What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

By the end of their careers... (1 Viewer)

Man, I really don't like this QB class. There might not be a star in the bunch.

Having said that, I like Bradford most of the guys who were drafted.

To me McCoy looks like a college overachiever with marginal physical tools for the pro game. People throw out the Drew Brees comparison because they're both short, but I really don't see McCoy as the next Brees/Favre. At best I could see him becoming Jeff Garcia. Troy Smith might be a more likely career outcome.

 
Dilfer could not stop raving about McCoy today prior to day 2 of the draft.

"McCoy is THE GEM of the draft" was the quote that stuck with me. Loves his arm strength (which some people criticize), loves his football IQ, loves his athleticism... loves everything about him. I'm not sure I agree, but he did make a pretty good case.

 
I don't like this QB class either. I definately felt like McCoy and Tebow wouldn't be NFL stars. I like both players in college, so I'm hoping to be wrong. Clausen has a chance to be decent, I like the CMU QB Dan LeFevour the most as a dark horse, but not 100 percent sure about him. I've watched a lot of those MAC QB's come thru and I think this guy could be another one that eventually turns into a starter in the NFL. The good thing about being a 4th rounder is that you won't be thrust into the starter roll, so he'll have a year or two to develop.

I am unsure about Bradford. It's definately fair to say most people are way higher on him than I am. One thing that comes to my mind is with Oklahoma, with all these top 5 players in the entire NFL draft, why wasn't this All Star team head and shoulders the best team in college? I have a feeling somebody's a bust in this group and overestimated how good they were because although Oklahoma was good, I didn't see a super team out on the field which is what this draft looked like for them.

I'm in no way a negataive Nancy, there's been years where I like a whole bunch of QB's and I scratch my head saying to myself I know all these guys can't be good, it just doesn't work that way. This year, I'm just glad the teams I root for in Detroit and Dallas weren't in need of a QB (unless Dallas can land LeFevour late).

 
If McCoy has such a weak arm, which "experts" have noted, how does he have such a high completion percentage? It's off the charts 70% and it was 77% in 2008. I think it was a definite good gamble by the Browns. That offense fits him perfectly

 
If McCoy has such a weak arm, which "experts" have noted, how does he have such a high completion percentage?
I agree that McCoy is pretty good value in the third, but that question has an easy answer. It's because he threw lots and lots of really really short passes.
 
Well, Bradford and McCoy are on familiar similar offenses (in terms of having very few weapons), so it should be an even race. Hell, Tebow has very few weapons, either, since Denver traded their two big ones away (Marshall and Scheffler). Granted they drafted a new WR, but I'm not all that sold on him, either.

It will be interesting...

 
Raider Nation said:
Dilfer could not stop raving about McCoy today prior to day 2 of the draft."McCoy is THE GEM of the draft" was the quote that stuck with me. Loves his arm strength (which some people criticize), loves his football IQ, loves his athleticism... loves everything about him. I'm not sure I agree, but he did make a pretty good case.
Ah so it was Trent Dilfer that sold you,that's great. He and Mccoy's girlfriend, youre definitely on the right track!
 
If McCoy has such a weak arm, which "experts" have noted, how does he have such a high completion percentage?
I agree that McCoy is pretty good value in the third, but that question has an easy answer. It's because he threw lots and lots of really really short passes.
If the Rams had a crystal ball I think they would have loved to get McCoy in the third and taken Suh first.
 
If McCoy has such a weak arm, which "experts" have noted, how does he have such a high completion percentage?
I agree that McCoy is pretty good value in the third, but that question has an easy answer. It's because he threw lots and lots of really really short passes.
Well, I wouldn't consider Massaquoi/Robiskie deep vertical threats so that won't be a problem. CLE really needs a Welker/Shipley guy now - someone McCoy can count on as the go-to-guy. Anyways, McCoy's YPA in college was around 8 so it wasn't THAT bad - actually more accurate than Clausen and Jimmy had talent around him with Floyd/Tate.
 
Blackjacks said:
Bradford is far and above the best in this classMcCoy is OVERRATED even in the third round
It would have been interesting if McCoy played with top OL and the weapons that Bradford had to see what his draft status would have been.
 
Clausen will be the best QB of this class IMO. I agree with others who feel this class is pretty weak. I don't think there are any franchise caliber QBs in it and in reality I think the best we can hope for is to come away with 2 average starters of this group. I'm fairly confident that Clausen will be 1 of those 2.

 
Blackjacks said:
Bradford is far and above the best in this classMcCoy is OVERRATED even in the third round
I would rather overdraft a qb in bottom of 3rd rd vs overdrafting a qb with the very first pick of the draft. Bradford is far more overrated than McCoy. I think Bradford is the better prospect, but no way was he even close to being the top player in this draft.
 
