This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Remember it sends a "message".. that the organization stinks
I mean this thread and this thread are both sitting on the front page. Even if it wasn't reported in either one, why not just post the news in their respective threads? No one likes clutter.
I believe the phrase you were looking for is "crap floats".
This. I know lots of folks want to keep a 1000 post going in order to keep it all together, but this title got my attention. I may have skipped over an old thread to avoid having to weed through chit chat about him.
Appreciate the notice Hairy. Mods can always combine the threads if they don't believe it needs it's own.Because he wanted to get the news out. I appreciate the new thread. I might have missed the news otherwise. I don't have Matthews, so I probably wouldn't have opened that thread. The Battle thread? I might have opened it, but the new thread for this new information is appropriate IMO. Besides, it's not my job or your job to decide if a new thread is thread worthy, that's what the Mods are for.
I hadn't seen it reported so I thought it was useful as well. Funny that you went from "this is already being reported" to "well it would fit well elsewhere" though.
Lot of schtick going on in that thread from last year when JC went down. Count me among those that didn't feeling like diving back in there for relevant news.
That link is to clearly flawed content:
WR1: Robert Meachem
Why do you care so much? THREAD POLICE
You are in $10k leagues? I'm jealous, I'm only in MFL's $10 leagues
I have zero interest in reading a Jackie Battle thread. I have zero interest reading a Ryan Matthews thread. I do have interest in reading that Battle is now starting ahead of Matthews.
That is interesting.New trend alert here...RB starters and RB closers.It looks like Mathews has been moved to the closer role.
I don't have Battle or Matthews rostered. I know that Battle has been getting a little playing time, but not really enough to make me wade into a thread about him unless I'm dying for RB help (which I'm not). However, if Battle is now starting above Matthews, that all of a sudden makes Battle interesting, and is news that I otherwise would have missed.
So we need three threads on the 1st page basically saying the same thing so lazy people can get their info.Cool.I don't have Battle or Matthews rostered. I know that Battle has been getting a little playing time, but not really enough to make me wade into a thread about him unless I'm dying for RB help (which I'm not). However, if Battle is now starting above Matthews, that all of a sudden makes Battle interesting, and is news that I otherwise would have missed.
Ah, I get it. So today when I realized W.Powell saw more field time than R.Williams last week, instead of posting it the William Powell thread I should have instead created a new topic. Thanks for the heads up.I don't have Battle or Matthews rostered. I know that Battle has been getting a little playing time, but not really enough to make me wade into a thread about him unless I'm dying for RB help (which I'm not). However, if Battle is now starting above Matthews, that all of a sudden makes Battle interesting, and is news that I otherwise would have missed.
Battle started the game last week. This thread is not breaking the news.I don't have Battle or Matthews rostered. I know that Battle has been getting a little playing time, but not really enough to make me wade into a thread about him unless I'm dying for RB help (which I'm not). However, if Battle is now starting above Matthews, that all of a sudden makes Battle interesting, and is news that I otherwise would have missed.
this is some bizarre logic.I don't have Battle or Matthews rostered. I know that Battle has been getting a little playing time, but not really enough to make me wade into a thread about him unless I'm dying for RB help (which I'm not). However, if Battle is now starting above Matthews, that all of a sudden makes Battle interesting, and is news that I otherwise would have missed.
I'm just thankful we have so many self-appointed forum police here to keep these threads full of relevant material.So we need three threads on the 1st page basically saying the same thing so lazy people can get their info.Cool.I don't have Battle or Matthews rostered. I know that Battle has been getting a little playing time, but not really enough to make me wade into a thread about him unless I'm dying for RB help (which I'm not). However, if Battle is now starting above Matthews, that all of a sudden makes Battle interesting, and is news that I otherwise would have missed.
Actually we do. I don't follow the Battle threads as they have "jumped the shark" long ago and seem to humor a subset of the FFA more than the SP, which is fine but not for me. I don't follow Ryan Mathews cuz I purposely avoided him for his injury history and always felt he was overvalued. But if not for the headline of the OP, it's news that would have passed me by. Certainly newsworthy as a separate thread as a topic of the day. Interesting to me to see a division rival bench their star RB starter they were building around.So we need three threads on the 1st page basically saying the same thing so lazy people can get their info.Cool.I don't have Battle or Matthews rostered. I know that Battle has been getting a little playing time, but not really enough to make me wade into a thread about him unless I'm dying for RB help (which I'm not). However, if Battle is now starting above Matthews, that all of a sudden makes Battle interesting, and is news that I otherwise would have missed.
You're welcome.I have never tried to be "forum police" and didnt even do so here. I do however, reserve the right to point out my opinion on things.I'm just thankful we have so many self-appointed forum police here to keep these threads full of relevant material.So we need three threads on the 1st page basically saying the same thing so lazy people can get their info.Cool.I don't have Battle or Matthews rostered. I know that Battle has been getting a little playing time, but not really enough to make me wade into a thread about him unless I'm dying for RB help (which I'm not). However, if Battle is now starting above Matthews, that all of a sudden makes Battle interesting, and is news that I otherwise would have missed.
Me to. Because I am sick of the front page being polluted with multiple threads about the same topic. Self appointed forum police spamming a thread is a lot better than people spamming the entire forum with redundant threads.I'm just thankful we have so many self-appointed forum police here to keep these threads full of relevant material.So we need three threads on the 1st page basically saying the same thing so lazy people can get their info.Cool.I don't have Battle or Matthews rostered. I know that Battle has been getting a little playing time, but not really enough to make me wade into a thread about him unless I'm dying for RB help (which I'm not). However, if Battle is now starting above Matthews, that all of a sudden makes Battle interesting, and is news that I otherwise would have missed.
It's not newsworthy because he started the game LAST week and that is the only reason he was listed on the depth chart this week.Funny that people claim to "not care" about Mathews or Battle but will open and post in a thread simply b/c the title is provocative and ignoring the fact that there is no actual news here other than the fact that Chargers.com updated the depth chart based on who started a game LAST week.Actually we do. I don't follow the Battle threads as they have "jumped the shark" long ago and seem to humor a subset of the FFA more than the SP, which is fine but not for me. I don't follow Ryan Mathews cuz I purposely avoided him for his injury history and always felt he was overvalued. But if not for the headline of the OP, it's news that would have passed me by. Certainly newsworthy as a separate thread as a topic of the day. Interesting to me to see a division rival bench their star RB starter they were building around.So we need three threads on the 1st page basically saying the same thing so lazy people can get their info.Cool.I don't have Battle or Matthews rostered. I know that Battle has been getting a little playing time, but not really enough to make me wade into a thread about him unless I'm dying for RB help (which I'm not). However, if Battle is now starting above Matthews, that all of a sudden makes Battle interesting, and is news that I otherwise would have missed.
