
he's afraid if an award gets retroactively removed because of steroids it might set a precedent..........sho nuff said:Yeah...how do you defend that?Kool-Aid Larry said:CHANGED FROM JAIRUS BYRD (2)
Ed Bouchette, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Brian Cushing)
lololololololol........when the pittsburgh guy finds out steroids were involved he switched over to cushing.
That was a really articulate and well thought out post.I'm a big fan of what Cushing does on the field; I thought it was a great pick by the Texans (with some risk), but the bottom line is the guy came into the league with questions surrounding steriod use. Sure, cancer or some other minimally likely situation "could" have resulted in his positive test (and I'll feel like a tool if that turns out to be the case), but if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck...ETA - What I'm really trying to say is that I think it's a lot harder for the public (media included) to give a guy the benefit of the doubt when there is a laundry list (although non proven) of accusations and conjecture that the guy has been a habitual PED user.A couple of different thoughts about the situation...
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports...nt/7003559.html"I tested positive for such a small amount it can't be performancing enhancing," Cushing said during a press conference at Reliant Stadium. "I've got to get medical help to find out what it happened and to keep it from happening again. I'm not going to change my workout regime or anything I do because I know I haven't done anything wrong."
...
"I was tested in September, and I found out in October I had tested positive," he said. "I played the rest of the season thinking I had tumors."
I'm not sure they exist.Tumors. Awesome. Only thing dumber than this is people who buy this crap.