This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Gotta think this means BScott will get one game as starter...@Seattle week 8. Seahawks are #1 in the NFL is yds per carry (3.1) and #7 in rushing yds allowed per game. I'll be cutting Scott tonight.
scott's role has gradually increased this yr and last game he had 12 touches to benson's 17. there is a glimmer that this is trending towards rbbc, and scott can really force the issue with a big game as the workhorse.
Apparently they lumped in something in '10 with the lockout incident in order to do the suspension. I'm betting the grievance will continue against the NFLPA as regards the other 7 on that list.
He might have agreed to drop the NLRB petition, but it should be noted that the case to the NLRB was against the NFLPA (the Union) not the NFL (league).Without getting too technical, essentialy the NFLPA and NFL signed a "letter of understanding" which settled most of the disciplinary issues that arose during the lockout. What Benson was arguing in front of the NLRB was that the Union did not adequately represent him (among other things) - this is an "unfair labor practice". So, his case is against the Union, not the League.Now, of course, this doesn't mean that this couldn't all be resolved by reducing it to one game and Benson couldn't agree to drop the charge against the NFLPA, but it also doesn't clearly mean that the the ULP against the NFLPA is dropped either, since the NFL (employer) is the one issuing the suspension and the NLRB cause of action is between the employee (Benson) and his union (NFLPA)./L&E law nerdery.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.