tommyGunZ
Footballguy
It is what it is said:The Oakland defense actually looked pretty good.

It is what it is said:The Oakland defense actually looked pretty good.
One pass attempt is the minimum, not 14. QB rating formula. (You are thinking of the season-long minimum, but there's no minimum for individual games.)It is what it is said:If my math is correct, 11 pass attempts is not enough to qualify Rivers in the QB rating. Rivers would have needed 14 pass attempts tonight (224 per season minimum).I'm pretty sure Philip Rivers has the highest QB rating in the NFL so far this season, coming in at 133.9.
Nope. The 1979 Seahawks lost 24-0 to the LA Rams in week 10. They finished with -7 yards and gained only one first down!I ask this in all seriousness.Is Oakland's performance tonight the worst offensive display of all time?
That is not what MT is saying. Whether or not Rivers qualifies for the "QB rating leader" does not have any bearing on the fact that Rivers currently has the highest QB rating in the NFL thus far, which was MT's original point.It is what it is said:Right and 224 pass attempts per season (16 games) would break down to 14 pass attempts per game (Rivers had 11). Otherwise say if Kelly Holcomb went and threw just one pass for a touchdown in fifteen games, then he would be the QB rating leader all year long according to what you are saying. http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=tmq/020813One pass attempt is the minimum, not 14. QB rating formula. (You are thinking of the season-long minimum, but there's no minimum for individual games.)It is what it is said:If my math is correct, 11 pass attempts is not enough to qualify Rivers in the QB rating. Rivers would have needed 14 pass attempts tonight (224 per season minimum).I'm pretty sure Philip Rivers has the highest QB rating in the NFL so far this season, coming in at 133.9.
Better yet, win a divisional game in the last three years. The Raiders are about 2- 15 in that time span against the rest of the AFC West.Hey, at least we're actually TRYING. Win a Super Bowl post 1984. It does wonders for the "Commitment to Excellence."Win a playoff game post 1996. It does wonders for the fanbase.What a ####### joke of a franchise. I mean, how ####ed up do you have to be with a team this ####ty and still showing up to games in Darth Raider gear?
With this game and this warm laptop in my crotch, it's a wonder I'm not sleeping by now.
seriouslyWhat a thread! If you didn't read this thread yet and you have some time to kill, I highly recommend reading this thread. The all-star cast of comedic genius was alive and well last night. I'm still laughing after reading some of these posts. At least 8 posts had me laughing out loud all by myself. Quality stuff!![]()
![]()
It is worth noting that that Seahawks team wound up #4 in the NFL in scoring and #7 in yardage for the year, despite racking up negative yardage in one game. Steve Largent finished as the #1 WR that year (the only time he accomplished that feat).So, there is the meaning of, "it's only one game."sterjs said:Nope. The 1979 Seahawks lost 24-0 to the LA Rams in week 10. They finished with -7 yards and gained only one first down!Raging Alpaca said:I ask this in all seriousness.Is Oakland's performance tonight the worst offensive display of all time?
So whatever happened to this? I was listening intently at home for the deafening roar of the Raider Nation to severely intimidate Rivers. Maybe ESPN had the external microphones turned off?Raiii-derrrs! Raiii-derrrs! Just a reminder that you can help make the First Drive Experiment a success on Monday night. To recap, the goal is to chant the familiar “Raiii-derrrs” war cry during San Diego's first offensive drive in order to freak out Philip Rivers and the Chargers; to pump up our team; and to serve notice to a national television audience that the Raider Nation is still loud and proud.This idea has been met with considerable enthusiasm on several Raiders sites and forums. I have also received several emails about it (thanks to Chris P. for today’s email). As stated before, I think there are three keys to making it happen:1. Keep the concept simple by focusing on the first drive. The chant might emerge at other points in the game, but the initial concept needs to be clear and simple in order to get the word out.2. Spread the word. You can click on the email icon below to quickly send this take to all of your Raider Nation friends. I encourage other Raiders forums and outlets to also run with this idea and help spread the word. It won’t happen unless we can get reach a critical mass of fans.3. Get the Oakland Raiders organization involved. How can we get the team to flash “Raiii-derrs” on the scoreboard during the Chargers’ first offensive drive? That would really help get the crowd into it. If anyone has the right connections, please speak up.Wouldn’t it be cool if we could pull it off? Personally, I would freak out. Imagine 60,000 fans chanting “Raiii-derrrs” in unison to kick off the season.From the RAIDER TAKE fan site
Same here. I called Marty every name in the book during that ad nauseum third quarter run-run-pass-punt debacle. The Raiders fans around me were astonished since it was clear Oakland was stacking everyone on the line. Nobody was going to get through that.bump...I went to the game last night so I missed this thread. Classic thread and the things you guys were posting is what myself and the folks around me were screaming all night. I was the only Charger fan in my section (along with my Raider fan buddies who kept me alive) and I was screaming the whole 3rd quarter for Marty to call a passing play. The game was pretty much a joke in the 2nd half but I have to hand it to the Raider fans around me, they kept the one liners coming all night and they tore everyone on the Raiders organization a new one the whole 2nd half. The whole game was one bigmoment.Great thread guys, you made 23 pages worth it!