Clausen will be the best QB of this class IMO. I agree with others who feel this class is pretty weak. I don't think there are any franchise caliber QBs in it and in reality I think the best we can hope for is to come away with 2 average starters of this group. I'm fairly confident that Clausen will be 1 of those 2.
Though I don't agree that Clausen is the best of the class, I do think he'll have the best opportunity to shine. He fell into a more ideal offense than the others...
 
If McCoy has such a weak arm, which "experts" have noted, how does he have such a high completion percentage?
I agree that McCoy is pretty good value in the third, but that question has an easy answer. It's because he threw lots and lots of really really short passes.
Which is why he's perfect for the West Coast offense. I think overall Bradford>McCoy>Clausen>LeFevour>Pike>TebowDue to circumstances:Clausen>McCoy>Bradford>Clausen couldn't have asked for a better landing spot considering it's the same offense and terminology in Carolina that he ran at Notre Dame.
 
Blackjacks said:
Bradford is far and above the best in this classMcCoy is OVERRATED even in the third round
It would have been interesting if McCoy played with top OL and the weapons that Bradford had to see what his draft status would have been.
Not really. UT's passing game was less dynamic than OU's because of McCoy's limitations as a passer.
 
Bradford will be a star. The Rams o-line is coming along and they have 3-4 #2 type of WR's. Once they get a true #1, they will be deadly. Next years WR class has a few #1 WR's at the top, which is where the Rams will be drafting again. 2012 is the year the Rams start their playoff run. They have some nice young players.

 
McCoy's career was killed the moment the Browns selected him.
This is just dumb on so many levels.Bradford is definitely the better of the two but McCoy landed in a great spot for himself. He will have a good line in front of him, the offense in place suits his strengths, and he has some pretty good minds at his disposal. That being said, I would still say that McCoy's chances of having a better career than Bradford is around 20%.
 
If Bradford stays healthy, what does he lack that prevents him from having super-star upside?
Anyone?I don't follow college football, all I do is read about prospects. But everything I've read pretty much raves about him - hyper-accurate, adequate arm, smart. The only knocks that I consistently see are his shoulder and he didn't play in a pro-style offense. Yet I see a lot of people put Bradford down, nobody seems to think he can be elite, and I'm just wondering why.
 
If McCoy has such a weak arm, which "experts" have noted, how does he have such a high completion percentage?
I agree that McCoy is pretty good value in the third, but that question has an easy answer. It's because he threw lots and lots of really really short passes.
Is this really true? I know zero about college football so I'm asking honestly here.Here are some YPA stats:

Colt McCoy

2006 - 8.08

2007 - 7.79

2008 - 8.91

2009 - 7.49

Jimmy Clausen

2007 - 5.12

2008 - 7.21

2009 - 8.76

Sam Bradford

2007 - 9.15

2008 - 9.77

2009 - 8.15

Tim Tebow

2006 - 10.85

2007 - 9.39

2008 - 9.22

2009 - 9.22

According to the numbers McCoy doesn't look that bad. What's the reason for this perception then? I'd like to know what we've gotten ourselves into here :lmao:

 
If McCoy has such a weak arm, which "experts" have noted, how does he have such a high completion percentage?
I agree that McCoy is pretty good value in the third, but that question has an easy answer. It's because he threw lots and lots of really really short passes.
Is this really true? I know zero about college football so I'm asking honestly here.Here are some YPA stats:

Colt McCoy

2006 - 8.08

2007 - 7.79

2008 - 8.91

2009 - 7.49

Jimmy Clausen

2007 - 5.12

2008 - 7.21

2009 - 8.76

Sam Bradford

2007 - 9.15

2008 - 9.77

2009 - 8.15

Tim Tebow

2006 - 10.85

2007 - 9.39

2008 - 9.22

2009 - 9.22

According to the numbers McCoy doesn't look that bad. What's the reason for this perception then? I'd like to know what we've gotten ourselves into here :lmao:
McCoy is a check down/tunnel vision machine.
 
Wouldnt it make more sense to look at yards per completion if you actually wanted to look at an honest statistic ????
Um, okay...YPC stats:Colt McCoy2006 - 11.842007 - 11.972008 - 11.622009 - 10.61Jimmy Clausen2007 - 9.092008 - 11.842009 - 12.88Sam Bradford2007 - 13.172008 - 14.392009 - 14.41Tim Tebow2006 - 16.272007 - 14.042008 - 14.32009 - 13.59What should I take away from this. That Tim Tebow loves the deep ball more than Sam Bradford? That Colt McCoy and Jimmy Clausen are roughly the same in terms of how often they checkdown?Again, I've watched zero minutes of college football in 10 years, so I'm trying to find something that tells me that Colt McCoy is a "checkdown machine"
 
Again, I've watched zero minutes of college football in 10 years, so I'm trying to find something that tells me that Colt McCoy is a "checkdown machine"
The first part of your statement answers your question, watch any of McCoy's games against tougher opponents and you'll find that 'something' you're looking for.
 
