I actually agree.Clausen > LeFevor > Bradford > Tebow > McCoyhow bout that?
I agree that McCoy is pretty good value in the third, but that question has an easy answer. It's because he threw lots and lots of really really short passes.If McCoy has such a weak arm, which "experts" have noted, how does he have such a high completion percentage?
Ah so it was Trent Dilfer that sold you,that's great. He and Mccoy's girlfriend, youre definitely on the right track!Raider Nation said:Dilfer could not stop raving about McCoy today prior to day 2 of the draft."McCoy is THE GEM of the draft" was the quote that stuck with me. Loves his arm strength (which some people criticize), loves his football IQ, loves his athleticism... loves everything about him. I'm not sure I agree, but he did make a pretty good case.
If the Rams had a crystal ball I think they would have loved to get McCoy in the third and taken Suh first.I agree that McCoy is pretty good value in the third, but that question has an easy answer. It's because he threw lots and lots of really really short passes.If McCoy has such a weak arm, which "experts" have noted, how does he have such a high completion percentage?
Well, I wouldn't consider Massaquoi/Robiskie deep vertical threats so that won't be a problem. CLE really needs a Welker/Shipley guy now - someone McCoy can count on as the go-to-guy. Anyways, McCoy's YPA in college was around 8 so it wasn't THAT bad - actually more accurate than Clausen and Jimmy had talent around him with Floyd/Tate.I agree that McCoy is pretty good value in the third, but that question has an easy answer. It's because he threw lots and lots of really really short passes.If McCoy has such a weak arm, which "experts" have noted, how does he have such a high completion percentage?
It would have been interesting if McCoy played with top OL and the weapons that Bradford had to see what his draft status would have been.Blackjacks said:Bradford is far and above the best in this classMcCoy is OVERRATED even in the third round
LOL - McCoy did break most of his records...Applewhite wasn't even drafted though.McCoy will have a slightly better career than Major Applewhite
I would rather overdraft a qb in bottom of 3rd rd vs overdrafting a qb with the very first pick of the draft. Bradford is far more overrated than McCoy. I think Bradford is the better prospect, but no way was he even close to being the top player in this draft.Blackjacks said:Bradford is far and above the best in this classMcCoy is OVERRATED even in the third round
Though I don't agree that Clausen is the best of the class, I do think he'll have the best opportunity to shine. He fell into a more ideal offense than the others...Clausen will be the best QB of this class IMO. I agree with others who feel this class is pretty weak. I don't think there are any franchise caliber QBs in it and in reality I think the best we can hope for is to come away with 2 average starters of this group. I'm fairly confident that Clausen will be 1 of those 2.
Which is why he's perfect for the West Coast offense. I think overall Bradford>McCoy>Clausen>LeFevour>Pike>TebowDue to circumstances:Clausen>McCoy>Bradford>Clausen couldn't have asked for a better landing spot considering it's the same offense and terminology in Carolina that he ran at Notre Dame.I agree that McCoy is pretty good value in the third, but that question has an easy answer. It's because he threw lots and lots of really really short passes.If McCoy has such a weak arm, which "experts" have noted, how does he have such a high completion percentage?
Not really. UT's passing game was less dynamic than OU's because of McCoy's limitations as a passer.It would have been interesting if McCoy played with top OL and the weapons that Bradford had to see what his draft status would have been.Blackjacks said:Bradford is far and above the best in this classMcCoy is OVERRATED even in the third round
They should have taken Clausen and Golden Tate so that we could have had two games a year of Catholics versus Convicts when they play Pitt.McCoy's career was killed the moment the Browns selected him.
LOL - McCoy did break most of his records...Applewhite wasn't even drafted though.McCoy will have a slightly better career than Major Applewhite
Did yinz get rid of Shaun Rogers? I must've missed that oneThey should have taken Clausen and Golden Tate so that we could have had two games a year of Catholics versus Convicts when they play Pitt.McCoy's career was killed the moment the Browns selected him.
This is just dumb on so many levels.Bradford is definitely the better of the two but McCoy landed in a great spot for himself. He will have a good line in front of him, the offense in place suits his strengths, and he has some pretty good minds at his disposal. That being said, I would still say that McCoy's chances of having a better career than Bradford is around 20%.McCoy's career was killed the moment the Browns selected him.
I think Skelton is a sleeper and may end up being the best QB of this class.
Anyone?I don't follow college football, all I do is read about prospects. But everything I've read pretty much raves about him - hyper-accurate, adequate arm, smart. The only knocks that I consistently see are his shoulder and he didn't play in a pro-style offense. Yet I see a lot of people put Bradford down, nobody seems to think he can be elite, and I'm just wondering why.If Bradford stays healthy, what does he lack that prevents him from having super-star upside?
Is this really true? I know zero about college football so I'm asking honestly here.Here are some YPA stats:I agree that McCoy is pretty good value in the third, but that question has an easy answer. It's because he threw lots and lots of really really short passes.If McCoy has such a weak arm, which "experts" have noted, how does he have such a high completion percentage?
McCoy is a check down/tunnel vision machine.Is this really true? I know zero about college football so I'm asking honestly here.Here are some YPA stats:I agree that McCoy is pretty good value in the third, but that question has an easy answer. It's because he threw lots and lots of really really short passes.If McCoy has such a weak arm, which "experts" have noted, how does he have such a high completion percentage?