Never happened.So whatever happened to this? I was listening intently at home for the deafening roar of the Raider Nation to severely intimidate Rivers. Maybe ESPN had the external microphones turned off?Raiii-derrrs! Raiii-derrrs! Just a reminder that you can help make the First Drive Experiment a success on Monday night. To recap, the goal is to chant the familiar “Raiii-derrrs” war cry during San Diego's first offensive drive in order to freak out Philip Rivers and the Chargers; to pump up our team; and to serve notice to a national television audience that the Raider Nation is still loud and proud.This idea has been met with considerable enthusiasm on several Raiders sites and forums. I have also received several emails about it (thanks to Chris P. for today’s email). As stated before, I think there are three keys to making it happen:1. Keep the concept simple by focusing on the first drive. The chant might emerge at other points in the game, but the initial concept needs to be clear and simple in order to get the word out.2. Spread the word. You can click on the email icon below to quickly send this take to all of your Raider Nation friends. I encourage other Raiders forums and outlets to also run with this idea and help spread the word. It won’t happen unless we can get reach a critical mass of fans.3. Get the Oakland Raiders organization involved. How can we get the team to flash “Raiii-derrs” on the scoreboard during the Chargers’ first offensive drive? That would really help get the crowd into it. If anyone has the right connections, please speak up.Wouldn’t it be cool if we could pull it off? Personally, I would freak out. Imagine 60,000 fans chanting “Raiii-derrrs” in unison to kick off the season.From the RAIDER TAKE fan site
and of those 48.. Most likely 35 were really OFFENSIVE!!!I just counted it up in the gamebook.
The Raiders ran 48 offensive plays.
Not including penalties, 11 of them resulted in negative yardage.
That's 23%.
It was a lackluster performance overall. I was impressed with Thomas Howard though - after the 1st quarter it seemed like he (and Lechler) were the only Raiders who looked like they were actually trying.tommyGunZ said:I thought the Raider defense looked like garbage. They gave up 27 pts. to the most conservatively called offensive game I've ever seen. And it's not like the Bolts had short fields - the Raiders only turned the ball over once.
I cut off three cyber partners just to keep up with this thread. I was faking it just to run back here.Had to go to bed around page 15 or so. Very well done game thread. Had much more fun in here then watching the actual game.
Remember you were impressed with his pass protection above his run blocking? Well, there's certainly no worries about his run blocking. I thought he tired late in the game, but in the first half he was dominant. Yet another collegian who looks the same in the NFL as he did in college.eta Groovus, I meant to reply to MT. Same thing tho...McNeill did much, much better than I thought he'd do.
You think that's bad; I lost by 0.5 points in a 0.5 ppr league.That swing pass to LT that went incomplete in the 3rd qtr. killed me because LT was going 40+ yards or all the way for a TD if he caught that ball. Shick!'s man love for LT would have reached epidemic proportions.
Ouch.I still managed to win my game but only by a little, my opponent had Gates so I sweated the whole game.You think that's bad; I lost by 0.5 points in a 0.5 ppr league.That swing pass to LT that went incomplete in the 3rd qtr. killed me because LT was going 40+ yards or all the way for a TD if he caught that ball. Shick!'s man love for LT would have reached epidemic proportions.
... i'm still pissed off http://www24.myfantasyleague.com/2006/live...HISES=0005_0009You think that's bad; I lost by 0.5 points in a 0.5 ppr league.That swing pass to LT that went incomplete in the 3rd qtr. killed me because LT was going 40+ yards or all the way for a TD if he caught that ball. Shick!'s man love for LT would have reached epidemic proportions.
I do remember, he looked like a completely different player last night than he did two weeks ago. Probably the cast he was wearing then had a lot to do with it, I'd imagine it's tough to play LT with that kind of impediment.Remember you were impressed with his pass protection above his run blocking? Well, there's certainly no worries about his run blocking. I thought he tired late in the game, but in the first half he was dominant. Yet another collegian who looks the same in the NFL as he did in college.eta Groovus, I meant to reply to MT. Same thing tho...McNeill did much, much better than I thought he'd do.
Why not some of both? I think that's a very likely outcome.I'm really torn. I don't know what I want more: for San Diego to be this good or for Oakland to be this bad.
i'm disappointed no one recorded arnold's "miracle performance" line... that would be bookmarked for sure.Marlon McCree's KO
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZCkhdQxXJQ
Shawne Merriman vs Robert Gallery
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hk7cs0IQgF4
Pass to Parker and Gates TD
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHactO6bE0U
Moss Penalty
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEjNM4Jagrs
Marty
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Md5B2GVJ9lo
I've used this line before, but I enjoy it so I'll use it again....My chances of making sweet sweet love to Salma HayekMy best friend is a Raiders fan (), and he just told me that he thinks a 12-4 record for them is still reasonable.
![]()
It was a bad handoff. Jordan never actually got the ball so it was likely charged to the QB.so question for you guys... was talking to a buddy whose FF team I faced in a Yahoo league, and he said something about Lamont Jordan fumbling (or so he thought, as well as the awesome announcers (), but the scoresheet shows differently. Did the announcers just fumble the call? I only ask because if it was Jordan, I win the matchup, if it wasn't, he wins.
![]()
I need to save this discussion. I laughed my ### off while reading this.