I think he bailed on the fumble because a team mate was diving for it and Cam thought that team mate had it. Watch the replay.
Cam's backing away as DeMarcus Ware stretches out and has a hand on it.
https://twitter.com/ugafootballlive/status/696752061694681089
He saw 67 in motion, and he almost got it. We cant see Cams peripheral but Im pretty sure he saw that guy.
Wasn't even in his field of vision. But even if he was, Cam was right on top of the ball. He just bailed.
Not in his field of vision? Does he have tunnel vision or peripheral vision like every other NFL player? One would think that if he couldn't see people from his left side in the periphery that he likely wouldn't be playing in the NFL.No one but him know what he was thinking, but watch it again. He is initially going for it, so why back away? Personally, I think he sees Ware and Kalil and figure he can't just pick it up so he stops and goes where he thinks it may squirt out. Amazingly enough, watch where the ball goes when Kalil comes in, it goes towards where Newton ends up and hits him in the leg. Amazingly enough, he is an NFL QB who has likely seen a few more fumbles and scrambles than you have. I'll bet, he's seen that happen. Maybe he knew Ware didn't quite have it, but he has no chance to get it with Kalil diving so he is playing what he thinks will happen and what does happen. Did Ware get it when he reaches? Did Kalil when he dives over? The answer is No and No, so if Newton goes straight down, would he have gotten it? No.
Sorry, but to just say he decided he didn't want to risk it is just nonsense. Maybe he did bail on it, but the fact that he initially goes towards it and then is closer to the ball where he ends up and it does squirt out when neither Ware nor Kalil gets it IMHO says that I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt that he actually thought about where the ball would end up and didn't bail.
ETA: Please re-watch it and see where the ball ends up and where Newton's leg and hand is, i.e. touching the ball. Feel free to say that in bailing, he ended up right where the ball went. Wouldn't bailing mean he would get out of the scrum, not position himself on his knees with his hand trying to touch the ball? Seems like that is the opposite of bailing. Please post your thoughts after watching it with my "assumptions" of how he acted.