Colt McCoy
2006 - 8.08
2007 - 7.79
2008 - 8.91
2009 - 7.49
Jimmy Clausen
2007 - 5.12
2008 - 7.21
2009 - 8.76
Sam Bradford
2007 - 9.15
2008 - 9.77
2009 - 8.15
Tim Tebow
2006 - 10.85
2007 - 9.39
2008 - 9.22
2009 - 9.22
According to the numbers McCoy doesn't look that bad. What's the reason for this perception then? I'd like to know what we've gotten ourselves into here![]()
They should put every QB threw that test.Skelton is very, very raw, but if he's willing to learn he could be a good QB in a couple years - maybe just after the Leinart experiment fails?I think Skelton is a sleeper and may end up being the best QB of this class.The
Um, okay...YPC stats:Colt McCoy2006 - 11.842007 - 11.972008 - 11.622009 - 10.61Jimmy Clausen2007 - 9.092008 - 11.842009 - 12.88Sam Bradford2007 - 13.172008 - 14.392009 - 14.41Tim Tebow2006 - 16.272007 - 14.042008 - 14.32009 - 13.59What should I take away from this. That Tim Tebow loves the deep ball more than Sam Bradford? That Colt McCoy and Jimmy Clausen are roughly the same in terms of how often they checkdown?Again, I've watched zero minutes of college football in 10 years, so I'm trying to find something that tells me that Colt McCoy is a "checkdown machine"Wouldnt it make more sense to look at yards per completion if you actually wanted to look at an honest statistic ????
The first part of your statement answers your question, watch any of McCoy's games against tougher opponents and you'll find that 'something' you're looking for.Again, I've watched zero minutes of college football in 10 years, so I'm trying to find something that tells me that Colt McCoy is a "checkdown machine"
Bradford and Gresham went down with season ending injuries.I am unsure about Bradford. It's definately fair to say most people are way higher on him than I am. One thing that comes to my mind is with Oklahoma, with all these top 5 players in the entire NFL draft, why wasn't this All Star team head and shoulders the best team in college? I have a feeling somebody's a bust in this group and overestimated how good they were because although Oklahoma was good, I didn't see a super team out on the field which is what this draft looked like for them.I'm in no way a negataive Nancy, there's been years where I like a whole bunch of QB's and I scratch my head saying to myself I know all these guys can't be good, it just doesn't work that way. This year, I'm just glad the teams I root for in Detroit and Dallas weren't in need of a QB (unless Dallas can land LeFevour late).
You're nuts.
You talkin' to me?ETA: For the sake of saving time/space, if you are talking to me, with which specific part(s) of my post do you take issue? Just curious.Lol no way
That partly maybe true, but the bigger part of the equation is the crap OL Texas had.Not really. UT's passing game was less dynamic than OU's because of McCoy's limitations as a passer.It would have been interesting if McCoy played with top OL and the weapons that Bradford had to see what his draft status would have been.Bradford is far and above the best in this classMcCoy is OVERRATED even in the third round
I'd say they're both true to some extent...but I wouldn't necessarily put it on the OL talent, more on the blocking scheme, running east and west out of the shotgun, predictability, and lack of commitment to the running game.A testament to the limitation of Colt's arm would seem to be indicated by the change to an offense that will work under center much more of the time with Garrett Gilbert, going deeper down the field much more often, and featuring more power looks, drive blocking (as opposed to zone looks and reaching), and straight-ahead running in the rushing attack this year.That's not to say he can't throw a deep ball or an out. He can in the right situations. He can't live off of it like some guys, though. He certainly isn't a guy I'd characterize as having a big arm.That partly maybe true, but the bigger part of the equation is the crap OL Texas had.Not really. UT's passing game was less dynamic than OU's because of McCoy's limitations as a passer.It would have been interesting if McCoy played with top OL and the weapons that Bradford had to see what his draft status would have been.Bradford is far and above the best in this classMcCoy is OVERRATED even in the third round
a twice fried throwing shoulder on a team with perhaps the worst O-line in NFL History that gives up an avg of 36 sacks/yr each of past 4 seasons, means this kid isn't going to last McCoy goes to a team with Holmgren as a GM so he'll get some sound advice, versus Bradford who goes to a team with perhaps the worst head coach in the NFL - Steve Spagnuolo - and an equally bad coaching staff..no wr's, no TE's, only Sjax to help out..Bradford has Tim Couch/Heath Shuler/J. Russell written all over him...out of the NFL within 4 years..David Carr was supposed to be the big Ticket Item,right? where's he now, a career backup...What sayeth you?
then i don't think you understand how football games championships are won.I would rather overdraft a qb in bottom of 3rd rd vs overdrafting a qb with the very first pick of the draft. Bradford is far more overrated than McCoy. I think Bradford is the better prospect, but no way was he even close to being the top player in this draft.Bradford is far and above the best in this class
McCoy is OVERRATED even in the third round
Generally, This.However, i do think Clausen is the best QB of the class. how more people don't understand how great a landing spot CAR is don't understand how important a solid running game is to a new QB.Though I don't agree that Clausen is the best of the class, I do think he'll have the best opportunity to shine. He fell into a more ideal offense than the others...Clausen will be the best QB of this class IMO. I agree with others who feel this class is pretty weak. I don't think there are any franchise caliber QBs in it and in reality I think the best we can hope for is to come away with 2 average starters of this group. I'm fairly confident that Clausen will be 1 of those 2.
This is one of the worst "thought out" posts I've seen in awhile.Why did you remove the Follows Closely: Browns from your profile?a twice fried throwing shoulder on a team with perhaps the worst O-line in NFL History that gives up an avg of 36 sacks/yr each of past 4 seasons, means this kid isn't going to last McCoy goes to a team with Holmgren as a GM so he'll get some sound advice, versus Bradford who goes to a team with perhaps the worst head coach in the NFL - Steve Spagnuolo - and an equally bad coaching staff..no wr's, no TE's, only Sjax to help out..Bradford has Tim Couch/Heath Shuler/J. Russell written all over him...out of the NFL within 4 years..David Carr was supposed to be the big Ticket Item,right? where's he now, a career backup...What sayeth you?![]()