I am unsure about Bradford. It's definately fair to say most people are way higher on him than I am. One thing that comes to my mind is with Oklahoma, with all these top 5 players in the entire NFL draft, why wasn't this All Star team head and shoulders the best team in college? I have a feeling somebody's a bust in this group and overestimated how good they were because although Oklahoma was good, I didn't see a super team out on the field which is what this draft looked like for them.I'm in no way a negataive Nancy, there's been years where I like a whole bunch of QB's and I scratch my head saying to myself I know all these guys can't be good, it just doesn't work that way. This year, I'm just glad the teams I root for in Detroit and Dallas weren't in need of a QB (unless Dallas can land LeFevour late).
Bradford and Gresham went down with season ending injuries.
 
Am I crazy for thinking Crompton is a good prospect, he'd need to do a Charlie Whitehurst and move somewhere else but I think the guys got a chance.

 
Bradford is far and above the best in this classMcCoy is OVERRATED even in the third round
It would have been interesting if McCoy played with top OL and the weapons that Bradford had to see what his draft status would have been.
Not really. UT's passing game was less dynamic than OU's because of McCoy's limitations as a passer.
That partly maybe true, but the bigger part of the equation is the crap OL Texas had.
 
Bradford is far and above the best in this classMcCoy is OVERRATED even in the third round
It would have been interesting if McCoy played with top OL and the weapons that Bradford had to see what his draft status would have been.
Not really. UT's passing game was less dynamic than OU's because of McCoy's limitations as a passer.
That partly maybe true, but the bigger part of the equation is the crap OL Texas had.
I'd say they're both true to some extent...but I wouldn't necessarily put it on the OL talent, more on the blocking scheme, running east and west out of the shotgun, predictability, and lack of commitment to the running game.A testament to the limitation of Colt's arm would seem to be indicated by the change to an offense that will work under center much more of the time with Garrett Gilbert, going deeper down the field much more often, and featuring more power looks, drive blocking (as opposed to zone looks and reaching), and straight-ahead running in the rushing attack this year.That's not to say he can't throw a deep ball or an out. He can in the right situations. He can't live off of it like some guys, though. He certainly isn't a guy I'd characterize as having a big arm.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What sayeth you?
a twice fried throwing shoulder on a team with perhaps the worst O-line in NFL History that gives up an avg of 36 sacks/yr each of past 4 seasons, means this kid isn't going to last McCoy goes to a team with Holmgren as a GM so he'll get some sound advice, versus Bradford who goes to a team with perhaps the worst head coach in the NFL - Steve Spagnuolo - and an equally bad coaching staff..no wr's, no TE's, only Sjax to help out..Bradford has Tim Couch/Heath Shuler/J. Russell written all over him...out of the NFL within 4 years..David Carr was supposed to be the big Ticket Item,right? where's he now, a career backup... :bs:
 
Bradford is far and above the best in this class

McCoy is OVERRATED even in the third round
I would rather overdraft a qb in bottom of 3rd rd vs overdrafting a qb with the very first pick of the draft. Bradford is far more overrated than McCoy. I think Bradford is the better prospect, but no way was he even close to being the top player in this draft.
then i don't think you understand how football games championships are won.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Clausen will be the best QB of this class IMO. I agree with others who feel this class is pretty weak. I don't think there are any franchise caliber QBs in it and in reality I think the best we can hope for is to come away with 2 average starters of this group. I'm fairly confident that Clausen will be 1 of those 2.
Though I don't agree that Clausen is the best of the class, I do think he'll have the best opportunity to shine. He fell into a more ideal offense than the others...
Generally, This.However, i do think Clausen is the best QB of the class. how more people don't understand how great a landing spot CAR is don't understand how important a solid running game is to a new QB.
 
What sayeth you?
a twice fried throwing shoulder on a team with perhaps the worst O-line in NFL History that gives up an avg of 36 sacks/yr each of past 4 seasons, means this kid isn't going to last McCoy goes to a team with Holmgren as a GM so he'll get some sound advice, versus Bradford who goes to a team with perhaps the worst head coach in the NFL - Steve Spagnuolo - and an equally bad coaching staff..no wr's, no TE's, only Sjax to help out..Bradford has Tim Couch/Heath Shuler/J. Russell written all over him...out of the NFL within 4 years..David Carr was supposed to be the big Ticket Item,right? where's he now, a career backup... :bs:
This is one of the worst "thought out" posts I've seen in awhile.Why did you remove the Follows Closely: Browns from your profile?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top